logo
Scientists discovered microplastics in human semen and follicular fluid

Scientists discovered microplastics in human semen and follicular fluid

CTV News02-07-2025
Dr. Richard Thompson of the University of Plymouth, who wasn't involved in the research, analyzes microplastics under a microscope in 2023. (Ben Stansall/AFP/Getty Images via CNN Newsource)
Scientists have detected microplastics — the tiny and pervasive fragments now found in our seas, drinking water, food and, increasingly, living tissue — in human semen and follicular fluid, according to new research.
A small group of 25 women and 18 men participated in the research, published Tuesday in the journal Human Reproduction. Microplastics were detected in 69 per cent of the follicular fluid samples and 55 per cent of the seminal fluid samples. Follicular fluid is the liquid that surrounds an egg in an ovarian follicle.
The research is an abstract — a short summary of completed research — and has not yet been peer reviewed. It was presented Tuesday in Paris at the 41st Annual Meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.
'Previous studies had already suggested this possibility, so the presence of microplastics in the human reproductive system is not entirely unexpected,' said lead research author Dr. Emilio Gómez-Sánchez, director of the assisted reproduction laboratory at Next Fertility Murcia in Spain, in a statement provided to the press. 'What did surprise us, however, is how widespread it is. This is not an isolated finding — it appears to be quite common.'
Microplastics are polymer fragments that range in size from less than 0.2 inches (5 millimetres) to 1/25,000th of an inch (1 micrometre). Polymers are chemical compounds with long chains of large and repetitive molecular units called monomers, and are known for being flexible and durable. Most plastics are synthetic polymers.
Plastics smaller than the measurement criteria for microplastics are considered nanoplastics, which are measured in billionths of a meter.
'Microplastics primarily enter the body through three routes: ingestion, inhalation, and skin contact,' Gómez-Sánchez said. 'From there, they can enter the bloodstream, which then distributes them throughout the body, including to the reproductive organs.'
In previous studies, the fragments have also been detected in various body parts or fluids including the lungs, placenta, brain, testicles, nose tissue at the base of the brain, penises and human stool.
'Decades of studies and the (US Food and Drug Administration) agree that microplastics are not a threat because exposure is extremely low and they are non-toxic,' said Dr. Chris DeArmitt, founder of the Plastics Research Council, via email.
However, while there is little to nothing known about the potential effects of microplastics on human health, chemicals used in plastic production — that often leach from plastics — are linked with health risks including hormonal disruptions, certain cancers, respiratory diseases and skin irritation.
Testing bodily fluids for microplastics
The research participants were patients and donors at Next Fertility Murcia. The women were undergoing egg retrieval, formally known as follicular aspiration, for assisted reproduction, while the men were undergoing semen analysis. The authors stored and froze the samples in glass, then incubated them for two days before analyzing them using an imaging technique combining microscopy and infrared laser.
The research team also analyzed the containers used to collect and store samples to ensure they hadn't been contaminated with microplastics. The abstract doesn't disclose what materials the collection containers were made of.
Imaging revealed nine types of microplastics in the reproductive fluids. Over 50 per cent of the follicular fluid samples contained polyamide (PA), polyurethane (PU) and polyethylene (PE), while polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) were discovered in over 30 per cent of the follicular fluid samples.
Polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polylactic acid (PLA) appeared in over 20 per cent of the follicular fluid samples.
In the semen samples, 56 per cent contained PTFE.
Synthetic polyamide is commonly known as nylon, often used in textiles, plastics and automotive parts. Polyurethane is commonly used in coatings, foams and adhesives for furniture, construction, automotive parts, footwear and more. Polyethylene and polypropylene are often found in packaging, construction uses and consumer goods, such as toys and kitchenware.
The plastic PTFE is widely used in nonstick cookware, while PET is found in many food and beverage containers. Polyvinyl chloride is often used in the construction, packaging and medical industries, while PLA is primarily found in food packing, medical implants and 3D-printed objects.
In most samples, the researchers found only one or two particles, but they detected up to five in others, Gómez-Sánchez said. Microplastic concentrations were higher in follicular fluid than in semen. However, the overall concentrations of microplastics in both fluids were relatively low when compared with the concentrations of non-plastic particles. The abstract didn't disclose what those non-plastic particles were.
