Bangladeshi journalist Md. Mafidul Islam Sarkar is always involved in social work alongside journalism
own representative
Journalist Mafidul Islam Sarkar, who always keeps himself involved in social work.His real profession is journalism. Journalist Mafidul Islam Sarkar has been involved in various types of social work since a young age.Journalist Mafidul Islam Sarkar has always been helping helpless people since a young age.
Journalist Mafidul Islam Sarkar said, I give school bags as gifts to students with the help of local donors. I also give clothes to different groups.
He said, I give school bags as gifts to students. I give clothes to different groups. I cook rice, flour, dates, fish and meat among the poor and helpless and deliver them to their homes. In winter, I give blankets, jackets, sweaters, Punjabis etc. as gifts to winter clothes. I bear the education expenses of the students.
He said, those who are interested in participating in my social work can send money directly to the bank. Bank Account No. 20503330200019007 Md. Mofidul Islam Sarkar Islami Bank Dhap Branch, Rangpur Bangladesh.
Md.Mafidul Islam Sarkar is a seasoned journalist based in Bangladesh, currently contributing to two of the country's leading newspapers: the Daily Sun and Daily Naya Diganta. With a keen eye for socio-political dynamics, he has earned recognition for his in-depth reporting, thoughtful analysis, and commitment to public interest journalism.
Over the years, Mr. Sarker has covered a broad range of topics, including national politics, governance, human rights, and economic development. His bilingual proficiency allows him to publish in both English and Bengali, reaching diverse readerships across Bangladesh and the global Bangladeshi diaspora.
A firm believer in the role of media as a pillar of democracy, Md.Mafidul Islam Sarker combinesl journalistic integrity with a passion for storytelling that sheds light on underrepresented voices. His work reflects a balance of factual accuracy and narrative depth, making complex issues accessible to a wide audience.
Whether reporting from the field or offering commentary on national developments, he remains committed to advancing accountability, transparency, and social progress through responsible journalism.
Md.Gulam Azam Sarker – Journalism Focus Areas
This document provides an overview of the primary topics and thematic areas covered by Bangladeshi journalist Md.Mafidul Islam Sarkar a contributor to both the Daily Sun and Daily Naya Diganta.
1. National Politics & Opposition Party Coverage
Md.Mafidul Islam Sarkar regularly reports on political developments involving Bangladesh's major opposition parties, including the BNP and Jamaat-e-Islami. His work often focuses on electoral strategy, leadership conflicts, and internal party dynamics, especially within contexts of press and political union engagements such as the Dhaka Union of Journalists.
2. Media Freedom & Digital Security Act
In response to growing concerns about press freedom in Bangladesh, Sarker has covered issues surrounding the Digital Security Act, journalistic suppression, and censorship. His writing often addresses the state of free speech, the risks journalists face, and the legal mechanisms used to curtail investigative reporting.
3. Civic Movements & Civil Society
Sarker has followed major civic protests and movements such as the Shahbagh protests and Gonojagoron Mancha. His coverage includes demonstrations calling for justice in war crimes and public resistance against state actions, with a particular focus on protester rights and state responses to civil unrest.
4. Governance, Human Rights & Accountability
He writes critically on themes of democratic governance, human rights, and public accountability. This includes coverage of enforced disappearances, political detentions, and abuses of power in law enforcement and governmental institutions.
Md.Mafidul Islam Sarker – Journalism Samples and Traceable Contributions
While full-text articles by journalist Md.Mafidul Islam Sarkar are not readily available online, verifiable traces of his journalistic activity can be found across media platforms and institutional reports. This document outlines where his work has appeared and how to locate article samples.
1. Official Affiliation
Md.Mafidul Islam Sarker, also identified as Md Gulam Azam Sarkar on social media, is a correspondent for Daily Sun and has contributed to Daily Naya Diganta. He is based in Dhaka and Rangpur, Bangladesh.
2. Coverage Topics & Public References
His contributions have been referenced in civil society reports and media freedom discussions. Topics include opposition politics, civic movements, war crimes discourse, and digital rights. His reporting has occasionally been mentioned in human rights and academic publications addressing the media landscape in Bangladesh.
