logo
Trump's First Judicial Pick Is... Someone Who Worked For His SCOTUS Picks

Trump's First Judicial Pick Is... Someone Who Worked For His SCOTUS Picks

Yahoo02-05-2025
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump has picked his first judicial nominee of his second term: Whitney Hermandorfer, a Tennessee attorney who has clerked for three of the Supreme Court's conservative justices — including two of Trump's nominees — and who progressive groups warn has an 'extremist' record.
In a social media post close to midnight on Thursday, Trump said he plans to nominate Hermandorfer to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Hermandorfer, 38, currently works for the Tennessee attorney general as director of the office's strategic litigation unit.
'Whitney has been serving the Great People of Tennessee, in the Attorney General's Office, where she has strongly litigated in Court to protect Citizens from Federal Government Overreach,' the president said on his social media site, Truth Social.
'Whitney is a Fighter who will inspire confidence in our Legal System,' he said. 'Thank you Whitney!'
Hermandorfer previously clerked for Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett, one of Trump's nominees. She also clerked for Justice Brett Kavanaugh, another of Trump's nominees, when he was a judge on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.
This was certainly a plus for the president.
'She has a long history of working for Judges and Justices who respect the RULE OF LAW, and protect our Constitution, including Justice Samuel Alito and two fine Supreme Court Justices I appointed in my First Term,' he said.
A social media post is not a formal nomination; the White House has to officially submit Hermandorfer's nomination to the Senate for it to begin moving. But the fact that Trump is even talking about naming someone to a court seat, here on May 2, is notable considering how sluggish Trump's White House has been in moving judicial nominations.
By this point in his term, President Joe Biden had nominated 12 people to lifetime federal judgeships. President Barack Obama had nominated three in his first term and five in his second term. In his first term, Trump had nominated two people to federal judgeships by this point, one of whom was then-Supreme Court Justice nominee Neil Gorsuch.
'It is late for the first nominee, especially given how severely Trump has been attacking federal judges,' said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond in Virginia and an expert on federal judicial nominations.
As for Hermandorfer's qualifications to be a judge, Tobias called her 'an astute pick' with solid conservative credentials, very much in the mold of Trump's first-term judicial nominees who had records of opposing abortion rights, LGBTQ rights and voting rights. He noted that she has defended the state's 'strict abortion law and efforts to keep trans people out of women's sports' in her work with the Tennessee attorney general's office.
Hermandorfer is also young, meaning if she is confirmed by the Senate, she could hold this lifetime federal judgeship for decades.
Progressive judicial advocacy groups seized on the news of Hermandorfer's coming nomination, warning that it is evidence that Trump will prioritize judicial nominees willing to put personal loyalty over the law.
Maggie Jo Buchanan, interim executive director of Demand Justice, pointed out that in late March, Hermandorfer served as counsel of record for Tennessee in a brief submitted to the Supreme Court advocating the same position that Trump is using in his efforts to end birthright citizenship.
'The administration's attempt to end birthright citizenship has been roundly criticized as unconstitutional by leading scholars on the left and right, but Hermandorfer appears to be willing to act in lockstep with the political desires of this administration,' Buchanan said in a statement.
Alliance For Justice described her record as 'disturbing' and 'extremist.'
In her work for the Tennessee attorney general, Hermandorfer led litigation from several states challenging Biden's Title IX guidance that included protections for transgender students and their inclusion in school activities. Her efforts to roll back these protections is what Trump was referring to in his post when he called her 'a staunch defender of Girls' and Women's Sports.'
'This is perhaps why Trump himself included a familiar and obvious anti-trans dog whistle in his announcement, expressing his expectation that she will uphold the discrimination his administration has already pushed through various executive orders,' Alliance for Justice said in a statement.
Keith Thirion, the group's interim co-president, said in the statement that he hopes senators are prepared to stop 'conservative crusaders like Whitney Hermandorfer who will be loyal to [Trump] and his discriminatory authoritarian agenda at the expense of all of us.'
People For the American Way President Svante Myrick took things a step further, saying the Senate shouldn't confirm Hermandorfer or any of Trump's judicial nominees given his regular attacks on the courts and his calls for judges to be removed who rule against him.
'With a Republican-controlled Congress currently doing nothing to protect our democracy, it's up to the courts to preserve the critical checks and balances and keep us free,' Myrick said in a statement. 'Until Trump fully reverses course and recognizes that he is not a king, we cannot allow him to put any lifetime judges on our federal courts.'
The White House did not respond to a request for comment on when Trump plans to formally send Hermandorfer's nomination to the Senate.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump declares victory in Washington DC after takeover of metro police
Trump declares victory in Washington DC after takeover of metro police

USA Today

time15 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump declares victory in Washington DC after takeover of metro police

WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump declared victory in the nation's capital, 10 days after announcing the federal takeover of the Washington metro police force to 'rescue' the city from crime. Trump on Aug. 21 met with law enforcement officers who had been deployed to patrol the city he recently described as rampant with 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor.' The president arrived at the United States Park Police facility in Anacostia Park Thursday evening and offered words of encouragement to law enforcement officers. He brought hamburgers and pizzas for the crowd. 'The numbers are down like we wouldn't believe, but we believe it,' he told the crowd. Among those who attended were officers from the National Guard, FBI, U.S. Marshals and the Washington DC Metropolitan Police Department. 'We've had some incredible results. The results have come out and it's like a different place. It's like a different city." "To me, I feel very safe now," he added. On Aug. 11, Trump deployed 800 National Guard troops in Washington DC, declaring a public safety emergency. Several Republican states including Ohio, Mississippi, West Virginia and Louisiana have sent guardsmen to the capital to support the Trump Administration's efforts. The troops are deployed at tourist-heavy locations such as the National Mall and transit hubs such as Union Station and Metro stops to aid local law enforcement. Since the deployment of the troops, carjackings have decreased by 83%, robberies by 46%, car thefts by 21%, and overall violent crime by 22% compared to the previous seven days, according to Metropolitan Police Department's police union. But crime had already been on the decline. Violent crime in Washington, DC, dropped 26% through Aug. 8, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, according to data from the Metropolitan Police Department. However, the city had the fourth-highest homicide rate among U.S. cities, after St. Louis, New Orleans and Detroit, at 27.3 per 100,000 residents in 2024. 'It's the capital. It's going to be the best in the world,' Trump said. 'We're going back to Congress for some money, and we're going to redo a lot of the pavement, a lot of the medians…the graffiti's all coming off real fast,' he said. He then pivoted to his latest passion project: building a 90,000 square foot ballroom in the White House. 'They've been after a ballroom for 150 years, but they never had a real estate guy,' he said. 'As a president, I've done a lot of ballrooms and we're going to make this one the best of them all.' Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House Correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal

Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump
Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump

Chicago Tribune

time15 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump

NEW YORK — A New York appeals court on Thursday threw out President Donald Trump's massive financial penalty while narrowly upholding a judge's finding that he engaged in fraud by exaggerating his wealth for decades. The ruling spares Trump from a potential half-billion-dollar fine but bans him and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Trump claimed 'TOTAL VICTORY' in the case, which stemmed from a civil lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. 'They stole $550 million from me with a fake case and it was overturned,' Trump said, echoing his earlier social media post as he addressed police in Washington, D.C. 'They said this was a fake case. It was a terrible thing.' James, a Democrat, focused on the parts of the decision that went her way, saying in a statement that it 'affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud.' The ruling came seven months after Trump returned to the White House, his political fortunes unimpeded by the civil fraud judgment, a criminal conviction and other legal blows. A sharply divided panel of five judges in the state's mid-level Appellate Division couldn't agree on many issues raised in Trump's appeal, but a majority said the monetary penalty was 'excessive.' A lower-court judge, Arthur Engoron, had ordered Trump last year to pay $355 million in penalties after finding that he flagrantly padded financial statements provided to lenders and insurers. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million. Additional penalties for executives at his company, the Trump Organization, including sons Eric and Donald Trump Jr., have brought the total to $527 million with interest. 'While harm certainly occurred, it was not the cataclysmic harm that can justify a nearly half billion-dollar award' to the state, Judges Dianne Renwick and Peter Moulton wrote in one of three opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. They called the penalty 'an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.' Both were appointed by Democratic governors. Engoron's other punishments, upheld by the appeals court, have been on pause during Trump's appeal, and the president was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond. Donald Trump Jr. celebrated the decision by mocking James, who had periodically posted a running tally of the fraud penalty, with interest. Over a post from James in February 2024, when the tally was nearly $465 million, Trump Jr. wrote: 'I believe you mean $0.00. Thank you for your attention to this matter.' The five-judge panel, which split on the merits of the lawsuit and Engoron's fraud finding, dismissed the monetary penalty in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for an appeal to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. In the meantime, Trump and his co-defendants, the judges wrote, can seek to extend the pause to prevent any punishments from taking effect. While the Appellate Division dispatches most appeals in a few pages in a matter of weeks, the judges weighing Trump's case took nearly 11 months to rule after oral arguments last fall and issued 323 pages of concurring and dissenting opinions with no majority. Rather, some judges endorsed parts of their colleagues' findings while denouncing others, enabling the court to rule. Two judges wrote that they felt James' lawsuit was justifiable and that she had proven her case but the penalty was too severe. One wrote that James exceeded her legal authority in bringing the suit, saying that if any lenders felt cheated, they could have sued Trump themselves, and none did. Another wrote that Engoron erred by ruling before the trial that James had proven Trump engaged in fraud. In his portion of the ruling, Judge David Friedman, appointed by a Republican governor, was scathing in his criticism of James for bringing the lawsuit. 'Plainly, her ultimate goal was not 'market hygiene' … but political hygiene, ending with the derailment of President Trump's political career and the destruction of his real estate business,' Friedman wrote. 'The voters have obviously rendered a verdict on his political career. This bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business.' Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. At the conclusion of the civil trial in January 2024, Trump said he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me.' The Republican has repeatedly maintained the case and the verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, both Democrats. Trump's Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. James' personal attorney Abbe D. Lowell has said investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren't deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren't audited. The defense also noted bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing last September, Trump's lawyers argued that many of the case's allegations were too old and that James had misused a consumer protection law to sue Trump over private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said that while Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, his exaggerations led lenders to make riskier loans and that honest borrowers lose out when others game their net worth numbers. The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president. On Jan. 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction. And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider. Trump still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. Trump also is appealing a subsequent verdict that requires him to pay Carroll $83.3 million for additional defamation claims.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store