Massive utility legislation expected to boost Missouri power generation — and energy bills
A rendering shows Evergy's planned natural gas plant in Hutchinson, Kansas. A bill in the Missouri Legislature would allow utilities to add the cost of building new gas-fired plants to consumer bills before the project is completed. (photo courtesy of Evergy).
A quip is a witty remark that brings a chuckle. Another kind of CWIP, however, is an extra charge on utility bills that critics say is nothing to laugh about.
The acronym stands for Construction Work in Progress, and it means allowing companies to put a charge to build a new generation plant on customer bills before it is producing power. A bill that passed the Missouri Senate last week would allow the charge for the first time since voters banned it as 'unjust and unreasonable' with an initiative petition passed with a 63% majority in 1976.
The bill is now on a fast track, scheduled for a Monday hearing and vote in the House Utilities Committee.
Promoters of the 1976 petition were upset that the Public Service Commission allowed Union Electric — now known as Ameren — to pass on the costs of constructing the Callaway nuclear power plant with no certainty it would be completed.
Utilities across the country were reconsidering nuclear power. In all, despite billions in expenses, 40 plants where construction commenced during the 1970s, including a second reactor at Callaway, were canceled before completion.
'The primary driver was concern about inflation, just like the concern is today, and having to pay in advance for a power plant that's not yet serving you and, who knows, may not ever serve you,' John Coffman, attorney for the Consumers Council of Missouri, said during a January hearing in the Missouri House.
Past attempts to repeal or revise the prohibition — most notably in 2009 as Ameren again considered adding a second nuclear reactor — failed in the face of bipartisan opposition.
The vote on this year's bill was also bipartisan — five Democrats joined 15 Republicans supporting it and five Democrats and five Republicans opposed it.
In this year's version, the CWIP charge would be allowed for power plants that use natural gas to generate electricity. In another section, it is allowed for new generating plants, including nuclear, that are part of an approved plan for meeting power demands.
The PSC would not be allowed to consider the process for generating new power, only the utility's 'qualifications to construct and operate the resources, the electrical corporation's ability to finance the construction or acquisition of the resources, and siting considerations.'
There are consumer protections built into this year's bill that makes repeal more palatable, said Republican state Sen. Mike Cierpiot of Lee's Summit, sponsor of the bill.
The PSC can deny an application for the charge, he said, and consumers will get a refund of the extra charge, with interest, if the plant is not put into operation.
'There's not a lot of gas turbines here that are being planned and money spent and then canceled,' he said.
State Sen. Tracy McCreery, a Democrat from Olivette, negotiated with Cierpiot and utility lobbyists over several provisions of the bill. None of the items she won to strengthen consumer protections offset the extra cost customers will pay if the bill passes, she said.
'These monopolies are going to be able to pull a billion dollars out of my constituents' pockets and transfer it to stockholders of these companies,' McCreery said.
Republicans opposed to repealing the ban agreed it was a bad deal for consumers. During Senate debate, Republican state Sen. Mike Moon of Ash Grove said he didn't think making the charge discretionary was a true protection.
'Because of that option, the ratepayers, the customers, those that we represent, are kind of under the thumb,' Moon said.
The PSC does not control rates for municipal power utilities or rural electric cooperatives. Past attempts to repeal the ban made it mandatory for the commission to allow the charge.
Making it optional for regulators is a big change, Cierpiot said.
'If they don't think it's the consumer's best interest, they could say no,' he told Moon.
Another change from 2009 is that the PSC supports the repeal.
'We need to unlock CWIP accounting treatment for new generation that goes through the new resource planning process,' PSC Chairwoman Kayla Hahn said at a January hearing on a House bill.
During testimony on the 2009 bill, then-PSC Chairman Robert Clayton said the PSC would not be able to properly regulate rates if the ban on construction work in progress charges was repealed.
'The staff's effectiveness and role will be limited by this bill,' Clayton said at the time.
Cierpiot's bill began as a measure allowing utilities to apply to use a 'future test year' for setting rates. The companies would project their planned spending and the PSC would determine what that meant for customer costs.
The bill he brought to the full Senate combined several measures he proposed in other bills, heavily worked in lawmaker offices by lobbyists. The first attempt to get it passed faltered under a filibuster from Democratic state Sen. Angela Mosley, a member of the Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy and the Environment Committee chaired by Cierpiot.
McCreery, also a member of the committee, negotiated for consumer issues and said in an interview that she secured several items to protect against shutoffs and strengthen the official consumer voice. McCreery voted against the bill, but did not filibuster it.
