Aberdeen GOP Sen. Carl Perry introduces bill to cap fluoride in water in South Dakota
Aberdeen GOP Sen. Carl Perry introduces bill to cap fluoride in water in South Dakota
Show Caption
Hide Caption
The truth about fluoride
Fluoride is present in dental products like toothpaste, protecting teeth from cavities and preventing bacteria in the mouth. It is also added to public water supplies.
unbranded - Lifestyle
A South Dakota bill, SB 133, would give municipalities control over fluoride levels in their drinking water.
Proponents of the bill cite potential changes in federal fluoridation policy and concerns about excessive fluoride consumption.
A bill that would make fluoridation of drinking water optional for South Dakota cities is headed to the Senate chamber.
Cities add fluoride to tap water to prevent tooth decay and strengthen teeth, in South Dakota and throughout the United States. Research shows that community water fluoridation reduces cavities by around 25%, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calls water fluoridation one of the top 10 public health achievements of the 20th century.
Senate Bill 133, introduced by Aberdeen Republican Sen. Carl Perry, would allow municipalities controlling a public water supply or a person controlling a private water supply to determine the amount of fluoride in their drinking water. Currently, the South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources regulates fluoride levels and testing methods.
The bill would cap water fluoridation at 4 milligrams per liter, the limit already imposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. South Dakota cities would not be required to include any fluoride in the municipal drinking water, so some could discontinue the practice.
Coming to historic Ward Hotel: LaRue's offers authentic French pastries, cuisine
Skeptics of fluoridation benefits have raised concerns about excessive fluoride consumption for years. President Donald Trump tapped outspoken water fluoridation opponent Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to lead the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The U.S. Senate has yet to confirm his nomination.
Perry told lawmakers that the federal government could change fluoridation policy under Kennedy's influence, so South Dakota 'should be ahead of that.'
Several dental and medical organizations opposed the bill, saying it would lead to more health problems in the state. South Dakota Municipal League, South Dakota Association of Rural Water Systems, South Dakota Department of Health, and South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources also opposed the bill.
Sub sandwiches, hot and cold: Jersey Mike's opens new sub shop in Aberdeen
Ensuring access to safe and reliable drinking water is the 'primary' public health initiative for the state Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, said Mark Mayer, water director for the department.
'We feel that community water system fluoridation is one of the safest, most beneficial and cost effective ways to prevent tooth decay,' Mayer said.
The legislation passed out of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee 6-1 'without recommendation' after an attempt to defeat the bill failed. That means that a majority of senators must agree to place it on the calendar before it's debated, said Brookings Republican Sen. Tim Reed, otherwise the bill dies.
South Dakota Searchlight is part of States Newsroom, the nation's largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
12 minutes ago
- CNBC
PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts
The House on Wednesday moved a step closer to approving President Donald Trump's $9.4 billion spending cut package, which would codify some cuts originally proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency. The package would grant permission to the White House not to spend billions of dollars that had already been approved by Congress. The money would be clawed back from specific agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes federally appropriated grants to National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Although the Wednesday procedural vote passed largely along party lines, a final vote expected Thursday could see some resistance from House Republicans who are uneasy about the popular programs that are being targeted, like PBS and National Public Radio. Given House Speaker Mike Johnson's narrow Republican majority, he can only afford to lose a handful of votes and still push the package over the finish line on a party-line vote. Johnson said earlier this week that he was "working on" getting enough Republicans on board to pass the DOGE package, CNN reported. Wednesday's vote also finalized changes to Republicans' "big, beautiful bill" that were required by the Senate before the measure was allowed to pass with a simple majority, rather than the typical 60-vote Senate threshold. Budget measures like the "big, beautiful bill" can be considered under a special set of rules known as reconciliation. The Senate's parliamentarian, who acts as a sort of referee in disputes over Senate rules, had flagged some provisions in the package earlier that she said were incompatible with the chamber's reconciliation rules.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New law helps clear the way for birthing centers in Iowa
