logo
Tourist Taxes to Spread Across UK in Overtourism Fight

Tourist Taxes to Spread Across UK in Overtourism Fight

Skift28-05-2025

Edinburgh will soon charge hotel guests an extra 5% tax, and the idea is catching on fast across the UK, impacting hotels, short-term rentals, and cruise lines.
A cascade of tourist tax proposals is sweeping across the UK after Edinburgh became the first British city to approve a 5% hotel bed tax starting July 2026.
Edinburgh's move, announced last August, has triggered a wave of similar tourist tax proposals across Britain as cash-strapped local governments eye taking a cut of tourism revenue while making it costlier to visit.
Half of Scotland's local authorities are now developing similar levies, with Wales poised to vote on its own tourist tax legislation this summer, and some UK cruise ports are considering levies on passengers, too.
Why now? Scotland last year became the first part of the UK to enable localities to charge visitor levies.
The push stems from a practical constraint: Scotland's devolved government cannot create new national taxes without approval from the UK Treasury, which routinely refuses such requests, according to an inteview with Ross Greer, a Scottish Greens member of parliament.
Edinburgh's announcement of a new visitor tax came during the city's festival season when four million visitors arrive each year in the town of 500,000 as part of a long-running live tourism experience.
Other UK towns have grown increasingly frustrated with overtourism, making the tax politically palatable despite opposition from the hospitality industry, which fears that taxes could reduce tourism spending and add a compliance burden.
Exhibit A is the Scottish Highlands, which, at almost 10,000 square miles of picturesque scenery, relies a lot on tourism. The Highlands Council estimated a levy could be worth £10 million (about $13.5 million).
Wales is advancing similar visitor levy legislation, which would also introduce licensing requirements for hotels and short-term rentals. Northern Ireland is exploring comparable measures.
The tourism tax trend reflects broader tensions over tourism's economic impact. While visitors bring spending, they also strain infrastructure and drive up housing costs. Tourist taxes offer local governments a way to capture revenue while potentially managing visitor flows. But local businesses say they could hurt overall tourism revenue.
UK Cruising May Face Taxes, Too
The tax wave isn't limited to hotels. Scottish ports are considering locally applied cruise passenger levies, backed by groups including the typically tourism-friendly Orkney Islands Council.
Scotland welcomed 1.2 million cruise passengers last year, nearly half the UK total.
The cruise industry warns that a patchwork of different charges could drive business elsewhere.
"There are other destinations," said Andy Harmer, managing director of Cruise Line Industry Association, United Kingdom & Ireland. "What we don't want is Scotland seen as an unattractive place to do cruise business."
Greer told Skift that the Green party proposed the tax as a way to help communities derive financial benefit from tourism as well as a way to discourage excess ship emissions.
Due to differing local priorities and decisions about levies, the association suggested some ports may be disadvantaged over others.
The Scottish government's consultation on cruise taxes runs through May 30, with a decision expected afterward. Meanwhile, other regions watch Edinburgh's experiment closely.
Tourist taxes aren't new globally. Cities from Amsterdam to Venice have implemented various levies, with mixed results. Some claim to have successfully tamed overtourism while generating revenue. Others have faced legal challenges or seen tourism shift to untaxed neighboring areas.
Possible Visitor Levies in England?
In England, county-level authorities are watching Edinburgh's bed tax with interest.
Some authorities in England's Lake District have lobbied for similar taxation powers. This year, the Lake District published a report looking at the opportunities of a similar tax in the English National Park and UNESCO World Heritage Site, which sees around 20 million visitors a year.
England faces legal hurdles in applying visitor taxes that Scotland avoided. Most English authorities lack the devolved powers, the report's author, Davina Stanford, told Skift.
Manchester represents a special exception, with some devolved powers under the mayor of Greater Manchester. However, its Business Improvement District bed tax only applies to the city center.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dawn French apologises for 'clumsy tone' in Gaza clip
Dawn French apologises for 'clumsy tone' in Gaza clip

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Dawn French apologises for 'clumsy tone' in Gaza clip

Dawn French has posted a public apology after posting a video about the war in Gaza, and removed the item from her social media. The 40-second video posted earlier this week showed the star of BBC sitcom The Vicar of Dibley share her views on the conflict, saying "Complicated, no, but nuanced. But bottom line is no." Switching into a high-pitched voice, she continued: "Yeah, but you know they did a bad thing to us, yeah but no. But we want that land... and we have history... No. Those people aren't really even people, are they really? No." Following a backlash with people complaining she was mocking the 7 October attack that ignited the war, French removed the video on Saturday and said she never meant to "mock, or dismiss, or diminish the horror" of the event. "I hope you will understand my intention was not to offend, but I clearly have. For which I am sorry and I have removed the video." French said that she had posted a video in the style that she has been using for social media "in an effort to convey an important point", although she added that she had "clumsily used a mocking tone". "My intention was never to mock, or dismiss, or diminish the horror of what happened on 7 October 2023 and what continues to unfold from that brutal unthinkable, unforgivable, savage attack." She said her intention had been "to point the finger of shame at the behaviour of the cruel leaders on all sides of this atrocious war".

