North Yorkshire Council accused of 'cynical ploy' over transport
A council has been accused of a "cynical ploy" after telling parents they would no longer be eligible for free school transport for their children just before the half-term holiday.North Yorkshire Council sent its decision notice out by email on Friday outlining the new policies on home-to-school provision.The free transport eligibility has been for children living in rural areas with long journeys to school that were paid for by the council.However, on Friday councillors voted to approve a change to the scheme, that means provision is based on the distance to a pupil's nearest school rather than any school of their choice within the catchment area.
£4.2m saving
Altering the eligibility rules would save the council £42m a year, and is currently the authority's third-largest expense.The council has defended the policy change, and said the move would make savings at a time of severe financial constraints.It added that the new policy was "fairer" because under the old system, some families claimed the grants for journeys to more than one school for their children.Director for children and young people, Stuart Carlton, said the information had been sent as quickly as possible, and parents who had already been in touch would receive replies.The families of children due to start secondary school in September were informed on 30 May and those with children due to start primary school are due to find out by 30 June.
'Cynical ploy'
Those who have complained are those who wish to send their child to a school within their catchment area but which is not the closest one to their home, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) said, and campaign group School Transport Action Group (STAG) has called for the policy to revert to the old system.STAG criticised the council for telling parents on a Friday afternoon before a Bank Holiday weekend when no council staff were available to answer queries."This adds insult to injury," STAG said."Anguished parents have been left in the dark as to what they are supposed to do now."This seems a really cynical ploy by the council to deliver bad news and then not be on hand to help sort out the mess."We're starting to wonder what North Yorkshire parents have done to deserve this type of treatment from their council."
Parent Rachael Berry, who lives near Skipton, received an email advising that her daughter would not be eligible for free transport because Skipton Girls' High School, where she has a place, was not their nearest school."It's going to be a time of confusion for parents about what to do next."The bus passes are allocated on a first-come-first served basis, so we need to get the message out to check if you've got an email, and get your application in as soon as possible."The Green Party councillor for Great Ouseburn, a small village between Ripon and York, said the council needed to "be careful" about how it treated families, and the decision should not be made for "convenience"."Sometimes there's no solution for everyone, but what you can do with everybody is give them due consideration," Arnold Warneken said. "We've sent these emails out when there will be nobody at the council for three days and nobody at the schools to talk to for 10 days because it's half-term. "This seems to be being rushed through."Mr Carlton added: "We are aware that parents and carers have been waiting for information about the child's eligibility for assistance with home to school travel. Therefore, we have tried to provide the information as quickly as possible."The letters sent today provide information not only about whether their child is eligible for assistance with home to school travel, but also about how and where they are able to obtain further information about school travel arrangements, including information about the appeals process."We have already received correspondence from parents about the letters and we will be responding to them as soon as possible."
Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
41 minutes ago
- Times
Michael Gove's Spectator could Reform its allegiance
In the past 12 months the Conservatives have lost power, lost a leader, lost their way and now, it seems, they may lose their organ. The Spectator has usually been a bastion of support for the Tories but, with the right wing in flux, it seems even that endorsement may be up in the air. 'We're giving house room to Reform,' the new editor Michael Gove told Andrew Neil on Times Radio, as he weighs up his options. Gove says that both Farage's upstarts and Badenoch's bedraggled band will be held to account by the magazine until either has shown they can be an 'effective governing force'. Neil was sceptical of this impartiality, pointing out that the editor now takes the Tory whip in the Lords, but apparently this isn't enough to tame the Govester. 'The whip in the House of Lords,' Gove said, 'is a whip so gentle that it doesn't even count as BDSM.' Spooky coincidence It's Pride month and everyone is getting into the spirit, including our spies. Sir Richard Moore, the head of MI6, announced on Tuesday that his organisation would be flying the Pride flag from its base in Vauxhall Cross. Moore tweeted that this showed that 'sexual orientation is no bar to you working and thriving' in our secret service. A praiseworthy message — although it probably would not have come as much of a shock to Guy Burgess and Anthony Blunt. No ifs, no butts The students of Eton are lucky in their provost. The journalist, museum chief and fashion honcho Sir Nicholas Coleridge, who now holds that post, told the Radio Oldie podcast that he goes for walks across the college grounds on a daily basis to get his 10,000 steps in. On any other campus, this would mean seeing all sorts of rule-breaking, but he does his bit to ensure the integrity of the college is upheld. 