
Reform UK candidate in court battle after losing election in bizarre ‘name out of the hat' draw
The election was decided at random after recounts left Liz Williams and Green candidate Hannah Robson tied on 889 votes in a rural Worcestershire election in May.
Two ballot papers were placed in a box, and Mrs Robson's name was pulled out, securing victory for the Green candidate, who took her seat on the county council.
But Mrs Williams is now challenging the result after launching an "election petition" at the High Court in London, claiming that what happened was not fair.
As well as citing various alleged irregularities during the vote and count process, Mrs Williams says her defeat was on the equivalent of a "toss of a coin" and that the election should be declared void.
At a preliminary hearing this week, Mrs Justice Yip said the petition, naming Green Party candidate Mrs Robson and deputy returning officer Vic Allison as respondents, will be decided at the High Court later this year.
The two women were rival candidates for the Littletons ward, which comprises three tiny villages, of Worcestershire County Council, when the unlikely dead heat occurred.
According to Mrs Williams' petition, several counts resulted in the rivals being tied on 889 votes, with traditional party candidates behind.
"The declared result was determined only by folding and placing two used election ballot papers into a ballot box and the deputy returning officer pulling one out," she says.
"The petitioner believes this process was not carried out in accordance with due process of law, open to fraud and corruption and did not allow time for independent legal advice to be obtained when being pressured into accepting the process in principle.
"I did not feel able to witness the entire process without obstruction, nor my concerns to be heard at the time.
"I could not see the box for all of the preparation and was not included in that.
"I did not agree to a third person shuffling the papers. Once in the ballot box, only the returning officer should have had their hand in the box."
Footage posted online shows the returning officer putting his hand into a large black box and pulling out a slip of paper, before declaring her winner to cheers and applause in the counting room at Pershore Leisure Centre.
Mrs Robson was declared to have won by 890 to 889 votes.
Afterwards, she said: "I think I am still in shock and probably will be all weekend. This was just something - maybe next level.
"I am feeling like I don't know whether to be sick or jump up in excitement. I have never seen something like this and I know the staff here hasn't either."
Challenging the result, Mrs Williams says she wants, "a declaration that the said Hannah Robson was not elected by a due process of law, namely by the electorate as the Representation of Peoples Act 1983 provides; but by an equivalent of a 'toss of a coin' and therefore the election declaration be void."
As well as complaints about the way the dead heat was decided, she complains of irregularities in the vote and count.
Mrs Robson was not represented during the preliminary hearing this week, but Timothy Straker KC, representing the returning officer, said he would be applying to dismiss Mrs Williams' petition when the case comes back to court later this year.
"It would be on the basis that the petition cannot proceed because, unfortunately, from the petitioner's point of view, it is out of time and the time cannot be extended," he said.
As well as the winning candidate and the returning officer, Mrs Williams originally named local police and the council's chief executive in her petition.
But the cases against them were struck out by Mrs Justice Yip, who said the rules only allow winning candidates and returning officers to be respondents to election petitions.
Although very rare, it is not the first time a council election in the UK has ended in a dead heat between two candidates, leading to the winner being picked at random.
In Blyth in 2007, the winner in one ward was chosen by the drawing of straws, while a candidate in Yorkshire in 2022 offered to play poker to decide the winner, before going on to draw straws too.
Electoral Commission guidance to returning officers states: "When two or more candidates have the same number of votes, and the addition of a vote would entitle any of those candidates to be declared elected, you must decide between the candidates by lot.
"Whichever candidate wins the lot is treated as though they had received an additional vote that enables them to be declared elected."
