New Jersey issues new guidance on national opioid settlement spending
A Reach NJ poster along Pacific Ave. in Atlantic City on Feb. 13, 2023. (Daniella Heminghaus for New Jersey Monitor)
A state panel on Thursday issued a five-year strategic plan advising New Jersey communities how to spend over $1 billion in national opioid settlement funds they're expected to receive over the next decade and a half.
The plan comes as an escalating court fight over two 'opioid awareness concerts' in Irvington shows such guidance may be overdue.
Investigators from the state comptroller's office have raised concerns about fraud, misuse of money and contract and ethical improprieties after Irvington paid nearly $370,000 in opioid settlement funds in 2023 and 2024 to two entertainment companies — both tied to a township employee — that ran the concerts, according to a defamation lawsuit Irvington filed in April. The comptroller's office was set to release a report on investigators' findings when the township sued to block its release.
The state's strategic plan announced Thursday — drafted by an advisory council convened in 2023 — offered no definitive answers on whether drug awareness concerts are an acceptable use of settlement funds. Instead, the council said spending should be evaluated on an array of metrics to ensure it is 'data-driven and equity-focused.'
The settlement funds come from pharmaceutical companies and others that helped fuel the opioid crisis, and the settlement agreements arose from separate claims by states and local governments. The state of New Jersey and its local governments will each get about half of the more than $1.1 billion in funding expected to flow to New Jersey through 2038.
Thursday's plan is intended to guide the disbursement of the state's share of settlement funds, 'though hopefully it will prove a helpful tool for subdivision decision-making,' said Tom Hester, a state Department of Human Services spokesman.
'The state does not provide legal advice nor approve or deny local proposals related to subdivision settlement funds. Subdivisions are encouraged to review the national and state subdivision agreements for guidance on how these funds may be used,' he said.
County and municipal officials must publicly report each year how they spend settlement funds, which began disbursing in 2022.
Some reported that they haven't started spending yet. But those that have invested in things like direct services to people struggling with addiction, drug-awareness school assemblies and community events, and Narcan training and supplies for government employees.
The reports give a snapshot of the various ways officials have spent funds, including:
Union County paid for transportation to treatment centers, with the goal of removing that barrier to recovery.
Salem County used some funds to build up its overdose fatality review team.
Paterson spent part of its distribution on medication-assisted treatment.
Middlesex County spent some on 'go bags' — filled with Narcan, drug-testing strips, addiction treatment information, and more — to give people discharged from the county jail.
Irvington was the only municipality that used its funds to host concerts, according to the filings. Berkeley Township reported that it shared educational materials on safe medication disposal and drug drop box locations at an annual scheduled summer concert series — but did not spend settlement funds to do so.
In Irvington's 2024 filing, township officials reported that Irvington has received almost $1.1 million in settlement funds since 2022.
They reported that they opted to host the opioid awareness concerts after doing 'internal research on the benefits and effectiveness of concerts and festivals in making the community and stakeholders (aware of) the impact of opioid use and misuse.' They did not engage the public to help decide how to use the funds, have a strategic plan, complete a risk assessment for demographic or geographic impact or measure key performance indicators to track the success or impact of the spending, according to their filings.
Local officials unsure what would be sanctioned uses of opioid settlement funds 'should seek legal advice from their own counsel and/or guidance from their respective County Advisory Council,' said Allison Inserro, a spokeswoman for the attorney general's office.
The strategic plan recommends that officials plotting how to spend settlement funds should prioritize harm reduction services, addiction treatment and social services that fix problems, like housing insecurity, that can impede recovery.
Its overarching goals are to reduce overdose deaths, remove barriers to treatment and build 'a robust monitoring and evaluation framework' to track the funds' impact and ensure accountability, according to a Department of Human Services announcement.
Overdose deaths have fallen in New Jersey since an epidemic high of 3,171 in 2022, with 2,816 overdose fatalities reported in 2023, 1,813 in 2024, and 490 so far this year, state data shows. Health officials largely have credited harm reduction efforts for the decline.
The state already has allocated at least $120 million of the funds it has received. State officials announced last year that $95 million would support housing, harm reduction and mobile units to deliver medication-assisted treatment and $25 million would go toward free legal services for people struggling with addiction, an initiative to reduce teenage addiction and emergency response needs like xylazine-testing kits to reduce misuse of a horse sedative known as 'tranq' or 'zombie drugs.'
Human Services Commissioner Sarah Adelman chairs the advisory council that issued the strategic plan Thursday.
