
A fatal flaw in the new Beatles films? Casting big stars
Earlier this week, the world's worst secret was finally revealed. Sam Mendes's new quartet of Beatles films will feature Harris Dickinson, Paul Mescal, Joseph Quinn and Barry Keoghan as John, Paul, George and Ringo respectively. All four actors are star names – and thus the buzz has been considerable.
This is a canny move on the part of Sony Pictures. It is a tall order to get audiences to go and see four films in quick succession; indeed some people barely go to the cinema that much in a year. Thus, a fan base which isn't just a Beatles fan base is assured.
And yet I see problems with casting such established name players, and not simply because of their ages. Mescal, playing Paul, is 29 – McCartney had already written Hey Jude, Blackbird and A Day in the Life by that age. The fact is that it would have been wonderful to have some unknowns in the lead roles: think of the casting of Aaron Taylor Johnson in Nowhere Boy, and the fresh revelatory performance as the young Lennon which set him on the path to superstardom.
Indeed cinema history is full of excellent acting debuts, when a director has taken a chance on someone, whom we then see blossom. Alan Rickman, a long-established stage actor, blew all other film baddies out of the water when he took on Bruce Willis in a dirty vest for the first Die Hard film, but it is unlikely that such a high-stakes role would have been given to an estimable thesp unknown to the majority of the public today.
The Beatles news raises the question of authenticity casting. On principle, I am against the idea that an actor should be cast because they have some personal connection to a role – that they have the 'lived experience' necessary for a particular performance. Acting is not, I think, about who you are, but about talent, and thus they should have the opportunity to play anyone. And yet I am slightly disappointed that not one of the actors is from Liverpool. I don't feel as if there should have been X Factor-style auditions in the Fab Four's hometown, but I think casting directors should have been scouring local theatres such as the Everyman for rough-hewn talent, finding a fledgling actor who brings the famous Liverpudlian grit and humour to one of the roles.
A quartet of complete unknowns would have been a potential headache, of course: four young shavers on a crash course to global fame, having to navigate intense scrutiny from both the media and the public. But a mixture of big names and smaller ones might have gone down rather well with the public.
One problem with casting big names in biopics is that they come with baggage and, to complicate things, they are playing megastars for whom the public have very strong pre-conceived notions. How easy will it be to buy into the idea of Barry Keoghan as lovable, easy-going Ringo, when several of his performances are already etched in the imagination; the abused, adorable Dominic in The Banshees of Inisherin or Oliver, the social-climbing psychopath with a taste for nudity in Saltburn.
It is true that some very famous actors have overcome this hurdle – and admirably so: Renée Zellweger as Judy Garland; Michael Douglas as Liberace; Jamie Foxx as Ray Charles. Yet such films get an added thrill when you see a new face inhabiting Elvis (Austin Butler) or Amy Winehouse (Marisa Abela) or Edith Piaf (Marion Cotillard); not simply because you somehow become more susceptible to the psychology of the character they are playing, but it feels like a really exciting discovery.
I do think there is a particular problem for casting in general at the moment. While stars have always been used as leverage for getting a project off the ground, it feels like things are getting worse. In an age where TV and film are both obsessed with intellectual property (in other words, things which come with a ready-made audience like Tolkien or Jilly Cooper), to the extent that a story by an unknown quantity can't get commissioned, so it is getting increasingly hard for unknown actors to 'sell' a show or a film.
Actually some casting directors are still imaginative – Nina Gold has clearly seen a lot of theatre, hence Star Wars spin off Andor boasting the involvement of such theatrical talents as Denise Gough, Kyle Soller and James McArdle. But you wonder how hard she has to fight for these actors, and whether less influential figures than Gold have to cave in to their bosses who are slaves to the algorithm.
The picture is complicated by social media. The Telegraph recently reported on the elemental force of Instagram when it comes to making or breaking careers. A healthy amount of followers on the photo and video-sharing app is going to be attractive to an executive team who need to make money: the problem is that often the best actors are shy, socially awkward, using their talent as a refuge to escape into another world. Thus, building a sort of pictorial brand is the last thing they want to do.
