logo
Bereaved families of dead pensioners could be pursued over winter fuel payments

Bereaved families of dead pensioners could be pursued over winter fuel payments

The Guardian2 days ago

Bereaved families of tens of thousands of dead pensioners could be pursued by tax officials to recoup winter fuel payments under a new system being explored by the Treasury, the Guardian has learned.
Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, confirmed on Wednesday that more pensioners will get winter fuel payments reinstated this year after weeks of uncertainty over the government's decision to make a U-turn on scrapping the benefit.
Ministers are looking at restoring the payments as a universal benefit and then recouping the money when high-income pensioners fill in their tax returns, as creating a new means test would be a highly complex option.
However, government insiders are concerned about a time lag of at least six months between the payment of up to £300 being made and it then being clawed back. It is feared that thousands could have died in that time, leaving grieving families to pick up the bill.
One source said: 'We should never have scrapped the winter fuel payment in the first place, but the whole process of reinstating it has been completely chaotic. The optics of us demanding the money back from grieving families are dire.'
The chancellor has brought forward confirmation of the change to the £11,500 income threshold over which pensioners are no longer eligible for the benefit to next week's spending review from the autumn budget, after a backlash against one of the most unpopular policies of the Labour government.
In a further attempt to win public support and quell Labour backbench concerns, ministers are announcing on Thursday that all pupils in England whose families claim universal credit will be eligible for free school meals under an expansion of the scheme.
Hundreds of thousands more children across the country will be able to access means-tested free school meals when the provision is extended from September 2026, after campaigners and school leavers urged ministers to take action on child poverty amid fears of delays.
Reeves has already launched a charm offensive to persuade fractious Labour MPs that her spending review will not be a return to austerity, announcing £15bn for trams, trains and buses outside London as part of a £113bn investment in capital projects over the rest of the parliament.
The chancellor wants capital spending to be at the centre of the government's narrative at the review next week in an acknowledgment that MPs, many of them in marginal seats, need a better economic story to address rising discontent among the public.
Nearly 2.1 million pupils – almost one in four of the total in England – were eligible for free school meals in January 2024. The Department for Education has said more than half a million more children are expected to benefit from the expansion, with nearly £500 put back into parents' pockets every year.
It suggested that the expansion will lift 100,000 children across England completely out of poverty, with the move being the most effective way of tackling the issue outside the benefits system. Keir Starmer has said the government will look at scrapping the two-child benefits limit.
'It is the moral mission of this government to tackle the stain of child poverty, and today this government takes a giant step towards ending it with targeted support that puts money back in parents' pockets,' the education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, said.
The expansion of free school meals was almost universally welcomed by anti-poverty campaigners and teaching unions. Nick Harrison, chief executive of the Sutton Trust, said: 'This is a significant step towards taking hunger out of the classroom.
'Children can't learn effectively when hungry, so this announcement not only helps to tackle the effects of child poverty, but will also likely help improve education outcomes for disadvantaged young people.'
Kate Anstey, at the Child Poverty Action Group charity, said: 'This is fantastic news and a gamechanger for children and families. At last, more kids will get the food they need to learn and thrive and millions of parents struggling to make ends meet will get a bit of breathing space.'
Asked about the winter fuel payment after a speech in Rochdale, Reeves told reporters: 'We have listened to the concerns that people had about the level of the means test, and so we will be making changes to that; they will be in place so that pensioners are paid this coming winter.
'We'll announce the detail of that and the level of that as soon as we possibly can. But people should be in no doubt that the means test will increase and more people will get a winter fuel payment this winter.'
The option of paying all pensioners a winter fuel payment and then asking for wealthier people to repay the money is a similar approach to that taken by the former Conservative chancellor George Osborne when he reduced child benefit eligibility for better-off parents.
A senior official at HMRC, Jonathan Athow, confirmed to the Treasury select committee on Wednesday that if the tax system was used to make the changes, it would not be possible until next year.
'We'd have to get to April next year before we knew somebody's income, before we could then make any decisions about how [recouping the payment] would then be implemented,' he told MPs.
The government's reversal came despite Downing Street denying that it would make changes to winter fuel payments after the Guardian revealed that it was rethinking the cut amid anxiety at the top of government that the policy could wreak serious electoral damage.
The chancellor also hinted at tensions between cabinet colleagues saying she had had to turn down spending requests as she struggled to balance the books.
'Not every department will get everything that they want next week,' she said, 'and I have had to say no to things that I want to do too.'
Just two Whitehall departments are still to agree their multi-year budgets with the Treasury before the spending review, the Guardian understands, with the home secretary, Yvette Cooper and the housing secretary, Angela Rayner, holding out on policing and social housing budgets.
She also ruled out bending her fiscal rules, as some Labour MPs have urged her to do, and which she acknowledged would be the subject of much discussion over the coming days. It means that tax rises or further spending cuts are more likely this autumn.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sir Sadiq Khan urged to seek higher taxes and parking fees for SUVs
Sir Sadiq Khan urged to seek higher taxes and parking fees for SUVs

Glasgow Times

time23 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Sir Sadiq Khan urged to seek higher taxes and parking fees for SUVs

