There's One Huge Problem With That Xbox Handheld Teaser From ASUS
Project Kennan, the codename for Microsoft's dedicated Xbox gaming handheld, only exists in the prototype stage and is likely a few years ago. But there's a firestorm of rumors swirling that the first phase of Microsoft's Xbox handheld plans will involve partnering with an existing PC manufacturer, similar to Valve's partnership with Lenovo for the Legion Go S powered by SteamOS. Those rumors strongly suggest ASUS is that partner. However, that new teaser trailer from the ROG Ally X maker isn't worthy of all the excitement it's generating.
The excitement is born from the expectation that such a handheld will feature Microsoft's streamlined gaming interface, a sorely needed change to Windows 11 that could make the handheld experience as elegant and intuitive as SteamOS. Microsoft promised the first iteration of it would land this year.
So, back to the teaser trailer in question (which is slick and entertaining on its own). It shows ASUS' robot mascot OMNI performing an experiment to upgrade itself, and ends with the existing ROG Ally X and the Raikiri Pro Xbox controller accidentally finding their way into a fusion pod with the mischievous mascot.
When ASUS shared the video on X (formerly Twitter), the official Xbox account immediately replied with the classic 'monkey side-eye' meme. That engagement, easily interpreted as a 'knowing wink' from Microsoft, immediately accelerated the hype machine, resulting in a bunch of articles proclaiming this as the first official product in this Xbox handheld partnership.
FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™
Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase
Pinpoint By Linkedin
Guess The Category
Queens By Linkedin
Crown Each Region
Crossclimb By Linkedin
Unlock A Trivia Ladder
Well, not so fast. I don't think this is it. There are several moments in the trailer that point to this being an upgraded ROG Ally X, rather than some highly anticipated Xbox device with this new Windows UI for handhelds.
To begin with, the trailer highlights four upgrades: 'Marathon stamina, more capacity, faster speed, and fresh look.' So, let's translate that: it's a ROG Ally X with a larger battery, a larger storage drive, an upgraded processor (probably the Ryzen Z2 Extreme) and a new colorway.
Then there's the inclusion of the Raikiri Pro Xbox controller. If this were the fabled Xbox hybrid handheld, why wouldn't an Xbox Series S or Series X have been included?
All the evidence points to ASUS simply launching a ROG Ally X Pro.
This doesn't mean ASUS isn't Microsoft's hardware partner for that initial Xbox handheld with the SteamOS-like interface, but this teaser trailer isn't hyping the handheld we're all looking forward to.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI Employee Share Sale Could Value Firm at $500 Billion
OpenAI, backed by Microsoft (MSFT, Financials), is in early talks for an employee share sale that could value the artificial intelligence firm at about $500 billion, a source familiar with the matter said. The deal would let current and former employees sell several billion dollars' worth of shares ahead of a possible initial public offering; it would mark a significant increase from OpenAI's current $300 billion valuation. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Sign with MSFT. The company's flagship product, ChatGPT, has driven rapid growth; revenue doubled in the first seven months of the year to an annualized $12 billion and is expected to reach $20 billion by year-end, according to the source. Weekly active users climbed to about 700 million from 400 million in February. The proposed sale follows a $40 billion primary funding round earlier this year, led by SoftBank Group, which committed $22.5 billion to the round; the rest of the funding was raised at a $300 billion valuation. Existing investors, including Thrive Capital, are in talks to participate in the share sale. The transaction would come as competition for AI talent intensifies; tech giants like Meta Platforms (META, Financials) are making multibillion-dollar investments to poach executives and researchers. Private firms such as ByteDance, Databricks and Ramp have also used secondary share sales to refresh valuations and reward long-term employees. OpenAI is planning a corporate restructuring to move away from its capped-profit model, which could pave the way for a future IPO; the company has said an offering would come only when market conditions are right. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Entrepreneur
an hour ago
- Entrepreneur
Microsoft Planning Return-to-Office Mandate: Report
Microsoft employees at its headquarters in Redmond, Washington, may soon be mandated back to the office, according to new reports. Microsoft is planning to implement a stricter return-to-office mandate as soon as next year, sources told Business Insider. Since the pandemic, Microsoft has had a flexible work arrangement, allowing remote work as much as half of the time. According to the BI report, Microsoft is considering increasing the requirement for in-person work for employees based in its Redmond, Washington, headquarters to at least three days a week starting in January. Microsoft is still working out the details of the plan and intends to announce it in September, the sources said. A Microsoft spokesperson told BI that the company was considering revising its flexible work schedule, but had yet to finalize any changes. Related: Microsoft Just Became the Second Company in History to Achieve a $4 Trillion Valuation — Here's How A return-to-office mandate could impact tens of thousands of Microsoft employees. As of June 30, Microsoft employed 228,000 workers, with 125,000 located in the U.S. If Microsoft implements a stricter return-to-office policy, it would join a slew of other companies that have tightened the limits on remote work recently — or eliminated it altogether. In 2025, both AT&T and Sweetgreen revised their stances on remote work, with AT&T asking U.S. staff to work all five days from the office while Sweetgreen mandated four days. Both companies previously required staff to work in person three days a week. Meanwhile, Amazon announced a sweeping return-to-office mandate in September, requiring employees to work from the office five days a week starting in January instead of adhering to a hybrid schedule. Though the move met with pushback from staff — and inspired 500 employees to sign a letter in protest — Amazon persisted with the move. Related: Amazon Tells