'If I saw someone smoking out of a window,' he said, 'I just wouldn't look too hard.' Bigger news still: Coleridge says that Eton is admitting women, though only at reunions for very old boys. 'They're allowed to bring their wives when they're 78,' he said, 'so they can drive them home afterwards.' Perhaps future generations of old boys will be a little more egalitarian, although one would have thought that this particular group of alumni could afford a cab. Presidential seal A good review can do wonders for a restaurant but sometimes a bad review is even better. The former editor of Vanity Fair, Graydon Carter, is also a restaurateur and owns the Waverly Inn in New York's Greenwich Village — which, despite being a great success, hasn't been to every Manhattanite's taste. One bad review has ended up at the top of the menu. It reads 'Worst food in the city', a quote attributed to one Donald Trump. Carter tells the River Cafe podcast Table 4: 'That hasn't hurt business.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Bereaved families of dead pensioners could be pursued over winter fuel payments
Bereaved families of tens of thousands of dead pensioners could be pursued by tax officials to recoup winter fuel payments under a new system being explored by the Treasury, the Guardian has learned. Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, confirmed on Wednesday that more pensioners will get winter fuel payments reinstated this year after weeks of uncertainty over the government's decision to make a U-turn on scrapping the benefit. Ministers are looking at restoring the payments as a universal benefit and then recouping the money when high-income pensioners fill in their tax returns, as creating a new means test would be a highly complex option. However, government insiders are concerned about a time lag of at least six months between the payment of up to £300 being made and it then being clawed back. It is feared that thousands could have died in that time, leaving grieving families to pick up the bill. One source said: 'We should never have scrapped the winter fuel payment in the first place, but the whole process of reinstating it has been completely chaotic. The optics of us demanding the money back from grieving families are dire.' The chancellor has brought forward confirmation of the change to the £11,500 income threshold over which pensioners are no longer eligible for the benefit to next week's spending review from the autumn budget, after a backlash against one of the most unpopular policies of the Labour government. In a further attempt to win public support and quell Labour backbench concerns, ministers are announcing on Thursday that all pupils in England whose families claim universal credit will be eligible for free school meals under an expansion of the scheme. Hundreds of thousands more children across the country will be able to access means-tested free school meals when the provision is extended from September 2026, after campaigners and school leavers urged ministers to take action on child poverty amid fears of delays. Reeves has already launched a charm offensive to persuade fractious Labour MPs that her spending review will not be a return to austerity, announcing £15bn for trams, trains and buses outside London as part of a £113bn investment in capital projects over the rest of the parliament. The chancellor wants capital spending to be at the centre of the government's narrative at the review next week in an acknowledgment that MPs, many of them in marginal seats, need a better economic story to address rising discontent among the public. Nearly 2.1 million pupils – almost one in four of the total in England – were eligible for free school meals in January 2024. The Department for Education has said more than half a million more children are expected to benefit from the expansion, with nearly £500 put back into parents' pockets every year. It suggested that the expansion will lift 100,000 children across England completely out of poverty, with the move being the most effective way of tackling the issue outside the benefits system. Keir Starmer has said the government will look at scrapping the two-child benefits limit. 'It is the moral mission of this government to tackle the stain of child poverty, and today this government takes a giant step towards ending it with targeted support that puts money back in parents' pockets,' the education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, said. The expansion of free school meals was almost universally welcomed by anti-poverty campaigners and teaching unions. Nick Harrison, chief executive of the Sutton Trust, said: 'This is a significant step towards taking hunger out of the classroom. 'Children can't learn effectively when hungry, so this announcement not only helps to tackle the effects of child poverty, but will also likely help improve education outcomes for disadvantaged young people.' Kate Anstey, at the Child Poverty Action Group charity, said: 'This is fantastic news and a gamechanger for children and families. At last, more kids will get the food they need to learn and thrive and millions of parents struggling to make ends meet will get a bit of breathing space.' Asked about the winter fuel payment after a speech in Rochdale, Reeves told reporters: 'We have listened to the concerns that people had about the level of the means test, and so we will be making changes to that; they will be in place so that pensioners are paid this coming winter. 