Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H): Among Nicholas J. Pritzker's Stock Picks with Huge Upside Potential
We recently published an article titled . In this article, we are going to take a look at where Hyatt Hotels Corporation (NYSE:H) stands against Nicholas J. Pritzker's other stock picks with huge upside potential.
Nicholas J. Pritzker is the chairman and co-founder of Tao Capital Partners, a San Francisco-based venture capital firm established in 2013. A prominent American entrepreneur and member of the influential Pritzker family, Nicholas Pritzker is widely recognized for his business acumen and leadership within both the family's ventures and his own independent endeavors. He previously served as Chairman and CEO of the Hyatt Development Corporation and is associated with the Pritzker family's substantial business interests, including ownership stakes in Hyatt Hotels and Conwood, a leading chewing tobacco company. His academic journey includes studies at Reed College, Lake Forest College, and the London School of Economics, followed by earning a J.D. from the University of Chicago.
At Tao Capital Partners, Pritzker oversees a firm that strategically focuses on investments in technology, transportation, healthcare, education, sustainable food, alternative energy, agriculture, consumer products, real estate, and hospitality. Although he holds the role of chairman, Nicholas Pritzker is not the portfolio manager of the firm. Instead, that position is held by Matthias Brachtel, who is responsible for managing the firm's investment portfolio and making critical financial decisions. Under their leadership, Tao Capital has established a reputation for backing innovative and sustainable ventures, emphasizing long-term positive impacts alongside financial returns.
Tao Capital Partners follows a disciplined investment philosophy, targeting sectors poised for growth and transformation. The firm's investments include companies within the technology and transportation industries, as well as those focused on healthcare, education, sustainable food, and clean energy solutions. This diversified approach reflects the firm's commitment to not only achieving financial gains but also fostering advancements in critical global sectors.
As of Q4 2024, Tao Capital Partners reported managing $143.28 million in 13F securities across ten core holdings. The firm's commitment to sustainable and impactful investment aligns with Nicholas Pritzker's broader vision of leveraging capital to drive positive change. Pritzker's guidance continues to shape the firm's strategic direction, while Matthias Brachtel's portfolio management expertise ensures the optimization of returns within the chosen sectors. Through a combination of innovative vision and practical financial management, Tao Capital Partners continues to build a diverse portfolio aimed at fostering sustainable growth.
For this article, we searched through Tao Capital's Q4 2024 13F filings to identify billionaire Nicholas J. Pritzker's stock picks with the highest upside potential. We compiled the equities with upside potential higher than 2% at the time of writing this article and analyzed why they stood out as sound potential investments. Finally, we ranked the stocks based on the ascending order of their upside potential. To assist readers with more context, we mentioned the hedge fund sentiment around each stock using data from 1,009 hedge funds tracked by Insider Monkey in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Why are we interested in the stocks that hedge funds pile into? The reason is simple: our research has shown that we can outperform the market by imitating the top stock picks of the best hedge funds. Our quarterly newsletter's strategy selects 14 small-cap and large-cap stocks every quarter and has returned 363.5% since May 2014, beating its benchmark by 208 percentage points ().
A luxurious hotel suite overlooking a bustling city skyline.Hyatt Hotels Corporation (NYSE:H), headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, is a global hospitality company known for managing and franchising luxury hotels, resorts, and vacation properties. As of the first quarter of 2025, Hyatt has continued to strengthen its market position with notable financial achievements and strategic moves.
For Q1 2025, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (NYSE:H) reported net income attributable to the corporation of $20 million, while adjusted net income stood at $46 million. Diluted earnings per share (EPS) came in at $0.19, with adjusted diluted EPS of $0.46, reflecting the company's ability to generate positive earnings despite fluctuating economic conditions. Demonstrating shareholder commitment, Hyatt repurchased approximately 1.1 million shares of Class A common stock, amounting to $149 million.
Operationally, Hyatt witnessed a comparable system-wide hotels revenue per available room (RevPAR) increase of 5.7% compared to Q1 2024, signaling a steady recovery in guest demand and stronger pricing power. Additionally, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (NYSE:H) achieved net rooms growth of 10.5%, underlining its ongoing expansion in both domestic and international markets. These metrics reflect the successful implementation of Hyatt's strategic growth initiatives, bolstering its position as a leader in the luxury hospitality segment.
The company's increasing appeal among institutional investors is evident, as hedge fund interest rose significantly by the end of Q4 2024. A total of 35 hedge funds held stakes in Hyatt, compared to 22 in the previous quarter, with combined holdings valued at $577 million, according to Insider Monkey's database. Notably, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (NYSE:H) forms 7.66% of Pritzker's highly concentrated portfolio, highlighting its perceived long-term value and growth potential.