'Sadly, (the findings) are not surprising,' said Dr. Matthew J. Campen — a researcher who helped lead the discoveries of microplastics in the brain and testicles — via email.
Though the research is preliminary, it does 'set the stage for more advanced studies of the relationship between plastics exposure and reproductive fitness,' added Campen, who wasn't involved in the study and is a regents' professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of New Mexico.
Important questions remain
The research affirmed previous studies that had found microplastics in these reproductive fluids, and yet again raises important questions, including how these microplastics are absorbed in the intestine then transported to the gonads, Campen said.
'This suggests a very natural mechanism is being hijacked,' he added. 'It would also be important to assess plastics in the nanoscale range.'
People trying to conceive naturally or via in vitro fertilization may not need to be concerned about the findings, as they are only preliminary for now, Gómez-Sánchez said.
'We don't know if they have a direct effect on the capacity of a couple to conceive and carry a baby to term,' he added. 'Reproduction is a complex equation, and microplastics are a variable in this equation.'
The findings also can't yet be linked to more general health outcomes, experts said.
'So far, the effects of microplastics on humans have been mainly extrapolated from animal studies, where microplastics were administered at high concentrations,' Gómez-Sánchez said. 'We currently lack direct evidence regarding their impact on humans.'
Betsy Bowers, executive director of the EPS Industry Alliance, echoed these disclaimers and noted that the animal research results aren't indicative of harm at regular exposure levels. The EPS (expanded polystyrene) Industry Alliance is a North American trade association representing the EPS industry.
The finding that follicular fluid contained more microplastics than semen may be circumstantial, Gómez-Sánchez added, because the study group was small. However, when an ovary is stimulated for assisted reproduction, blood flow to the ovary increases, which may deliver more microplastics to the ovary, he explained.
Additional research is needed to identify the types and quantities of microplastics that could cause health problems, said Dr. Ranjith Ramasamy, a consultant urologist at Jumeirah American Clinic in Dubai. Ramasamy, who wasn't involved in the study, led the research that found microplastics in penises.
'The plan is to increase the number of cases and conduct a survey on lifestyle habits in order to determine if any of these habits are linked to higher concentrations of plastics found in the ovaries and seminal plasma,' Gómez-Sánchez said.
Gómez-Sánchez and the other researchers also plan to explore whether the presence of microplastics in reproductive fluids affects the quality of sperm and oocytes, he said. Oocytes are cells in ovaries that form an ovum, a mature female reproductive cell that can divide to create an embryo upon fertilization by sperm.
How to reduce your exposure to microplastics
The significance of the findings isn't yet clear, but they should be considered an additional argument in favor of avoiding the use of plastics in our daily lives, said Dr. Carlos Calhaz-Jorge, professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Lisbon in Portugal, in a news release. Calhaz-Jorge wasn't involved in the research.
Given the ubiquity of plastics, avoidance can be challenging, said Dr. Philip Landrigan, a pediatrician and director of the Program for Global Public Health and the Common Good at Boston College, via email. In addition to reducing obvious uses of plastic, you can also avoid using plastic cutting boards and eating ultraprocessed foods.
Also limit drinking water from plastic bottles, microwaving food in plastic containers and consuming hot food from plastic containers, Ramasamy said.
Food can be stored in glass, stainless steel or bamboo instead of plastic.
But 'the conversation needs to shift — immediately — to policymakers,' Campen said. 'Hoping that individual choices can make a difference has been clearly a losing strategy. Federal governments around the world need to make major changes to waste management and recycling policies.'
Annual plastic production by weight has increased by 250 times in the past 75 years and is on track to triple again by 2060, Landrigan said.
'To reduce plastic pollution and safeguard human health, it will be essential that the Global Plastics Treaty that is currently in negotiation at the United Nations impose a global cap on plastic production,' Landrigan, who wasn't involved in the research, added.
'But smart governments can act now,' Campen urged.
By Kristen Rogers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Musical anhedonia': Researchers investigate why some people don't enjoy songs
‘Musical anhedonia': Researchers investigate why some people don't enjoy songs

