Todd Chrisley addresses Julie Chrisley's 'dark' post-prison look
He added "when I first saw you when I got out of that car, I started thinking about going back, but then I thought, let me embrace this -- this is a moment." Julie replied, "Are you kidding me, right now?" when Todd admitted "it was a rough moment because I had never seen you dark in my life."
Julie then said, "I know that, Todd, but I didn't have any choice." The Chrisley's jabs at each other were well documented and helped them gain a loyal following on their USA Network show "Chrisley Knows Best," which ran for 10 seasons from 2014 to 2023.
In June 2022, the Chrisleys -- who portrayed themselves as real estate tycoons in the South -- were found guilty of conspiring to defraud community banks in Atlanta out of more than $36 million in fraudulent loans, defraud the IRS and commit tax evasion. Julie was additionally convicted of obstruction of justice and wire fraud.
In late May, Trump shared that he was pardoning the couple in a conversation from the White House with their middle daughter, Savannah Chrisley, who long advocated for their release and spoke last summer at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee.
Contributing: KiMi Robinson
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Julie Lin shares why she has 'stepped away from restaurants'
'Fusion is a symbol of strength, and it's a symbol of how people have migrated over here and created a cuisine that's powerful and gives them a means of survival,' says Julie, 'food is political, and it's always connected to the movement of people." "I think fusion got a bad name in the 80s, and 90s, which I want to try and reclaim, because fusion really explains the cuisine of Malaysia, where it's so diverse and it's made up of different cultures.' Fusion has a firm place in Scotland too. Sama Sama reads as part cookbook, part manifesto for how to bring cultures together in the kitchen. 'We have a very narrow view of authenticity,' says Julie, 'In my restaurants I would often have people who weren't Malaysian saying to me, 'that's not authentic Malaysian food'. I don't really understand what that means, because authentic Malaysian food would be going to Malaysia and eating food of Malaysian tradition. 'I want us to broaden our ideas of authenticity. I actually find it very authentic to use Scottish herbs, or samphire in a stir fry rather than bean sprouts when they're local and in season. I find that more authentic to the movement of people and how you enjoy food in different countries and climates. 'A phrase that I often hear is, 'Chinese takeaway food is not real Chinese food'. I don't think you can say that, because it would make the journeys of so many people that have emigrated from China to open Chinese takeaways and restaurants almost invalid. "That's part of immigration, where you get a hybrid cuisine of what people know how to cook and what works here. I think Chinese takeaways really epitomise that. It might be different from regional cuisine in China, but there's definitely validity to that, and strength.' (Image: Kate Seabrook) Sama Sama is a deeply personal book, interwoven with Julie's experiences of growing up mixed-race in Glasgow, starting a restaurant at a young age, and of her mum's immigration from Malaysia to Scotland to work as a NHS nurse. Every story adds a deeper understanding of ingredients, recipes and approaches to cooking. Chapters include 'Authentically in Between', exploration of the duality of Julie's cooking, and 'Learning for the Motherland' which are family recipes. Sama Sama aims to instill kitchen confidence, and encourage cooks to season 'Agak-Agak': until a dish is just right for your palate, or as Julie's cousin, quoted in the book says, 'season the dish until the ghost of our ancestors tells you to stop.' There's a chapter of solo meals: 'Cook when Nobody's Watching,' and plenty of reminders that it's always worth making something delicious just for you. Sama Sama has had a rapturous response with new fans including Nigella Lawson, whose work hugely inspired Julie as a young chef. It's also giving a voice to many people with dual heritage who have been reaching out to Julie, finding recognition in her pages: 'I was speaking to a girl who's Norwegian – Indonesian,' says Julie. 'She said now I want to try and cook a Norwegian stew with Indonesian flavours. I think that's amazing. It's really nice to hear of people doing the same thing and embracing that world of fusion.' Crucially, Julie's family in both countries are also delighted with the book. (Image: Kate Seabrook) 'My family have been so lovely,' she says, 'I got to show my Malaysian family the book when I was there for Lunar New Year. My family are a very supportive, loving bunch anyway, and the book felt like a vessel to explain how it's been being Scottish-Malaysian, a bit like a manual of how my brain works.' Having stepped away from restaurants Julie is currently in demand for pop-up food events, and on television, appearing on Channel 4's Sunday Brunch, presenting a food documentary for BBC's 'Discovering the World's Table' and becoming a frequent guest on BBC's Saturday Kitchen. 'I still have restaurants in my bones,' she says, 'but when you work in food, people expect you to work in restaurants. I want to see if there are other avenues to look into, maybe making products, and definitely book two. Finding a brilliant food community has been really important to me. So that's what this next year is going to be about, which is very exciting.' Sama Sama by Julie Lin (Ebury Press, £28) Photography by Liz Seabrook
Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Tourists 'poisoned' after drinking fake grappa at Putin's favourite resort
At least 12 people have died and there are fears the death toll could rise after dangerous fake alcohol was sold at a Russian market. The dodgy alcohol was sold at a market in Sochi, Vladimir Putin's favourite holiday resort on the Black Sea and host of the 2014 Winter Olympics. Three members of a family of four are among the dead after drinking the alcohol, bought from a market known as Bazar or Kazachiy. The victims, who suffered methanol poisoning, reportedly went blind, became unable to stand or speak, and eventually lost consciousness before their deaths. Two people have since been detained on suspicion of distributing fake alcohol following a raid of the market stall where the fake alcohol is believed to have been sold. In the meantime, the Russian government has issued a warning not to drink 'alcohol-containing products of unknown origin'. Among the dead are Maxim Smetanin, 37, and his wife Darya, 35, who bought the alcohol while holidaying in Sochi. Darya reportedly 'went blind and then lost consciousness' after having sipped at the fake grappa during their long-distance train journey home. She was rushed from the train to hospital in Russia's Voronezh region but died soon afterwards. While her husband felt fine initially, he died not long after his wife having 'gone blind, his kidneys collapsed and he fell into a coma'. At first, when the family of four all felt unwell after drinking the dodgy alcohol, they assumed they had a hangover. 'By the evening, they were unable to stand or speak, and began losing consciousness,' local reports said. 'Paramedics took all four to hospital, but only one could be saved.' The family have not yet been named but the three who died have been confirmed as a 42-year-old man and two women aged 57 and 69. Another tourist went blind and died from kidney failure after drinking the concoction, and two other female tourists, from Chelyabinsk, died after returning to their home city from their trip to Sochi. More Trending Two people, named as Olesya, 31, and Eteri, 71, have been detained on suspicion of distributing the fake alcohol, which was called 'chacha'. Russian Interior Ministry spokeswoman Maj-Gen Irina Volk said: 'Preliminary findings indicate that the detainees were selling homemade alcoholic beverages at the local Kazachiy market. 'Efforts are currently underway to identify the producer of the life-threatening alcohol and others involved in the illegal activity.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Trump and Putin to meet 'in the coming days' but who knows if Zelensky is going MORE: When the world 'likely' ends you can blame these three people, expert says MORE: Russia's warning to 'everyone' after Trump moved nuclear submarines
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘It's not a coincidence': after Ghislaine Maxwell's prison move … what next?
When Ghislaine Maxwell was transferred to a minimum security prison camp last week, despite being convicted of sex trafficking for Jeffrey Epstein, her move fueled ever-growing speculation about authorities' handling of the late financier's crimes. For many, the timing of Maxwell's sudden relocation from a Florida penitentiary to a Texas lockup known for its more campus feel and celebrity inmates was especially suspect – with two Epstein victims reportedly describing the event as a 'cover-up'. Maxwell, who was found guilty in 2021 of luring girls into Epstein's abusive world, met with the deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, one week before the move. This sit-down with Blanche – who defended Donald Trump in criminal proceedings before working in his justice department – came amid extensive criticism of the president's botched release of Epstein investigative files. The Epstein scandal is once again roiling American politics with many especially focused on the exact nature of Trump's own social links to Epstein, who killed himself in a New York jail cell in 2019. Trump had vowed on the campaign trail to release the Epstein files, a siren song to the many Maga devotees convinced that a network of elites protected Epstein and potentially participated in his sex trafficking of teen girls. But Trump's justice department then later released a memorandum stating that there was no Epstein client list and elected not to release extensive case files. Following the backtracking, several reports highlighting Trump's past ties to Epstein stoked still more suspicion. The Wall Street Journal published an article alleging that Trump contributed a 'bawdy' letter to a birthday book for Epstein. Not long after this story was published, Trump said that he had instructed the justice department to request unsealing of grand jury transcripts in Epstein and Maxwell's criminal proceedings. The newspaper on 23 July reported that his attorney general, Pam Bondi, told him that there were multiple instances of his name in the Epstein files, potentially negating whatever benefit he hoped would come from his grand jury directive. The House oversight committee on Tuesday subpoenaed Trump's justice department for Epstein investigation files, per the Associated Press – further amplifying comment surrounding Maxwell's improved prison conditions. Several longtime defense attorneys said that Maxwell's reassignment to FPC Bryan suggested she provided useful information to the justice department officials she talked with. It's also possible that this transfer foreshadows still better conditions for Maxwell – including possible release, they speculated. 