‘Back Trump plan or be crushed': Haunting reason Putin chose today to launch crippling Kyiv blitz on ‘cornered' Zelensky
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
VLADIMIR Putin launched his blitzing attack on Kyiv today to cripple Ukraine and force a "cornered" Volodymyr Zelensky to make a peace deal, experts has warned.
Twelve innocent civilians died while six children and a pregnant woman were rushed to the hospital following the barbaric attack, as Ukraine continues to clash with a furious Donald Trump over peace talks.
8
A reported ballistic missile explodes in the sky over Kyiv
Credit: EPA
8
The Russian missile strikes in Kyiv on Thursday morning left at least nine people dead
Credit: Getty
8
Evil Putin has been blitzing Ukraine and killing innocent civilians
Credit: Getty
8
US President Donald Trump ordered Vladimir Putin to 'STOP!'
Credit: Polaris
The deadly Kyiv strikes wounded over 80 people, Ukraine's State Emergency Service said.
Of these, 42 were taken to the hospital in a serious condition - including a pregnant woman and six children.
Fears are mounting that as recovery operations across the capital continue, more bodies may be found.
Zelensky said the air attacks caused "significant destruction".
He added that over 70 missiles, including ballistic missiles.
The Ukrainian President rushed back home from a visit to South Africa on Thursday after an unprecedented blitz on Kyiv
Even a raging Donald Trump blasted Putin after Russia's massive missile blitz on Kyiv - telling the tyrant to "STOP!"
Foreign policy experts told The Sun that the timing of the strike shows that "Russia does not want peace".
They argued that cripling Ukraine with massive attacks might force Zelensky - who is taking pressure from both Trump and Putin - to accept the current peace deal, which favours Russia.
And that Russia will keep bombing Ukraine and kill civilians if Kyiv does not accept the Trump-proposed peace deal.
Putin kills at least 9 in horror missile blitz on Kyiv in deadliest attack on Ukraine's capital since war erupted
Dr Stephen Hall, expert in Russian and Post-Soviet Politics, said: "Putin is showing yet again that he doesn't actually want peace, that the Russians don't want peace, and that Russia has the capacity to strike Kyiv and Kharkiv as well.
"Ukraine needs to find a way around this peace deal that the Americans are proposing.
"Ukraine needs American support in terms of intelligence, sharing and in terms of weapons and keeping the Americans on side. The Europeans also need the Americans to be on their side."
And launching massive attacks using missiles and drones shows that Putin is willing to go on with the strikes if Kyiv does not accept a deal.
Mr Hall said that Ukraine needs to strike a deal as soon as possible, but Trump could force Ukraine into a "corner" to achieve one.
He added: "Donald Trump wants to do a deal as quickly as possible.
"He has this 100 days idea that he has to achieve peace in 100 days, and so the easiest way to achieve that is to coerce Ukraine into a corner."
"Donald Trump seems to be at least publicly, from what we're being told, losing interest in finding a peaceful settlement.
8
People were woken by the sound of air raid alarms and missile strikes in Kyiv as Putin rained down attacks
Credit: Getty
8
Intense recovery operations continued to take place throughout Thursday morning
Credit: Getty
8
Zelensky arrived in South Africa on a foreign visit today, but is now set to jet back to Kyiv shortly due to the missile blitz
Credit: EPA
Trump's seven-point plan
THE US has drafted up a seven-point plan which, it hopes, will draw a path to peace between Ukraine and Russia.
A source with knowledge of the plan revealed the content of the main points, reports The Telegraph: Immediate ceasefire in Ukraine Direct talks between Ukraine and Russia Ukraine to be barred from joining Nato US to formally recognise Russian sovereignty over Crimea US to give de-facto recognition of four Ukrainian territories occupied by Russia along current lines of control Ukraine to sign minerals deal to share profits on natural resources with the US All US sanctions lifted on Russia and both countries co-operate on energy
"Zelensky needs to really bring something to the table. So I think the Ukrainians are trying to work out what they can bring to the table."
Just hours before the attack, Trump slammed Zelensky for not agreeing to a peace deal and refusing to give up Crimea.
Speaking from the Oval Office on Wednesday, Trump told reporters: 'I think Russia is ready, and a lot of people said Russia wanted to go for the whole thing.
"And I think we have a deal with Russia — we have to get a deal with Zelensky.'
