Indiana leaders welcome EPA's proposed rollback on climate change
Rescinding the pivotal 2009 air pollution guidance would eliminate greenhouse gas standards and regulations, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said at a press conference attended by Gov. Mike Braun and other state and federal officials.
'If finalized, today's announcement would amount to the largest regulatory action in the history of the United States,' Zeldin said.
Environmental advocates responded, saying the move is a devastating assault on clean air protections, and will exacerbate climate change, endanger public health and even slow the economy.
Braun, who formerly operated an automotive parts company now embroiled in a Clean Air Act legal battle, said he was 'tickled pink' the EPA chose to partner with Indiana — a state whose auto manufacturing industry could benefit from emission deregulation — in announcing the proposal.
Zeldin claimed the original finding that allowed the EPA to regulate greenhouse gasses relied "on assumptions that ended up not being true. They ended up making predictions about the science that many respects were not just pessimistic, they turned out not to be true.'
Environmental and public health advocates don't agree. In a statement, the Sierra Club said the effort to repeal was the "most direct assault thus far on the movement to mitigate the climate crisis."
'The vast majority of scientists will disagree with him,' said Meredith Hankins, an attorney at the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'Science has gotten stronger at demonstrating the harmful effects from greenhouse gases.'
Suzanne Jawaroski, the Indiana secretary of energy and natural resources, said Indiana's model of balancing economy and emissions could now scale nationally. She didn't mention Indiana ranks below all other states for its natural environment, according to a US News report.
What is the endangerment finding?
Greenhouse gases weren't always classified as air pollutants under the Clean Air Act.
Concerns about motor vehicles emissions rising throughout the early 2000s led to a petition where 19 organizations called upon the EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. The EPA rejected the petition, arguing the gases weren't considered air pollutants subject to the Clean Air Act.
Litigation ensued. And in 2007, the Supreme Court categorized greenhouse gases as 'without a doubt' air pollutants in a ruling leading to the endangerment finding.
In 2009, the finding gave the EPA authority to regulate six greenhouse gases — including carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide — as threats to human health. That move contributed to regulations on emissions from cars, trucks, power plants and the oil and gas industry.
The agency considered "the full weight of scientific evidence" when finalizing the finding under the Clean Air Act, and at the time, the EPA found the greenhouse gasses were dangerous to both public health and welfare for current and future generations.
Then-EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson cited assessments from the U.S. Global Climate Research Program, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the National Research Council as supporting evidence of the endangerment finding.
"This long-overdue finding cements 2009's place in history as the year when the United States Government began seriously addressing the challenge of greenhouse gas pollution and seizing the opportunity of clean-energy reform," Jackson said in a 2009 statement. "In less than 11 months, we have done more to promote clean energy and prevent climate change than happened in the last eight years."
Indiana's push to stop the endangerment finding
The state of Indiana has long opposed the endangerment finding. Before it was finalized in 2009, the state submitted comments to the EPA expressing disagreement over the quality of the science cited by the agency.
The endangerment finding proposal "is not supported by sound science," wrote Thomas Easterly, then-head of IDEM. The state expressed disbelief that human-caused greenhouse gas emissions have any direct impact on public health or welfare.
After pointing to studies outlining the Earth's history of temperature fluctuation, the report argued that a clear link between climate change and greenhouse gas emissions hadn't yet been established. The state requested the EPA conduct more research before making a finding that could result in "cumbersome and costly regulatory actions" — but ultimately, the endangerment finding was finalized later that year.
Since 2009, climate change research has proliferated. NASA has determined that despite the Earth's history of climatic changes, the current rate of warming is unprecedented when compared to 10,000 years of the planet's history.
But Indiana hasn't stopped pushing for the deregulation of greenhouse gas emissions.
IDEM Commissioner Clint Woods assisted in the completion of a chapter of The Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 — a conservative vision for President Donald Trump's second term. The chapter, which focused on the EPA, recommended an "update the 2009 endangerment finding."
In March, the Trump administration initiated a formal reconsideration of the endangerment finding, and this month, IDEM participated in a meeting with the federal Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs to discuss Indiana's perspective.