Thousands of Employees to Relocate or Resign According to a study conducted last year by Bamboo HR, return-to-office mandates were often layoffs in disguise, designed to pare down a workforce without conducting official job cuts. About a quarter of C-Suite executives surveyed wanted to inspire "voluntary turnover" with stricter return-to-office policies. Mass Layoffs Despite Stellar Earnings Microsoft recently conducted mass layoffs, eliminating 9,000 roles in July, or nearly 4% of its workforce. Two months earlier, in May, Microsoft laid off over 6,000 employees, or 3% of its workforce. At the same time, Microsoft has reported stellar earnings, greater than analyst expectations. Last month, Microsoft announced that for the quarter ending June 30, revenue was up 18% from the previous year, reaching $76.4 billion, while net income was $27.2 billion, a 24% increase. Related: Microsoft's CEO Says the Company's Mass Layoffs, Despite Financial Success, Are 'Weighing Heavily on Me' in an Internal Memo Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella explained the job cuts in a memo to staff released on Microsoft's corporate blog last month. Nadella acknowledged the discrepancy between Microsoft's "thriving" financials and his decision to still lay off staff. "This is the enigma of success in an industry that has no franchise value," Nadella wrote, without explaining further. Microsoft stock is up over 24% year-to-date at the time of writing.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta contractors say they can see Facebook users sharing private information with their AI chatbots
People love talking to AI—some, a bit too much. And according to contract workers for Meta, who review people's interactions with the company's chatbots to improve their artificial intelligence, people are a bit too willing to share personal, private information, including their real names, phone numbers, and email addresses, with Meta's AI. Business Insider spoke with four contract workers whom Meta hires through Alignerr and Scale AI–owned Outlier, two platforms that enlist human reviewers to help train AI, and the contractors noted that 'unredacted personal data was more common for the Meta projects they worked on' compared with similar projects for other clients in Silicon Valley. And according to those contractors, many users on Meta's various platforms such as Facebook and Instagram were sharing highly personal details. Users would talk to Meta's AI as if they were speaking with friends, or even romantic partners, sending selfies and even 'explicit photos.' To be clear, people getting too close to their AI chatbots is well-documented, and Meta's practice—using human contractors to assess the quality of AI-powered assistants for the sake of improving future interactions—is hardly new. Back in 2019, the Guardian reported how Apple contractors regularly heard extremely sensitive information from Siri users even though the company had 'no specific procedures to deal with sensitive recordings' at the time. Similarly, Bloomberg reported how Amazon had thousands of employees and contractors around the world manually reviewing and transcribing clips from Alexa users. Vice and Motherboard also reported on Microsoft's hired contractors recording and reviewing voice content, even though that meant contractors would often hear children's voices via accidental activation on their Xbox consoles. But Meta is a different story, particularly given its track record over the past decade when it comes to reliance on third-party contractors and the company's lapses in data governance. Meta's checkered record on user privacy In 2018, the New York Times and the Guardian reported on how Cambridge Analytica, a political consultancy group funded by Republican hedge-fund billionaire Robert Mercer, exploited Facebook to harvest data from tens of millions of users without their consent, and used that data to profile U.S. voters and target them with personalized political ads to help elect President Donald Trump in 2016. The breach stemmed from a personality quiz app that collected data—not just from participants, but also from their friends. It led to Facebook getting hit with a $5 billion fine from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), one of the largest privacy settlements in U.S. history. The Cambridge Analytica scandal exposed broader issues with Facebook's developer platform, which had allowed for vast data access, but had limited oversight. According to internal documents released by Frances Haugen, a whistleblower, in 2021, Meta's leadership often prioritized growth and engagement over privacy and safety concerns. Meta has also faced scrutiny over its use of contractors: In 2019, Bloomberg reported how Facebook paid contractors to transcribe users' audio chats without knowing how they were obtained in the first place. (Facebook, at the time, said the recordings only came from users who had opted into the transcription services, adding it had also 'paused' that practice.) Facebook has spent years trying to rehabilitate its image: It rebranded to Meta in October 2021, framing the name change as a forward-looking shift in focus to 'the metaverse' rather than as a response to controversies surrounding misinformation, privacy, and platform safety. But Meta's legacy in handling data casts a long shadow. And while using human reviewers to improve large language models (LLMs) is common industry practice at this point, the latest report about Meta's use of contractors, and the information contractors say they're able to see, does raise fresh questions around how data is handled by the parent company of the world's most popular social networks. In a statement to Fortune, a Meta spokesperson said the company has 'strict policies that govern personal data access for all employees and contractors.' 'While we work with contractors to help improve training data quality, we intentionally limit what personal information they see, and we have processes and guardrails in place instructing them how to handle any such information they may encounter,' the spokesperson said. 'For projects focused on AI personalization … contractors are permitted in the course of their work to access certain personal information in accordance with our publicly available privacy policies and AI terms. Regardless of the project, any unauthorized sharing or misuse of personal information is a violation of our data policies, and we will take appropriate action,' they added. This story was originally featured on Solve the daily Crossword