'While no amount of settlement payments can undo the harm and human toll of the opioid crisis, we can and must ensure New Jersey uses the funding wisely to help our residents and communities recover,' Adelman said in a statement.
Hundreds of people who have struggled with addiction shared their thoughts with the advisory council, resulting in a 'strong plan that prioritizes evidence-based harm reduction, treatment, and recovery services,' she said.
Late last month, a state appeals judge granted Irvington's request to block the comptroller's office from releasing its findings on the drug awareness concerts.
The office already had given early copies, as is its practice, to Gov. Phil Murphy, Senate President Nick Scutari, and Assembly Speaker Craig Coughlin. So last week, Judge Mark K. Chase made an unusual move — he extended the injunction to them, forbidding 'any government entity or official' from distributing the comptroller's report on Irvington any further.
Irvington's attorneys have complained that state investigators did not let them adequately respond to their findings.
In a brief filed last week, they wrote that the report 'reads like a ham-handed and overly-broad Drew Pearson serial with an accusatory purpose.' They warned that it threatens to irreparably harm the township's reputation, endanger vendor contracts, hurt the township's ability to carry out public health initiatives, and erode the trust of state and federal officials who interact with the township.
'All of those harms would be especially pernicious in Irvington, a predominantly Black and minority community, which has historically faced discrimination in oversight and in governance,' the attorneys wrote.
But Friday afternoon, the comptroller's office snagged a win.
Chase denied Irvington's injunction request, calling the matter moot because the report had already been released to
Murphy and top legislative leaders.
Besides, the comptroller's office had given the township 15 days to respond to its draft report, Chase added. Officials 'failed to do so. They now complain of the contents of the report,' the judge wrote.
He gave Irvington until 4 p.m. Monday to ask the state Supreme Court for relief, saying his stay on the report's release should remain in place until then.
But, the judge added, 'any further suppression of OSC's report hinders its statutory mandate and oversight role, and directly harms the public interest.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Jersey issues new guidance on national opioid settlement spending
A Reach NJ poster along Pacific Ave. in Atlantic City on Feb. 13, 2023. (Daniella Heminghaus for New Jersey Monitor) A state panel on Thursday issued a five-year strategic plan advising New Jersey communities how to spend over $1 billion in national opioid settlement funds they're expected to receive over the next decade and a half. The plan comes as an escalating court fight over two 'opioid awareness concerts' in Irvington shows such guidance may be overdue. Investigators from the state comptroller's office have raised concerns about fraud, misuse of money and contract and ethical improprieties after Irvington paid nearly $370,000 in opioid settlement funds in 2023 and 2024 to two entertainment companies — both tied to a township employee — that ran the concerts, according to a defamation lawsuit Irvington filed in April. The comptroller's office was set to release a report on investigators' findings when the township sued to block its release. The state's strategic plan announced Thursday — drafted by an advisory council convened in 2023 — offered no definitive answers on whether drug awareness concerts are an acceptable use of settlement funds. Instead, the council said spending should be evaluated on an array of metrics to ensure it is 'data-driven and equity-focused.' The settlement funds come from pharmaceutical companies and others that helped fuel the opioid crisis, and the settlement agreements arose from separate claims by states and local governments. The state of New Jersey and its local governments will each get about half of the more than $1.1 billion in funding expected to flow to New Jersey through 2038. Thursday's plan is intended to guide the disbursement of the state's share of settlement funds, 'though hopefully it will prove a helpful tool for subdivision decision-making,' said Tom Hester, a state Department of Human Services spokesman. 'The state does not provide legal advice nor approve or deny local proposals related to subdivision settlement funds. Subdivisions are encouraged to review the national and state subdivision agreements for guidance on how these funds may be used,' he said. County and municipal officials must publicly report each year how they spend settlement funds, which began disbursing in 2022. Some reported that they haven't started spending yet. But those that have invested in things like direct services to people struggling with addiction, drug-awareness school assemblies and community events, and Narcan training and supplies for government employees. The reports give a snapshot of the various ways officials have spent funds, including: Union County paid for transportation to treatment centers, with the goal of removing that barrier to recovery. Salem County used some funds to build up its overdose fatality review team. Paterson spent part of its distribution on medication-assisted treatment. Middlesex County spent some on 'go bags' — filled with Narcan, drug-testing strips, addiction treatment information, and more — to