logo
CalMac pays out £460,000 to delayed ferry passengers

CalMac pays out £460,000 to delayed ferry passengers

BBC News5 hours ago
CalMac has paid out more than £460,000 in compensation to passengers because of delays and cancellations to its services since April last year.The state-owned ferry operator paid £432,735 in compensation to travellers in 2024-25, with a further £33,792 paid out in May and June this year.It marks a 37% rise on compensation payments in 2023-24, but a slight fall from 2022-23, when the operator paid £454,000 to delayed passengers, according to figures obtained by the Scottish Liberal Democrats.A Transport Scotland spokesperson said just over 5% of sailings on the network had been cancelled over the last 10 years.
Lib Dem transport spokesman, Jamie Greene, accused the Scottish government of "letting the ferry network deteriorate".He pointed to reliability issues within the CalMac fleet and delays in new vessels going into service.
The Glen Sannox ferry, built by Port Glasgow shipyard Ferguson Marine, was delivered years late and over budget.Its sister ship, the Glen Rosa, will now not be delivered until early next year due to a series of delays.Meanwhile, the MV Caledonian Isles, which has not sailed since January last year, could be out of action for a further four months in order to undergo further repairs.The Lib Dems have launched a consultation on the future of the country's ferry services.Greene, who represents the West Scotland region, said staff and passengers had been "let down" by the SNP's management of the networkHe added: "The SNP government took control of the company and broke their promise to deliver new ferries on time and on budget, which would have reduced the massive bills we are now seeing for compensation and repairs."All of this has created a grim new norm for my constituents along the west coast, from losing business to missing hospital appointments."
Data obtained by the Lib Dems via freedom of information request showed more than 7,000 compensation claims had been lodged by passengers over a two-year period between April 2023 and April 2025.The operator has paid out a total of £1.9m in compensation since the 2017-18 financial year.CalMac said it expected to welcome an additional 13 vessels to its fleet by 2029.It said, when delays and cancellations did occur, staff worked to find alternative routes or sailings for passengers.A spokesperson added: "We're operating more sailings than ever before, with many of our vessels stretched to their limits."It is no secret that our fleet is ageing and that this can lead to higher levels of technical problems."This is why we are looking forward to welcoming 13 new vessels to the CalMac fleet by 2029, which will lead to less technical problems and cancellations, giving passengers a more reliable service."
A Transport Scotland spokesperson said those new vessels would be able to "operate in more challenging sea and weather conditions".They added: "Between January 2015 and June 2025 CalMac have operated over 1.6 million sailings, with just 5.5% of scheduled sailings cancelled. Of those cancelled sailings, 25% were for technical reasons whilst more than double was due to the weather at 60%."In the coming year, the Scottish government intend to invest over £530m maintaining and enhancing our networks and strengthening resilience of services on the west coast and northern isles."This represents a near 23% increase on 24-25 funding levels."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Financially stricken former EFL side are SAVED from going bust - as takeover is approved by governing body
Financially stricken former EFL side are SAVED from going bust - as takeover is approved by governing body

Daily Mail​

time2 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Financially stricken former EFL side are SAVED from going bust - as takeover is approved by governing body

The National League has approved the takeover of turmoiled Morecambe, with the Shrimps cleared to start their season next weekend should the sale go through. A group known as Panjab Warriors struck a deal to save the beleaguered Lancashire club, which was relegated from League Two last season. Amid grave concerns over their existence, Morecambe had their first three matches postponed thanks to an inability to meet financial obligations. However, National League officials say they have now given the green light to the takeover and that their suspension of the club will be lifted upon receipt of the sale and purchase agreement. A transfer embargo will remain in place until HMRC and other creditors including staff and players have been paid. The statement added: 'It is the intention for Morecambe's first National League game to be on Saturday 23rd August at home v Altrincham FC. 'The National League would like to welcome the new owners and to thank everybody involved in helping to secure the future of the Club and reaching this point.' An ongoing saga dominated the summer included Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy writing to Morecambe's controversial owner Jason Whittingham, to urge him to sell. In July it appeared there had been a breakthrough for the 105-year-old club, when Whittingham said he agreed terms with Panjab Warriors, although the takeover failed to materialise. Both sides subsequently agreed to a mediation session last week. Morecambe had ceased operations in late July, following their suspension by the National League.

