Florida GOP, DeSantis may follow Texas's lead
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) said Wednesday he is 'very seriously' looking at asking the state Legislature to redraw the state's congressional map, arguing the 2020 census is flawed.
Rep. Jimmy Patronis (R-Fla.) came out in favor of redistricting in a post on social platform X, writing that 'Texas can do it, the Free State of Florida can do it 10X better.'
Florida Republicans say they were already headed in this direction following a state Supreme Court decision that upheld a congressional map supported by DeSantis and state Republicans.
But the plan is gaining even more traction in the wake of Texas Republicans' unveiling of a new congressional map.
'It's picking up steam,' Florida GOP Chair Evan Power told The Hill. 'We were probably heading there with the court decision, but Texas made it top news.'
Florida has seen an uptick in population growth following the coronavirus pandemic in 2020.
The state has also become solidly Republican over the past decade, with Republicans growing their representation in Congress and once-Democratic strongholds like Miami-Dade and Osceola counties flipping from blue to red.
A number of Democratic-held congressional seats could be impacted if redistricting were to take place, including those held in south Florida by Reps. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Jared Moskowitz and Lois Frankel. Rep. Kathy Castor (D) in the Tampa area and Rep. Darren Soto (D) outside of Orlando have also been floated as possible targets.
Florida Republicans already hold a 20 to 8 advantage over Democrats in the congressional delegation.
Republicans were boosted last month when the state's Supreme Court ruled to uphold a congressional map that blocked a challenge to the elimination of a majority-Black congressional district in the north of the state that previously was represented by former Rep. Al Lawson (D). The area that comprised the former congressional district is now divided among three Republican lawmakers.
But DeSantis is not stopping there.
The governor has argued that Florida got a 'raw deal' in the 2020 census when the state only gained one congressional seat. The governor said last month he had relayed his concerns to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick after he was sworn in earlier this year and that the Trump administration could be pursuing redoing the census.
Additionally, the governor said he believes Florida's Fair District amendments, which a majority of voters approved of in 2010, could conflict with the U.S. Constitution. The amendments say that districts cannot be drawn in a way that hinders minorities voting for their choice of elected representatives.
'There's a lot of people who believe that the Fair District Amendments is unconstitutional, because what it does is, it mandates having race predominate,' DeSantis said this week. 'Whereas, neutrality should really be the constitutional standard.'
Patronis also said in his X post that he believes the Fair District Amendments are unconstitutional 'because it violates freedom of speech AND elections are a states rights issue.'
'Time to add more conservatives to Congress, so we can better deliver on President Trump's agenda, finally win the war against woke, cut government waste, and create an economy that moves our country into a new age of prosperity,' Patronis said.
Republicans argue that DeSantis and the state's Republicans could be setting an example for other red states to follow.
'DeSantis here sees an opportunity to be a trailblazer for the Republican Party in this sense in that he could be setting up a pilot program that Texas and some of the other states can actually follow,' a Florida Republican strategist said.
'Let's not disillusion ourselves, if he pulls this off, he will be a fan favorite of one person who sits at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,' the strategist added, referring to Trump.
So far, Republicans in the Florida state Legislature have remained publicly quiet about the prospect of pursuing redistricting. This year's state legislative session was extended from 60 days to 105 days and saw tensions emerge between DeSantis and members of his own party.
State Rep. Alex Andrade, a vocal Republican critic of DeSantis, said he has not spoken to his colleagues about redistricting. The state lawmaker noted he would support the effort only if the census was redone.
'I get the partisan argument,' Andrade told The Hill. 'I understand we could make hay right now and benefit Republicans but at some point do I care more about my party or the Constitution?'
'If the census were redone, I'd jump all over it,' he said.
Florida Democrats warn that a move by DeSantis and the state's Republicans would set a negative precedent.
'It would mean that the governor and the state legislative branch would completely capitulate under Donald Trump,' state House Minority Leader Fentrice Driskell (D) said. 'It's not supposed to be that the president gets to act like a king and say 'do this on my behalf.''
In a Facebook video posted by Rep. Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), Soto accused Republicans of wanting to cheat in the election.
'They want to pick their voters rather than voters picking their representatives,' he said. 'You'll see us do whatever we can in the courts to make sure that the Fair Districts Amendments are enforced.'
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesperson Madison Andrus dismissed the effort from Florida Republicans as 'a bold-faced attempt to save their flailing midterm performance by rigging the game.'
The effort comes as the nationwide redistricting war heats up and both parties seek to gain seats ahead of next year's midterm elections.
In addition to Republicans in Texas and potentially Florida taking a look at redistricting, Democrats in states like California and New Jersey are also exploring their options.
