Sheffield priest assaulted 'staggering number' of women, court told
NOS was initially lauded by Church of England leaders for its "ground-breaking" services which incorporated live music and multimedia to attract young people to St Thomas Church, Mr Clark told the jury as he opened the prosecution's case on Tuesday.But he said the group "became a cult" in which members were encouraged to cut themselves off from family and friends, leaving them "utterly dependent" on NOS and "desperate for the attention and praise" of its leader Mr Brain.
The jury heard some young women who joined the movement were recruited to a team which looked after Mr Brain, his wife and their daughter in their Sheffield home, where the defendant was "surrounded by attractive women" wearing lingerie or other revealing clothing.One woman who joined the team - referred to as "the Lycra lovelies" or "the Lycra nuns" - told a police interview she was warned she would be excluded if she disobeyed Mr Brain.Mr Brain would also "suddenly appear" beside female members as they walked in the street and ask them to get into his car, the jury heard.Mr Clark said: "Those who did not keep the defendant happy would find themselves estranged from the group - this was incredibly disconcerting to young impressionable women who had become emotionally dependent on NOS and, as a result, highly vulnerable."The prosecutor said "any capacity to consent" to sexual acts with Mr Brain was "removed by the domineering nature of the defendant, by his control over their entire lives and by their absolute terror of being ostracised".The alleged offences are said to have taken place between 1981 and 1995.The trial, which is expected to last six to eight weeks, continues.
Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
32 minutes ago
- BBC News
Redcar houses linked to drug dealing targeted by court
A house linked to drug dealing and anti-social behaviour has been shut down while a second has been made subject to Police said incidents at the properties in Redcar - on Broadway West, Dormanstown, and Westbourne Avenue, Coatham - left people nearby feeling intimidated in their own homes.A court order for the Dormanstown address says only one named resident and one other person with reason to visit can now be present with anyone else there facing a fine or Neil Deluce said the force would "continue to go after and deal with those who believe they can behave in this way with no care for the wellbeing or safety of the law-abiding majority". Councillor Adam Brook, cabinet member for neighbourhoods at Redcar and Cleveland Council, said he hoped the measures would "help to send a message to anyone who commits crime and anti-social behaviour in our communities to think again because they will be dealt with robustly".A spokesperson for landlord Beyond Housing also welcomed the orders, saying the firm was committed to helping police and the local authority "tackle behaviour that causes distress and disruption to local communities". Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
BBC News
32 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man in court accused of cutting BBC Jersey transmitter cable
A man accused of cutting the cables of five JT mobile phone masts and the BBC Radio Jersey Medium Wave transmitter has appeared before a Symanski, 44, was charged with causing malicious Bridget Shaw said the allegations were too serious for the court to deal with and ordered Mr Symanski to appear at the Royal Court on 5 Symanski was remanded in custody until then.
The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Labour has delivered where Tory ministers did not on NDA rules
The ban on the use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to silence employees subjected to harassment and abuse is a significant and long-awaited moment – one that has been talked about since the advent of the #MeToo movement. Such contracts, where employers usually agree to pay an employee in return for keeping information confidential, have been around for decades but entered the lexicon as a result of the appalling revelations of sexual abuse and discrimination faced by women in the workplace. NDAs had originally been used for the understandable reason of protecting trade secrets when staff were moving jobs but have since become associated with a much darker purpose. Their use – or misuse – entered the public consciousness when, in 2017, Zelda Perkins, a former aide of the American film producer Harvey Weinstein, decided to break an NDA to expose how he had used the gagging contracts to silence harassment victims. The UK had its own reckoning with NDAs the following year when it emerged – only after an MP used parliamentary privilege to name him – that the billionaire businessman Philip Green had used them to prevent staff revealing sexual harassment and bullying allegations, which he denied. Those scandals and others appeared to provide impetus for reform, with the then prime minister, Theresa May, promising to act swiftly on the problem. While in opposition, under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, Labour pledged to ban NDAs that stopped employees from disclosing discrimination, harassment or victimisation. A 2019 report by the Commons' women and equalities committee (WEC) found employers were routinely using NDAs to cover up allegations of such behaviour at work and said their use in these circumstances should be outlawed. The Conservative government of the time responded to the report by saying it would legislate to prevent the misuse of NDAs but never did. In the meantime, evidence of their use in organisations as disparate as trade unions, charities, universities and media organisations proliferated. Announcing the ban on NDAs being used to silence victims and witnesses of harassment and discrimination, the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, said it was not an issue confined to high-profile individuals or the most powerful organisations but was growing 'sadly among those in low-income or insecure employment across multiple industries and workplaces'. While ministers did not act, others did, including the solicitors' regulator. It issued a warning notice, first in 2018 in light of evidence heard by the WEC, and then updated last year, which outlined a range of circumstances in which preventing disclosure would be improper. Although solicitors are duty bound to abide by the warning notice, it is not the same as having a statutory prohibition, which is what the amendment to the employment rights bill will do. Reacting to the proposal, Perkins said: 'If what is promised at this stage becomes reality, then the UK will be leading the world in protecting not only workers but the integrity of the law.' That is not to say there are not problems. In the past, people have suggested employers will have no incentive to settle without confidentiality, that NDAs expedite a quick settlement without having to go to a tribunal and can deliver higher payments. But the trickle of revelations about them tells a different story: of a power imbalance between employer and employee being exploited to the detriment of the latter and those who came after them, who might otherwise have been forewarned of what they were getting themselves into. In the face of such evidence, it is easy to see why Labour has acted to fulfil a pledge that previous governments failed to deliver.