Mosley said she was disrespected because no one had asked her if she wanted changes to soften her opposition.
'My biggest concern is the constituents having to pay more money on their utility bills,' Mosley said in an interview. 'We have a lot of people on fixed incomes. We have a lot of people losing their jobs at this time due to our new president.'
Mosley tried to add a 10% discount for customers over 60 to the bill.
The bill was set aside when Mosley made it clear she wouldn't back down. The final bill did not include her amendment but it does create a discounted rate for people who pay an unusually large portion of their income for utility service.
Mosley did not resume her filibuster after that provision was added.
'If you could take the time to speak to everybody else about the bill, you should have been able to take the time to speak to me,' she said.
The major points of the bill sent to the House would:
Allow 'future test year' rates. Currently, rates are set after the PSC examines the actual costs incurred to deliver service and determines if each expense was prudent and necessary. In a future test year scenario, the utility would outline what it expects to spend and the costs would be pre-approved by the PSC.
Require electric utilities to submit plans projecting demand for at least 16 years into the future and plans for meeting those demands. This is the section that allows CWIP for any form of generation approved in the resource plan.
Increase the assessment on utility revenue to fund the PSC and, for the first time, add an assessment to support the Office of Public Counsel, which represents consumer interests before the commission.
Change the shut-off rule for hot and cold weather. Instead of using 24-hour forecasts, the rule would use 72-hour forecasts, prohibiting shutoffs for non-payment in summer if the temperature is expected to exceed 95 and winter if it is forecast to go below 32 within that period.
Require the PSC to review any savings utilities realize from federal tax cuts that may go into effect in the next four years to adjust rates.
Allow consumers with 'smart meters' that allow real-time monitoring of power consumption to replace them with traditional meters and opt-out of time-of-use billing.
At a news conference Thursday, House Majority Leader Alex Riley of Springfield said the utility bill is being fast-tracked because having adequate generating capacity is 'an urgent concern' for Missourians.
'We are very concerned with wanting to make sure that our constituents, that the entire state has sufficient power generation to meet their needs,' he said.
The impact on rates, he said, is an important consideration but not the overriding question.
'You're always trying to make sure that you're balancing generation and rates and making sure that when our constituents turn on their lights, that the power turns on, that when they need their heat, that there's sufficient heat there for them to be able to do that,' he said. 'You have to, at the same time, address those rates, and we don't want rates to go sky high.'
Democrats in the House are split on the measure as they were in the Senate, House Minority Leader Ashley Aune of Kansas City said.
Several of items in the bill have strong support from Democrats, so members will have to balance that, and whether the need for new power generation justifies the package of incentives.
'We are talking about a bill that could potentially raise rates for consumers,' she said. 'That said, we are also in a period where rates are rising for consumers either way.'
A new push to repeal CWIP is coming as utilities plan new natural gas plants, with Ameren working on an 800 megawatt plant at the site of the now-closed Meramec Energy Center, which burned coal, in south St. Louis County. The plant closed in 2022.
Evergy, the largest power provider in Kansas and western Missouri, is planning two natural gas plants in Kansas to open by 2030. Those plants are cited by supporters as a failure of Missouri to provide the right incentives.
'We don't want to be losing any football teams, Googles, Metas or gas plants to Kansas,' Hahn said during the House hearing on CWIP.
The Midcontinent Independent System Operator operates the interstate high-voltage transmission grid serving Ameren's territory in eastern Missouri and all or part of 14 other states and the Canadian province of Manitoba. It estimates, in a report published in January, that there is a regional need for 17 gigawatts of new power generation per year for the next 20 years.
'The situation could be further exacerbated by the large load additions that are expected in the MISO region due to the growth of data centers, electric vehicles and other factors,' the report states.
In a shorter-term projection, the Southwest Power Pool, which operates the grid that serves western Missouri, forecast a shortage of 5,950 megawatts in its 12-state region by 2029.
How that translates to Missouri customer needs, and how much more they will pay for power, depends in large part on whether Cierpiot's bill passes.
'There was nothing I was able to get into the final version of the bill that will offset the negative impact on Missourians,' McCreery said. 'And I'm not exaggerating when I say this bill will, with 100% certainty, increase what people are paying for their gas and their water and their electricity, and in some communities, their sewer.'
The bill will also impose substantial new costs on commercial users, McCreery said, putting jobs at risk.
'I did not see a path to be able to kill this bill on the Senate floor,' she said.
The dedicated funding for the Office of Public Counsel will help it fight for the lowest possible rates, she said, adding she does not trust the PSC.
