logo
How the East Midlands is already transforming NHS care

How the East Midlands is already transforming NHS care

ITV News2 days ago
The NHS 10-Year Plan, published by the government last month, lays out an ambitious vision - to make healthcare more accessible, efficient and centred around the needs of patients. But what does that look like in practice?
Across the East Midlands, change is already happening, from quicker ways to access a GP and faster hospital discharges, to better care and support for patients at home. These innovations matter all year round but especially during the winter months when the NHS comes under its greatest pressure.
Freeing up hospital beds faster
Flow through hospitals, from A&E to wards to discharge, becomes even more critical in winter when beds are tight and demand surges.
At King's Mill Hospital in Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, five daily meetings coordinate resources and discharge planning. The goal? To make sure beds are available for those who need them, when they need them.
A key part of this is the hospital's Discharge Lounge, which opened just over a year ago. It provides a calm space for patients who are ready to go home but waiting on medication or transport.
'It's a much calmer experience,' said 80-year-old Jillian, waiting to be collected after a hospital stay.
More than 10,500 patients have used the lounge so far, a move that's significantly reduced pressure on wards and emergency departments.
'Everything we do from the moment someone comes through the door, their whole journey, is key to making sure they can leave in a timely way,' said Janine Foxhall, Associate Director of Operations at Sherwood Forest Hospitals.
GP access easier with technology
Primary care is evolving and digital tools are helping ease pressure on phone lines, cutting down the rush for 'those 8am appointments' and making it easier for patients to get the care they need.
At Measham Medical Unit in North West Leicestershire, nearly half of GP appointments are now booked through Rapid Health - an NHS-approved online triage system available 24/7. The practice has been using it since November 2024 and has already noticed the difference.
'It's taken approximately 500 to 600 appointments off the telephone system each week, reducing wait times significantly,' said Dr Ruth Handford.
For many patients, the convenience is a game-changer.
'I didn't have to sit on the phone and wait 45 minutes for an appointment that probably never comes,' said patient James Pearson. 'I can just book the appointment online and I usually get it the same day or the next. It really helps with time.'
The surgery still offers phone bookings for those less confident with tech and continues to provide appointments for children and home visits.
'It's really important that we try and find new ways to safely manage the demands on the service,' added Dr Handford. 'It's just a case of getting the right patient to the right clinician in the right place and that applies across the whole NHS.'
Bringing healthcare closer to home
One of the NHS Plan's key ambitions is to develop more localised, community-based care. In Derbyshire, the 'Team Up' initiative is already putting that into practice.
'Team Up' brings together GPs, pharmacists and social prescribers to support people with complex needs in their own homes - reducing hospital admissions and improving quality of life.
For Rob Bell from Chaddesden, Derby, the impact has been life-changing. Three years ago, a construction site accident left him with multiple injuries, paralysis and bouts of temporary blindness. His health and hope were declining fast.
'Before, I was like a zombie,' Rob said. 'Now, I'm alive again and that's what they have done.'
A GP referral a year ago connected him with the Complex Care Team, part of 'Team Up'. Since then, he's had medication reviews, help applying for benefits and support moving into an accessible home.
'If you can get better communication and better working with health and social care, then that enables strategies to be put in place,' said Dr Ruth Lenehan from the team. 'People stay at home, get the care they need and avoid unnecessary hospital visits. It's a win-win for everyone.'
Since launching in 2021, the initiative has helped prevent an estimated 1,000 unnecessary hospital trips and 700 unplanned admissions every year, saving around 3,500 hours of GP time annually.
Faster surgical care with same-day discharge
Not all emergencies need an overnight stay and the Surgical Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) unit at King's Mill Hospital proves it.
Launched in 2024, the unit sees patients with urgent surgical issues like abscesses, gallstones or wounds, offering treatment plans and often sending them home the same day. About 80% of patients are discharged within hours.
'It's been really efficient,' said James Prewett, who came in for a recurring abscess. 'I saw my GP this morning and four hours later it was dealt with. Just one day off work and the problem's gone.'
With more than 2,000 patients seen in its first year, the unit is helping reduce pressure on A&E and freeing up hospital beds.
'On an almost daily basis the hospital is at or near capacity,' said Clinical Lead, Consultant Jane Patterson. 'But patients are more willing to be seen and discharged, as long as they've had a proper assessment and a clear plan. That really seems to work.'
What the next 10 years could bring?
The NHS 10-Year Plan is designed to reshape services around people's lives - making care more personalised, more integrated and closer to home. Across the East Midlands, these changes are already underway.
Whether it's online GP triage, community care teams, faster discharges or same-day surgery, each innovation is helping the NHS run more smoothly, when every hour and every bed matters. It's already making a difference to thousands of patients across the region.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Government urged to crack down on ‘exploitative' baby formula marketing
Government urged to crack down on ‘exploitative' baby formula marketing