London Assembly Members agreed a motion calling on the mayor to take action because of fears that the increasing size of cars is damaging road surfaces, causing congestion and putting other road users at greater risk of death and serious injury. The London Assembly called on Sir Sadiq to ask the Treasury to amend vehicle excise duty to include a tax based on vehicle weight. It also wants the mayor to request that councils in the capital consider charging more for parking larger cars, and to call on the Department for Transport to introduce tighter limits on the size and bonnet height of passenger vehicles. The motion was agreed by 14 votes in favour and eight votes against. SUVs have grown in popularity in recent years, with many drivers favouring their higher seating position. They accounted for a third of all new car registrations in the UK last year, compared with just 12% a decade earlier. SUVs are generally taller, wider and heavier than traditional cars, and less fuel-efficient. The increase in the size of cars has been described as carspreading. Labour London Assembly Member Elly Baker, who proposed the motion, said the capital's streets 'weren't designed for larger vehicles like SUVs'. She went on: 'Their greater size, weight, and higher bonnets put vulnerable road users at greater risk, reduce available parking spaces, and cause more wear and tear on our roads. 'It's time we took sensible steps to manage the impact of oversized cars and ensure our streets remain safe and accessible for everyone.' But AA president Edmund King insisted it is 'up to Londoners to choose the type of vehicle that best fulfils their needs'. He added: 'It is not really the role of the London Assembly to dictate what cars individuals should drive. 'Some larger families may well need bigger vehicles with more passenger seats, whereas a driver conducting most trips alone may well choose a city car. 'London's streets were developed around the horse and cart, so of course our infrastructure needs modernising to keep up with change.' A recent study found pedestrians and cyclists are 44% more likely to die if they are hit by an SUV or similar-sized vehicle rather than a traditional car. The analysis produced by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and Imperial College London stated that the figure rises to 82% for children.

Sir Sadiq Khan urged to seek higher taxes and parking fees for SUVs
Sir Sadiq Khan urged to seek higher taxes and parking fees for SUVs

Western Telegraph

time26 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Sir Sadiq Khan urged to seek higher taxes and parking fees for SUVs

London Assembly Members agreed a motion calling on the mayor to take action because of fears that the increasing size of cars is damaging road surfaces, causing congestion and putting other road users at greater risk of death and serious injury. The London Assembly called on Sir Sadiq to ask the Treasury to amend vehicle excise duty to include a tax based on vehicle weight. It's time we took sensible steps to manage the impact of oversized cars Elly Baker, London Assembly Member It also wants the mayor to request that councils in the capital consider charging more for parking larger cars, and to call on the Department for Transport to introduce tighter limits on the size and bonnet height of passenger vehicles. The motion was agreed by 14 votes in favour and eight votes against. SUVs have grown in popularity in recent years, with many drivers favouring their higher seating position. They accounted for a third of all new car registrations in the UK last year, compared with just 12% a decade earlier. SUVs are generally taller, wider and heavier than traditional cars, and less fuel-efficient. The increase in the size of cars has been described as carspreading. Labour London Assembly Member Elly Baker, who proposed the motion, said the capital's streets 'weren't designed for larger vehicles like SUVs'. She went on: 'Their greater size, weight, and higher bonnets put vulnerable road users at greater risk, reduce available parking spaces, and cause more wear and tear on our roads. 'It's time we took sensible steps to manage the impact of oversized cars and ensure our streets remain safe and accessible for everyone.' But AA president Edmund King insisted it is 'up to Londoners to choose the type of vehicle that best fulfils their needs'. He added: 'It is not really the role of the London Assembly to dictate what cars individuals should drive. 'Some larger families may well need bigger vehicles with more passenger seats, whereas a driver conducting most trips alone may well choose a city car. 'London's streets were developed around the horse and cart, so of course our infrastructure needs modernising to keep up with change.' A recent study found pedestrians and cyclists are 44% more likely to die if they are hit by an SUV or similar-sized vehicle rather than a traditional car. The analysis produced by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and Imperial College London stated that the figure rises to 82% for children.

Kemi Badenoch to give speech on the ECHR
Kemi Badenoch to give speech on the ECHR

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Kemi Badenoch to give speech on the ECHR

Kemi Badenoch is set to use a major speech to declare she is 'increasingly of the view' that the UK should withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights. The leader of the Conservative Party is expected to set out a plan to launch a commission into whether Britain should quit the treaty. The ECHR was a dividing issue in last year's Conservative leadership election, with Mrs Badenoch's rival Robert Jenrick championing the idea that Britain should pull out. Critics of the treaty want to leave it because it has been used to frustrate attempts to deport migrants from Britain. Mrs Badenoch is expected to say that she is 'increasingly of the view that we will need to leave, because I am yet to see a clear and coherent route to change within our current legal structures'. 'I have always been clear that if our national interest means that we need to leave the ECHR, we will leave,' the Conservative leader will say. She will add: 'But I say that not because of any particular obsession with international law or with our treaty arrangements. I say that because for me, the most important thing is making our country safer, richer and fairer.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store