Trump ally calls for big tech 'united front' to fight UK and EU online safety laws
The idea that big tech companies like Meta, Apple, Microsoft and others could work together against both the UK and EU law was made by Republican senator Scott Fitzgerald, who is chair of the judiciary subcommittee and an ally of President Donald Trump.
He was part of a trip that US politicians made to this side of the Atlantic recently around the topic of online regulation.
This included meetings with both the UK, EU and European member states, as well as discussions with big tech companies.
Speaking to journalists, Mr Fitzgerald said he asked Facebook owner Meta whether the businesses had been working together - but said they "wouldn't confirm that".
He added: "There may be some value in some type of united front in trying to fight these things off in Europe."
Mr Fitzgerald went on to say that he thinks the White House "certainly is interested in finding out" what the delegation discovered.
"I'm not sure if it can be elevated to a level of something that the president would talk about publicly and on the global stage, but this stuff is dangerous.
"And I think it needs to be addressed, and so I certainly expect to talk to the platforms and talk to the White House as well."
5:23
As well as Mr Fitzgerald, Republicans Jim Jordan and Kevin Kiley were also on the trip - both of whom are politically close to Mr Trump.
In a recent thread on social media, Mr Jordan accused the UK government of trying to censor US tech companies last summer during the riots that took place after the Southport killings.
He shared emails the committee obtained from tech organisations showing the UK government asking for information and wanting to know what was being done by the companies during the rioting.
A report by the UK Commons Science and Technology Committee into the events last year found that " social media business models incentivise the spread of content that is damaging and dangerous, and did so in a manner that endangered public safety in the hours and days following the Southport murders".
But Mr Jordan said that the government asking for companies to tell them what was being done to tackle reports of a "two-tiered system" was concerning.
He added that such an attempt by the UK government to get information from technology companies would "chill speech".
Mr Jordan and the delegation met the UK Technology Secretary Peter Kyle on Wednesday.
The topic of the impact of UK law on American companies came up, in what is understood to have been a polite meeting.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Senior judge says he would apologise to IPP prisoners he jailed
Senior judges who imposed indefinite jail terms, known as IPP sentences, have expressed regret over their role in the 'injustice' that has left thousands of inmates trapped in prison for minor offences. Former High Court judge Sir John Saunders stated he would apologise to IPP prisoners he jailed, while former recorder Simon Tonking says he feels driven to rectify the system that he was part of. Over 2,500 prisoners remain incarcerated under IPP sentences, which were abolished in 2012 but not retrospectively, with cases including people serving nearly two decades for mobile phone theft. The judges are backing proposals from the Howard League for Penal Reform, advocating for IPP prisoners to be given a release date within a two-year window at their next parole hearing, alongside mental health support. Prisons Minister Lord Timpson said the IPP sentence was rightly abolished and support has improved, but said further reductions in prisoner numbers will only occur in a way that protects the public.
The Sun
18 minutes ago
- The Sun
Labour must come up with a deterrent that makes migrants worry their money won't get them what or where they want
Boats sailed WHEN will the Government finally get the message on illegal immigration? Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's announcement of 300 extra National Crime Agency officers to tackle people-smuggling gangs is welcome, of course. 1 Anything that disrupts this evil trade is a good thing, in the same way that a crackdown is needed on profiteers who employ the migrants on the cheap — no questions asked — when they get here. But if this £100million investment is the Government's grand plan to 'break the business model' of the crooks then it is doomed to failure. When the risk-versus-reward equation is so much in their favour, the smugglers and the illegal migrants will always find a way. The incentives are too great: millions of pounds for the smugglers, for little effort; hand-outs, accommodation and black market jobs for the migrants, with virtually no chance of being deported. The only way to break the business model is to come up with a deterrent which makes the migrants worry that their money — and the dangers they will face — won't get them what they want. Or where they want. A deterrent like the Rwanda scheme, which was already beginning to work but which Labour couldn't wait to ditch. The soaring number of Channel small boats is the inevitable consequence. Jobs shame THE number of young people facing unemployment is one of the most heart-breaking results of the Chancellor's job-wrecking tax hikes. A million Neets — youngsters Not in Education, Employment or Training — is a disaster for the economy as well as a tragedy for them. Migrant boats are carrying 'bad people' REJECTED by other NATIONS says Trump At a time in their lives when they are desperately trying to find their place in the world, a job — or the skills to get one — gives them purpose and a sense of who they are, just as surely as being dumped on benefits crushes that. The Skills Tax Relief proposed by more than 100 business chiefs would be a vital boost to apprenticeships and vocational training, offering young Brits a route into the workplace. If Rachel Reeves isn't swayed by the thought of saving so many from the scrapheap, then she should be swayed by the £10billion of welfare savings it could bring over the next five years. It's not the water temperature that puts them off but the sewage dumped in it. What a blow for our coastal communities and seaside resorts.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump confessed ear injury was ‘not too bad' at RNC despite wearing oversized bandage, Congressman says
Donald Trump allegedly confessed to GOP colleagues that his ear injury was 'not too bad' at the Republican National Convention, despite wearing his infamous oversized bandage. The then-presidential nominee told Byron Donalds that doctors had advised him to keep the bandage on, the Florida Congressman said, speaking at a GOP conference over the weekend. Trump arrived at the convention in July 2024 wearing the bandage, two days after surviving an attempted assassination while out campaigning in Butler, Pennsylvania, during which a bullet clipped his right ear. Many convention goers decided to mimic the look in solidarity, also sporting bandages of their own. However, Donalds recalled, Trump himself was unenthused about his medical head accessory when the pair met shortly after his convention speech. "I see the bandage, and the second thing [Trump says] is 'what do you think of the bandage?'" Donalds said. "I said, 'I don't like it. Take it off.' That's what I said. 'I don't like it. Take it off.' I said 'let everybody see the ear.'' "He was like, 'you know, it's not too bad. It's not too bad'..."Doc Ronny [Jackson] says, I gotta wear the bandage." 'I'm like 'so what? You're the president just take the thing off,' Donalds added. The president's bandage became the inspiration for many at the RNC, with one Arizona delegate Joe Neglia describing it at the time as 'the newest fashion trend.' 'Everybody in the world is going to be wearing these pretty soon,' Neglia told CBS, while sporting a piece of white tape over his own ear. 'When he came in [to the convention], and there was that eruption of love in the room, I thought, 'what can I do to honor the truth? What can I possibly do?'' 'And then I saw the bandage and I thought, I can do that. So, I put it on simply to honor Trump and to express sympathy with him and unity with him.' At a rally shortly after the convention, Trump appeared to have downgraded his ear bandage, instead sporting a skin-colored band-aid covering the top part of his right ear.
