
The Zohran Mamdani conundrum for moderate Democrats: ‘It's hard to distance yourself from cool'
It's part of the political neophyte's outreach to Democratic voters after he pulled off a surprise victory against disgraced former governor Andrew Cuomo to win the nominee for mayor. But Mamdani, an avowed socialist, did so largely without the backing of the Democratic establishment, so he needed this week to make his case with party elites.
On Friday, the trip will culminate in a meeting with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who has yet to endorse Mamdani despite the fact that the upstart state assemblyman won Jeffries' district outright before ranked-choice voting kicked in.
It reveals a conundrum for the Democratic establishment and party moderates: Mamdani is popular among young people, but supporting him also risks the party being painted as too radical, something Donald Trump and congressional Republicans used to batter Democrats in the 2024 race.
Part of Mamdani's job will be building a rapport with Jeffries, who is notoriously skeptical of progressives and the socialist wing of the Democratic Party, which has a large presence in New York and his home of Brooklyn, thanks to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, better known as AOC.
'The mayor needs the New York congressional delegation, and the New York congressional delegation needs the mayor,' Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY), a moderate pro-Israel Democrat, told The Independent.
'It's a mutually necessary relationship, and so it's in the interest of both sides to cooperate and co exist for the good of the city and the country.'
During the New York mayoral primary, Torres endorsed Cuomo, the former governor riddled by scandal after the attorney general of the state put out a report detailing his alleged sexual misconduct. Cuomo resigned his office amid the AG's probe.
Now, Cuomo has said he will run as a third-party candidate against Mamdani, Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa and incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who was beset by a federal indictment that the Trump Justice Department subsequently dropped.
'Republicans are going to attempt to weaponize the caricature of Mamdani as a bogeyman now, there's no question,' Torres told The Independent. 'And it could have implications in places like Long Island.'
'Mamdani is undeniably cool, and it's always harder to distance yourself from cool,' Liam Kerr, co-founder of the centrist Welcome PAC, told The Independent.
'The best way for centrist to distance themselves from Mamdani is to organize themselves.'
While Mamdani's campaign has excited young people, he does have his critics, particularly his calls for free buses, freezing rent and free child care.
In addition, some moderates and pro-Israel Democrats criticized him for not denouncing the phrase ' globalize the intifada ' in an interview with The Bulwark.
Already, some Republicans have called for Mamdani to be denaturalized and deported. While Mamdani had the support of some members of the New York delegation such as AOC and Rep. Nydia Velázquez, other Democratic members such as Rep. Tom Suozzi and Laura Gillen have criticized him.
Kerr said that centrist Democrats need to create a contrast between themselves and progressives like Mamdani.
'I think a lot of swing district Democrats, the answer is similar to how they talk about Trump,' he said. 'He identifies the problem, but his solutions are wrong. Good on TV. We're not a reality show.'
According to the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, Democrats hold 13 seats in districts that voted for Trump. Republicans only hold three seats in districts that voted for Kamala Harris. If they want to win back the House of Represenatives, they need to win more races in seats that Trump won.
While Harris spent much of her final weeks in the election season campaigning with Liz Cheney and touting the support from moderate Republicans, the Trump campaign spent much of the time once Harris became the Democratic nominee portraying her as a radical. Most notably, it attacked her for being too friendly toward transgender people saying ' Kamala is for They/Them. President Trump is for you.'
It seemed to have an efffect. In 2024, Third Way, the centrist Democratic organization, conducted a survey released shortly after the election showing that Harris was seen as 3.18 points to the left of how voters saw themselves while Trump was only seen as 2.15 points to the right of how they saw themselves.
At the same time, Mamdani excited many younger voters and many Democrats who skipped the 2024 election have said they want the party to move leftward, according to a poll from Democratic pollster Celinda Lake.
But some Democrats are already threading the needle between adopting Mamdani's message about affordability while distancing themselves from his policy. The next big test for Democrats will be in New Jersey later this year when Democratic Rep. Mikie Sherrill, a centrist, challenges Republican Jack Ciattarelli for the governorship.
Sherrill repeated some of Mamdani's points about lowering costs while distancing herself from him.
'It's a very different place,' she told The Independent. 'The people in New Jersey are focused on affordability. They're worried about how Trump's attacking the economy of New Jersey, and then they're worried about driving improviser housing, healthcare and utilities, and that's what we've been focused on, and I think that's what people care about.'
Still, progressives were excited about one of their own becoming the mayor of a major metropolitan. On Wednesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) talked about seeing Mamdani. Ocasio-Cortez for her part has served as his liaison in Washington. She had a simple message for Democrats nervous about him.