'There's an opportunity and if it better reflects the makeup of a state whether that's Texas or Florida, or to Gavin Newsom's point even California, then you should do it,' a national Republican strategist said.
'These redistricting efforts, if they comply with the law and meet all of the various federal thresholds to get mapped through, if you do that and do it quickly, you're going to increase the likelihood that the president and Republicans in Washington and going to be able to keep pushing things forward,' the strategist continued.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
20 minutes ago
- UPI
Texas AG to investigate O'Rourke-linked group amid map row
Texas has launched an investigation into Beto O'Rourke's Powered by People group in connection to Democrats who fled the state over the weekend. File Photo by Kevin Dietsch/UPI | License Photo Aug. 6 (UPI) -- Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Wednesday launched an investigation into potential Democratic presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke over allegations that he "bribed" Democratic state lawmakers who fled the Lone Star State to prevent Republicans from passing GOP-favorable congressional maps that critics say strip power from voters of color. Paxton announced the investigation amid a deepening row between the state's Democrats and Republicans. The state's minority Democrats fled Texas over the weekend to deny Republicans the quorum needed to certify the controversial maps. The state's Republican leadership has responded with threats of arrest and to vacate their congressional seats if they don't return by Friday, as well as investigations into anyone who solicits funds to support their effort. Paxton said Wednesday that he is investigating the O'Rourke-led Powered by People, which is reportedly covering the costs of Texas Democrats who fled the state. He also said the Powered by People group may have violated bribery laws and state laws, such as those governing campaign or officeholder contributions and expenditures, coercion of a public servant and abuse of office. "Any Democrat coward breaking the law by taking a Beto Bribe will be held accountable," Paxton said in a statement announcing the investigation. "These jet-setting runaways have already lost public trust by abandoning our state, and Texans deserve to know if they received illegal bribes to do it." The new maps, if certified, are expected to give Republicans five additional seats in the U.S. House of Representatives ahead of next year's midterm elections. Critics and Democrats argue that the maps draw lines that dilute the voting power of Latino and Black people, while serving as a power grab by President Donald Trump through rigging the GOP representation in the House. Democrats have widely supported their Texan colleagues' actions to prevent quorum. Republicans have viewed the move as a shirking from their responsibilities. O'Rourke has been traveling throughout several swing states, including Missouri, Wisconsin, Indianapolis, Nebraska and others, trying to generate grassroots support for the Texas Democrats. In response to the investigation, O'Rourke accused Paxton of hypocrisy. "The guy impeached for bribery is going after the folks trying to stop the theft of five congressional seats," he said on X. Paxton was impeached by the state House but was acquitted of all corruption charges by the Senate. The Republican attorney general has vowed that he will seek "aggressive legal action" against any Democrat who is not present at the House on Friday, while Abbott has called for their arrests.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump-Modi bromance sours over trade talks, Russian oil
During his first term, President Trump struck up an exuberant bromance with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, holding joint rallies in Texas and India and calling Modi one of 'America's greatest, most devoted, and most loyal friends.' While Modi was among the first heads of state to visit the White House in Trump's second term, the U.S.-India relationship has soured amid the president's trade war and push for peace in Ukraine. The president in recent days has publicly fumed over India's trade imbalance with the United States and its economic ties with Russia, threatening to 'substantially raise' a 25 percent tariff rate set to take effect in the coming days. The tensions are straining a partnership that both Republicans and Democrats view as essential in challenging China. 'I don't think that he wants to spoil his relationship with Modi,' Derek Grossman, professor of international relations at the University of Southern California, said of Trump. 'Again, he is personalistic, and if he feels like Modi is a great guy, a great friend, as he said, why ruin that? Well, there's got to be a reason to, and that's that the U.S. is being undermined in its policies by India.' Trump has singled out India as a particularly egregious trade foe amid his global trade war, citing a trade deficit of about $46 billion. India is also the second-largest importer of Russian oil after China. 'What people don't like to say about India — they're the highest tariff nation. They have the highest tariff of anybody. We do very, very little business with India because their tariffs are so high,' Trump said Tuesday. 'So we settled on 25 percent, but I think I'm going to raise that very substantially over the next 24 hours, because they're buying Russian oil. They're fueling the war machine, and if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be very happy.' Those remarks, echoed in a series of Truth Social posts in the days since, marked a stark change in tone. During Trump's first term, the two demonstrated a personal warmth and exchanged boisterous rallies — a 'Howdy Modi' rally in Texas in 2019 that drew a reported 50,000 people, and a 2020 'Namaste Trump' rally in India that drew an estimated 100,000 people. Hints of Trump's frustration were dropped during Modi's visit in February, when Trump said it was only 'fair' that the U.S. match India's tariffs on American exports. But the visit was largely friendly, with the two leaders launching an initiative to boost cooperation around military, commerce and technology. While Democratic lawmakers have raised concerns about human rights issues in India — the nonprofit Freedom House has tracked democratic backsliding and rates the country as only 'partly free' — there's a growing bipartisan consensus that India provides one of the best partnerships for countering China's economic, diplomatic and military might. 