'We'll announce the detail of that and the level of that as soon as we possibly can. But people should be in no doubt that the means test will increase and more people will get a winter fuel payment this winter.' The option of paying all pensioners a winter fuel payment and then asking for wealthier people to repay the money is a similar approach to that taken by the former Conservative chancellor George Osborne when he reduced child benefit eligibility for better-off parents. A senior official at HMRC, Jonathan Athow, confirmed to the Treasury select committee on Wednesday that if the tax system was used to make the changes, it would not be possible until next year. 'We'd have to get to April next year before we knew somebody's income, before we could then make any decisions about how [recouping the payment] would then be implemented,' he told MPs. The government's reversal came despite Downing Street denying that it would make changes to winter fuel payments after the Guardian revealed that it was rethinking the cut amid anxiety at the top of government that the policy could wreak serious electoral damage. The chancellor also hinted at tensions between cabinet colleagues saying she had had to turn down spending requests as she struggled to balance the books. 'Not every department will get everything that they want next week,' she said, 'and I have had to say no to things that I want to do too.' Just two Whitehall departments are still to agree their multi-year budgets with the Treasury before the spending review, the Guardian understands, with the home secretary, Yvette Cooper and the housing secretary, Angela Rayner, holding out on policing and social housing budgets. She also ruled out bending her fiscal rules, as some Labour MPs have urged her to do, and which she acknowledged would be the subject of much discussion over the coming days. It means that tax rises or further spending cuts are more likely this autumn.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Labour's plan for illegal migrants explained — and is it working?
What you need to know Sir Keir Starmer has secured improved commitments from France on tackling small boats but this has yet to translate into action on the ground Labour believes a new bill going through the Lords would make a significant difference in its pledge to 'smash the gangs' Despite rejecting the Rwanda plan as a 'gimmick', the prime minister's plan for return hubs has a similar aim, but is still at an early stage Ministers are looking at tightening the rules around Article 8 of the ECHR, the right to family life, in asylum claims When Sir Keir Starmer entered No 10 almost a year ago he pledged to make good on Labour's election promise to 'smash the gangs' and succeed, where the Conservatives had failed, in securing Britain's borders against illegal migration. Yet so far this year almost 15,000 people have arrived in the UK in small boats — up 42 per cent on this time last year and a 95 per cent rise from the same point in 2023. This week ministers sought to blame the weather and insisted that their policies would be effective in making good on Starmer's pledge. But what exactly is the government doing, and how successful has it been? A new deal with France From the British side perhaps the most critical element of the government's small boats strategy has been to leverage Starmer's relationship with President Macron to persuade the French to take a more proactive approach to preventing small boats setting sail from French waters in the first place. At the start of the year the prime minister hosted Macron at Chequers, where the two leaders agreed to step up bilateral co-operation to prevent Channel crossings. This led to a formal agreement a month later under which the UK extended a £480 million deal to pay for policing French beaches in return for new measures to stem the flow of boats. In particular, Paris agreed to change the law to allow police officers to apprehend vessels in shallow waters and restore the offence of an 'illegal stay' in France, which would allow the police to arrest migrants and smugglers before they attempted a crossing. There was also a commitment by France to speed up the construction of a detention centre in Dunkirk — paid for by the British — which had become bogged down in planning rows. But, so far, these commitments have yet to materialise. The plan to enable police to intervene within 300m of the shore is yet to be implemented amid opposition from the officers themselves. There is also still slow progress on Dunkirk. Verdict: Ministers believe improved co-operation with France is as close as it comes to a silver bullet to stem the flow of boats. But while Starmer has won important commitments from Paris, which were never given to the last government, these commitments have yet to materialise into action on the ground. New legal powers to tackle smuggling gangs In January ministers published a bill that they claimed would give police anti-terrorism-style powers to 'identify, disrupt and prevent' organised immigration crime. The Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill, which is going through