'I burst into tears': How airline carry-on bag confusion triggered legal row
'I burst into tears': How airline carry-on bag confusion triggered legal row

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'I burst into tears': How airline carry-on bag confusion triggered legal row

Determined to avoid baggage fees for his holiday to Pisa, Benjamin Till trawled several different shops armed with a tape measure in search of the right suitcase. Eventually, he found a case within the dimensions EasyJet allows for a free underseat bag - or so he thought. When Mr Till arrived at London Gatwick Airport in December 2023, he discovered those measurements included wheels, meaning his bag was deemed slightly too big. He protested, but eventually paid £48 to bring the bag on board. He says he was told to remove the wheels for the way back - which he did. But at the gate on his way home, he was told the suitcase was still too large, so he sat on the floor, unpacking his dirty underwear and souvenirs into a bin bag. "I don't mind admitting that I actually burst into tears because it was so humiliating," he says. An EasyJet spokesperson told the BBC its ground crew had to ensure non-checked bags were within maximum dimensions "to safely and securely fit", and that rules were made clear to customers when they booked. Stories of passengers caught out by baggage rules they feel are inconsistent or confusing are common, with many customers complaining or seeking clarity from budget airlines on social media. Different airlines have varying rules on the acceptable size and weight of an underseat personal item or an overhead cabin bag, with some charging customers to bring the latter. For people who fall foul of these rules, some airlines charge hefty fees to upgrade a bag from a free personal item to an overhead cabin bag at the airport gate, or to stow an oversized cabin bag in the hold. Passenger confusion has prompted the European Union's largest consumer group to push for fairer and more consistent hand luggage rules, and caused one government to start cracking down on airlines over bag charges. The EU is now looking at changing its laws - changes which would also affect UK passengers who are travelling to or from an EU destination using an EU-based airline. On Thursday, EU transport ministers proposed standardised sizing for free underseat baggage on EU airlines, among other air travel and passenger rights' changes - meaning this could become EU law if their position is accepted by the European Parliament. Budget airlines say their baggage policies comply with the law while keeping fares low, but they have been facing mounting pressure and calls for change. EU transport ministers proposed that passengers should be guaranteed one free personal item, measuring up to 40x30x15cm (including wheels and handles) - or which could reasonably fit under a plane seat. These rules would apply to EU-based airlines (such as Ryanair, Wizz Air and EasyJet), including when they are carrying passengers from a non-EU country like the UK to an EU country and vice-versa, but not third-party airlines. New rules would add clarity to an EU court ruling from 11 years ago, which stated hand baggage should not be subject to an extra fee, provided it met "reasonable" weight and dimensions, but did not say what reasonable was. Currently, Ryanair allows a free carry-on bag of 40x20x25cm, while EasyJet's dimensions for a free bag are a more generous 45x36x20 cm, including wheels and handles. The ministers' proposal was silent, however, on the issue of whether airlines could charge for overhead cabin bags – meaning that if their proposal was adopted into law, the current situation would not change and airlines could keep charging for that kind of hand baggage, which some in Europe have lobbied to stop. The European Consumer Organisation, BEUC, an umbrella group for 45 independent consumer organisations from 32 countries, believes Thursday's proposals do not go far enough, and legitimise "charging for reasonably sized hand luggage". In November, five airlines were fined a total of €179m (£150m) in Spain for "abusive" practices, including charging for hand luggage. Spain's Consumer Rights Ministry said at the time that it planned to ban charging extra for carry-on luggage and other policies. The airlines had said they would appeal the decision. Regarding charges for overheard cabin bags, Ryanair said it fully complied with EU law in its policy, which allows one small bag on board free of charge. "If airlines were forced to include additional carry-on bags as part of the basic fare, it would reduce choice and drive up air fares for all passengers, which would harm consumers," the airline said. Industry group Airlines For Europe said charging different amounts depending on baggage "allows passengers to choose the exact services that best suits their needs". Hand luggage dimensions should be universal, says Jane Hawkes, a consumer expert specialising in travel. "I don't really see why it can't be, and why they can't come to a voluntary agreement as to what those requirements should be for your baggage," she tells the BBC. "There have to be restrictions, obviously, but a one-size-fits-all kind of approach would make it a lot simpler for passengers," she says. BEUC said policymakers should define what "reasonable" size and weight was "to avoid surprises at the airport and ultimately reduce the number of disputes costing consumers and airlines time and money". Ms Hawkes suggests passengers make sure they measure their bag after it is packed, as it may expand when it is full and go over the limit. She adds that consumers should not just be swayed by the fare price, as "if you've got an airline that encompasses [baggage] without you having to pay extra costs to start with, then that might be more of a better option for you". Mr Till would welcome a one-size-fits-all approach to underseat bags. "It's just really, really unfair and ridiculous and there should be one size that goes across all of the airlines," he says. He also criticises the permitted size of underseat cabin bags, saying "it was such a tiny, tiny size of luggage that you were allowed that it had taken me so long to find something that was so small". Still, he was grateful for the inexpensive air fare, and the place he had to stay in Italy, because "otherwise I wouldn't be able to come to this beautiful country". Ryanair fine over 'potentially oversize' cabin bag Rip Off Britain: Why is my hand luggage allowance shrinking?

Britain to allocate $116 billion to R&D in spending plan
Britain to allocate $116 billion to R&D in spending plan

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Britain to allocate $116 billion to R&D in spending plan

LONDON (Reuters) -British finance minister Rachel Reeves will allocate 86 billion pounds ($116 billion) in this week's spending review to fund research and development, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said on Sunday. It said the package, funding everything from new drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries to artificial intelligence breakthroughs, would be worth over 22.5 billion pounds a year by 2029/30, driving new jobs and economic growth. Reeves will divide more than 2 trillion pounds ($2.7 trillion) of public money between her ministerial colleagues on Wednesday, making choices that will define what the year-old Labour government can achieve in the next four years. The DSIT said the announcement on R&D follows Reeves' commitment last week to 15.6 billion pounds of government investment in local transport in city regions in the Northern England, Midlands and the South West. ($1 = 0.7398 pounds)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store