‘Super corals' and supplements: Inside the lab trying to save the Great Barrier Reef
Australia's iconic Great Barrier Reef is the largest living structure on the planet and home to a vast array of species. But in recent years it has been hit by a series of devastating mass bleaching events, turning the vibrant colors of parts of the reef a bright white.
Across the world, corals are suffering a similar fate, with more than 80% of the ocean's reefs hit by an ongoing global bleaching event that began in 2023, due to record high marine temperatures. Bleaching can be deadly, as the corals are depleted of the algae that live inside them and act as a food source.
The effects can be catastrophic; while coral reefs occupy just 0.01% of the ocean floor, they support a quarter of all marine life, as well as providing people with food and livelihoods, and helping to reduce storm surge and protect against erosion.
At the UN Ocean Conference this month, 11 countries signed a pledge to protect climate-resilient reefs, and, separately, governments and partners pledged $25 million to a global fund for coral reefs.
Ultimately, if coral reefs are to be saved, efforts to curb ocean warming by reducing carbon emissions need to be stepped up, but scientists are also searching for other solutions to keep coral reefs alive in a warming world.
At the University of Technology Sydney, scientists from the Future Reefs team are searching for 'super corals' — species that are naturally more resilient to environmental changes, such as high temperatures, acidity or low oxygen levels. One of the program's goals is to identify these corals, discover what methods they are using to survive, and use them as a blueprint to support other corals in the harsher environments of the future.
'We have a focus on trying to understand reef resilience in a changing environment,' says Dr. Emma Camp, marine biologist and leader of the Future Reefs team. 'How do we build coral resilience to survive the stresses they're going to inevitably face? But also, how can we as humans use technology and science to support corals to make them more resilient?'
Camp first discovered 'super coral' species growing in mangrove lagoons, which are naturally hot and acidic. Since then, she says the team has found up to 40 of these hardy species growing in different environments across the globe. Now, their focus is on finding them within the Great Barrier Reef.
'(We want) to identify coral species with greater heat tolerance, but that are still able to maintain other traits that are really critical: we want them to be fast growers, we want them to provide good habitat for other organisms living on the reef,' says Christine Roper, a postdoctoral researcher on the team.
During expeditions to the Great Barrier Reef, the team collects and analyzes specific coral species. They carry out real-time heat tolerance testing on the samples using a special phenotyping machine that helps to predict which coral has the best chance of survival as water temperatures rise. They also take fragments of coral back to the lab, where they can extract DNA and conduct more extensive tests.
Once they've identified a stress-tolerant species, the Coral Nurture Program — a project co-founded by Camp that works with local tourism operators and indigenous communities to replant corals at scale — propagates it on coral nurseries which they have established at different locations across the Great Barrier Reef, before 'outplanting' them on the reef to help restore areas that have been affected by bleaching.
Since the program's inception in 2018, over 125,000 corals have been outplanted across the Great Barrier Reef — off Cairns, Port Douglas and the Whitsundays — with a survival rate of 85%.
But restoring areas of the Great Barrier Reef is no easy task. It has almost 3,000 individual reefs and covers 344,400 square kilometers (133,000 square miles), and as of April 2024, as much as 60% of its reefs had recently been exposed to potential bleaching. The team is hopeful that areas where outplanting has taken place are already showing visible signs of recovery.
Other labs around the world are developing similar solutions, also with promising results. The Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) has been using artificial selection and selective breeding to grow heat-tolerant corals, reporting that genetic interventions can work, but with varying success between species. The UK's University of Newcastle has also selectively bred corals that it says can better survive marine heatwaves, although it is yet to conduct large-scale trials in the wild.
Studies have shown that traditional coral restoration efforts can be undone within a few years if there is a bleaching event, but by planting heat-resilient corals the Coral Nurture Program hopes the restoration will be able to withstand future events. 'By focusing our efforts on identifying and increasing the abundance of heat-tolerant corals in the population, we optimize our efforts by ensuring those populations will be more resilient to future heat stress events,' says Roper.
The major challenge — be it with naturally or selectively bred corals — is how to scale up the process of planting, which is labor-intensive and costly, requiring people to dive down to the reef and plant the corals by hand.
That's why the focus of the Coral Nurture Program has been to engage tourism operators and local communities. 'We can build scale by having pockets of communities undertaking these actions,' says Camp.
It collaborates with seven tourism operators on the Great Barrier Reef, including Wavelength Reef Cruises, so that snorkelling trips to the reef paid for by tourists double up as outplanting expeditions. On these trips, members of the crew — who are all trained divers and marine biologists — outplant coral, tend to nurseries and conduct surveys of the area. The team at Wavelength helped to establish the program with Camp and has also been integral in operating coral nurseries along the reef and collecting data on coral health.