With a price target of $144.92 and an upside potential of 17.01%, Hyatt Hotels Corporation (NYSE:H) is among billionaire Nicholas J. Pritzker's stock picks with huge upside potential, supported by its consistent earnings growth, shareholder-friendly strategies, and expanding global presence.
Nightview Capital stated the following regarding Hyatt Hotels Corporation (NYSE:H) in its Q4 2024 investor letter:
'Travel and entertainment are transforming as consumers prioritize experiences over material goods. This isn't a return to pre pandemic norms—it's a reinvention of how we connect, explore, and enjoy life. Travelers seek uniqueness and personalization, while entertainment blends digital and physical realms to create new experiences. The companies leading this evolution are redefining tradition through innovation, delivering unforgettable moments to a new generation. These businesses are not just adapting—they're shaping the future of the experience economy.
Overall H ranks 6th among billionaire Nicholas J. Pritzker's stock picks with huge upside potential. While we acknowledge the potential of H as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and doing so within a shorter timeframe. There is an AI stock that went up since the beginning of 2025, while popular AI stocks lost around 25%. If you are looking for an AI stock that is more promising than H but that trades at less than 5 times its earnings, check out our report about this cheapest AI stock.
READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stock To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires
Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at .
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
30 minutes ago
- CBS News
"eBay for government" helps agencies and schools auction off property, Municibid founder says
A little slice of land in Ambridge Borough could be yours at a steep discount, and all the proceeds will benefit the local community. "We're like an eBay for government," said Greg Berry, CEO and founder of online government auction site Municibid. Berry says his company helps local governments auction off anything, from parcels of land and old desks to school buses and riding mowers. So far, about 7,000 local governments and schools use the online site to sell unneeded items to the public. The latest listing in Ambridge consists of a nearly 4,000-square-foot parcel of land along Glenwood Drive. Twenty-two bids have already been placed at just over $5,000. "A lot of times, smaller towns, and larger ones, have excess land or land that they've come into own in some form, and they don't have a need for it and they're looking to sell it," said Berry. He said maybe in this case, a neighbor wants to expand or a new park could pop up in the space. Berry says governments sell just about everything on his site. "While it's typically vehicles and heavy equipment and tools and land and things that you might expect the government to have and no longer need, it could be anything, such as sailboats and airplanes and jewelry and electric guitars," Berry said. Municibid allows consumers to sort and shop by state, borough or category. And when a winner scores a deal, here's how the costs break down. "When the auction closes and there's a winning bidder, the winning bidder pays us 9% of the winning bid amount, and then they pay 100% of the bid amount to the selling agency," Berry said. Gone are the days of going to the town hall to fill out a sealed bid. Berry told KDKA he used to work as a borough councilor and found that process far from transparent. "No one knew what the governments were selling, and if they did, the process was super inconvenient and intimidating and just wasn't very easy," said Berry. Besides the Ambridge property, KDKA found a lot of items up for grabs in the Pittsburgh area, including an ATV in Mt. Lebanon, a 2020 Ford Explorer in Castle Shannon, a Ford Crown Victoria police car in New Castle, and golf carts in Greensburg. Berry told KDKA some parents snag their teenagers' first car on the site, or business owners land some needed equipment at a fraction of the price.
Forbes
32 minutes ago
- Forbes
Crisis Averted—But What Was The Section 899 Revenge Tax Proposal?
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 23: U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent delivers remarks during the ... More International Finance Institute Global Outlook Forum at the Willard InterContinental Washington on April 23, 2025 in Washington, DC. The forum is being held alongside the 2025 spring meetings of the World Bank Group (WBG) and International Monetary Fund (IMF). (Photo by) There are myriad ways to express displeasure with international tax policy: you can file a complaint at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), leverage a charm offensive, or, if you're looking for a quick fix, you can slap a retaliatory tax on foreign investors, spook the market, and call it a day. The Trump administration opted for the latter—albeit briefly—with the seemingly now-defunct Section 899 provision, branded by some as the 'revenge tax.' This provision, tucked into the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, levied a targeted tax meant to punish countries that impose 'discriminatory' taxes on American firms – particularly tech giants. Now however, after some handshakes and a flurry of posts on social media, it seems the revenge tax has been scrapped. Quietly scuttled, its political usefulness exhausted—for now. What Was the Section 899 'Revenge Tax?' At its core, Section 899 was a legislative jab aimed squarely at America's trading partners. Buried in the GOP's sweeping policy bill, the provision would have authorized the U.S. to impose punitive taxes on companies headquartered in countries that were, in the view of the Trump administration, treating American firms unfairly. The sweeping new section of the tax code would have been titled 'Enforcement of Remedies Against Unfair Foreign Taxes'—not exactly a subtle start. Section 899 