CTV News

time11 hours ago

  • CTV News

‘Musical anhedonia': Researchers investigate why some people don't enjoy songs

We've all been there. You try sharing a beloved album, artist or niche musical genre with a friend, but for whatever reason, it just doesn't land. Maybe it's a little too mainstream for their tastes, or not mainstream enough. Maybe they're on the cutting edge of new releases, but have a bit of a tin ear for the classics. Maybe, just maybe, your choice of all-time favourite song is more about what it means to you than its objective quality. But have you ever encountered someone who doesn't like songs at all? Someone with no need for a record collection, concert tickets or streaming service, and for whom humanity's musical canon is all just so much noise? Though rare, a team of researchers at McGill University and the University of Barcelona says the inability to enjoy music is a distinct neurological phenomenon, and determining how it happens could be key to better understanding how parts of the brain interact. Carrying a tune? The term 'specific musical anhedonia' (SAR) describes the 'impaired ability to derive pleasure from music,' despite both the ability to hear and to find joy in other experiences Genetics may be involved, but researchers say that environmental factors could also be at play. SAR has sometimes been observed following a brain injury, but the condition has also appeared in patients with no prior neurological issues. It's been estimated that between three and five per cent of the population could be impacted. Researchers used the Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (BMRQ) to gather data on the phenomenon, probing respondents with questions about music's capacity to evoke emotion, regulate mood, foster social connections, compel dance or movement and inspire the search for new sounds and styles. Combining that survey data with brain imaging taken while listening to music, researchers say that SAR manifests as low activity in the connections between the brain's pleasure centres and the areas responsible for processing sound, rather than those pleasure centres just failing to operate on their own. 'If the reward circuit is not working well, you get less pleasure from all kinds of rewards,' said study co-author Ernest Mas-Herrero, in a release. 'Here, what we point out is that it might be not only the engagement of this circuitry that is important but also how it interacts with other brain regions that are relevant for the processing of each reward type.' In a 2016 study, SAR patients showed typical neurological responses to a different source of joy, winning at a game of chance, just not with music. This disconnect, the researchers argue, suggests that different kinds of pleasure can rely on their own pathways through the brain, with varying effectiveness. The University of Barcelona's Josep Marco-Pallarés says that understanding the pathways that respond -- or don't respond -- to musical stimuli could be a stepping stone to other pleasure-related disorders, from general anhedonia (the inability to feel joy), to addiction and eating disorders. 'It's possible, for instance, that people with specific food anhedonia may have some deficit in the connectivity between brain regions involved in food processing and the reward circuitry,' he said in a release. 'Using our methodology to study other reward types could yield the discovery of other specific anhedonias.'

Medical professionals weigh in as Londoners react to secret dog study at St. Joseph's hospital
Medical professionals weigh in as Londoners react to secret dog study at St. Joseph's hospital

CBC

timea day ago

  • CBC

Medical professionals weigh in as Londoners react to secret dog study at St. Joseph's hospital