'It appears to be a place where politicians go when their terms are up, and I'm not necessarily sure that that commission has the ability to do a thumbs up or thumbs down for dramatic amounts of money,' McCreery said.
Hahn was policy director for then-Gov. Mike Parson when she was appointed and previously worked for the state Senate. There are two former lawmakers on the commission, a vacant seat recently held by a former lawmaker and one member, John Mitchell, who worked for an engineering firm for 34 years.
All costs are rising and utility rates will increase whether or not the bill passes, Cierpiot said. And there is no doubt that regionally, more power will be needed to meet demand, he said. For many years, demand did not grow because of increasing efficiency of homes and businesses, but data centers and electric vehicles are pushing needs up again.
'We have still got some of the cheapest rates in the country and in the area,' he said, 'and I think that will continue.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
700 Marines deployed to L.A. as Trump, Gov. Newsom clash over response
June 9 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump publicly endorsed the arrest of California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday during a war of words, as the administration authorized the deployment of 700 Marines to Los Angeles to quell anti-ICE immigration protests that turned violent over the weekend. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced the deployment to help defend federal agents amid protests over immigration raids. "We have an obligation to defend federal law enforcement officers -- even if Gavin Newsom will not," Hegseth said Monday. "Due to increased threats to federal law enforcement officers and federal buildings, approximately 700 active-duty U.S. Marines from Camp Pendleton are being deployed to Los Angeles to restore order," Hegseth added in a post on X. Meanwhile, Trump and Newsom ramped up their rhetoric after the Trump administration called in 2,000 National Guardsmen over the weekend to protect buildings and residents, a move Newsom called inflammatory for the "peaceful" protests as the administration called it "chaos." "While Los Angeles burns -- officers ambushed, city in chaos -- Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom and Maxine Waters call the riots and insurrection 'peaceful,'" The White House wrote Monday in a post on X, showing video of burning cars and protesters closing Highway 101. "They side with mobs. President Trump stands for law and order." In response to a reporter question Monday, Trump was asked whether he supported Newsom's taunt to "border czar" Tom Homan to "come and arrest him." "I would do it if I were Tom," Trump said Monday. "I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing," Trump said, as he called Newsom a "nice guy," but "grossly incompetent." Newsom responded on social media saying, "The president of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America." "I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation -- this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism," Newsom wrote in a post on X. By Monday evening, Newsom said he would send 800 more state and local officers to Los Angeles. "Chaos is exactly what Trump wanted, and now California is left to clean up the mess," Newsom wrote in a new post on X. "We're working with local partners to surge over 800 additional state and local law enforcement officers to ensure the safety of our L.A. communities." Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta also announced Monday that they have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its activation of the state's National Guard without getting state and local approval first. "California's governor and I are suing to put a stop to President Trump's unlawful, unprecedented order calling federalized National Guard forces into Los Angeles," Bonta said. "The president is trying to manufacture chaos and crisis on the ground for his own political ends. This is an abuse of power -- and not one we take lightly." During Friday's raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, demonstrators flooded the streets and freeways to protest their actions. The fire department said it responded to "multiple vehicle fires" during the unrest. Waymo autonomous electric vehicles were among those targeted, according to Los Angeles Fire Department public information officer Erik Scott. "Due to the design of EV battery systems, it's often difficult to apply the water directly to the burning cells, especially in a chaotic environment, and in some cases, allowing the fire to burn is the safest tactic," Scott said. Over the weekend, demonstrators spilled out onto the 101 freeway that runs through downtown L.A. Approximately 70 people have been arrested after being ordered to leave the downtown area. Some were also seen throwing objects at officers. "I just met with L.A. immigrant rights community leaders as we respond to this chaotic escalation by the administration," L.A. Mayor Karen Bass wrote Monday evening in a post on X. "Let me be absolutely clear -- as a united city, we are demanding the end to these lawless attacks on our communities. Los Angeles will always stand with everyone who calls our city home."