Even so, there is a limit to how much can be achieved just through outplanting tough coral species. The Future Reefs team is also exploring other solutions, including whether feeding corals different food or vitamins could change their heat tolerance.
Corals feed by extending tentacles out from their body to catch microscopic food particles. Past research has shown that feeding corals zooplankton — tiny animals that float near the surface of the water — after a bleaching event can help to boost resilience, as can growing corals on substrates infused with metal nutrients such as manganese and zinc. But such methods have not yet been tried on a large scale.
'Despite knowing a lot about corals, we know relatively little about coral nutrition,' says Camp. 'This, to me, is an area where research and science can really help us advance restoration practice by understanding more about what the corals fundamentally need to survive through stress.'
Though in its early stages, the team back in the laboratory in Sydney has experimented with feeding corals foods such as microscopic brine shrimp fed with different types of algae, and adding certain metals or vitamins to the water that the corals will absorb.
The goal is to develop a supplement that could give corals extra nutrients when stressed, helping them survive or recover from mass bleaching events.
'It's like us as humans: when we are run down, we might take a supplement to give us a boost. It's the same with the corals,' says Camp, adding that this kind of solution would potentially be easy to scale and apply to reefs globally.
'It's these sorts of new ideas that we have to explore, and nothing can be off the table, because if we don't do something, the end result is going to be a loss of reefs around the world,' she says.
While hopeful that scientific innovation and scalable solutions can provide some sort of stopgap for coral reefs, Camp warns that protecting them long-term comes down to tackling the cause of mass coral bleaching, which means reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating global warming.
'There's only so much we can do to buy time for the reef,' she says. 'We have to tackle climate change, because if the temperatures keep increasing, we're going to be asking too much of the corals to survive through the environment that they're being faced with.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Cute but fearsome' whale from 26 million years ago discovered in Australia
Scientists have discovered a 'deceptively cute' but fearsome whale that roamed the seas 26 million years ago. Australian scientists at Museums Victoria identified the species from an unusually well-preserved fossil of a skull found on Victoria's Surf Coast in 2019. They found the 'fast, sharp-toothed predator' would have been about the size of a dolphin. 'It's essentially a little whale with big eyes and a mouth full of sharp, slicing teeth,' said researcher Ruairidh Duncan. 'Imagine the shark-like version of a baleen whale – small and deceptively cute, but definitely not harmless.' The skull belonged to a group of prehistoric whales known as the mammalodontids, distant smaller relatives of today's filter-feeding whales. It is the fourth mammalodontid species ever discovered, Museums Victoria said. Erich Fitzgerald, a palaeontologist who co-authored the study, said: 'This fossil opens a window into how ancient whales grew and changed, and how evolution shaped their bodies as they adapted to life in the sea.' Victoria's Surf Coast lies on the Jan Juc Formation – a geological feature that has been the site of previous fossil discoveries dating to the Oligocene period, from between 23 and 30 million years ago. A string of rare fossils have been unearthed along the coastline, and is a renowned site for the study of early whale evolution. 'This region was once a cradle for some of the most unusual whales in history, and we're only just beginning to uncover their stories,' said Mr Fitzgerald. 'We're entering a new phase of discovery. 'This region is rewriting the story of how whales came to rule the oceans, with some surprising plot twists.' The species was named Janjucetus dullardi, a nod to Ross Dullard, a resident who stumbled across the skull in 2019. The study was published in the peer-reviewed Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword


Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
Geoffrey Hinton Says AI Needs Maternal Instincts. Here's What It Takes
'If it's not going to parent me, it's going to replace me,' Geoffrey Hinton, known as the godfather of AI, said at Ai4, an industry conference in Las Vegas this week. He was, of course, talking about AI. More specifically, the AI he helped pioneer, but which he now believes poses an existential threat to humanity. Hinton doesn't think the solution to this threat is to force AI to submit to humans. Instead, he suggests building "maternal instincts" into AI models so that they genuinely care about us humans and therefore won't want to wipe us out. Following my Forbes article on how Alan Turing, known as the father of AI, laid the foundation of AI by building a digital 'child-machine', Hinton's call for 'super-intelligent caring AI mothers' raises an intriguing question: Is the entire AI industry made up of fathers and godfathers trying to build an AI family of artificial children and mothers? And what would it take for them to succeed? 1. Geoffrey Hinton As God, Not Godfather In an interview on CNN, a reporter asks Hinton how easy it is from a technological perspective to build motherly instincts — 'is there an example of that being done at all?' Hinton's answer provides a rare insight into how he and AI developers like him understand themselves and the work they do: 'The only real example we have is evolution. Evolution obviously made a pretty good job with mothers.' Hinton says that the reason we lack technological examples is because AI developers haven't tried to build artificial maternal instincts – yet: 'They have been focusing on making these things more intelligent. But intelligence is just one part of a being. We need to make them have empathy towards us. And we don't know how to do that yet. But evolution managed and we should be able to do it too.' So that's the idea: If evolution can do it, so can we. But what does this idea imply? And who are the 'we' who can accomplish the same as evolution? Hinton is known as the godfather of AI, but the achievement he talks about seems to require a god rather than a godfather. Who else would understand themselves and the work they do as on par with evolution? 