Leader Live

time4 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Government urged to crack down on ‘exploitative' baby formula marketing

Liberal Democrat MP Jess Brown-Fuller, chairwoman of the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Infant Feeding, has said new parents face inflated prices and unfounded health claims on packaging. Firms are also 'exploiting a legal loophole' to circumvent rules about the advertising of formula, she added, and offering their product to hospitals at discounted rates, giving parents the impression of an NHS recommendation. The Chichester MP is raising concerns after the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) published a formula market study report earlier this year highlighting a number of issues, including misleading marketing, information gaps and cost impacts on low-income families. Formula manufacturers increased prices by an average of 25% in the two years up to November 2023 and they remain at near record highs. Parents often believe that a higher price tag means a more nutritious formula for their baby, despite regulations requiring all formula on the market to be nutritionally equivalent. Ms Brown-Fuller told the PA news agency: 'There are parents who believe that by buying the more expensive formula, they are supporting their child's feeding or growth or potential more when actually all of those milks are nutritionally equivalent.' There are even reports of parents buying more expensive formula but using fewer scoops per bottle to try and make it last longer, which Ms Brown-Fuller branded 'dangerous'. These parents are doing what they think is best for their children, she said, when in reality there is 'no difference' between the £14 tub and £7 tub of formula. The Liberal Democrat noted that companies will use their packaging to 'imply a nutritional superiority', with phrases like 'nutritionally complete' or 'supports a healthy immune system'. She asked: 'Where is the evidence that suggests that that formula is in any way a boost to an infant's immune system above any others?' Meanwhile, other formulas will write 'with added…' and name ingredients like Omega 3, certain vitamins, or iron. Ms Brown-Fuller said: 'It has to have a certain number of nutrients in it anyway. And anything that is additional potentially shouldn't be in there because they are working around a very strict compliance code.' She explained: 'They wouldn't be able to make these bold claims if they were a medication but, because it's a food, it's a source of nutrition, they're not held to the same standards.' Meanwhile, it is illegal to advertise newborn formula in the UK but firms are allowed to advertise follow-on milk for babies that are six months and older. This is because World Health Organisation (WHO) guidance is that breast milk should be the main source of nutrition for all infants until they are six months old, and a lack of advertising regulation is linked to lower breastfeeding rates. Ms Brown-Fuller said: 'There is a direct correlation between countries that have no regulation around formula marketing and drastic reductions in breastfeeding. 'So that is why the Government did introduce regulation around advertising of formula milk because the numbers of breastfeeding mothers was dramatically reducing.' The UK scores just 48 out of 100 overall on a range of infant-feeding metrics, according to the World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative. However, to get around these regulations, formula companies advertise for their follow-on milk and 'make all their packaging look exactly the same to anybody that was just perusing the shelves'. The Chichester MP said: 'They're exploiting a legal loophole, because it is a legal loophole, but they've totally blurred the lines through similar branding.' Another form of 'exploitative' marketing, she argued, is that formula companies will sell their formula into healthcare professional environments like maternity units or neonatal units for a hugely reduced price. Purchase habits show strong brand loyalty when it comes to formula, with parents rarely switching brands once they have introduced a particular one to their baby. It is also argued that brand presence in a healthcare setting gives the 'fake impression of an NHS endorsement'. Ms Brown-Fuller told PA: 'They know that if they get the parents to use that in a hospital setting, the likelihood is that that is the formula they will then use when they go home.' The CMA has put forward 11 recommendations to address these issues, aiming to strengthen labelling and advertising rules, better inform parents to make choices in retail environments and to eliminate brand influence in healthcare settings with standardised packaging. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'As part of our Plan for Change, we're determined to ensure every child has the best start to life. 'There are many benefits of breastfeeding but for those mothers that cannot or choose not to breastfeed, it is vital parents can access infant formula that is affordable and high quality. Families should not be paying over the odds to feed their babies. 'We are working closely with the devolved governments to carefully consider the CMA's recommendations and will respond fully in due course.'