didn't go after governments that it felt had treated U.S. firms unfairly, but instead targeted people and businesses with ties to 'discriminatory foreign countries.' That included foreign individuals, corporations not majority-owned by U.S. persons, private foundations and trusts, and just about any other foreign partnership or structure that Treasury didn't like the looks of. The goal was clear: foreign investors from offending jurisdictions were going to be made to feel real economic pain. The core mechanism was an annual ratcheting-up of tax rates by 5% on the U.S. income of 'applicable persons' – everything from dividends and royalties to capital gains and even real estate sales. Exceptions were few – the legislation even explicitly overrode Section 892, which exempts sovereign wealth funds from taxation. The triggering mechanism for the tax was any broadly-defined 'unfair foreign tax,' which included the Undertaxed Profits Rule from OECD's Pillar 2, Digital Services Taxes (DSTs), and any other tax Treasury later deemed discriminatory or deliberately burdensome to U.S. persons. In sum, it would have been sweeping. If passed, Section 899 would have been a weaponization of the tax code into a tool of transparent foreign policy enforcement. It would have marked a sea change in international tax policy, shifting tax rates away from economics and towards the punishment of deemed foreign policy sins. What Prompted this 'Revenge?' Likely the most salient policy shift that triggered this revenge tax was the OECD's Pillar 2. Championed by the Biden administration, Pillar 2 aims to impose a 15% global minimum tax on the profits of multinationals—regardless of where they are headquartered or what markets they serve. On paper, it was intended to end the race to the bottom of low-tax jurisdictions; in practice, it creates a complex web of policies and enforcement rules that can allow foreign governments to tax U.S. companies in situations where the U.S. does not. The Undertaxed Profits Rule allows other countries to claim the ability to tax if a company's home jurisdiction does not sufficiently tax its own domestic entities. Think of it as a foreign state saying, well, if you aren't going to tax your companies at 15%, we'll gladly make up the difference for you. To the Trump administration, this was unacceptable—a path to the European Union skimming revenue from American companies. The final straw was likely the imposition of DSTs—levies aimed at the revenue of tech giants like Meta and Google, often imposed by European countries that have grown tired of waiting for the U.S. to sign on to Pillar 2. Of course, countries considering and ultimately passing DSTs were merely exercising their right to tax American companies selling into their markets—but that is neither here nor there. Why Section 899 Was a Problem—And Why It Died For all its bluster, Section 899 had one main flaw: it was bad policy masquerading as tough politics. From the moment the bill hit the docket, or more accurately folks found it swimming around in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, alarms went off across the market. As it turns out, foreign investment doesn't like uncertainty. Section 899 would have injected a lot of uncertainty into the foreign investment market. The tax hikes weren't automatic, and there was no schedule that could be consulted by any one individual state; they turned on vague determinations like what was and wasn't an 'unfair tax.' Treasury could label a state a discriminatory foreign country based on opaque criteria and ramp up rates immediately—all without Congress lifting a finger. As is to be expected, trade groups warned of chilling effects on capital markets. Foreign governments viewed it as a backdoor sanctions regime. So it died – not with a bang, but with a post. Scott Bessent publicly called for the provision's removal, citing diplomatic progress. The death of the Revenge Tax doesn't mean this particular international tax skirmish is over, however, only that the battle was paused temporarily in favor of diplomacy. If global talks stall, or DSTs raise their heads again, no one should be surprised if a future Congress pulls out this playbook again.
Fast Company
39 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Nvidia stock price hits fresh record high as analyst sees ‘golden wave' of Gen AI adoption
Shares of Nvidia Corp (Nasdaq: NVDA) reached a new record high on Thursday in premarket trading. As of the time of writing, the stock had peaked at $156.99 before slightly sliding to $156.68. The uptick follows Wednesday's all-time high closing price of $154.31, which rose to $154.59 in after-hours trading. DeepSeek and tariffs worried investors earlier this year Nvidia has been a de facto representative of AI investment in the market. It reached a high of $153.13 in early January, but its shares soon tumbled alongside China's success with AI company DeepSeek and uncertainty around tariffs. DeepSeek used Nvidia chips to build its AI systems despite the United States banning their sale to China. The stock hit a low of $86.62 on April 7, just five days after President Trump's 'Liberation Day,' on which he announced a series of tariffs worldwide. But now, at nearly double that price, it has recovered its losses—and signaled a renewed investment in AI. However, it comes as the dollar hits a three-year low after reports that Trump will move up his selection of a new Federal Reserve chair, the Wall Street Journal reports. What's fueling Nvidia's recent rally? The chipmaker's current ascension was fueled in part by Loop Capital's decision yesterday to raise its price target from $175 to $250. 'Our work suggests we are entering the next 'Golden Wave' of Gen AI adoption, and NVDA is at the front-end of another material leg of stronger than anticipated demand,' Loop Capital analyst Ananda Baruah stated in a client note, according to Reuters. Helped along by Nvidia's 4% rise on Wednesday, the Nasdaq composite also neared its record high with a 0.3% increase.