'The Biden administration — and the first Trump administration, for that matter — looked at India and thought, having India on our side, so to speak, can be very helpful toward countering China throughout the Indo-Pacific,' Grossman said. 'There's a problem with that: The biggest problem is India is still multialigned. They are not really going to do too much for us in the Indo-Pacific unless it directly impacts their national interest.' A pillar of India's foreign policy is its 'strategic autonomy,' a right to have relations with any nation, unbound by decisions from other multilateral groupings. India has also chafed at Trump's efforts to claim credit for mediating a ceasefire with Pakistan after clashes in May. Modi reportedly conveyed to Trump during a call in June that the U.S. played no role in halting the fighting. Pakistan, on the other hand, has nominated Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize, and Trump welcomed Pakistan army chief Asim Munir to the White House in June. Grossman said the disagreement around the India-Pakistan ceasefire is likely fueling 'personalistic baggage' between Trump and Modi. The president hasn't said exactly how much tariffs will increase on India, but he called out the country Monday for buying Russian oil and 'selling it on the Open Market for big profits.' He previously had vowed to hit India with a penalty for buying military equipment and energy from Russia amid the war in Ukraine. India's Ministry of External Affairs criticized the U.S. and European Union on Tuesday as 'targeting' the country for buying Russian oil when New Delhi was 'encouraged' by the Biden administration to import Russian oil as other global supplies were diverted to Europe. 'India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by global market situation,' the ministry's statement continued, also criticizing a double standard of carve-outs on Russian trade with the U.S. and Europe despite the war in Ukraine. Trump's focus on India as fueling Russia's war in Ukraine is a relatively new development, coming as trade talks between Washington and New Delhi have faltered. Top administration officials, including Trump, have insisted for months that a deal with India was pending. Vice President Vance traveled to India in April and, at the time, said there was progress on trade talks. But some four months later, no deal has materialized. India is laying out red lines protecting the country's agriculture and dairy sectors, an Indian government source told Reuters. New Delhi is committed to blocking imports of dairy products due to religiously based opposition to animal feed in these products. Trump also appears to be using India in a bid to gain leverage on Russia, putting an Aug. 8 deadline on Moscow to reach a peace deal or face 'secondary tariffs' on its trading partners. While the Senate has called for a 500 percent tariff on countries that buy Russian oil, Trump has said he could impose a 100 percent tariff on nations that do business with Russia. White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, one of Trump's closest and most influential advisers, summarized all of the administration's problems with India in an interview with Fox News on Sunday. 'India portrays itself as being one of our closest friends in the world, but they don't accept our products, they impose massive tariffs on us, we also know they engage in a lot of cheating on immigration policies that is very harmful to American workers and, again, we see the purchasing of oil,' he said. Aman Thakker, vice president at the Asia Group, said a draft trade deal originally imposed around a 13 percent to 15 percent tariff on India, with India reducing tariffs across the board for most sectors in the U.S., except on certain agricultural products. He expects officials from the National Security Council to travel to India next week to continue talks on a deal, suggesting the door isn't closed to negotiations. 'I think this is, in my view, the president playing hardball with India trying to get a bigger deal than what was presented,' he said. 'The president, this is sort of his way now to say, 'Well, I can secure a better deal than what the trade negotiators have been able to hammer out, and I'm going to use as much leverage as I can to make that deal happen.'' Thakker argued it's 'an open question' as to whether India would back down on purchasing Russian oil. 'I still think that there is a possibility about both sides engaging and finding a solution. They've done it before across administrations and including the last time President Trump was in the White House,' he said. 'But it will really depend, I think, on how the next couple of days and weeks play out. If the president announces a higher tariff rate … that will raise the temperature in an unproductive way.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thune's bid to change rules for nominees faces GOP opposition