"IDEM did not have access to the underlying proposal but shared previous State of Indiana comments on related issues, including on the '2009 Endangerment Finding,'" wrote Allen Carter, a spokesperson for IDEM.
On July 25, state Rep. Beau Baird, R-Greencastle, invited Zeldin to visit Indiana to tour conservation sites and discuss environmental issues. Just four days later, Zeldin was in Indianapolis to announce a proposal to repeal the finding.
Repeal provides economic benefits, some say
Zeldin's tenure as EPA's administrator has been marked by deregulation in the name of economic progress. Braun and Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita both commended the administrator's efforts to align the agency with Trump's efforts in the White House.
The Indiana Manufacturers Association also made a statement saying this will remove burdens that hindered economic growth. Ashton Eller, vice president of governmental affairs at IMA, wrote that burdensome regulatory actions cost jobs, drive up energy prices and are counterproductive.
'This is a significant victory for manufacturers and other large stationary sources that face burdensome regulations and increased costs under the previous framework,' Eller added.
Environmental advocates say it is a step backward
Several environmental organizations and Democrat lawmakers have expressed frustration with the EPA's proposal to rescind the endangerment finding.
Rep. Carey Hamilton, D-Indianapolis, said repealing the rule is shortsighted from not only a human health perspective, but an economic one, too.
'China is eating our lunch when it comes to clean energy manufacturing,' Hamilton told IndyStar. 'Indiana — thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act — has significant investments going into EV battery and solar panel manufacturing.'
She is concerned the proposal to rollback the endangerment finding threatens these investments and weakens Indiana's foothold in renewables as the rest of the global economy is moving away from fossil fuels.
Rep. Sue Errington, D-Muncie, the ranking minority member of the House Environmental Affair Committee, said summers in Indiana are already 'hotter, longer and more dangerous than they were a decade ago." Eliminating greenhouse gas standards, she said, will accelerate climate change and harm public health.
'Environmental protections, long supported on a bipartisan basis, are now being used as a political tool," Errington said. "Hoosiers deserve better than short-term political gain at the expense of our land, water and health.'
IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.
Karl Schneider is an IndyStar environment reporter. You can reach him at karl.schneider@indystar.com. Follow him on BlueSky @karlstartswithk.bsky.social or X @karlstartswithk.
Sophie Hartley is an IndyStar environment reporter. You can reach her at sophie.hartley@indystar.com or on X at @sophienhartley.
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Indiana leaders welcome EPA's proposed rollback on climate change
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
9 hours ago
- Boston Globe
PFAS bill targets management of sewage sludge
'I've long understood Maine's leadership, nationally and internationally, on the issue of banning PFAS, banning biosolids, centering farms, and supporting farmers,' Comerford told reporters outside the Maine State House in Augusta Tuesday afternoon. 'I leave with a renewed fire in my belly that in Massachusetts, we have to turn off the tap for PFAS,' the Northampton Democrat added. 'We must follow Maine. There is a saying in Massachusetts, 'Where goes Maine, there goes the nation.' And so in Massachusetts, we must ban PFAS.' Advertisement The US Environmental Protection Agency on its website promotes the land application of sewage sludge, outlining environmental benefits such as 'improved soil health, carbon sequestration, and reduced demand on non-renewable resources like phosphorus.' The EPA says it defines biosolids as sewage sludge that's been treated and meets regulatory standards to be used as fertilizer. Still, PFAS are 'nearly universal' within the chemicals that the EPA detects in wastewater sludge, according to the Maine Morning Star. Advertisement When PFAS enter soil that is used to grow crops, the contamination can be passed on to farmers and consumers, according to Comerford's office, which said that small doses of PFAS are linked to cancer, harm to the reproductive and immune systems, and other diseases. The legislation from Comerford and Arena-DeRosa calls for the creation of a statewide plan for reducing and managing sludge. It also authorizes legal and financial protections for farmers and a relief fund to help farmers who have suffered financial losses 'resulting from standard agricultural practices that may have resulted in the actual or suspected presence of PFAS in soil, water or agricultural products,' according to the bills. 'We want to encourage testing, but we have to do it in a way that people aren't going to be afraid to test,' Arena-DeRosa said. 