
Is Hong Kong's legislature becoming too timid, too tame? A year in review
The new law, opposed by the major political parties, was the government's response to a landmark court ruling that found authorities had violated the city's Bill of Rights by failing to offer some form of legal recognition, such as civil partnerships, to same-sex couples.
Opposing lawmakers had
slammed the framework as a threat to the institution of traditional marriage between a man and a woman. It marked a rare public rift between the government and the
Legislative Council
But privately, some conceded a veto might not necessarily be an undesirable outcome as the government could still argue it had fulfilled its constitutional responsibility by offering the bill even if it failed to pass.
Still, the unlikely display of opposition was a break from the brisk and efficient proceedings the chamber had been known for since Beijing revamped the city's electoral system in 2021.
After months of
anti-government protests in 2019 and taunting of Legco by anti-China elements, Beijing moved to overhaul the political system to 'safeguard the constitutional order' of the city, requiring all aspiring lawmakers to demonstrate their patriotism before they could run, a move that effectively wiped out the existing opposition then.
As a measure of the current briskness of business, the legislature approved 117 bills between January 1, 2022, and July 15 this year, or three each month, representing a 98 per cent increase compared with the same period in the previous term.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
The Europe-China trade relationship: deficits, disputes and de-risking
When Donald Trump took office as US president for the second time in January 2025, many people anticipated trade ties between the European Union (EU) and China to grow closer. The reality has been more complex. As the world's third-largest economy, the EU navigates choppy waters between the US and China, while facing a widening trade imbalance with China and increasingly assertive Chinese trade measures. The EU seeks to 'de-risk' as trade talks with China remain stiff and trade disputes between the European bloc and China remain unsolved. What are the core issues at stake and where is this vital partnership heading?


South China Morning Post
8 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump-Putin summit: was it a win for Russia or the US?
The highly anticipated US-Russia presidential summit in Alaska had raised hopes for progress on ending the Ukraine war, but instead left more questions than answers Advertisement Still, observers viewed Vladimir Putin's diplomatic return to US soil – his first in a decade – as a symbolic win for Moscow. The nearly three-hour talks, which both Putin and Donald Trump described as 'productive', signalled a potential thaw in the fraught US-Russia relationship despite concluding without a ceasefire agreement, they said. Meanwhile, as China offered a cautious endorsement of the summit, Chinese and Russian analysts warned that Beijing could face a strategic dilemma , wary of how the limited détente might reshape the US-China-Russia power triangle. With Ukraine and Europe notably absent from the discussions, Trump's post-summit remarks about territorial swaps and US security guarantees sparked confusion over whether he had tacitly accepted Russia's retention of occupied territories amid the prolonged war. Advertisement There was a joint press appearance after the meeting, but neither Trump nor Putin announced concrete outcomes or details on what they had agreed on. They also did not take any questions from reporters. Putin, who was the first to speak, described the US and Russia as 'close neighbours'. He said he hoped 'the agreement that we've reached together' would be seen 'constructively' by Kyiv and European capitals and 'they won't throw a wrench in the works'.


South China Morning Post
8 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Will Trump-Putin thaw in Alaska leave China facing a 3-way dilemma?
The highly anticipated US-Russia presidential summit in Alaska had raised hopes for progress on ending the Ukraine war, but instead left more questions than answers Still, observers viewed Vladimir Putin's diplomatic return to US soil – his first in a decade – as a symbolic win for Moscow. The nearly three-hour talks, which both Putin and Donald Trump described as 'productive', signalled a potential thaw in the fraught US-Russia relationship despite concluding without a ceasefire agreement, they said. Meanwhile, as China offered a cautious endorsement of the summit, Chinese and Russian analysts warned that Beijing could face a strategic dilemma , wary of how the limited détente might reshape the US-China-Russia power triangle. With Ukraine and Europe notably absent from the discussions, Trump's post-summit remarks about territorial swaps and US security guarantees sparked confusion over whether he had tacitly accepted Russia's retention of occupied territories amid the prolonged war. There was a joint press appearance after the meeting, but neither Trump nor Putin announced concrete outcomes or details on what they had agreed on. They also did not take any questions from reporters. Putin, who was the first to speak, described the US and Russia as 'close neighbours'. He said he hoped 'the agreement that we've reached together' would be seen 'constructively' by Kyiv and European capitals and 'they won't throw a wrench in the works'.