'Get to know him,' she told The Independent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's super PAC has ballooned to $200M thanks to Musk and other Silicon Valley heavyweights
President Donald Trump's super PAC holds nearly $200 million after donations from Elon Musk and other Silicon Valley heavyweights. The funds may be spent to take on rivals in both the Democratic and Republican parties. During the first half of this year, the Trump group MAGA Inc. gathered about $177m in total from Musk, TikTok investor Jeffrey Yass, Silicon Valley executives Ben Horowitz and Marc Andreessen, and others, a Thursday filing with the Federal Election Commission states. Trump has held several fundraisers this year, costing as much as seven figures a seat, The New York Times noted. The dinners, which have often been held at one of the president's properties, have allowed lobbyists and executives to make their case to Trump about their business interests. The filing states that the super PAC has $196.1m in cash on hand. Politicians haven't previously been so meticulous about raising money when they don't have a campaign in the future. Comparatively, a group backing term-limited former President Barack Obama raised $356,000 in the first half of 2013. That June, it had $3.4 million in cash on hand. MAGA Inc. has collected almost double the money as the Republican National Committee. But the RNC is restricted by contribution limits. Yass donated $16m to MAGA Inc. while Horowitz and Andreessen jointly contributed $6m. Trump has boosted the crypto industry from which his group collected several seven-figure donations. The group also received a $5m donation from a crypto entity co-founded by Sam Altman, the chief of OpenAI. Some Republicans have grown confused as to why Trump has been raising so much money for the group. Some of the president's top supporters have pushed for him to run for an unconstitutional third term. Trump aides have said it would be unwise not to take money that is essentially up for the taking. The funds can be used to attack the president's enemies. With such a sizable money pot, MAGA Inc. is set to play a significant role in Republican primaries, boosting the value of an endorsement from Trump. Some conservatives have grown worried about the amount of money collected by the Super PAC, with the group likely to be a bigger spender in the 2026 midterm elections than groups connected to the Republican leadership in Congress. As of June 30, the Congressional and Senate Leadership Funds held $32.7m and $29.7m. Filings show that a super PAC supported by the crypto industry, Fairshake, had $140m on hand, according to filings. Musk at first said he would spend roughly $100m on Trump's political operation, but in the end, he spent only $5m. Musk and Trump's close relationship has since come to an apparent end. Musk also contributed $5m each to the Senate and Congressional Leadership Funds some weeks after his public feud with the president. But soon after, following the passage of Trump's budget bill, Musk said he would leave the Republican Party to start his own party.


Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Highly strung MSNBC anchor soapboxes about why he quit plum job at Washington Post
Longtime Washington Post opinion writer and current MSNBC anchor Jonathan Capehart has detailed his decision to leave the paper after nearly two decades. Subbing in for Lawrence O'Donnell on MSNBC's 'The Last Word' Thursday, Capehart said it was the editorial board's increasingly conservative tone as of late that led him to make the call. 'American democracy is in peril', he claimed, after taking a buyout from the Jeff Bezos-run paper nearly two weeks ago. He will still have his own show on MSNBC to go back to - 'The Weekend' - where Eugene Daniels, a self-professed ' Kamala Harris expert', and the Post's current congressional correspondent, Jackie Alemany, are his co-hosts. Also a frequent PBS NewsHour contributor, Capehart told O'Donnell's usual audience that it was Bezos's increasingly hand-on approach to the newspaper that set him off - as well as Americans' 'optimism' under Donald Trump. He explained: 'In February, the owner of the Post decided that the section would focus on the twin pillars of personal liberties and free markets.' 'We in the section received an email from our new editor, which reiterated that and added, it's also important that we communicate with optimism about this country in particular and the future in general. 'How can we communicate with optimism about the future in general when we're living in the here and now, where American democracy is in peril?' The spiel saw him take aim at Post owner Jeff Bezos, who announced the Post's opinion section would only focus on 'free markets and personal liberties' back in February Capehart, 58, had been referring to Bezos' recent interference with the Post's editorial process since Trump's reelection, which was followed by a wave of exits from the Post's largely progressive opinion section. Back in February, Bezos announced the Post's opinion section would only focus on 'free markets and personal liberties' - sparking the negative response. Months before, Bezos ruled to not endorse a presidential candidate shortly before the election, after years of propping up Democrats. Around that time, the Post's then-new publisher and CEO, Will Lewis, a former editor of the British Daily Telegraph, flat out told Post journalists: 'People are not reading your stuff'. A round of layoffs ensued, in late February, after which The Post announced it was implementing a buyout program targeting veteran staffers. Capehart, on-air, said he accepting the offer because the editorial board he belonged to since 2017 was now being expected to "constantly extoll the beauty of a home's doors, crown moldings, and windows when the rest of the house is engulfed in flames and its foundation is flooding." He further claimed 'patriotism is incomplete' if the ideology does not allow for a "mirror to be held up" to the US and its citizens. 'The administration is playing chicken with federal courts,' Capehart said. 