Government urged to crack down on ‘exploitative' baby formula marketing
Government urged to crack down on ‘exploitative' baby formula marketing

North Wales Chronicle

timean hour ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Government urged to crack down on ‘exploitative' baby formula marketing

Liberal Democrat MP Jess Brown-Fuller, chairwoman of the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Infant Feeding, has said new parents face inflated prices and unfounded health claims on packaging. Firms are also 'exploiting a legal loophole' to circumvent rules about the advertising of formula, she added, and offering their product to hospitals at discounted rates, giving parents the impression of an NHS recommendation. The Chichester MP is raising concerns after the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) published a formula market study report earlier this year highlighting a number of issues, including misleading marketing, information gaps and cost impacts on low-income families. Formula manufacturers increased prices by an average of 25% in the two years up to November 2023 and they remain at near record highs. Parents often believe that a higher price tag means a more nutritious formula for their baby, despite regulations requiring all formula on the market to be nutritionally equivalent. Ms Brown-Fuller told the PA news agency: 'There are parents who believe that by buying the more expensive formula, they are supporting their child's feeding or growth or potential more when actually all of those milks are nutritionally equivalent.' There are even reports of parents buying more expensive formula but using fewer scoops per bottle to try and make it last longer, which Ms Brown-Fuller branded 'dangerous'. These parents are doing what they think is best for their children, she said, when in reality there is 'no difference' between the £14 tub and £7 tub of formula. The Liberal Democrat noted that companies will use their packaging to 'imply a nutritional superiority', with phrases like 'nutritionally complete' or 'supports a healthy immune system'. She asked: 'Where is the evidence that suggests that that formula is in any way a boost to an infant's immune system above any others?' Meanwhile, other formulas will write 'with added…' and name ingredients like Omega 3, certain vitamins, or iron. Ms Brown-Fuller said: 'It has to have a certain number of nutrients in it anyway. And anything that is additional potentially shouldn't be in there because they are working around a very strict compliance code.' She explained: 'They wouldn't be able to make these bold claims if they were a medication but, because it's a food, it's a source of nutrition, they're not held to the same standards.' Meanwhile, it is illegal to advertise newborn formula in the UK but firms are allowed to advertise follow-on milk for babies that are six months and older. This is because World Health Organisation (WHO) guidance is that breast milk should be the main source of nutrition for all infants until they are six months old, and a lack of advertising regulation is linked to lower breastfeeding rates. Ms Brown-Fuller said: 'There is a direct correlation between countries that have no regulation around formula marketing and drastic reductions in breastfeeding. 'So that is why the Government did introduce regulation around advertising of formula milk because the numbers of breastfeeding mothers was dramatically reducing.' The UK scores just 48 out of 100 overall on a range of infant-feeding metrics, according to the World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative. However, to get around these regulations, formula companies advertise for their follow-on milk and 'make all their packaging look exactly the same to anybody that was just perusing the shelves'. The Chichester MP said: 'They're exploiting a legal loophole, because it is a legal loophole, but they've totally blurred the lines through similar branding.' Another form of 'exploitative' marketing, she argued, is that formula companies will sell their formula into healthcare professional environments like maternity units or neonatal units for a hugely reduced price. Purchase habits show strong brand loyalty when it comes to formula, with parents rarely switching brands once they have introduced a particular one to their baby. It is also argued that brand presence in a healthcare setting gives the 'fake impression of an NHS endorsement'. Ms Brown-Fuller told PA: 'They know that if they get the parents to use that in a hospital setting, the likelihood is that that is the formula they will then use when they go home.' The CMA has put forward 11 recommendations to address these issues, aiming to strengthen labelling and advertising rules, better inform parents to make choices in retail environments and to eliminate brand influence in healthcare settings with standardised packaging. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'As part of our Plan for Change, we're determined to ensure every child has the best start to life. 'There are many benefits of breastfeeding but for those mothers that cannot or choose not to breastfeed, it is vital parents can access infant formula that is affordable and high quality. Families should not be paying over the odds to feed their babies. 'We are working closely with the devolved governments to carefully consider the CMA's recommendations and will respond fully in due course.'

