logo
Teen wanted to carry out mass murder of Muslims at Scots mosque after being radicalised by right-wing videos on TikTok

Teen wanted to carry out mass murder of Muslims at Scots mosque after being radicalised by right-wing videos on TikTok

Scottish Sun11-07-2025
The boy hoodwinked the Imam into believing that he wanted to become a Muslim
MOSQUE 'PLOT' Teen wanted to carry out mass murder of Muslims at Scots mosque after being radicalised by right-wing videos on TikTok
A TEENAGER wanted to carry out a mass murder of Muslims at a mosque, a court has heard.
The 17-year-old boy idolised right-wing killers such as Anders Brevik who slaughtered 77 people in Norway in 2011.
2
An exterior shot of the Inverclyde Muslim Centre, Laird Street, Greenock
Credit: Alan MacGregor Ewing - Commissioned by The Sun Glasgow
The boy spoke online about how white people were at "war" and that he would "die for my land."
Police intelligence led to officers finding the boy who was armed with weapons outside the Inverclyde Muslim Centre.
This included an airgun which he claimed would keep worshippers inside once he had set the building on fire.
The boy was able to plan his attack after he hoodwinked the centre's Imam into believing that he wanted to become a Muslim.
He was trusted at times to be left alone in the building which allowed him to make sketches and videos of the layout.
The boy also went as far as to join in with prayers in a bid to convince others of his lies.
The boy appeared today/yesterday in the dock at the High Court in Glasgow.
He pleaded guilty to a charge under the Terrorism Act and possession of documents likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism.
The crimes spanned between December 15 2024 and January 23 2025.
The court heard how the boy - who suffers from autism - had become "radicalised" since the age of 13 by social media channels such as TikTok.
He believed that white people were in a "war" against other races such as Jews and he "developed sympathies" with the Nazi party.
The boy created his own "manifesto" on his mobile phone in which he said he would "die for my land."
He listed a number of "inspirations" which included Brevik, Hitler, Benito Mussolini and Irish fascist leader Eion O'Duffy.
The boy also created a list of dislikes which included Keir Starmer, the Prophet Mohammed and Jihadi John.
2
Two police vehicles were outside the mosque to arrest the suspect
The boy initially had plans to carry out a terrorist attack at his school in Inverclyde.
He recorded himself walking through the school in which he stated he planned to "liquidate" one of the offices.
The boy also claimed that he would plant bombs under the tables of the school canteen.
He said: "That'll be funny, watch some reactions, that'll be hilarious."
The boy planned to attack the Inverclyde Muslim Centre in December 2024.
Prosecutor Greg Farrell said: "This involved the use of aerosols and lighters to set fire to the premises."
The boy spoke to the centre's Imam online and was later provided with reading materials.
Mr Farrell added: "The boy went as far as to take part in prayer with the congregation of the Islamic Centre.
"He was trusted to be left alone in the centre and he took several videos wandering the corridors of the building.
"In one video, he enters a room and his own hand enters the shot, shaped like a gun."
The boy then began searching images of the centre online as well as weapons and combat clothing.
He went on to speak to an acquaintance on chatting application Telegram.
The boy said: "It's good to infiltrate the target be it a mosque or synagogue as they think I'm one of them because I infiltrated the place."
He claimed that he could have burned down the centre when left alone but there would have been "zero kills."
Mr Farrell said: "He told the user he would use a deodorant can and a lighter to start a fire and he had a BB gun that people would believe was a real firearm.
"He also said he would use it to prevent them leaving the building."
The boy also asked the acquaintance to live stream the burning down of the mosque which would be shared with his manifesto.
He meantime tried to get a rifle licence but was unable to as his local club was closed at the time.
The boy prepared a "final" manifesto in which he stated he would attack "tomorrow" when "the mosque will be at its fullest."
On the morning of the planned attack, the boy left his home with a rucksack which concerned his mother.
He messaged friends, stating: "Today, I choose what my life was and will be."
The boy appeared at the Islamic Centre but was unable to enter as the door was locked.
Earlier that morning, the police had received intelligence regarding the boy and waited on him at the Islamic Centre.
He was found by officers to be dressed in black clothing and he carried a camouflage military rucksack.
When asked what was in the bag, the boy replied: "Guns, I'll tell you what's in the bag so you don't get hurt. I don't want to hurt you."
A German manufactured air pistol - capable of firing BBs - was recovered as well as a magazine which was suitable for the gun.
He was also snared with ball bearings, gas cartridges, four cans of aerosol spray and his mobile phone.
The boy was further found to have notepads which contained sketches and right wing symbols such as swastikas.
A search of his home recovered a copy of Hitler's book Mein Kampf, a copy of the Quran, knives, airsoft weapons and ingredients for explosive substances.
A book, named 'The Anarchist Cookbook' was also found which was an instruction manual on how to produce weapons and explosives.
Tony Lenehan KC, defending, told the court: "He was a 16-year-old isolated vulnerable young man who had a wholesale world view of what was on the internet rather than personal experience."
Sentence was deferred pending background reports until next month by Judge Lord Arthurson.
The boy will remain remanded in a secure unit meantime.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Britain's rights watchdog warns against heavy-handed policing amid Gaza demos
Britain's rights watchdog warns against heavy-handed policing amid Gaza demos