'Right now, we're dealing with that in Massachusetts because we're worried about the cost, so we have to think about mitigation strategies and the funding that it's going to take.' The bills are awaiting a hearing before the Agricultural and Fisheries Committee. Comerford is vice chair of the panel. During their day trip on Tuesday, the Massachusetts delegation visited a PFAS-impacted farm in Arundel, attended a lunch and 'storytelling session' at the Maine State House, and participated in a roundtable discussion with farmers, advocates, and lawmakers, Comerford's office said. Massachusetts lawmakers on the trip included Reps. Arena-DeRosa, Michelle Ciccolo, Steven Owens, and Senators Comerford and Jamie Eldridge. They were joined by Maine Representatives Bill Pluecker and Lori Gramlich, and Senator Henry Ingwersen. Advertisement Pluecker said he sponsored the landmark legislation in Maine that prohibited applying sludge on farms. 'This toxic contaminant, which knows no bounds regionally, flows downhill. It poisons our water, fish, and drinking water,' he said. 'And what we need to do is stand together as politicians and activists across the states, regionally looking at how we can address this issue and how we can move the issue forward to protect farmers, wherever you may be.' Ingwersen recalled how his work confronting PFAS started in 2016 in his hometown of Arundel, where a dairy farmer discovered his property was contaminated. The farmer had to slaughter cows, pause selling products, and spend thousands of dollars out of pocket to mitigate the issue, he said. 'We know we must keep up the fight here and share what we've learned with anyone looking to do the same,' Ingwersen said. 'So I was really happy to be able to talk to our folks in Massachusetts and hopefully begin relationships we can work together on in their state.' Comerford said she asked Maine lawmakers about the lessons they've learned and about any approaches they would have done differently. 'I do feel like we've benefitted greatly from the wisdom, and the experience, and the knowledge base that Maine has built,' Comerford said. 'We have to think as upstream as we could possibly go, and that is the manufacturers, the chemical companies who make these chemicals and have polluted our rivers and polluted our food systems.' The Massachusetts chapter of the Northeast Organic Farming Association, which supports the legislation from Comerford and Arena-DeRosa, says a relief fund 'will be critical for increasing PFAS testing and protecting farmers' business liability and their health.' Advertisement 'While it's anticipated that some farms will have higher than acceptable levels of PFAS in their soil and/or water, farmers are hesitant to test until they know they'll be protected in case they need to cease production,' NOFA/Mass The legislation is also a priority for environmental advocacy group Clean Water Action. 'Farmers across the nation are learning that the fertilizer they used may have contained high levels of PFAS, and they need our help to identify and remediate PFAS contamination to ensure that our food supply is safe,' Clean Water Action
E&E News
15 hours ago
- E&E News
EPA unplugs biogas-to-electricity in renewable fuel standard
The Trump administration is putting the brakes on an already sputtering effort to turn farm wastes into power for electric vehicles. In its latest proposal for biofuel volumes as part of the federal renewable fuel standard, EPA said it intends to remove electricity as a qualifying fuel for the incentive program — and thus kill the credits producers might have claimed for making electricity from manure gases. That's a big setback for the biogas industry and organizations that hoped EVs might help turn waste into profits. Advertisement It's not just manure that's losing out as biogas from municipal sewage treatment plants can also generate electricity. But the demise of so-called eRINs — or electric renewable identification numbers — is part of a mixed picture for agriculture in an administration that touts a 'farmers first' agenda.
E&E News
15 hours ago
- E&E News
EPA brings guidance database back online
EPA has revived an online database to shed light on thousands of the agency's guidance documents. The agency announced the relaunch Wednesday of a feature from the first Trump administration: A searchable web portal for the public to find advice on how to comply with rules. It's another step on the regulatory front by President Donald Trump as his team looks to revise and often pull back environmental rules dealing with air, climate and water pollution. Deputy Administrator David Fotouhi said in a statement the portal will 'reduce bureaucratic hurdles and increase transparency' for those interested in the agency's guidance documents. Advertisement 'This will bring much-needed clarity to small business owners, farmers, and everyday Americans, and it reinforces our commitment to following the law and upholding fundamental fairness,' said Fotouhi, who also served as EPA's acting general counsel during the first Trump administration.
