3 men sentenced for murder in NYC gay bar drugging scheme
Jacob Barroso, 32, Jayqwan Hamilton, 37, and Robert DeMaio, 36, were found guilty in February of committing murder, robbery and conspiracy for the scheme that sent shockwaves through the city's LGBTQ community.
During the 15-month spree — which lasted from March 2021 to June 2022 — Julio Ramirez, a 25-year-old social worker, and John Umberger, a 33-year-old political consultant, were killed after being given fentanyl-laced drugs.
Ramirez was left unresponsive in the back of a taxi after being targeted by the trio outside The Ritz Bar and Lounge in Hell's Kitchen. He was eventually taken to a hospital where he was pronounced dead.
Umberger was found dead in an Upper East Side apartment, days after he met Hamilton and DeMaio outside The Q, a Hell's Kitchen nightclub that has since closed.
The city's medical examiner ruled both men had ingested a fatal mix of fentanyl, lidocaine and cocaine.
During the trial, prosecutors said the crew lurked outside the nightclubs to exploit intoxicated patrons, befriending them before offering them drugs that rendered them unconscious.
After knocking out their victims, they used facial recognition technology to unlock their phones, then proceeded to drain their bank accounts and use payment apps to make thousands of dollars in purchases.
All three of the defendants were convicted of murdering Ramirez, while only Hamilton and DeMaio were convicted in Umberger's death.
On Wednesday, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced Hamilton and DeMaio had been sentenced to 40 years-to-life in state prison. Barroso was hit with 20 years-to-life.
'They left both men to die as they used their financial accounts to purchase clothes and sneakers, never once showing concern about the deadly consequences of their actions,' Bragg said in a statement. 'We will never be able to undo the tragic losses of Mr. Ramirez and Mr. Umberger, but I hope these significant prison sentences can provide some closure to their loved ones.'
Attorneys for all three men said their clients intend to appeal their convictions.
Three other conspirators, Eddie Ashley, Shane Hoskins and Andre Butts, were previously arrested and reached plea deals in connection with the scheme.
The death of fashion designer Kathryn Marie Gallagher under similar circumstances in 2022 was eventually ruled a homicide and led police to suspect a second drugging-and-robbery crew was targeting the Lower East Side.
So far, only one man, Kenwood Allen, has been charged in relation to Gallagher's case. He was ultimately charged in a drugging spree that led to the deaths of five people.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
4 hours ago
- New York Times
Former employee sues Blackhawks, alleging discrimination, wrongful termination
A former Chicago Blackhawks employee is suing the team for discrimination and retaliation, alleging he was treated differently by his supervisor for being gay, and then wrongfully fired shortly after being interviewed by Outsports, a website covering LGBTQ+ issues and individuals in sports. The lawsuit, filed Thursday on behalf of Anthony Filomena, said the Blackhawks' former manager of public relations dealt with 'hostile and aggressive actions' from his supervisor, who was hired about a year into Filomena's two-year stint with the Blackhawks. It then states that Filomena was fired one day after complaining to his supervisor that he was being unfairly criticized for his interview with Outsports, an interview for which Filomena said he had direct approval from team chairman and owner Danny Wirtz. Advertisement Outsports published the interview on April 29, 2024. Three days later, the lawsuit alleges, Filomena was criticized by another senior employee, who told him the department 'was very angry about it.' Filomena said he requested permission from Wirtz in a text message earlier in the month after Outsports reached out to him, and that Wirtz approved, stating the article would boost the team's reputation in the LGBTQ+ community. The suit says Filomena then told his supervisor that he believed the criticism stemmed from 'discrimination based on (Filomena's) sexual orientation.' The next day, May 3, 2024, Filomena was fired. The lawsuit says that Filomena had a 'perfect rating' on his performance review a month earlier, and that he 'met or exceeded performance expectations.' In response to the lawsuit, the Blackhawks said Filomena was fired for other reasons. 'Mr. Filomena was terminated for cause due to multiple instances of misconduct over a period of six months,' the Blackhawks wrote in a statement. 'He received multiple written communications outlining expectations including a formal, final written warning prior to his dismissal. His termination was solely due to continued misconduct and disregard for our company policies.' The lawsuit argues the team's 'stated reasons for termination — alleged policy violations and performance deficiencies — were either fabricated, exaggerated, or not the actual basis for the decision.' 'The proximity between (Filomena's) complaint about discrimination and his termination is direct evidence of retaliation,' the lawsuit alleges. Filomena's lawsuit alleges that other employees who were not openly gay, 'who engaged in comparable conduct, were not terminated.' He is suing for back pay with interest, front pay, lost benefits, attorneys' fees, and compensatory and punitive damages. The situation, the suit says, has caused Filomena mental anguish, emotional distress, humiliation, degradation and loss of enjoyment of life. Advertisement The suit was filed in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. A former Blackhawks player, identified as John Doe, is also suing the team for its alleged failure to act upon sexual-assault allegations against former video coach Brad Aldrich during the 2010 Stanley Cup playoffs. The team previously settled a high-profile lawsuit from former player Kyle Beach, who alleged Aldrich sexually assaulted him during the 2010 playoffs. Wirtz and the Chicago Blackhawks Foundation are being sued by a former independent contractor as well, who has accused them of breach of oral contract, fraud and violating the Gender Violence Act, among other counts. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