I will now hold my tongue until the Beatles films are out, and pass judgment on the performances of Mescal et al. At the very least they will be better than hologrammatic versions of the Fab Four – although I am sure that is not so very far away.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
23 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Meg Nicholls ‘bags a belter' for dad Paul in £280,000 spending spree as father-daughter duo smash the sales
The Nicholls team are getting the cheque book out FINE NIC Meg Nicholls 'bags a belter' for dad Paul in £280,000 spending spree as father-daughter duo smash the sales Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) MEG Nicholls helped dad Paul 'bag a beauty' as the father-daughter duo went on a huge £280,000 spending spree at the sales. Sun Racing told you that legendary 14-time champion trainer Paul is enabling the help of Meg at the auctions this year. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Megan Nicholls and dad Paul went on a spending spree at the sales securing three potential superstars - including one related to Lulamba Credit: Alamy The pair hit up the Goffs Arkle sale in Ireland on Tuesday and got the cheque book out in style - snapping up three hugely promising sorts. The pick of the bunch was a £130,000 gelding by champion jumps sire Walk In The Park, whose mum Lackaneen Leader was placed in a Grade 1. Meg, who combines her role as an ITV pundit with sourcing top talent, said: "I'm absolutely delighted to get him. "We got our three top picks, and thought we might have had to stretch a bit more for the Walk In The Park. "Dad actually loved him from the moment he came out of his box. "His eyes lit up really, the horse had that bit of class about him. "He's really athletic, and we can't wait to get him back and get him going. "We knew he would make this sort of money – he really is classy, he had that swagger about him, and he's by the right sire. "We've been fighting hard against some big stables and as I have got older I've found it easier to work alongside Dad! "To get some pretty smart horses at what we valued them at - I'm delighted. Now we need to find the right owners for them." The pair also bought £78,000 L'Ami Pierrot, who is related to Nicky Henderson's former multiple Grade 1 winner L'Ami Serge. Being by Nirvana Du Berlais, he also shares a sire with Lulamba, so expect him to be a speedy sort capable over hurdles. The Nicholls also went to £75,000 for an unnamed gelding by Vadamos, whose progeny include Grade 3 winner The Other Mozzie and Grade 1-placed runners such as Matata and King Of Kingsfield. Nicholls told Sun Racing he will continue to work with long-time sales ally Tom Malone. But he thought it would be beneficial having another set of eyes helping him too, hence the decision to bring in Meg. He said: "I've been hearing all sorts of rumours, Tom and I are good mates but there has never been any contract between us. "He's a freelance and he buys plenty for me, so do several others. "I'm going to work with everybody, but Megan is going to get quite a bit more involved for me. "Results could have gone better over the last few years but that's the way things are, it's very hard buying these days. "I'll keep all avenues open, but more so than ever I'd like to get Megan much more involved on that front." FREE BETS - GET THE BEST SIGN UP DEALS AND RACING OFFERS Commercial content notice: Taking one of the offers featured in this article may result in a payment to The Sun. You should be aware brands pay fees to appear in the highest placements on the page. 18+. T&Cs apply. Remember to gamble responsibly A responsible gambler is someone who: Establishes time and monetary limits before playing Only gambles with money they can afford to lose Never chases their losses Doesn't gamble if they're upset, angry or depressed Gamcare – Gamble Aware – Find our detailed guide on responsible gambling practices here.


Scottish Sun
23 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
It's good to see parents on Love Island this year – but why are we treating mums differently to dads?