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) faces a difficult test in rallying GOP colleagues to change the Senate's rules to speed up the confirmation of approximately 140 Trump nominees. Changing the Senate's procedural rules with a simple-majority vote is sometimes called the 'nuclear option' because it's viewed as an extreme tactic. In this case, many Republicans are ready to go 'nuclear' because they think Democrats are unfairly holding up a number of lower-level, noncontroversial nominees. Democrats have refused to confirm a single civilian Trump appointee by voice vote or unanimous consent during his first six-and-a-half months in office. But Thune still needs to sell a handful of members on the change, including Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), who aren't yet on board with a proposal to weaken individual senators' ability to hold up nominees. A senior Senate Republican strategist said senators are going to be reluctant to give up their power to place holds on executive branch nominees, a power that GOP senators employed to gain leverage over the Biden administration. 'There's a core group of people that are wary of setting new precedents or changing anything that's going to affect them when the shoe's on the other foot. I don't think it's a slam dunk,' the strategist said of Republican senators who are worried about diminishing their own authority if they return to minority-party status. 'Anytime you make these changes, it can have lasting impact on how the Senate operates moving forward,' the source added. Then-Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) placed a hold on all of former President Biden's Justice Department nominees in 2023 to protest the Biden administration's indictment of President Trump on criminal charges. Alabama Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R) put a sweeping hold on all of Biden's military promotions to protest the use of taxpayer dollars at the Defense Department to pay for service members' travel across state lines to receive medical services, including abortion services. Thune can only afford three defections from within his conference. Tillis last week ruled out going 'nuclear' over the stalled nominees. 'I just generally don't go nuclear,' he said. 'We can do the work. We've come up with some bipartisan strategies for changing the rules,' he added, arguing Republicans and Democrats could work together to make the Senate more efficient at confirming nominees without trampling on the rights of the minority party. 'If we do this, then that means the new bar for rules is a simple majority,' he said of the prospect of Senate Republicans changing the rules with 51 votes instead of the 67 votes required under regular order to change the chamber's rules. Tillis also poured cold water on the idea of allowing Trump to make recess appointments, something Senate conservatives have floated as an option to clear the backlog of stalled nominees. Tillis, who opposed Ed Martin, Trump's initial nominee to serve as U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, said he would want to put guardrails on recent appointments. Asked whether he could support opening the door to recess appointments, Tillis replied: 'Not if it lays the groundwork for an Ed Martin.' Republican senators left town pledging to take up rules reform when they return to Washington after Labor Day. 'We're trying to break the logjam,' Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) said on Fox News's 'Sunday Morning Futures' with Maria Bartiromo. 'We put them on notice and said, 'We're not going to play games with you anymore. Now you're forcing us to change Senate rules,'' said Mullin, a deputy Senate GOP whip. 'So, soon as we get back from August, we're going to be working on rules change. When we get back, we're going to have to implement that rules change.' Thune and his leadership team will need to focus on Tillis, Collins and Murkowski, along with other potential wild cards such as former Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.). McConnell earlier this year voted against some of Trump's controversial nominees, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Collins told reporters she wants to review precisely what rule changes the Senate GOP leadership team has in mind. 'We clearly have a huge problem with bipartisan nominees requiring roll call votes, but I want to see what the exact proposals are,' she said. Murkowski has favored preserving senators' rights and prerogatives from the ever-expanding powers of the White House and executive branch. The Alaska senator has voiced her frustration about spending hours of Senate floor time churning through lower-level nominees. But she's drawn a line at allowing Trump to make recess appointments. 'No, we do our job here. We've got plenty of time to address it, we're working through it,' she said of the backlog of Trump nominees. Asked about changing the Senate rules with a simple-majority vote, Murkowski expressed her desire to instead find a bipartisan solution that would not blow up relations with Democrats. 'There's a good conversation that's going on, it's actually a bipartisan conversation, about how we can be more efficient,' she said. 'We just voted on the general counsel … of the Department of [Agriculture]. There's a better way to do this.' Murkowski, a senior appropriator, wants to work with Democrats to pass the regular spending bills for fiscal 2026, bills that need 60 votes to pass on the Senate floor. Triggering the nuclear option to fast-track lower-level, noncontroversial nominees would likely scuttle the chances of reaching a bipartisan spending deal before the Sept. 30 deadline. A Senate Republican aide said GOP senators are still in the discussion phase of a potential rules change. 'No one's presented a clear option. Right now, they're still discussing a suite of options,' the source said. GOP senators have discussed a rules change that would allow Thune to advance lower-level nominees in groups, perhaps in blocs of three or five or more. Another option would be to eliminate the time-consuming cloture vote, which takes place to limit debate before proceeding to a final confirmation vote. A third option would be to collapse the mandatory two hours of debate time that must take place between the procedural vote to invoke cloture and the final confirmation vote. That could save two hours of floor time per district court-level and sub-Cabinet-level nominees. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