As animal-loving Londoners express "horror" at a local hospital's use of dogs in scientific studies, medical professionals say there are ethical ways to reduce harm and death in animal-based research. A story published Wednesday by the Investigative Journalism Bureau, in partnership with Postmedia, found that dogs are being used in a heart study at St. Joseph's Health Care's Lawson Research Institute. Researchers are secretly inducing three-hour heart attacks in dogs and puppies, the investigative report said, before euthanizing them and removing their hearts for further study. The hospital has kept the research under wraps, wheeling in the animals in blanket-covered crates and playing loud music to drown out the barking, according to the report. "I was absolutely horrified and I was really, really angry," said longtime Londoner Orreanna Douglas. "The sting of this shock is basically like the stun these poor, suffering dogs are getting. I'm livid that this is going on here. Douglas, whose children were born at St. Joseph's and who has been getting physiotherapy at the hospital for the last four months, said she cancelled her latest appointment at the hospital due to her frustrations. "I can't go back now, nor will I until the situation is rectified," she said. St. Joseph's has refused interview requests. In a statement to CBC News, officials confirmed that dogs, rodents, fruit flies and other large mammals are used in research. Other Londoners have taken to social media to express their outrage and non-profit organization Animal Justice Canada is planning a Saturday vigil for the dogs outside of the hospital. Meanwhile, medical experts have differing opinions on the use of animals in scientific study and the ethics that surround the practice. "[Animals] are needed because they're complex systems," said Pierre Verreault, the executive director of the Canadian Council of Animal Care (CCAC), which develops standards for the ethical use and care of animals in science. Different types of animals are used to try new medical treatments, ensure medical products are safe to sell, and teach veterinarians different procedures, Verreault said, adding that dogs are often used for regulatory testing purposes. Research projects must be approved by a panel before being granted funding, Verreault said, and part of that includes presenting a protocol to an animal care committee which conducts an ethical review. The core of animal research ethics is referred to as the Three Rs: Replacement, reduction and refinement. "Is there an alternative method? If yes, you shouldn't use an animal. Reduction is, 'Do you need to use that amount of animals to conduct research?" Verreault said. The principle, refinement, aims to minimize pain and distress by using pain medication if possible and giving the animal comfort. St. Joseph's officials have been on the defensive since the report came out. In a note sent to staff and volunteers on Thursday, obtained by CBC News, officials said they "acknowledge how difficult this story is" and that it "evokes strong feelings," but that hospital is "committed to ethical research at every stage of the discovery and innovation process." "The care, treatment and welfare of animals involved in Lawson research is taken extremely seriously and every possible step is taken to ensure their comfort and minimize suffering," the note to staff said. However, other experts say there are no ethical methods to animal testing. "There are [ethics] that are written on paper and there are ones that are actually practiced in a laboratory," said Charu Chandrasekera, executive director of the Canadian Centre for Alternatives to Animal Methods, who previously worked in a lab that studied heart failure using animals. "The three R's have become rather unjustified. They've become a box-ticking formality in a system more focused on paperwork than real accountability," she said. "Humans are not 60 kilogram mice, rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, cats, dogs or monkeys. We are not equivalent biologically…The differences are immutable," she said, adding that scientific facilities should look at alternatives to animal testing now that technology has developed. Alternatives exist, experts say "Justifying the use of animals because it has worked in the past at a time when new technologies weren't available is like praising the telegraph in the age of Zoom," Chandrasekera said. In a statement, St. Joseph's said the purpose of its dog research is to look at post-heart attack injury and healing, which cannot be done using other methods. "These techniques are essential for providing clinical teams with tools that permit proper diagnosis and treatment for heart attacks and heart failure, one of the leading causes of death in Canada," the statement said. Both experts say there are ways to reduce or rid animal testing in a scientific setting, and the technology is developing daily. Chandrasekera say there is a "toolbox" of alternatives, but recommends scientists who want to advance their research refer to already-published human studies that contain MRI and PET images. Verreault's suggestions for testing include developing cells to do research experiments, simulating experiments on chips, or reusing tissue from animals who were used in previous experiments. "Sometimes it can completely replace the animals in certain types of research, but sometimes it may only replace a certain part of it because an animal is like a human being. It's a very complex system that's still hard to replace," Verreault said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store