Leader Live

time27 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Britain's rights watchdog warns against heavy-handed policing amid Gaza demos

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has written to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley to remind them that the 'right to protest is a cornerstone of any healthy democracy'. The letter, from EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner, raised concerns about 'reports of police engagement with individuals participating in forms of protest that are not linked to any proscribed organisation'. The commission referenced a report by the Guardian newspaper about a woman said to have been threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act for holding a Palestinian flag and signs saying 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide'. The woman was reportedly told by police that her demonstration in Canterbury, Kent, in July expressed views supportive of Palestine Action, an organisation which has been banned by the Government. The woman said neither of her signs mentioned Palestine Action and that she had told police she did not support any proscribed organisations. Baroness Falkner said any interference with protest rights 'must be lawful and assessed case-by-case'. She added: 'Heavy-handed policing or blanket approaches risk creating a chilling effect, deterring citizens from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of expression and assembly through fear of possible consequences. 'This concern extends beyond those directly affected by police engagement to the broader health of our democracy, because the perception that peaceful protest may attract disproportionate police attention undermines confidence in our human rights protections.' The EHRC said Government and police authorities must 'ensure that all officers receive clear and consistent guidance on their human rights obligations' when it comes to protests. 'This guidance should ensure that the appropriate balance is maintained between public safety and the protection of essential human rights,' Baroness Falkner added. Palestine Action was proscribed by the UK Government in July, with the ban meaning that membership of, or support for, the group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. More than 500 people were arrested last weekend on suspicion of displaying an item in support of a proscribed group, as demonstrations took place in central London. Downing Street has described Palestine Action as 'violent' and said it has committed 'significant injury' as well as criminal damage, adding that evidence and security assessments shared in closed court supported its proscription. Palestine Action said Downing Street's accusations were 'false and defamatory' and 'disproven by the Government's own intelligence assessment'. The Metropolitan Police, Home Office and Kent Police have been contacted for comment. Meanwhile, campaigners including Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and Quakers in Britain have written to the Attorney General asking for prosecution decisions of those arrested at the London march at the weekend to be delayed until after further legal action over Palestine Action's proscription. A High Court hearing is set to take place in November challenging the group's ban as a terror organisation. In their letter to Attorney General Richard Hermer, the groups argued that 'prosecuting individuals for offences connected to that proscription before the court has determined its legality raises significant legal and moral questions' and said delaying prosecution decisions 'would demonstrate restraint, fairness and respect for the ongoing legal process'. The Attorney General's office has been contacted for comment.

Britain's rights watchdog warns against heavy-handed policing amid Gaza demos
Britain's rights watchdog warns against heavy-handed policing amid Gaza demos

North Wales Chronicle

time28 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Britain's rights watchdog warns against heavy-handed policing amid Gaza demos