2. AI Shaped By Pain, Confusion, And Worry In addition to a god, rather than a godfather, it takes some work to get from the lying AI we know today to the caring 'AI mother' Hinton calls for. What does this work look like? And where do we start? While making AI intelligent has required computer scientists like Hinton to study and simulate neural networks, giving AI maternal instincts requires studying something entirely different. Maternal instincts are neither innate nor learned (neither part of the child brain/program nor the educational process, Turing set out to simulate). They arise during pregnancy, are embodied at birth, and evolve throughout motherhood. From the outside, maternal instincts may be most associated with care and compassion. But from the inside, the development of these instincts through pregnancy, birth, and parenting is just as much about pain, confusion, and worry. And that's just it. Maternal instincts develop from the inside. From a place nobody – not even the mother herself – is able to define and describe. How does Hinton and an industry of fathers and godfathers plan to study and simulate that? 3. Humans Stop Being Human In a LinkedIn post commenting on Hinton's CNN interview, another AI godfather, Meta's Yann LeCunn, says that 'simple, low-level hardwired guardrail objectives' like "don't run over people" and 'don't flail your arm if there are people around, particularly if you are holding a kitchen knife,' would be the AI equivalent of instinct or drive in animals and humans. This suggests that the fathers and godfathers of AI may have a chance to succeed in building an AI family of artificial children and mothers. All it takes is for children and mothers to stop being influenced by pregnancy, birth, and upbringing and start following simple, low-level hardwired guardrail objectives. That would allow the AI industry to say they were able to do what evolution did: create AI mothers who have the same maternal instinct as human mothers. Not because AI starts behaving like human mothers. But because human mothers start behaving like AI. Unfortunately – or fortunately, depending on how you look at it – that is unlikely to happen. Just as Geoffrey Hinton says we need AI mothers rather than AI assistants because 'an assistant is someone you can fire, you can't fire your mother,' the pain, confusion and worry that come with pregnancy, birth, and upbringing is not something we can get rid of. So maybe that's what the AI fathers and godfathers should be focusing on: not how to create artificial children, mothers and maternal instincts, but how to use their paternal instincts to build AI that gives way to humans, for better or worse?

Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
From bees doing maths to fish driving cars: teaching animals irrelevant skills can help unlock the secrets of cognition
Scientists can get animals to do the strangest things. They've taught goldfish to drive cars, primates to perform calculations with Arabic numerals and giraffes to do statistical reasoning. But what's the point? In this episode of The Conversation Weekly podcast, biologist Scarlett Howard from Monash University in Australia – who has taught bees to tell the difference between odd and even numbers – defends the importance of these seemingly ecologically irrelevant experiments. She argues that they can help us understand the secrets of animal cognition, and even potentially unlock future technological developments for humanity too. Howard got hooked on working with bees when she realised it was possible to train individual bees using sugar water as a reward. 'We work with a single bee for hours and hours at a time and she comes back and forth from the hive to the experimental area,' she says. She began wondering what bees' cognitive boundaries were, which led to experiments exploring how bees count and tell the difference between pictures with odd and even numbers of objects. ' I wasn't doing these experiments just flippantly,' she says. 'There is a fun aspect to them, but I was also doing them because I thought they really had value to other areas of science.' Howard argues that these kinds of experiments are important for the field of neuromorphic technology, computer systems inspired by animals. Learning about cognition from animals, and particularly how they do tasks very efficiently compared to their brain size, can help to develop 'technology based on biological systems', Howard says. Read more: And she says that while these human-centric tasks may seem ecologically irrelevant to an animal's species now, we may just not know yet. 'Maybe one day we'll find out that they choose flowers or remember flowers by looking at the petal number and remembering if it's an even number, that's a good flower,' she posits. Listen to the conversation with Scarlett Howard on The Conversation Weekly podcast. This episode of The Conversation Weekly was written and produced by Katie Flood. Gemma Ware is the host and executive producer. Mixing and sound design by Eloise Stevens and theme music by Neeta Sarl. Listen to The Conversation Weekly via any of the apps listed above, download it directly via our RSS feed or find out how else to listen here. A transcript of this episode is available on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Scarlett Howard currently has funding from the Australian Research Council and the Hermon Slade Foundation.