The Hill
2 days ago
- The Hill
Teen says server demanded proof of gender in restaurant restroom
A Minnesota teenager filed a charge of discrimination Tuesday against a Buffalo Wild Wings restaurant, accusing a server of following her into the women's restroom and demanding she 'prove' she was a girl. Gerika Mudra, an 18-year-old high school student, was dining with a friend at the chain restaurant's Owatonna, Minn., location in late April when a female server followed her into the bathroom and accused her of being 'a boy,' according to Gender Justice, the Minnesota-based nonprofit that filed the discrimination charge on Mudra's behalf. 'This is a women's restroom. The man needs to get out of here,' the server said while banging on the stall door, according to Gender Justice. The server blocked Mudra from exiting the restroom until she unzipped her hoodie to show that she had breasts. Buffalo Wild Wings did not respond to two emails seeking comment on the incident and the charge of discrimination, which Gender Justice filed with the state's Department of Human Rights. The charge alleges the restaurant violated the Minnesota Human Rights Act, one of the nation's strongest state civil rights laws that prohibits discrimination based on characteristics including sexual orientation and gender identity. 'What happened to Gerika Mudra was not just wrong, it was unlawful,' said Sara Jane Baldwin, senior staff attorney at Gender Justice, in a statement on Tuesday. 'Minnesota law protects people from exactly this kind of discrimination in public spaces. No one should be harassed, humiliated, or forced to prove themselves just to use the bathroom.' In a video released by Gender Justice, Mudra, who is biracial and not transgender, said this was not the first time she has been questioned about her gender in a public restroom. 'This wasn't the first time this has happened, but this is, like, the worst time,' she said. 'After that, I just don't like going in public bathrooms. Like, I just hold it in. I just keep thinking, 'I'm gonna keep getting harassed like this.'' Mudra's stepmother, Shauna Otterness, said what happened to Mudra was 'cruel and humiliating' and left her feeling 'enraged.' 'We know Gerika was targeted because of how she looks. She didn't do anything wrong. She just didn't fit what that server thought a girl should look like,' she said in a statement released by Gender Justice. 'I was shocked and heartbroken by how many people shared similar stories after I posted about it online. This shouldn't be normal. We can do better, and we have to.' Nineteen states have laws prohibiting transgender people from using facilities that match their gender identity in K-12 schools, and most also bar trans people from entering restrooms consistent with their gender identity in government-owned buildings, according to the Movement Advancement Project, a nonprofit that tracks LGBTQ laws. A measure to bar trans students from bathrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender identity failed to advance in the Minnesota legislature in 2017. 'This kind of gender policing is, unfortunately, nothing new. And yet, in our current climate we have to ask: What if Gerika had been a trans person?' said Megan Peterson, executive director at Gender Justice. 'Would this story have ended differently? That's the terrifying reality too many trans people live with every day.' 'Gerika's story sits at the intersection of anti-LGBTQ+ panic, racism, and rigid gender norms and stereotypes,' Peterson said. 'A growing culture of suspicion and control is targeting trans, gender-nonconforming, and Black girls and women—anyone who doesn't match narrow ideas of how women should look or behave. When people are harassed just for existing, none of us are truly safe.'
Miami Herald
2 days ago
- Miami Herald
Woman steals Pride flag from Michigan church. Now it's returned, with an apology
A Pride flag stolen from a church and ultimately returned sparked waves of support from a Michigan community. Footage shared on Facebook from St. John's Episcopal Church in Grand Haven shows a woman remove the flag from outside the church around 1 a.m. Aug. 9. She was joined by another woman, who appeared to record the incident on a phone. As the church attempted to identity the women, many people in the Grand Haven community offered to replace the stolen flag. They didn't have to. In an Aug. 12 video, Rev. Jared Cramer said the flag was returned by the father of the woman who took it. With it, there was a note with an apology and a 'generation' donation to the church. The woman's boyfriend had called Cramer and said she was drunk when she took the flag after leaving a bar, according to WZZM. 'Even if this was a prank or joke, stuff like that contributes to a culture where LGBTQ people aren't safe,' Cramer told WOOD. 'Where that's why they need the flag to know whether or not this is a safe place for them, because there are so many places particularly here in West Michigan that are unsafe for queer people.' Cramer is offering forgiveness to the woman, he said in his video, and will not be filing charges. He called upon people offering to replace the flag to support their local LGBTQIA+ group. 'I would encourage all of us, as best as we can, to try and be curious about those who with we disagree, to find ways to build relationships because no one is probably the villain we make them out to be,' the pastor said. Grand Haven is about a 35-mile drive northwest from Grand Rapids.