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has written to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley to remind them that the 'right to protest is a cornerstone of any healthy democracy'. The letter, from EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner, raised concerns about 'reports of police engagement with individuals participating in forms of protest that are not linked to any proscribed organisation'. The commission referenced a report by the Guardian newspaper about a woman said to have been threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act for holding a Palestinian flag and signs saying 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide'. The woman was reportedly told by police that her demonstration in Canterbury, Kent, in July expressed views supportive of Palestine Action, an organisation which has been banned by the Government. The woman said neither of her signs mentioned Palestine Action and that she had told police she did not support any proscribed organisations. Baroness Falkner said any interference with protest rights 'must be lawful and assessed case-by-case'. She added: 'Heavy-handed policing or blanket approaches risk creating a chilling effect, deterring citizens from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of expression and assembly through fear of possible consequences. 'This concern extends beyond those directly affected by police engagement to the broader health of our democracy, because the perception that peaceful protest may attract disproportionate police attention undermines confidence in our human rights protections.' The EHRC said Government and police authorities must 'ensure that all officers receive clear and consistent guidance on their human rights obligations' when it comes to protests. 'This guidance should ensure that the appropriate balance is maintained between public safety and the protection of essential human rights,' Baroness Falkner added. Palestine Action was proscribed by the UK Government in July, with the ban meaning that membership of, or support for, the group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. More than 500 people were arrested last weekend on suspicion of displaying an item in support of a proscribed group, as demonstrations took place in central London. Downing Street has described Palestine Action as 'violent' and said it has committed 'significant injury' as well as criminal damage, adding that evidence and security assessments shared in closed court supported its proscription. Palestine Action said Downing Street's accusations were 'false and defamatory' and 'disproven by the Government's own intelligence assessment'. The Metropolitan Police, Home Office and Kent Police have been contacted for comment. Meanwhile, campaigners including Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and Quakers in Britain have written to the Attorney General asking for prosecution decisions of those arrested at the London march at the weekend to be delayed until after further legal action over Palestine Action's proscription. A High Court hearing is set to take place in November challenging the group's ban as a terror organisation. In their letter to Attorney General Richard Hermer, the groups argued that 'prosecuting individuals for offences connected to that proscription before the court has determined its legality raises significant legal and moral questions' and said delaying prosecution decisions 'would demonstrate restraint, fairness and respect for the ongoing legal process'. The Attorney General's office has been contacted for comment.

Britain's rights watchdog warns against heavy-handed policing amid Gaza demos
Britain's rights watchdog warns against heavy-handed policing amid Gaza demos

Glasgow Times

time31 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Britain's rights watchdog warns against heavy-handed policing amid Gaza demos

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has written to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley to remind them that the 'right to protest is a cornerstone of any healthy democracy'. The letter, from EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner, raised concerns about 'reports of police engagement with individuals participating in forms of protest that are not linked to any proscribed organisation'. The commission referenced a report by the Guardian newspaper about a woman said to have been threatened with arrest under the Terrorism Act for holding a Palestinian flag and signs saying 'Free Gaza' and 'Israel is committing genocide'. The woman was reportedly told by police that her demonstration in Canterbury, Kent, in July expressed views supportive of Palestine Action, an organisation which has been banned by the Government. The woman said neither of her signs mentioned Palestine Action and that she had told police she did not support any proscribed organisations. Baroness Falkner said any interference with protest rights 'must be lawful and assessed case-by-case'. She added: 'Heavy-handed policing or blanket approaches risk creating a chilling effect, deterring citizens from exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of expression and assembly through fear of possible consequences. 'This concern extends beyond those directly affected by police engagement to the broader health of our democracy, because the perception that peaceful protest may attract disproportionate police attention undermines confidence in our human rights protections.' A woman is detained by police officers as supporters of Palestine Action take part in a mass action in Parliament Square, Westminster, central London (Stefan Rousseau/PA) The EHRC said Government and police authorities must 'ensure that all officers receive clear and consistent guidance on their human rights obligations' when it comes to protests. 'This guidance should ensure that the appropriate balance is maintained between public safety and the protection of essential human rights,' Baroness Falkner added. Palestine Action was proscribed by the UK Government in July, with the ban meaning that membership of, or support for, the group is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. More than 500 people were arrested last weekend on suspicion of displaying an item in support of a proscribed group, as demonstrations took place in central London. Downing Street has described Palestine Action as 'violent' and said it has committed 'significant injury' as well as criminal damage, adding that evidence and security assessments shared in closed court supported its proscription. Palestine Action said Downing Street's accusations were 'false and defamatory' and 'disproven by the Government's own intelligence assessment'. The Metropolitan Police, Home Office and Kent Police have been contacted for comment. Meanwhile, campaigners including Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and Quakers in Britain have written to the Attorney General asking for prosecution decisions of those arrested at the London march at the weekend to be delayed until after further legal action over Palestine Action's proscription. A High Court hearing is set to take place in November challenging the group's ban as a terror organisation. In their letter to Attorney General Richard Hermer, the groups argued that 'prosecuting individuals for offences connected to that proscription before the court has determined its legality raises significant legal and moral questions' and said delaying prosecution decisions 'would demonstrate restraint, fairness and respect for the ongoing legal process'. The Attorney General's office has been contacted for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store