give people discharged from the county jail. Irvington was the only municipality that used its funds to host concerts, according to the filings. Berkeley Township reported that it shared educational materials on safe medication disposal and drug drop box locations at an annual scheduled summer concert series — but did not spend settlement funds to do so. In Irvington's 2024 filing, township officials reported that Irvington has received almost $1.1 million in settlement funds since 2022. They reported that they opted to host the opioid awareness concerts after doing 'internal research on the benefits and effectiveness of concerts and festivals in making the community and stakeholders (aware of) the impact of opioid use and misuse.' They did not engage the public to help decide how to use the funds, have a strategic plan, complete a risk assessment for demographic or geographic impact or measure key performance indicators to track the success or impact of the spending, according to their filings. Local officials unsure what would be sanctioned uses of opioid settlement funds 'should seek legal advice from their own counsel and/or guidance from their respective County Advisory Council,' said Allison Inserro, a spokeswoman for the attorney general's office. The strategic plan recommends that officials plotting how to spend settlement funds should prioritize harm reduction services, addiction treatment and social services that fix problems, like housing insecurity, that can impede recovery. Its overarching goals are to reduce overdose deaths, remove barriers to treatment and build 'a robust monitoring and evaluation framework' to track the funds' impact and ensure accountability, according to a Department of Human Services announcement. Overdose deaths have fallen in New Jersey since an epidemic high of 3,171 in 2022, with 2,816 overdose fatalities reported in 2023, 1,813 in 2024, and 490 so far this year, state data shows. Health officials largely have credited harm reduction efforts for the decline. The state already has allocated at least $120 million of the funds it has received. State officials announced last year that $95 million would support housing, harm reduction and mobile units to deliver medication-assisted treatment and $25 million would go toward free legal services for people struggling with addiction, an initiative to reduce teenage addiction and emergency response needs like xylazine-testing kits to reduce misuse of a horse sedative known as 'tranq' or 'zombie drugs.' Human Services Commissioner Sarah Adelman chairs the advisory council that issued the strategic plan Thursday. 'While no amount of settlement payments can undo the harm and human toll of the opioid crisis, we can and must ensure New Jersey uses the funding wisely to help our residents and communities recover,' Adelman said in a statement. Hundreds of people who have struggled with addiction shared their thoughts with the advisory council, resulting in a 'strong plan that prioritizes evidence-based harm reduction, treatment, and recovery services,' she said. Late last month, a state appeals judge granted Irvington's request to block the comptroller's office from releasing its findings on the drug awareness concerts. The office already had given early copies, as is its practice, to Gov. Phil Murphy, Senate President Nick Scutari, and Assembly Speaker Craig Coughlin. So last week, Judge Mark K. Chase made an unusual move — he extended the injunction to them, forbidding 'any government entity or official' from distributing the comptroller's report on Irvington any further. Irvington's attorneys have complained that state investigators did not let them adequately respond to their findings. In a brief filed last week, they wrote that the report 'reads like a ham-handed and overly-broad Drew Pearson serial with an accusatory purpose.' They warned that it threatens to irreparably harm the township's reputation, endanger vendor contracts, hurt the township's ability to carry out public health initiatives, and erode the trust of state and federal officials who interact with the township. 'All of those harms would be especially pernicious in Irvington, a predominantly Black and minority community, which has historically faced discrimination in oversight and in governance,' the attorneys wrote. But Friday afternoon, the comptroller's office snagged a win. Chase denied Irvington's injunction request, calling the matter moot because the report had already been released to Murphy and top legislative leaders. Besides, the comptroller's office had given the township 15 days to respond to its draft report, Chase added. Officials 'failed to do so. They now complain of the contents of the report,' the judge wrote. He gave Irvington until 4 p.m. Monday to ask the state Supreme Court for relief, saying his stay on the report's release should remain in place until then. But, the judge added, 'any further suppression of OSC's report hinders its statutory mandate and oversight role, and directly harms the public interest.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Jersey Fresh wine and beer could be coming to a shelf near you