Love Island star Huda's love interest was visibly shocked when she told him she had a daughter unjust It's good to see parents on Love Island this year – but why are we treating mums differently to dads? THIS year, Love Island, both in the UK and US, has done something a little different to its normal proceedings, and recruited people with children to star on the show. On the US version, Huda is a mum to a little girl, and over in the UK we're set to meet new bombshell Shea, who has a son from a previous relationship. 8 This year, Love Island, both in the UK and US, has done something a little different to its normal proceedings, and recruited people with children to star on the show Credit: Ben Symons/Peacock 8 Bombshell Shea is dad to a little boy 8 Huda has been getting to know Jeremiah Credit: Kim Nunneley/Peacock 8 Shea has been praised for being a dad looking for love While both are parents, there is a stark difference between them - and that, sadly, is the way their news has been received. Have YOU got a story or an amazing picture or video? Email exclusive@ and you could even get PAID Before the US season got under way, internet detectives had discovered Huda was a mum, and they immediately feared for her. 'Why do I feel like the guys are gonna be d**** about this,' wrote one fan, while another responded, saying: 'It wouldn't be a surprise unfortunately.' The general consensus amongst Love Island fans being that Huda's revelation would leave the men running for the hills, instead of treating her the same as any other woman on the show. Then fears became reality, as Huda decided to tell love interest Jeremiah that she had a four-year-old daughter. 'I wanted to be honest with you,' she began, adding: 'I really trusted and liked you, and I am a mum.' Jeremiah then throws his head back and fails to hide his shocked reaction: 'You're a mum, and you're 24?' he says, weirdly emphasising her age, as if women of 24 shouldn't have children. Huda is then forced to reassure him that she only has the one child, and Jeremiah tells her he can't look at her. The scene left US Love Island fans horrified, with many telling Huda to 'run,' as well as calling out Jeremiah for his 'red flag' behaviour. Others defended him, saying it must've come as a big shock, and that taking on a child is a huge responsibility, the latter of which no-one is denying. New Love Island bombshell reveals he's a dad as he sets his sights on breaking up villa couples But it's just a massive shame that Huda's first attempt at telling someone she likes on the show that she's a mum, is met with such shock and, dare I say it, disgust. Fans noticed that Huda was visibly afraid to tell him the news, struggling to get her words out, almost as if she was worried that being a mum would push him away. She even ended up saying things like she's 'not ashamed of it at all,' and was 'worried about how he'd react.' Huda took her time telling Jeremiah that she was a mum, four episodes in fact, because of the reaction she'd had from other men in the past. And yet, when UK Love Island bombshell Shea was revealed as having a son, the reaction couldn't have been better. Beneath TikTok videos of Shea being a dad, fans said how 'cute' it was, and praised the star for 'doing the show for his baby.' The comments section on X, TikTok and Instagram has been flooded with positivity about Shea being a dad, especially as he says in his pre-Love Island interview: 'Also, I have a little boy, so I'll be taking him into consideration with who I couple up with, too.' The news has been so well-received, with fans praising the star for thinking about his son when it comes to picking which girl he'll couple up with. But for Huda? Just negativity, fears and a reaction that's enough to put anyone off telling someone that they're a mum ever again. As a mum myself, it makes me so sad to see. Why is there such an obvious split between the way both Huda and Shea have been treated when revealing that they're parents? It's a great move from Love Island to have parents on the show, and really widens the representation. But we've still got a way to go in changing perception when it comes to single mums looking for love. Jeremiah isn't the sole problem, he's well within his right to be surprised, as the revelation had been kept a secret from him for some time. But he is a part of the wider issue of women being afraid to admit they've got kids while dating. You might not be ready to be a step-dad and that's fair enough, but is there a world where people learn to react in a manner that doesn't portray pure horror? A world where people consider the feelings of the person telling them, and not just themselves. Maybe it's wishful thinking, but what I will say is seeing parents on Love Island really does highlight that we have a huge way to go in the way that the world views mums looking for love versus dads. We need to do better. Much better. 8 Huda has a four-year-old daughter with her ex Credit: Instagram/mrpreshaa 8 Fans begged Huda to 'run' after she revealed news she was a parent Credit: Instagram 8 Jeremiah was left visibly shocked by the news Credit: Instagram