Sally Rooney says she will support Palestine Action despite ban
Sally Rooney says she will support Palestine Action despite ban

BBC News

time2 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Sally Rooney says she will support Palestine Action despite ban

Author Sally Rooney says she will continue to support Palestine Action, despite the group being proscribed as a terrorist organisation in the award-winning Irish novelist said she intends to use the earnings of her work and her public platform to "go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide".Writing in the Irish Times, she said "if this makes me a supporter of terror under UK law, so be it".Her remarks come as Home Secretary Yvette Cooper again defended the proscription of Palestine Action, saying it is more than "a regular protest group known for occasional stunts". Palestine Action is a British pro-Palestinian direct action group that was proscribed as a terrorist organisation by the government in activities have predominantly targeted arms companies since the start of the current war in Gaza. After mass arrests, what happens next with Palestine Action ban?Palestine Action can challenge UK ban, court rulesBring sick and injured children to UK from Gaza immediately, MPs say Rooney, who wrote bestsellers including Normal People and Intermezzo, has previously been a vocal backer of the protest group, writing in the Guardian in June that proscribing them would be an "alarming attack on free speech".She was speaking after some of its members broke into RAF Brize Norton and sprayed two planes with red paint, causing damages worth £ in 2021, she refused to allow Beautiful World, Where Are You to be translated into Hebrew in a move to boycott Israel over its policies towards her latest Irish Times opinion piece, she said she will continue to use the proceeds of her work - including residuals from a BBC co-production of Normal People and Conversations with Friends - to keep supporting the than 700 people have been arrested since the group was banned by the government on 5 July - including more than 500 at a demonstration in central London last writing in the Observer on Sunday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said while many were aware of the Brize Norton incident, fewer would be aware of other incidents for which the group had claimed example, in August 2024 alleged Palestine Action supporters broke into Elbit Systems UK in Bristol, an Israeli defence firm that has long been a key allegations are due to come to trial in November. Eighteen people deny charges including criminal damage, assault causing actual bodily harm, violent disorder and aggravated has also referenced a so-called "Underground Manual" from the group, which she said "provides practical guidance on how to identify targets to attack and how to evade law enforcement"."These are not the actions of a legitimate protest group," Cooper also said she had received "disturbing information" which "covered ideas and planning for future attacks".Rooney - who lives in the west of Ireland - wrote: "The present UK government has willingly stripped its own citizens of basic rights and freedoms, including the right to express and read dissenting opinions, in order to protect its relationship with Israel."She said "the ramifications for cultural and intellectual life in the UK... are and will be profound".The BBC and Rooney's management have been contacted for comment. Israel has long rejected accusations of genocide, but leading Israeli and global human rights organisations have argued that the country's conduct in the war in Gaza constitutes genocide against the Palestinian war was triggered by Hamas's 7 October 2023 attack on Israel, which killed about 1,200 people and saw 251 others taken offensive has since killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to figures from the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry, which the UN considers reliable.

My criticism of university sparked a backlash. I stand by it – young people deserve better
My criticism of university sparked a backlash. I stand by it – young people deserve better

Telegraph

time2 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

My criticism of university sparked a backlash. I stand by it – young people deserve better

My article last week arguing that too many youngsters go to university stirred up a hornets' nest. I had a large amount of correspondence, most of which was supportive, although some was critical. This raised many fundamental issues, for which I am grateful. One line of criticism was that many prospective employers advertise jobs as graduate-only. Accordingly, even if many students would rather not do another three years of full-time study, they may feel that they are compelled to do it. This point is well taken. What is going on here is a system of mutual re-enforcement. More graduates are produced so employers can supposedly raise the status of their jobs by advertising them as 'graduate only'. This then leads to an increased appetite for degrees. And so on. One of the effects is to propel many students into undertaking post-graduate courses in order to mark them out from the hordes of mere graduates. This is a sort of arms race. Admittedly, degrees aren't all about money. The attitudes of students and parents are critical. It took decades for an attitude to develop on the part of both teenagers and parents that it was natural for everyone to go to university. Given this, some of my respondents were sceptical that anything could be done to change the system. The answer, as so often, lies with the funding. At the moment, most government funding for university courses comes in the form of support for the student loan agency, which provides funds to pay for tuition and, in some cases, living expenses. These loans are guaranteed by the state. If and when they are not repaid, the state bears the loss. Accordingly, herein lies a route through which the state can influence matters. There are three aspects of the over-expansion of higher education: individuals ill-suited to higher education; next-to-useless courses; and poorly performing universities. A blanket reduction in the amount of loan funding would be a crude and inefficient way of proceeding. It would be better for the Department for Education to vet university courses according to content, excellence of teaching and the subsequent success of students who take them. The majority of university courses would pass this test. But those that failed it would cease to be eligible for student loans. That would surely cause the number of students applying for these courses to plummet. Moreover, some of these courses would cease to be offered and some universities might cease to exist. That would be no bad thing. Another of the strands of criticism that I encountered was about equity. Isn't it important, some respondents said, that everybody should have access to higher education? I do think it is important that students who are capable of benefiting from a university education should have that opportunity, whatever background they come from. But being at an institution for which you are not properly suited, wasting three years to acquire a useless qualification and then emerging with a heavy burden of debt (which averages more than £53,000) is not an opportunity. It's a curse. We do young people no favours by encouraging them into such a position.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store