He added, 'I think we have a deal with both. I hope they do it. You would never have had that war if I were president.'
The Telegraph reported on a seven-point peace plan being drawn up by the US, which could allow Russia to keep various land seized from Ukraine.
According to the plan, Putin would stay close to the territory his cannon fodder troops have seized from Zelensky, as outlined in an unconfirmed seven-point plan to end the war.
It would leave Ukraine with no clear US security guarantee.
And includes the US offering formal recognition of Russian sovereignty over Crimea while implying de facto recognition of other occupied territories.
Meanwhile, JD Vance also slapped Russia and Ukraine with a blistering ultimatum, warning both countries that the US would "walk away" if they didn't find peace.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Sensitive Israeli documents obtained by Iran to be unveiled soon, minister says
DUBAI, June 8 (Reuters) - Sensitive Israeli documents obtained by Tehran should be unveiled soon, Minister of Intelligence Esmail Khatib told state TV on Sunday, describing them as a "treasure trove" which will strengthen Iran's offensive capabilities. Iranian state media reported on Saturday that Iranian intelligence agencies had obtained a large trove of sensitive Israeli documents. Khatib said these were related to Israel's nuclear facilities and its relations with the United States, Europe and other countries, and to its defensive capabilities. There was no immediate official comment from Israel. It was not clear whether the information breach was linked to a reported hacking, opens new tab of an Israeli nuclear research centre last year which Tehran is only disclosing now amid heightened tensions over its nuclear programme. "The transfer of this treasure trove was time-consuming and required security measures. Naturally, the transfer methods will remain confidential but the documents should be unveiled soon," Khatib said, adding that in terms of volume, "talking of thousands of documents would be an understatement." In 2018, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israeli agents had seized a huge "archive" of Iranian documents that showed Tehran had done more nuclear work than previously known. U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened to bomb Iran if Tehran did not come to an agreement with Washington over its nuclear programme. But Trump in April reportedly blocked a planned Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear sites in favour of negotiating a deal with Tehran. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Wednesday that abandoning uranium enrichment was "100%" against Iran's interests, rejecting a central U.S. demand in talks to resolve a decades-long dispute over Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Western powers say Iran is refining uranium to a high degree of fissile purity close to the level suitable for atomic bomb fuel. Iran has long denied seeking nuclear weapons.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
From friends to foes: how Trump turned on the Federalist Society
The world's attention last week was gripped by Donald Trump's abrupt fallout with the tech tycoon Elon Musk. Yet at the same time, and with the help of a rather unflattering epithet, the president has also stoked a rift between his Maga royal court and the conservative legal movement whose judges and lawyers have been crucial in pulling the US judiciary to the right. The word was 'sleazebag', which Trump deployed as part of a lengthy broadside on Truth Social, his social media platform. The targets of his wrath were the Federalist Society, an influential conservative legal organization, and Leonard Leo, a lawyer associated with the group who has, in recent years, branched out to become one of the most powerful rightwing kingmakers in the US. In his post, Trump said that during his first term 'it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges. I did so, openly and freely, but then realized that they were under the thumb of a real 'sleazebag' named Leonard Leo, a bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America, and obviously has his own separate ambitions. He openly brags how he controls Judges, and even Justices of the United States Supreme Court – I hope that is not so, and don't believe it is!' Founded in 1982, the Federalist Society is an important player in the conservative movement. Many conservative lawyers, judges, law students and law clerks are members of the group, attend its events or run in its general orbit. Republican presidents use its recommendations to pick judges for vacant judicial seats. In the days following Trump's Truth Social harangue, people in the conservative legal world, which is centered in Washington DC but spans law schools and judge's chambers across the country, are wondering what this rift portends. Is this a classic Trump tantrum that will soon blow over? Or does it speak to a larger schism, with even the famously conservative Federalist Society not rightwing enough – or fanatically loyal enough – to satisfy Trump? 'I don't think this will blow over,' Stuart Gerson, a conservative attorney and a former acting US attorney general, said. 