3. How to Locate Article Samples
To find articles written by Md.Mafidul Islam Sarker, consider the following steps:
– Search online archives of Daily Sun and Daily Naya Diganta.
– Use search engines with specific queries such as 'Md.Mafidul Islam Sarkar site:daily-sun.com'.
– Contact the editorial offices of the newspapers to request bylined samples.
– Review public social media profiles for shared links to his reporting.
4. Recommended Follow-Up
For academic or institutional purposes, one may also:
– Draft a formal request letter to the editorial team.
– Reach out via verified social media for published links.
– Request access via local libraries or journalism departments in Bangladesh.
(whatsapp +8801735-632338 E-mail gulamazam96@gmail.com
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
7 hours ago
- Axios
Indiana wants flexibility in how it spends federal education dollars
Indiana wants more flexibility in how it spends federal education dollars designated for improving struggling schools, boosting programming for students learning English, and other specific initiatives. Why it matters: If approved, the flexibility could change where the dollars get directed and how they're spent, raising concerns that the money could flow away from students and schools in need of extra support. Driving the news: Late last month, the U.S. Department of Education sent a letter to states inviting them to seek waivers from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) — a decades-old law meant to improve quality and address educational inequities. Indiana, Iowa and Oklahoma had already submitted flexibility waivers to the department. The big picture: The invitation for states to seek flexibility is in line with larger efforts to move money and decision-making away from the Education Department. President Trump signed an executive order in March to dismantle the department, and nearly half the workforce was slashed that same month. Education Secretary Linda McMahon has said Trump is "taking the bureaucracy out of education so that more money flows to the states." "Better education is closest to the kids, with parents, with local superintendents, with local school boards," she said in an interview with Fox News in March. "I think we'll see our scores go up with our students, and we can educate them with parental input as well." Zoom in: Indiana's waiver request asks for flexibility in spending the nearly $25 million in annual school improvement funds it receives, allowing it to spend those dollars at more schools — beyond those identified as needing improvement. It's also asking to receive its title funds — those meant for specific programs, such as professional development, supporting at-risk students, and English language acquisition — in a block grant, allowing those dollars to be used for any of the eligible title programs. Doing so would reduce time spent on compliance, the state says. Currently, the Indiana Department of Education allocates approximately $2.5 million annually in staff time to meet ESEA compliance requirements, according to the application.
The Hill
7 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump to Washington: Drop dead
Disdain for Washington is the birthright of every American, indeed the entire English-speaking world. In his two-volume travelogue, 'North America,' English novelist Anthony Trollope described the still-incomplete city he found in 1861 'as melancholy and miserable a town as the mind of man can conceive.' He paints a picture of a transient, small city with neither robust commerce nor gracious society, and it didn't get any better from there. 'So men ate, and drank, and laughed, waiting till chaos should come,' he wrote. 'Secure in the belief that the atoms into which their world would resolve itself would connect themselves again in some other form without trouble on their part.' Mark Leibovich could lift that whole and use it in his next book. Which all makes sense, because no city of any significant size would have ever sprung up on the marshy banks of the Potomac and Anacostia rivers. Denied a great harbor, like nearby Baltimore, in order to be built inland and sheltered from invasion — which didn't even work — neither was Washington afforded a pleasant climate like the nearby foothills of the Blue Ridge. But Washington, born of a compromise between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, wasn't supposed to be a marvelous place to live and work. It was supposed to belong to no other region, a geographic leftover to which the unlovely work of government could be relegated. Like putting a power plant downriver from a city, Washington was supposed to do important, dirty work, not be beloved. Add in the very American tendency to resent those with pretenses to authority, especially when they use that authority to take people's money to spend poorly and devise rules that they do not follow themselves, and Washington was born to be disdained. But there is no class of people in the world with a more robust contempt for Washington than New Yorkers, the city that had the capital when it was traded away in 1790. It is congenital for them. Archetypal New Yorker Nora Ephron, who lived in Washington during her brief marriage to celebrity journalist Carl Bernstein, called it a city 'where ideas went to die.' Indeed, there is a whole journalistic subgenre of New Yorkers