the House of Lords, will make it illegal to handle items suspected of being used for organised immigration crime, such as boat parts and engines, with a maximum punishment of 14 years in prison. Those found collecting information that could be used by people smugglers will face up to five years in jail. This would include researching routes or vessels online, or arranging departure points, dates and times. The new offences will be accompanied by additional powers for Border Force officers, police and the National Crime Agency. They will be allowed to seize and search the mobile phones of anyone arriving in the UK illegally if they believe it will help an investigation into who organised the journey. The information gathered will also be available to be used in cases brought overseas. Verdict: Senior policing figures believe the legislation will make a difference in their ability to dismantle the smuggling gangs — pointing out that the numbers involved are in the hundreds — and are vulnerable to a concerted attempt to dismantle their activities. However, as the bill is not yet law, at the moment it remains an aspiration. Return hubs In one of his first acts as prime minister Starmer scrapped the Conservative Party's plans to send migrants to Rwanda, branding it a waste of money and a 'gimmick'. However, he is now drawing up a policy that sounds remarkably similar — sending failed asylum seekers to 'return hubs' in the west Balkans. There is one significant difference: the Tories planned to send all those who came to the UK on small boats abroad, while Labour's plan is limited to those who have exhausted all avenues of appeal. But the intent is similar: to deter people from making the crossings in the first place. Verdict: The plans are at a very early stage, and it is not a given that countries will agree to host the return hubs. Albania has already ruled out doing so. There remain significant legal and political challenges to getting the scheme off the ground. There is broader support for the idea among some EU states and also in the UN. But even if the plans get off the ground, there is no guarantee it will work as a deterrent. Deal with other countries In December Starmer negotiated a deal with Germany, which agreed to tighten its laws to make it easier to prosecute those helping to smuggle migrants to the UK. Ministers said this was important because facilitating people-smuggling to a third country was not technically illegal in Germany. However, the law has not yet been enacted, and ministers need to win approval from the new German government for it to be put into place. Starmer has also recently announced a partnership with Albania, Kosovo and North Macedonia to detect and deter illegal migration operations. Verdict: The prime minister has made improving international co-operation to tackle smuggling gangs a big diplomatic priority for the government. But while the issue is a huge priority for the UK it is less important for other countries, and it remains to be seen how quickly and effectively diplomatic deals are converted into concrete action. The asylum backlog and hotels There are 8,000 more asylum seekers living in hotels than when Starmer pledged during the election campaign in June last year to 'end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds'. The reality of how difficult that is has become clear. This month the National Audit Office said the cost of asylum accommodation would be three times higher than previously estimated and more than 38,000 migrants are being housed in hotels, costing the Home Office an estimated £5.5 million a day — while a further 66,000 migrants are in dispersal accommodation such as large houses, bedsits and flats across different local authorities. • Migrants will be put up in hotels for years yet, Treasury admits The vast majority are awaiting asylum decisions, so speeding up that process is seen as key. The Home Office has had some success — it has been increased by 52 per cent and 24,000 people have been removed from the country. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, is also planning to change the law to introduce a mandatory 24-week legal deadline for all asylum appeals. Verdict: If decision-making can genuinely be sped up it will help not only to bring down the hotel bill, but could act as a deterrent for those considering making the journey across the Channel. Human rights laws Ministers will bring in a new framework for judges to work to when deciding whether to allow migrants to make claims for asylum using the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR). The most heavily used part of the ECHR, Article 8 — the right to family life — has been leveraged by murderers and paedophiles to stay in the country. Cooper revealed this week about 30 per cent of cases had been considered 'exceptional' by judges, and she wants to restrict that to a more narrow set of circumstances. • Kemi Badenoch would override ECHR on asylum for illegal migrants Verdict: Restricting the scope of Article 8 will save ministers from some embarrassing headlines but is unlikely to be enough on its own to fulfil the government's immigration pledges. An appetite to direct judges — and suggestions that the government could be open to reforming the ECHR — shows a willingness from Starmer and Cooper to step into an arena previously inhabited by the Tories and Reform UK. But as those on the right ramp up pressure for Britain to pull out of the convention altogether, the efforts may fall short.