Government urged to crack down on ‘exploitative' baby formula marketing
Government urged to crack down on ‘exploitative' baby formula marketing

South Wales Guardian

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Government urged to crack down on ‘exploitative' baby formula marketing

Liberal Democrat MP Jess Brown-Fuller, chairwoman of the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Infant Feeding, has said new parents face inflated prices and unfounded health claims on packaging. Firms are also 'exploiting a legal loophole' to circumvent rules about the advertising of formula, she added, and offering their product to hospitals at discounted rates, giving parents the impression of an NHS recommendation. The Chichester MP is raising concerns after the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) published a formula market study report earlier this year highlighting a number of issues, including misleading marketing, information gaps and cost impacts on low-income families. Formula manufacturers increased prices by an average of 25% in the two years up to November 2023 and they remain at near record highs. Parents often believe that a higher price tag means a more nutritious formula for their baby, despite regulations requiring all formula on the market to be nutritionally equivalent. Ms Brown-Fuller told the PA news agency: 'There are parents who believe that by buying the more expensive formula, they are supporting their child's feeding or growth or potential more when actually all of those milks are nutritionally equivalent.' There are even reports of parents buying more expensive formula but using fewer scoops per bottle to try and make it last longer, which Ms Brown-Fuller branded 'dangerous'. These parents are doing what they think is best for their children, she said, when in reality there is 'no difference' between the £14 tub and £7 tub of formula. The Liberal Democrat noted that companies will use their packaging to 'imply a nutritional superiority', with phrases like 'nutritionally complete' or 'supports a healthy immune system'. She asked: 'Where is the evidence that suggests that that formula is in any way a boost to an infant's immune system above any others?' Meanwhile, other formulas will write 'with added…' and name ingredients like Omega 3, certain vitamins, or iron. Ms Brown-Fuller said: 'It has to have a certain number of nutrients in it anyway. And anything that is additional potentially shouldn't be in there because they are working around a very strict compliance code.' She explained: 'They wouldn't be able to make these bold claims if they were a medication but, because it's a food, it's a source of nutrition, they're not held to the same standards.' Meanwhile, it is illegal to advertise newborn formula in the UK but firms are allowed to advertise follow-on milk for babies that are six months and older. This is because World Health Organisation (WHO) guidance is that breast milk should be the main source of nutrition for all infants until they are six months old, and a lack of advertising regulation is linked to lower breastfeeding rates. Ms Brown-Fuller said: 'There is a direct correlation between countries that have no regulation around formula marketing and drastic reductions in breastfeeding. 'So that is why the Government did introduce regulation around advertising of formula milk because the numbers of breastfeeding mothers was dramatically reducing.' The UK scores just 48 out of 100 overall on a range of infant-feeding metrics, according to the World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative. However, to get around these regulations, formula companies advertise for their follow-on milk and 'make all their packaging look exactly the same to anybody that was just perusing the shelves'. The Chichester MP said: 'They're exploiting a legal loophole, because it is a legal loophole, but they've totally blurred the lines through similar branding.' Another form of 'exploitative' marketing, she argued, is that formula companies will sell their formula into healthcare professional environments like maternity units or neonatal units for a hugely reduced price. Purchase habits show strong brand loyalty when it comes to formula, with parents rarely switching brands once they have introduced a particular one to their baby. It is also argued that brand presence in a healthcare setting gives the 'fake impression of an NHS endorsement'. Ms Brown-Fuller told PA: 'They know that if they get the parents to use that in a hospital setting, the likelihood is that that is the formula they will then use when they go home.' The CMA has put forward 11 recommendations to address these issues, aiming to strengthen labelling and advertising rules, better inform parents to make choices in retail environments and to eliminate brand influence in healthcare settings with standardised packaging. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'As part of our Plan for Change, we're determined to ensure every child has the best start to life. 'There are many benefits of breastfeeding but for those mothers that cannot or choose not to breastfeed, it is vital parents can access infant formula that is affordable and high quality. Families should not be paying over the odds to feed their babies. 'We are working closely with the devolved governments to carefully consider the CMA's recommendations and will respond fully in due course.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store