Mrs Williams' challenge to the Littletons election result is expected to go ahead at the High Court after September.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘This is not action': MPs respond to David Lammy's condemnation of Israel
When David Lammy stood at the dispatch box to deliver a statement condemning Israel's killing of starving civilians in Gaza on Monday, he was met with anger from MPs. 'We want action, and this is not action,' thundered one Labour MP. 'Is this it?' another questioned. 'At what point does our basic humanity require us to take stronger action? Many of us think the red line was passed a long time ago,' a third said. The fury across the Commons was evident. 'Are words enough?' asked one veteran Tory. A second accused Lammy of 'complicity by inaction' and warned it could land him at The Hague. A Lib Dem highlighted that repeated UK expressions of regret had not prevented further carnage. A clearly despairing Lammy attempted to reassure the politicians the government was playing its part. 'Me raising my voice will not bring this war to an end. I lament that and I regret that. But am I sure that the UK government are doing everything in our power? Yes, I am.' But as international condemnation of Israel over the horrors it is inflicting on starving Palestinian civilians grows, Keir Starmer's government is struggling to convince the British public that it is doing enough. The outrage in the Commons is reflected across the country more widely, with the public increasingly regarding Israel's response since the October 7 attacks as disproportionate, as the atrocities continued. The government have been on the defensive, pointing out that it has restored funding to the UN agency UNWRA, provided millions in humanitarian assistance, sanctioned far-right Israeli ministers and those who committed settler violence, and broken off trade negotiations with Israel. But it has struggled to explain its export licensing regime. Ministers insist they have stopped the sale of arms, despite there still being more than 300 licences in operation. These include, they say, body armour sent to protect NGO workers, chemicals for Israeli universities and components for goods which are then transported to Nato allies. In particular, there is anger at the UK decision to allow the export of F-35 fighter jet components to Israel, which ministers argue is unavoidable because they are part of a global programme over which the UK does not have unilateral control. It exposes serious weaknesses in the regime and some believe the government should go further – with a fuller export embargo and an end to all military co-operation with Israel. Lammy has only recently sought to explain that RAF flights that overfly Gaza do not share information to help Israel conduct the war. 'We are not doing that. I would never do that,' he said this week. Starmer is also under pressure to immediately recognise a Palestinian state, both from his own back benches, within his cabinet and from the wider diplomatic community. Ministers say the UK will 'play its part' in working towards formal recognition, with a UN conference led by the French and Saudis later this month a key moment. Privately, they warn the move would only be symbolic unless there is a ceasefire first. But for many, who think the UK should be matching France's more hardline stance, that is not a good enough reason not to. 'If not now, then when?' one cabinet minister said. The government has stated it could issue more sanctions – with calls to do so against senior Israeli military officers, government ministers and even Benjamin Netanyahu himself. But that has not happened yet. Nor have suggestions it might expel the Israeli ambassador been heeded. 'That's unserious,' said one insider. The UK has also backed away from declaring that Israel has broken international law, insisting that while the government believes it is 'at risk' of doing so, it is up to the international courts to reach that judgment. Aides cite the same reason for avoiding the term 'genocide' to describe the horrors unfolding in Gaza. Back in the Commons on Monday, the criticism kept coming. 'The will of the House is clear on this matter: it wants action, not words. Why are you not hearing that?' a Labour MP asked. 'How could I not?' the foreign secretary responded. But while Lammy may have got the message, he appears to remain restricted by both the caution of the UK prime minister, and the realpolitik that there is only one foreign power that could single-handedly force an end to the conflict: the US. 'I wish we could, but the truth is … we are unable to do that just as the United Kingdom,' he told MPs. 'We have to work in partnership with our allies.' But for many, that will not be enough.


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Hillary Clinton's reliance on 'heavy tranquilizers' and 'psycho-emotional problems' hidden by Obama in damning documents
Tulsi Gabbard unleashed a barrage of shocking charges against Hillary Clinton on Wednesday, claiming that she was on 'heavy tranquilizers' and was dealing with 'psycho emotional problems' during the 2016 election. Gabbard, who is President Donald Trump 's director of National Intelligence, said Russia President Vladimir Putin had that information and planned to use it against her when she was serving as president. The information was in the September 2020 report by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on Russia's attempts to influence the election that Gabbard declassified on Wednesday. 'This report shows Putin held back leaking, held back from leaking compromising material on Hillary Clinton prior to the election, instead planning to release it after the election,' Gabbard said. The declassified report also claims that Clinton suffered from severe health ailments like type 2 diabetes and ischemic heart disease. 'The intelligence community intentionally suppressed intelligence that showed Putin was saving the most damaging material that he had in his possession about Hillary Clinton until after her potential and likely victory,' Gabbard said. 'There were high level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote, psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression and cheerfulness, and that then Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers,' she added. Gabbard has been releasing a slew of reports that claim former President Barack Obama and his administration were part of a 'treasonous conspiracy' to allege Russia interfered in the 2016 election on Trump's behalf. She claims Obama was behind a smear campaign to sew doubt about Trump's 2016 victory. 'President Obama directed an intelligence community assessment to be created to further this contrived false narrative that ultimately led to a years long coup to try to undermine President Trump's presidency,' Gabbard said. Gabbard specifically charged Obama's CIA director John Brennan as the leading figure behind the 'conspiracy' to undermine Trump's first term. She repeatedly claimed Russia was preparing for a Clinton victory in 2016 and were preparing to release it after she won. 'They specifically withheld what they had on her, the most damning information, because they thought she would win he election. They had plans to release it, just prior to her inauguration ... to discord and chaos in America,' she said. President Trump has seized on the new information and accused his Democratic rivals of organizing a failed 'coup' in 2016. 'They tried to rig the election and they got caught and there should be really severe consequences,' he said on Tuesday. Trump has long argued that the FBI counterintelligence probe that began during the 2016 election was the start of a 'coup' to prevent him from taking office. He also issued an extraordinary call to investigate the former president – accusing his predecessor of 'treason.' 'After what they did to me, whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people,' Trump said in the Oval Office on Tuesday. Obama fired back at the 'bizarre allegations' coming from Trump. His office dismissed the claims as another example of the constant 'nonsense and misinformation' that emanates out of the White House. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' his post-presidency office said in a statement.