DES MOINES, Iowa — At Des Moines Midwives Collective, they do prenatal and checkup appointments for expecting mothers, but they're not allowed to use this facility for the actual birthing process. They have to either go to the family's home or the hospital. But they say some mothers want an in-between, a home-like environment with a birthing tub and cozy feel, while still having the medical backup and professional facility. Right now, there are none of those in Iowa. However, a new law that will go into effect July 1 will help clear the way for birthing centers to be opened in Iowa. Midwife, nurse practitioner and owner of Des Moines Midwives Collective Caitlin Hainley has been fighting for over a decade to make that happen. She sued the state for permission to open a new birthing center, but lost in court. During that fight, she also was working on the legislative aspect of it, and was victorious there. Last month Governor Reynolds signed a bill that removed birth centers from the definition of health facilities covered by Certificate of Need law. This means standalone birthing centers will now be allowed. Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline Certificate of Need was meant to keep costs down but restrict duplicate services. Some other midwives around the state have tried to apply for an exception but got denied and lost that money. 'Birth centers are actually the safest places to have your babies and provide the best outcomes for both babies and moms and also just really help cost savings,' Hainley said. 'So we've known this for a long time, but Iowa has not been friendly to birth centers. We've had something called a certificate-of-need that birth centers have been listed on. To even ask if you can open a birth center, you have to file an application and pay up to $20,000, which you don't get back. It's a way to keep competition away. Instead of actually keeping health care costs down like it was touted to do in the 1970s, so many studies have been done on Certificate of Need law since then. They found that controlling competition in that way actually increases prices and decreases innovation.' Iowa and Des Moines do not have as many options for mothers as other cities across the country. 'We have an urban maternity desert here in Des Moines. This is the capital city of Iowa, and there are still so many services that pregnant moms can't access. You can't have a water birth in the entire state of Iowa in any single hospital. So if you want a birth, your baby in water, as is done in hospitals across the U.S., you cannot have that here,' Hainley said. 'Women can't get reasonable, high quality midwifery led care in Des Moines for a variety of options and desires.' Des Moines Midwives Collective hopes to build a birthing center one day to give a place where mothers can get the medical professionalism and homey comfort care while giving birth. 'What birthing centers generally look like, is really the most common model is a house like a single-family home that has been converted to be used as a birthing center. Your birthing room has a bed with like real linens on it, and that's fitted with a specific birthing tub. But really just a homey, comforting environment where the trust is really in the birthing process,' she added. This new law is just step one of the process of building a birthing center. July 1 it'll be possible to build, but it would have to be a mainly out of pocket clinic. The next step for them is to work on insurance reform, to make this option affordable and possible for all moms and families. Metro News: New law helps clear the way for birthing centers in Iowa Victim injured in Des Moines apartment fire has died A new rhino is calling Blank Park Zoo home DMPD seek help to find suspect in violent assault with a shoe 'ICE Out' protest brings in hundreds in Des Moines Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'
WASHINGTON, DC (KELO) — Senate Majority Leader John Thune is defending President Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard and send in Marines to put a stop to clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement in Los Angeles. Cheyenne River Reservation authorities investigating 2 deaths The South Dakota Republican fielded reporters' questions on a range of topics Wednesday on Capitol Hill, including the ongoing protests over immigration raids. The City of Los Angeles reported fewer clashes overnight as a curfew went into effect. Yet tensions remain high as members of the military are on standby in case of more violence. Thune says the military presence was needed because local officials in California didn't have a handle on the situation. Thune called public safety a 'political imperative' while discussing the protests taking place this week in Los Angeles. 'Because one of the most fundamental questions most people, or most voters ask is my family safe? Is my neighborhood safe? Is my community safe? And when you can't answer that in the affirmative, then you've got a problem and I think that's what they ran into in Los Angeles which is why they needed some outside help,' Thune said. But House Democrats say Los Angeles didn't need outside help from the military to keep the violence in check. 'And state and local law enforcement officials are prepared to do that. At the same time, we respect the right and should embrace the right for any American to peacefully protest,' (D) House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said. Thune wouldn't directly answer one reporter's question about President Trump's pardons of January 6th rioters. Manu Raju: 'Do you see any inconsistency when a president criticizes and condemns the violent LA protests but then pardons the violent January 6th protestors?' 'I think the issue that's in front of us right now is the chaos in Los Angeles. And clearly, the local officials there, for whatever reason, didn't seem up to the task,' Thune said. Critics say President Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles will only provoke more violence. But Thune and other Republicans on Capitol Hill say it was a move that needed to be made. 'At the end of the day, it's about preventing chaos and preserving law and order,' Thune said. A federal judge will hold a hearing Thursday on California Governor Gavin Newsom's request to stop President Trump from using troops in Los Angeles. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