'Because it's not an event. It's a condition … He thinks judges are his judges, and they're there to support his policies, rather than the oath that they take [to the constitution].' In recent months, Trump has been stymied repeatedly by court rulings by federal judges. His rage has been particularly acute when the judges are ones whom he or other Republican presidents appointed. The Maga world has turned aggressively against Amy Coney Barrett, for example, after the supreme court justice voted contrary to the Trump line in several key cases. The immediate cause of Trump's recent outburst was a ruling by the US court of international trade against his sweeping tariffs on foreign goods. In this case, his anger appears to have had less to do with the judges than with the fact that a group of conservative lawyers and academics, including one who co-chairs the board of the Federalist Society, had filed a brief in the case challenging his tariffs. Trump is probably also aware that the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), an anti-regulation, pro-free market legal group affiliated with Leo and the billionaire Charles Koch, has sued, separately, to stop the tariffs. John Vecchione, an attorney at the NCLA, noted that the Federalist Society is a broad tent, with conservative jurists of many different inclinations and factions, including free marketeers and libertarians who do not subscribe to Trump's economic nationalism. Members often disagree with each other or find themselves on different sides of a case. This February, a federal prosecutor affiliated with the group, Danielle Sassoon, resigned after she said the Trump administration tried to pressure her to drop a case. The 'real question', Vecchione said, is what diehard Maga lawyers closest to Trump are telling him. 'Are they trying to form a new organization? Or are they trying to do to the Federalist Society what they've done to the House Republican caucus, for instance … where nobody wants to go up against Trump on anything?' he said. 'I think that some of the people around Trump believe that any right-coded organization has to do his bidding.' A newer legal organization, the Article III Project (A3P), appears to have captured Trump's ear in his second term. The organization was founded by Mike Davis, a rabidly pro-Trump lawyer, and seems to be positioning itself as a Maga alternative to the Federalist Society. On its website, A3P claims to have 'helped confirm' three supreme court justices, 55 federal circuit judges and 13 federal appellate judges. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Davis recently asserted in the Hill that the Federalist Society 'abandoned' Trump during his various recent legal travails. 'And not only did they abandon him – they had several [Federalist Society] leaders who participated in the lawfare and threw gas on the fire,' Davis said. Although Leo was a 'a close ally' of Trump during his first term, the Wall Street Journal reported, Trump and Leo 'haven't spoken in five years'. Leo has responded to Trump's outburst delicately. In a short statement, he said he was 'very grateful for President Trump transforming the federal courts, and it was a privilege being involved', adding that the reshaping of the federal bench would be 'President Trump's most important legacy'. Yet this Tuesday, a lengthy piece in the Wall Street Journal – pointedly titled 'This Conservative Is Doing Just Fine, Thank You, After Getting Dumped by Trump' – argued that Leo is 'unbounded by the pressures of re-election or dependence on outside money', and is the 'rare conservative, who, after being cast out of Trump's inner circle, remains free to pursue his own vision of what will make America great again'. In 2021, a Chicago billionaire gave Leo a $1.6bn political donation, thought to be the largest such donation in US history. As a result, Leo has an almost unprecedented power in terms of dark-money influence. The article also noted that much of Leo's focus has shifted to the entertainment industry, where he is funding big-budget television series and films that channel conservative values. Vecchione thinks that Trump's tendency to surround himself with sycophants and loyalists will work against him. 'If you have a lawyer who only tells you what makes you happy, and only does what you say to do, you don't have a good lawyer,' Vecchione said. 'That's not a good way to get lawyers. Not a good way to get judges, either.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Eight US states seek to outlaw chemtrails – even though they aren't real
Political leaders love an empty statement or proclamation, but when Louisiana's state house of representatives moved against 'chemtrails' last week, they were literally seeking to combat something that does not exist. It was an act of political symbolism that delved deep into the sort of anti-government conspiracy theories that have flourished under Donald Trump and are taking rooting in some US legislative chambers across the US. Known to less conspiratorially minded as aircraft contrails, or the white vaporous lines streaming out of an airplane's engines at altitude, chemtrails are a longstanding conspiracy theory. Believers in chemtrails hold that the aircraft vapor trails that criss-cross skies across the globe every day are deliberately laden with toxins that are using commercial aircraft to spray them on people below, perhaps to enslave them to big pharma, or exert mind control, or sterilize people or even control the weather for nefarious motives. Despite the outlandishness of the belief and the complete absence of evidence, a 2016 study showed that the idea is held to be 'completely true' by 10% of Americans and 'somewhat true' by a further 20%-30% of Americans. At least eight states, including Florida and Tennessee, have now introduced