The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Old Trafford chaos as Lancashire try to woo India but forget local fans
'Lancashire Cricket is playing its role in supporting bilateral trade talks between the UK and Indian governments.' What does this mean? George Balderson mediating discussions over whisky tariffs? Luke Wells flanking Keir Starmer during his handshake photo op with Narendra Modi? The line appears on the club's website, highlighting an event at Old Trafford in March to welcome a new Indian consulate in Manchester. It's undoubtedly odd but also nothing new. The push to develop Indian ties has been part of Lancashire's story for a while now, the journey beginning at India and Pakistan's clash in the city at the 2019 World Cup. The story goes that their chair at the time, the late David Hodgkiss, observed the passion in the ground and told the chief executive, Daniel Gidney, that Lancashire needed to look east. 'My aim is that, one day, everyone in India will see Lancashire as their second favourite team,' Gidney told ESPNcricinfo in 2020. If that sounds a bit big-hearted, then there is the practical element, too. 'Rooms in our hotel were selling for £3,500,' said Gidney, referring to the Hilton that is part of the ground. So it leads to all of this: Lancashire having its own channel on JioTV, an Indian streaming service; pre-season tours of the country; hosting a networking event in Bengaluru to promote tourism in Manchester; expressing the desire to have an Indian Premier League partner for the Old Trafford-based Hundred team. RPSG, which owns Lucknow Super Giants, was the winning bidder, acquiring a 70% stake in Manchester Originals. This feels like a big week for the county, who do not host a Test next summer and won't receive the substantial injection of a men's Ashes match in two years' time. A contest involving India is the one to capitalise on and another substantial advertisement for those watching abroad. It comes two weeks on from the first women's Twenty20 international held at Old Trafford in 13 years, India beating England by six wickets. Lancashire admitted to disappointing ticket sales for the Test visit of Sri Lanka last year, and rain meant an abandonment of an England-Australia men's T20 in September. Their opportunity to host India four years ago was ruined by a Covid outbreak and a controversial last-minute cancellation, though the England and Wales Cricket Board stepped in to cover ticket refunds. There might have been a brief moment of relief for the club's hierarchy when Chris Woakes sent the ball down to Yashasvi Jaiswal on Wednesday morning. Not that everyone got to see it, as queues outside the ground derailed the arrival of supporters. Lancashire released a statement that tried to shift some of the blame, before admitting the need to change arrangements for the remainder of the Test. 'We are aware that some supporters experienced queues getting into Emirates Old Trafford this morning, which we apologise for,' the club said. 'We saw nearly 9,000 supporters arrive at the ground very late despite encouraging early arrival, with all bags subject to searches on entry. 'The club will be looking at increasing the number of gates for the rest of the Test match. We strongly encourage ticket buyers to only bring bags if required, and if doing so to arrive as early as possible. Gates will be open at 9am for the rest of the game.' Build your brand overseas, but those at home deserve more love, too. Sign up to The Spin Subscribe to our cricket newsletter for our writers' thoughts on the biggest stories and a review of the week's action after newsletter promotion Lancashire supporters may well agree. They do have plenty of things to celebrate this season – an upcoming men's Blast quarter-final, the women's T20 Cup victory, and the enduring presence of Jimmy Anderson – but there has largely been misery in the County Championship. Relegation last season was followed by a dire start this year, with Dale Benkenstein departing as head coach after seven winless games and Keaton Jennings stepping down as red-ball captain. Those who did beat the morning queues might have expected a bit of fire between the two teams: eyeballs, finger-wagging, stump-mic bleeps, the whole lot. After the tetchiness of the previous Test, Harry Brook had talked about England shedding their nice-guy image; Shubman Gill had continued to take umbrage with the hosts' time-wasting. But the morning lacked caffeine and any sunshine to boil tempers. Jaiswal and KL Rahul were watchful, Chris Woakes yearned for an outside edge to carry to the cordon, Jofra Archer stayed economical. Hostility was not the word to use. Maybe they were just playing their roles in supporting bilateral trade talks between the UK and Indian governments.