'My thinking is: if it walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck,' said Randy Zelin, a longtime defense attorney who has taught law at Cornell Law School. 'If someone who is in a really not nice prison gets moved to a nicer prison, there is typically a reason behind that, and it's not merely because you are the next contestant on The Price Is Right or today's your lucky day. 'It would appear to me that when Ms Maxwell was questioned under what we call a 'proffer agreement' by the government, the answers that she gave were found to be credible, they were found to be truthful and they were found to be helpful,' Zelin said. 'In exchange for her being helpful and being truthful and being candid and being cooperative, she had a [benefit] conferred upon her, which is: she's in much nicer digs than she was before she provided her help to the government.' While the Bureau of Prisons has discretion over inmate placement, Zelin surmises there was probably an agreement between the correctional agency and the justice department to move Maxwell. 'It's not a coincidence, and it's either because she's helping the Department of Justice go after other people, or she has more or less exonerated the president, and she has told the Department of Justice that she knows of absolutely nothing inappropriate, untoward or gross that took place between the president and Jeffrey Epstein,' Zelin said. Asked if one should look at Maxwell's move as a one-off, Zelin said no. 'This is the beginning, not the end.' For Sam Bassett, a criminal defense attorney with Austin, Texas-based law firm Minton, Bassett, Flores & Carsey, publicity surrounding Maxwell's meeting is particularly interesting. 'One of the things that intrigued me about the whole situation with her interview is how public it was and how public her lawyer was about it. I know that when my clients cooperate, either post conviction or even before they're convicted, it's something that I like to keep under wraps,' Bassett said. He noted that one reason for privacy surrounding meetings and cooperation is because other inmates tend to look down upon those who cooperate. 'So it really flagged to me that this was kind of a political move on a lawyer's part. It puts some pressure on the president or his staff to consider a pardon or commutation at some point.' As for Maxwell's transfer, Bassett said it could stem from security reasons – such as threats at her previous prison in Florida – or her lawyers requested a move. But it was 'unusual' that a person found culpable of such a serious crime as sex trafficking would end up in a prison camp. 'Maybe it's to be a recognition for cooperation, giving her more freedom, so to speak, in a facility,' he said, noting that a move to a lower-security facility might be considered a favor to some. 'The question is: is this a foreshadowing of bigger favors to come? Neama Rahmani, founder of West Coast Trial lawyers and a former federal prosecutor, said there were multiple possibilities behind the move. 'It could be something huge or just a mere coincidence,' Rahmani said. 'The Bureau of Prisons has complete control over inmate placement, and especially when you deal with female inmates, there's not as many facilities, so the options are more limited.' Rahmani said that sex trafficking was considered a more serious crime, a crime of violence, 'so her being moved to a minimum security camp would be atypical, but it's not unheard of'. That said, the chronology continues to raise many questions. Maxwell met with Blanche, she is vying for relief from the US supreme court, and potentially will testify before Congress. 'The timing of it all leads me to believe that maybe something big is really happening, and by something big, that has to be a cooperation, right? That's really all she has to offer.' For Maxwell, relief could take the form of prosecutors requesting a resentencing, prison officials moving her to home confinement, or a pardon. A veteran legal public relations expert, who spoke under the condition of anonymity as they have clients in federal custody, surmised Maxwell 'must have provided prosecutors with information that was valuable enough post conviction for her to warrant these more favorable sentencing conditions – and they're considerably more favorable'. 'The interesting thing to outsiders is it appears that she's a cooperating witness, though, at this point, she's cooperating against a corpse, and a corpse cannot be convicted,' they said. The public relations veteran described the Maxwell-Blanche meeting as 'part one' of a process potentially resulting in better sentencing conditions. 'Part two is the public finding out, through DoJ disclosure, what information she actually provided,' they said. 'I do think that there's going to be some mechanism for them to release what she shared – and I think what she shared was indeed favorable enough to secure these lessened conditions.' Asked for comment about Maxwell's transfer, a senior administration official said: 'Any false assertion this individual was given preferential treatment is absurd. Prisoners are routinely moved in some instances due to death threats, and significant safety and danger concerns.' Trump's justice department pointed to Blanche's tweet about his meeting with Maxwell, in which he said they 'will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time'. Neither the Bureau of Prisons nor Maxwell's lawyer immediately responded to requests for comment.