'The administration is using masked federal agents to snatch people off the streets and send them to hellish prisons abroad. 'The administration deployed the military on the streets of an American city,' he continued. 'The president is using his office to enrich himself and his family. 'The president has turned Congress, a co-equal branch of government, into the staff wing of the executive branch,' he claimed. 'And we're supposed to ignore it, leave it to others to wrestle with on their news pages and websites? No, no, no, no, no, no, no. 'The Constitution gives us the inherent, unapologetically patriotic right to rail against such affronts to democracy and the rule of law, and the First Amendment demands it,' he added. Capehart famously cried while reflecting on the memory of the January 6 riots live on MSNBC, during the insurrection's third anniversary. He specifically cited the January 6 Capitol siege as a turning point in where MAGA supporters of former president Donald Trump violently invaded the Capitol Building in Washington DC in an effort to disrupt a joint session of Congress that was busy counting electoral votes in Joe Biden's favor. Back in 2021, on the eve of the 20th anniversary of 9/11, the same MSNBC host announced that he believed that Trump supporters are more of a threat than the Taliban or ISIS. Capehart famously cried while reflecting on the memory of the January 6 riots live on MSNBC, during the insurrection's third anniversary in 2024. He currently hosts The Weekend with Eugene Daniels and former fellow Post staffer Jackie Alemany At the time, Capehart called out 'MAGA and the domestic threat', which he said was far 'more worrisome than any foreign threat', during an appearance at PBS NewsHour, where he is a regular presence. The Pulitzer Prize winner has continued the decry Trump for straying from the country's founding principles since. Such a stance was effectively barred with Bezos's edict back in February. The move saw the Post's longtime editorial page editor, David Shipley, resign immediately, before dozens of others followed suit. The terms of Capehart's buyout, meanwhile, remain unknown.


The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump fires labor statistics chief hours after data showed jobs growth slowed
Donald Trump fired of the federal government official in charge of labor statistics, hours after data revealed jobs growth stalled this summer, prompting accusations that he is 'firing the messenger'. The US president claimed that Erika McEntarfer, commissioner of labor statistics, had 'faked' employment figures in the run-up to last year's election, in an effort to boost Kamala Harris's chances of victory. Trump later claimed: 'Today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad'. He produced no evidence for these allegations, and insisted that the US economy was, in fact, 'BOOMING' on his watch. But Friday's employment figures told a very different story, and raised questions about the state of the labor market since Trump's return to office. 'We need accurate Jobs Numbers,' he wrote on Truth Social. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' McEntarfer was contacted for comment. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) confirmed in a brief statement that she had been dismissed. William Wiatrowski, the agency's deputy commissioner, will serve as acting commissioner. Trump's abrupt announcement came as administration officials scrambled to explain a lackluster employment report. Not only did jobs growth fail to meet expectations in July, but previous estimates for May and June were revised significantly lower. The president was promptly accused of trying to hide accurate statistics. 'Trump is firing the messenger because he doesn't seem to like jobs numbers that reflect how badly he's damaged the economy,' said Lily Roberts, managing director for inclusive growth at the Center for American Progress, a thinktank, said. 'Politicizing our country's collection of data on what's going on in the economy … will make it harder to create an economy that makes sure everyone has a good job,' added Roberts. 'Borrowing from the authoritarian playbook fuels more uncertainty that will cost Americans for years to come.' Paul Schroeder, executive director of the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics, described the president's allegation as 'very damaging and outrageous', adding: 'Not only does it undermine the integrity of federal economic statistics but it also politicizes data which need to remain independent and trustworthy. This action is a grave error by the administration and one that will have ramifications for years to come.' McEntarfer is a widely respected economist and veteran employee of the federal government. She previously worked at the US Census Bureau under George W Bush and at the US census bureau under Barack Obama, Trump and Joe Biden. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion In January 2024, before McEntarfer's confirmation for her current post by the US Senate, her nomination was backed by four former BLS commissioners. In a letter also signed by organizations including the American Statistics Association and a string of senior economists, they said there were 'many reasons' to confirm McEntarfer as commissioner of labor statistics, citing her 'wealth of research and statistical experience'. She was ultimately confirmed by a vote in the Senate, with 86 votes cast in favor and eight against. Gene Sperling, chair of the national economic council under Bill Clinton and Obama, and who worked as an official under Biden, said he expected Trump to 'destroy the credibility' of economic data when his administration suffered its first bad jobs report. 'Now: first bad job report, and he just fired BLS head over absurd claims of bias,' Sperling wrote on X, formerly Twitter. Trump's decision to fire McEntarfer was 'outrageous but not surprising', said Julie Su, former acting US labor secretary under Biden. 'He hates facts, so he blames truth-tellers.' The US 'needs and deserves trustworthy economic data', added Su. 'This is a pathetic attempt by the president to gaslight everyone about the consequences of his disastrous economic policies.'