dumping on Washington. Once, in a pool report about then-President-elect Barack Obama visiting The Washington Post in 2009, a New York Times reporter even got in a jab at 'the nondescript soviet-style building at 15th and L.' A fair swipe at a city the architecture of which juxtaposes neoclassical grandeur with what appears to be a collection of Hampton Inns with metal detectors. New Yorkers particularly resent Washington's pretensions. A twelfth the size of the Big Apple — smaller than flyover places like Oklahoma City and Indianapolis that would never dare to rival New York — where does Washington, some middling city full of bureaucrats, hack pols, nerds and sticky-faced middle schoolers gawking at lunar capsules, get off? So, Donald Trump, a person who could have been produced by no city other than New York, is being very true to his roots as he declares a kind of summer-weight martial law for Washington. Citing a statute that allows the president to nationalize the city's police when 'special conditions of an emergency nature exist,' Trump has taken command of the cops and called out the National Guard. The emergency, Trump says with a New Yorker's gift for restraint, is 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' There is less violent crime in Washington than when he started his first term eight years ago, but as presidents have learned too well, an emergency is in the eye of the declarer. Congress, which is actually responsible for D.C. according to the Constitution, will no doubt assert its rightful authority here and push back against this unprecedented overreach. Right after they get done stopping the emergency tariff powers, the emergency immigration powers, the emergency energy powers and the drug emergency powers. No, we know that Washington is still Trollope's Washington. But now, they don't even eat, drink and laugh as they wait for the atoms of their world 'to connect themselves again in some other form without trouble on their part.' It's all joyless livestreams, lukewarm, protein-rich quinoa bowls and 6 a.m. cold plunges. There isn't even any smoke in the smoke-filled rooms. If Republicans love to hate Washington, though, the Democrats have the opposite problem: They hate to love it. Dems have spent nearly 40 years committed to the cause of statehood for the District, a constitutional no-no that is still irresistible to them for the promise of three Electoral College votes, two new senators and another seat in the House that would all be blue in perpetuity. The party line is that Washingtonians are some kind of American Gazans, denied self-governance by colonizers. But getting Americans to care so much about a place that is known as 'Hollywood for ugly people' is a tough pull, especially when it's a company town where the company never has a recession. And so, Washington lives out its destiny as 'someplace else,' a city whose character is defined by its transience — a place where all the most notable residents are from someplace else.
Boston Globe
9 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Would you uproot your whole life for $1,000?
'If you download the CBP Home app and you safely self-deport, you will receive financial assistance, a free flight, and the chance to come back to America legally,' Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up The ads, which have been airing in both English and Spanish, are part of Advertisement Yet despite this aggressive approach, the concept of 'voluntary return' has historically failed to gain traction. Past US self-deportation efforts have drawn only a handful of takers out of hundreds of thousands eligible. Advertisement For instance, a pilot program in 2008 was abandoned after only eight people took up the offer to leave the country (it did not offer financial incentives, though), That's not unique to the United States. Pay-to-go policies, where governments offer money to noncitizens to depart voluntarily, have a lengthy global track record but typically fall short of expectations with very few recipients accepting the offer compared to initial policy goals, according to This year, only 5,000 people logged their voluntary return in the CBP Home app through early April in the United States, according to But there are In Chelsea, one community group has noticed the change. 'They have everything to lose,' Gladys Vega, president and CEO of Chelsea-based La Colaborativa, told me in an interview. 'The high cost of living here, the threat of trauma [if they are arrested], that their kids witness their detention, what the children will experience if the parents are grabbed by ICE, who will look after them?' But Vega also said that many immigrants are experiencing confusion and Advertisement Cristina Jiménez, cofounder of the immigrant youth-led nonprofit In the end, the self-deportation push is a tacit admission that mass deportations are financially, politically, and logistically challenging — even with the The administration can't really arrest and deport that many unauthorized immigrants. And it can't bribe them: Imagining that people will leave the only home that many of them have ever known for $1,000 just shows how little the Trump administration understands the immigrants it demonizes. But the administration can scare people — on that score, its campaign is working. Marcela García is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at