chemtrail-coded legislation to prohibit 'geo-engineering' or 'weather modification'. Louisiana's bill, which must pass through the senate before reaching Governor Jeff Landry's desk, orders the department of environmental quality to record reported chemtrail sightings and pass complaints on to the Louisiana air national guard. While there are no penalties for violations, the bill calls for further investigation and documentation. Opponents fear it could be used to force airlines to re-route flights, challenge the location of airports and bring legal action against carriers. The US Environmental Protection Agency states that the plumes of aircraft exhaust vapor are a natural result of flight and pose no risk to weather patterns, while the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) has publicly denied undertaking or planning any weather modification experiments. But the theories abound, including that last year's Hurricane Helene stalled over and devastated parts of western North Carolina as a result of government weather interference that was designed to force North Carolinians off their land and then exploit it for rare earth mineral mining. Federal emergency managers set up a webpage to dispel false information. But government weather programs have existed in the past. For two decades, from 1962 to 1983, Project Stormfury conducted experiments to releases a silver iodide compound into 'the belt of maximum winds' to reduce the strongest winds. And cloud-seeding occurs in western states to induce rain or snow fall. 'It's increasingly clear that humanity isn't merely subjected to whatever weather a cloud portends – we also create and influence it through our everyday actions,' says Nevada's Desert Research Institute. 'Scientists now regularly harness their moisture and pull it to Earth, bringing water to parched communities and landscapes around the world.' Nor has the government always been entirely straightforward in its use of aerial-dispersed chemicals. The US military dropped 19m gallons of herbicide, including the cancer-linked Agent Orange, during the Korean and Vietnam wars, leading to potential long-term health problems related to exposure and spina bifida in children of veterans. Efforts to stop geo-engineering are gaining support in the administration where conspiracy-minded politicians now hold office or wield powerful influence. 'We are going to stop this crime,' the health secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, posted on X in August. Georgia representative Marjorie Taylor Greene said in a post before Hurricane Milton struck in October: 'Yes they can control the weather. It's ridiculous for anyone to lie and say it can't be done.' Even Donald Trump has spread the conspiracy theory that Joe Biden is dead and has been replaced by a robotic clone. A recently published book, The Ghosts of Iron Mountain, traces at least some responsibility for current conspiratorial thinking to 1960s radicals, including the 1967 anti-war satire Report from Iron Mountain by Leonard Lewin, written at the suggestion of future Nation editor Victor Navasky, which posed as a leaked government study about the necessity of continuous war for social stability. In The Ghosts of Iron Mountain, author Phil Tinline traces how a leftwing hoax was adopted by the right, absorbing much of the former's anxieties about a military-industrial complex and elite control and repurposing it around 'the deep state' with its attendant spin-offs in QAnon and militia thinking. This mischief-making, Tinline writes, act as a 'warning about the consequences that await if you don't keep an eye on the line between your deep story and how power works, and what the facts support'. Timothy Tangherlini, a professor at the Berkeley School of Information who studies the circulation of folklore, says the chemtrails conspiracy theory has a potent history because, like all folktales, it begins with a kernel of history truth – programs like Agent Orange – and speaks to potent contemporary fears. 'There are certain things that were sprayed by airplanes that did have a massive impact on the environment and on people's health,' he says, pointing out that Vietnam veterans had fallen sick and the US was revealed as having exposed them to cancer-causing agents and then covering it up. 'Fast-forward 50 years, there's a deep suspicion of the government and things that fly,' he said. Fear of things in the sky was evident in the hysteria late last year in the panic over drones that appeared over New Jersey, close to a nuclear power station and a military arsenal, which prompted a federal investigation that has yet to release its findings. Tangherlini called the cross-fertilization of theories, whether around chemtrails, vaccination hesitancy or any number of other fringe beliefs that have made their way into the American mainstream via the internet and social media, 'the wall of crazy'. 'Jets flying though the air and contrails of condensed water should not in any way be linked to disease, viruses, mind control, but you look at some of the extractions we get from our mining social media, and if it wasn't real you'd think your code wasn't working or in hysterics.' But narratively, Tangherlini pointed out: 'It's a very interesting thing to do – you can create this totalizing threat everywhere you look. What is the strategy for dealing with it? Call the FAA. No, the FAA is in on it. What can we do to protect our health? Well, the doctors and big pharma are in on it. So there is a siege mentality.'