Spectator
7 hours ago
- Spectator
The pretentiousness of the pop critics
Pop music criticism, said Frank Zappa, was the work of people who can't write, about people who can't talk, for people who can't read. Half a century later and he's still right. Although pop is essentially a juvenile art form – its clearest strength and most obvious weakness – that doesn't stop reviewers pumping up performers as though Johann Sebastian Bach had decided to form an all-star band with Beethoven and Brahms. The Three Bs! Sign 'em up! The current pop reviewers for the Times and the Telegraph, Will Hodgkinson and Neil McCormick, clearly think they bear witness to giants. Like Pinky and Perky, these mature teenagers can trill 'we belong together', batting balls over the net in a contest of perfumed superlatives. Should Hodgkinson open with a 'sublime', his oppo will almost certainly return serve with an 'achingly beautiful'. 'Perfectly formed'. 'Apocalyptic opus'. 'Emotional depth'. 'Kaleidoscopic riches'. It can be difficult for readers to swivel their heads swiftly enough to follow these rallies. Pity the poor umpire, longing for a change of ends – and a restorative glass of Robinson's Barley Water. In recent years, the tousle-haired Hodgkinson has delivered his share of forehand smashes. He's fond of 'art music', which less credulous listeners call 'pretentious drivel', but it never hurts to take the folk they write about at their own estimation. McCormick can certainly smack 'em back from the baseline. Selecting 25 'albums that rocked the world' – those long-players which 'shaped the soundtrack of our times' – he came up with some scorching winners. 'New template… transformative power… cynical political epic… profoundly sincere… creative synergy… towering, symphonic wonder… new vistas of self-expression'. As weary copy-takers used to ask journalists in the good old days: 'Much more of this?' Plenty. McCormick can keep it up for five sets – without a banana. Nevermind by Nirvana, he said, 'recalibrated a genre that had become fatuous and overblown'. How they love their genres – and oh, the recalibration! Dark Side of the Moon, meanwhile, Pink Floyd's multi-million copy seller, offers 'perhaps the most epic conclusion to any album in rock history'. What, pray, is that history? Sixty years, tops. Pop became rock in the summer of 1966, when Eric Clapton, Jack Bruce and Ginger Baker formed Cream, Jeff Beck left the Yardbirds, and Chas Chandler persuaded Jimi Hendrix to leave New York for London. Beck, Clapton and Hendrix changed the sound of the electric guitar – and what has followed is essentially a footnote. There is a paradox here. Although pop writers care little for longer-established forms, like opera and orchestral music – which are deemed to be snooty – they love to coat the music they like with a patina of significance, if only to convince themselves they are not wasting their time. Hence those empty words. The list of 'essentials' is bog-standard: Michael Jackson, Fleetwood Mac, U2 McCormick's attachment to jargon is truly impressive, so it was no surprise to see 'template' appearing once more in his choice of the No. 1 album, Abbey Road. There was also a 'sublime summation' – the sort of alliterative guff Leonard Sachs gave punters as he banged his gavel on The Good Old Days. Abbey Road at No. 1, and Rubber Soul nowhere! What kind of judge is that? If a critic can't get the Beatles lined up properly, he ought to find a kitchen that needs a pot washer. Nor did McCormick find room for Pet Sounds by the Beach Boys – though there was space for the ghastly Bitches Brew by Miles Davis, which is not a pop record at all. As for Joni Mitchell, the Alpha and Omega of Californian self-absorption, she is 'lyrically… on a plane where Bob Dylan and Leonard Cohen are her only serious rivals'. Clearly this chronicler of popular music has never heard of Lorenz Hart, Cole Porter, Ira Gershwin, Johnny Mercer, Dorothy Fields, Johnny Burke, Frank Loesser, Stephen Sondheim and Hal David. Paul Simon should also be there. To borrow from the late football writer Brian Glanville: 'Mitchell, me no Mitchell. Simon towers above her in sheer class.' The list of 'essentials' is bog-standard: Michael Jackson, Fleetwood Mac, U2. There is (gulp) no Pet Sounds or Music from Big Pink – and Revolver limps in at No. 11. Even the dogs in the street know that was the best record the Fab Four made. You may not be surprised to learn, however, that Revolver established yet another 'template'. So it's game, set and match to Master McCormick. The centre court rises.