New Jersey lawmakers advanced a bill on Thursday, June 12, 2025, that would allow wines and beer to feature 'Jersey Fresh' labels — if they're made with at least 51% of in-state produce, like grapes for wine. (Photo by Amalie Hindash for New Jersey Monitor) Wines and beer made with Garden State products could feature new 'Jersey Fresh' labels under a bill lawmakers advanced Thursday. 'I would love to encourage our producers of our spirits to get their products, get what they need, their supplies here in the state. Let's encourage it,' said Assemblywoman Andrea Katz (D-Burlington). The Jersey Fresh program began in the 1980s to inform consumers about produce grown in the state and promote buying from local businesses. In order for farmers to use a Jersey Fresh logo, they must show they meet U.S. Department of Agriculture standards and the USDA can conduct regular inspections. Under the bill, a beverage should be made with at least 51% of in-state produce — like potatoes for vodka or barley for beer — to qualify for the Jersey Fresh designation. Farmer John Hart told the committee the legislation would help small farms promote their products and bring farmers into another industry. While Assemblywoman Dawn Fantasia (R-Sussex) called the bill a step in the right direction, she said that threshold is too high for businesses in New Jersey — home to harsh winters. She said she's heard from distilleries and breweries who find it's hard to source products year-round to meet Jersey Fresh standards. 'In off-season, we might be importing grapes in, so unless we're counting the water as being sourced in New Jersey, I think the 51% is too high of a standard,' Fantasia said. Katz said the standard is set by the agricultural industry. And the idea behind the bill was borne out of a New Jersey agricultural convention where none of the spirits had Jersey labeling on them. 'It's just a little bit of a unique label on that to show us that it's from New Jersey, and hopefully it will grow,' said Katz. Members of the Assembly Commerce, Economic Development and Agriculture Committee passed the bill by a 7-2 vote, with one abstention from Fantasia. The measure, introduced last month, does not yet have a Senate companion. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
06-06-2025
- Yahoo
With $122M spent, the 2025 governor's race is already New Jersey's most expensive
Spending totals for this campaign have already more than doubled those in every gubernatorial primary since at least the turn of the millennium. (Dana DiFilippo | New Jersey Monitor) Candidates and outside groups have spent more than $122.5 million on this year's gubernatorial primary, a total greater than any other in state history and one that stands to rise in the race's closing days, the New Jersey Election Law Commission said Friday. The spending total includes $54.9 million from the candidates themselves and $67.7 million from outside groups. Between them, $14 million remained unspent, and that number could swell from late-arriving donations to independent expenditure groups, which face no contribution limits. Voting is underway and ends Tuesday. Spending totals for this campaign have already more than doubled those in every gubernatorial primary since at least the turn of the millennium and have outpaced even the most expensive gubernatorial general election. That November 2005 race between Democrat Jon Corzine and Republican Doug Forrester cost about $98 million after adjustments to inflation, the commission said. This year's 11 gubernatorial candidates had about $6.7 million left in reserves on May 27, the last date covered by regular pre-election campaign finance disclosures. The commission credited the number of candidacies and a larger gubernatorial fund match for the increase. Candidates who meet fundraising and spending thresholds can receive up to $5.5 million in matching public dollars for the primary in exchange for observing an $8.7 million primary spending cap and participating in debates hosted by the commission. Five of the eight candidates have maxed out or nearly maxed out their matching funds. Of the $54.9 million spent by the candidates, Democrats Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop and Rep. Mikie Sherrill lead the pack, with Fulop spending nearly $8.7 million and Sherrill shelling out $8.5 million as of May 27. Republican Jack Ciattarelli, who unsuccessfully ran for governor in 2017 and 2021, spent $8 million, followed by Rep. Josh Gottheimer, a Democrat, at $7.9 million. Spending by outside groups is dominated by Working New Jersey, a super PAC funded by an independent expenditure group linked to statewide teachers union the New Jersey Education Association. It is responsible for more than half of the outside spending in the race, with at least $37.5 million boosting Democrat Sean Spiller, the union's president. Spiller's own campaign has spent only $342,059. Spiller's Democratic rivals have seen less but still sizable support from independent expenditure groups. They have boosted Rep. Josh Gottheimer to the tune of $11.6 million; Fulop, $7.4 million; former state Sen. Steve Sweeney, $4.3 million; and Sherrill, $3.8 million. A group run in part by Trump ally Kellyanne Conway has spent $1.3 million supporting Ciattarelli's campaign. Gubernatorial totals far exceed fundraising and spending on this year's Assembly races (all 80 seats in the chamber are on the ballot this year). Not counting independent expenditures, Assembly candidates have raised nearly $26.3 million and spent about $15.4 million, the commission said. Most of that money, $20.8 million, has flowed to incumbents. Collectively, challengers have raised just under $5.5 million. The ratio is similarly split along party lines. Democratic candidates account for $21.6 million of the funds raised, while only $4.7 million went to Republicans. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