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
La. legislative session nears end, here's a recap
BATON ROUGE, La. (Louisiana First) — The Louisiana legislative session is nearing the have tackled insurance reform, election security, and even the state's $45 billion spending budget. While some bills have been signed into law by the governor, a lot of bills are still making their way through the legislature. Governor Jeff Landry has signed into law six bills from his Tort and insurance reform effort, which he says will lower insurance rates. One of the laws requires people who claim they have been hurt in a car accident to prove their injuries were caused by it. 'This points to a cultural problem of frivolous litigation, driven by lawyer advertising,' said Governor Landry during a news conference and bill signing. Even before the session, Landry called for major reform with what he calls a balanced approach, addressing both trial lawyers and the insurance companies. State elections were also a priority in this session. A package of bills pushed by Louisiana's Secretary of State, Nancy Landry, promises election security in the state. Out of the six election bills presented, a few are hung up in committees, one has been sent to the governor, and another has been signed by the governor. As for the bills Louisiana First News has followed: The abortion exceptions bill never made it out of committee last week. It would have allowed victims of rape under the age of 17 to get an abortion. The bill failed 3-9, with two Democrats siding with Republicans. A bill that promised to address homelessness also failed in committee. HB 619 would have allowed local governments to designate certain areas as homeless encampments if beds at homeless shelters are not available. That bill was narrowly defeated by one vote in the Committee on Appropriations. And finally, the bill that funds the government, House Bill 1 by Representative Jack McFarland, has been on a fast track to the governor's desk with lots of bipartisan support. McFarland says the 45 billion dollar budget does more with less, adds no new taxes, and still funds the legislature's priorities, like education, teacher pay raises, and crucial government services. 'I have an open dialogue with every member. If you will remember when the session started, I told every member publicly I'm going to fund the priorities of the legislature,' said McFarland after his bill passed out of the Committee on Appropriations. Since that time, HB 1 has also passed out of the House, and on Monday it passed out of the Senate with no opposition. Out of the hundreds of bills filed, 83 have passed, with a lot more being considered. The Governor has only vetoed one bill so far. The session must end by Thursday. 81 Years After D-Day: Honoring the courage that changed history Date, game time announced for LSU Baseball in 2025 NCAA Men's College World Series Trump hails $1K-per-child 'Trump Accounts' during White House roundtable La. legislative session nears end, here's a recap Inmate accused of attacking Assumption Parish corrections officer facing additional charges Collins calls Kennedy's firing of vaccine experts 'excessive' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Debate within the debate: Should Pennsylvania's tipped minimum wage rise too?
HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) — The overall debate is not new. Neither are the arguments: All surrounding states — even West Virginia, supporters of raising Pennsylvania's base pay from $7.25 are always sure to note — have higher minimum wages than Pennsylvania. But raising it could cause consumer prices to rise and cost jobs, opponents always say. But within that familiar debate — this time over House Bill 1549, which would raise minimum wage to $15 (and eventually beyond) for most Pennsylvanians at different rates depend on which counties they call home — is the question of whether if that happens, employers of tipped workers (like restaurants who employ servers) should have to pay more than the $2.83 per hour, before tips, they're currently required to pay. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now What's already true, and wouldn't change under any plan, is: For tipped workers who don't earn much, employers have to make up the difference between tipped minimum wage and full minimum wage. But under the proposed bill, tipped minimum wage would rise to 60 percent of regular minimum wage — or, for example, $9.00 when minimum wage in a given county rises to $15. The problem with that, according to restaurant industry leaders? 'What this tripling of the base wage would mean, is restaurants would need to recoup those additional expenses somehow,' said Joe Massaro of the Pennsylvania Restaurant & Lodging Association (PRLA). New Rite Aid locations listed for closure in Pennsylvania: court docs Massaro cited the experience of Washington, D.C., where years ago, the city's Democratic mayor and city council previously overturned a law — backed by other Democrats and approved by voter referendum — that would have required restaurants to pay employees full minimum wage before tips. Now leaders there have paused a minimum wage hike, under a subsequently passed referendum, due to go into effect July 1. D.C. restaurants recouped the higher wages 'mostly by adding service charges to the bill,' Massaro said. 'And when that service charge is added, then consumers customers pay less in tips, so servers were reporting making less money after the change.' Massaro said the average tipped Pennsylvania employee earns $27 per hour. PRLA backs a proposed amendment by State Rep. Robert Leadbeter (R-Columbia) to House Bill 1549, which would exclude employers of tipped workers from the proposed minimum wage hike. The overall legislation enjoys strong support by Democrats, who narrowly control the commonwealth's House of Representatives, but faces tougher odds in the Republican-controlled Senate, which would need to pass the bill before it could go to Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, who supports raising Pennsylvania's minimum wage. Including Pennsylvania, 20 states have minimum wages equal to the federal minimum of $7.25 per hour. But most are in the south or mountain west; New Hampshire is the only northeastern state aside from Pennsylvania with a $7.25 hourly minimum wage. Minimum wages among states bordering Pennsylvania range from $8.75 in West Virginia to $15.50 in New York. Among all states and territories, Washington, D.C.'s $17.50 hourly minimum is highest, followed by California's $16.50. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.