logo
A week into their walkout, Texas Democrats are figuring out what to do next

A week into their walkout, Texas Democrats are figuring out what to do next

CNN10-08-2025
Texas Democratic lawmakers expected to confront many uncertainties when they left the state in a last-ditch attempt to block Republicans from pushing through a new congressional map.
How long would they be away? What retaliation might follow? Would their gambit work?
Laundry, though, was not among the concerns for those temporarily staying in Illinois. Their hotel — a sprawling complex attached to a convention center an hour outside Chicago — offered a washer and dryer on site.
Then, a bomb threat Wednesday morning forced an evacuation and, ultimately, a location change. Clean clothes suddenly became another unknown.
'Still haven't figured it out yet,' state Rep. Ron Reynolds joked to CNN on Friday.
A week into their effort to deny the Texas House of Representatives a quorum, Democrats have few answers about what comes next. For now, they have stalled a fast-tracked plan to net Republicans up to five additional congressional seats next year – a prize coveted by President Donald Trump – and drawn a rare burst of national attention to the partisan sausage-making behind how House districts are drawn.
The special legislative session ends in 10 days, but the milestone is hardly an end point. Gov. Greg Abbott can demand lawmakers return to Austin the moment it ends. On Thursday he told NBC that he intended to 'call special session after special session after special session' for as long as necessary.
From the outset, Democrats have acknowledged — if not embraced — their lack of clear path forward. Speaking in a cramped local Democratic Party headquarters shortly after landing in Chicago last Sunday, House Democratic caucus chairman Gene Wu said his members were prepared to do 'whatever it takes.'
'What that looks like,' he added, 'we don't know.'
For many of the more than 50 legislators now scattered across Illinois, Massachusetts and New York, memories of a similar stand in 2021 are still fresh. Some arrived wearing the black-and-white 'Let the people vote' T-shirts that memorialized their previous protest. That stalemate lasted 38 days before a handful of their colleagues returned to Austin and gave Republicans the quorum they needed to pass a sweeping elections overhaul.
This time, some Democrats started with muscle memory: how to pack for an indefinite absence, what to keep off social media, which details not to share even with family during daily video chats and other safety measures.
'The idea is to tell no one anything because we don't want our families harassed,' said Rep. Barbara Gervin-Hawkins, who told CNN that a pizza was delivered to her home in San Antonio that she didn't order.
Those precautions, though, are not impenetrable. In an interview on ABC News that quickly circulated among the out-of-state Democrats, Republican state Rep. Mitch Little shared the name of the Illinois hotel believed to be housing about 30 Democrats.
'Whoever wants to go and get them,' Little said, 'we fully support that effort.'
Lawmakers are quick to stress they are not on vacation, a distinction they learned to make after a local outlet reported that two members traveled to Portugal during the last walkout. Unlike four years ago, there also have been no cases of Miller Lite appearing in photographs, a precaution born from a 2021 social media flap.
They were better positioned for the heightened interest this time. Members have held daily news conferences and participated in hundreds of interviews with Texas and national outlets. Some lawmakers brought communications teams armed with video equipment. TikTok posts have attracted tens of thousands of views each, far surpassing their typical reach.
Soon after arriving in Illinois, an aide to Rep. John Bucy found a shop near the hotel that sold state flags. Bucy has since made several TV and social media appearances in front of the Lone Star flag, its creases notably smoothed as the week has progressed.
'We've only done this a couple of times,' Bucy told CNN. 'We don't have a good plan all the time.'
The expected costs — personal and financial — are clearer now, especially for newcomers. Lawmakers are missing birthdays, medical appointments and the first day of school for their children.
In Texas, the Legislature meets part-time and pays members $7,200 a year plus a per diem when they are in Austin. House Speaker Dustin Burrows suspended direct deposit payments for any absent lawmakers, requiring them to pick up their checks in person.
Many of the Democrats have caregiving roles or full-time jobs. Their caucus includes small-business owners, realtors, lawyers, engineers, teachers, grandmothers, a deacon and a masonry contractor. Soon, the $500-a-day fines for absent lawmakers enacted after the 2021 protest will outpace the salary they are paid all year. They cannot use campaign or official funds to pay the fines.
'We will have to figure that out when the time comes,' Representative Diego Bernal said of the mounting fees. 'One way or another.'
On Friday, a Texas judge temporarily barred a political committee operated former presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke from fundraising for absent Democratic lawmakers.
While the lawmakers left Texas prepared to expect the unexpected, some Republican moves have caught them off guard. Abbott's suggestion he could remove absent lawmakers from office rattled those gathered in Illinois. They huddled Monday with their lawyers with a straightforward question: Can Abbott do that?
They were assured that Abbott was acting on shaky legal ground, Reynolds said. Abbott has filed a motion to have Wu removed, and Attorney General Ken Paxton followed with his own petition asking the state Supreme Court to strip others of their seats.
'We believe that he's talking tougher because of President Trump is asking for this,' Reynolds said.
Democratic lawmakers expected Abbott would threaten to deploy law enforcement to return them to the Capitol, just as he did in 2021. But the suggestion from Abbott and Sen. John Cornyn that the FBI might assist state law enforcement efforts was a jarring reminder that leadership in Washington has turned over since their last walkout.
'No one knows for sure what's going to happen with those threats or if the FBI is deployed,' Bernal said. 'But it's not going to send us running back to our seats. Keeping our seats is not the most important thing in our life. Being able to look at our families and be able to say we didn't bend the knee, that's more important to us.'
Even with so much unknown, Democratic lawmakers say their defiance is not without calculation. They argue that the fight has now stretched beyond Texas, and they hope their resistance will galvanize a broader national response.
On Friday, California Democrats, led by Gov. Gavin Newsom, announced their plans to redraw their congressional map to offset Texas by going after five Republican-held seats. Other states could follow suit, setting off a chaotic and unprecedented mid-decade redistricting arms race heading into the midterm elections.
Over the past week, a small but growing number of Republicans have expressed dismay at the tactics – including some in blue states who could lose their Congressional seats amid the fallout. Their public condemnation has been welcomed by Texas Democrats, seeing it as a possible sign that pressure is building for both sides to step back.
'The biggest win,' Gervin-Hawkins said, 'is that we have alerted America that there is some devastation going on.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Zelenskyy Meeting: What To Know As Macron, Meloni, Starmer And More Will Attend
Trump-Zelenskyy Meeting: What To Know As Macron, Meloni, Starmer And More Will Attend

Forbes

time10 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Trump-Zelenskyy Meeting: What To Know As Macron, Meloni, Starmer And More Will Attend

Leaders from major European allies, NATO and the European Union are traveling to Washington, D.C., to join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at his Monday meeting with President Donald Trump—setting up what appear to be crucial talks as Trump pushes for a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine that has been raging since the Russian invasion in 2022. Leaders from the EU and NATO will join the Ukrainian president at the White House. Getty Images Zelenskyy will travel to meet with Trump at the White House on Monday. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte will reportedly take part in the talks, as well as leaders of individual allied nations including French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Finnish President Alexander Stubb. Trump administration officials have provided few details about what concessions the Russians may have offered at the negotiations in Alaska on Friday, but speaking to CNN on Sunday morning, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff described the Trump-Putin meeting as 'game-changing.' Witkoff said the Trump administration would likely discuss Ukraine exchanging territory with Russia, what he called a 'fundamental issue' for the Russians, but the administration would not make any decisions for Ukraine when it came to territory. 'We intend to discuss it on Monday,' Witkoff told CNN's Jake Tapper. The special envoy did not offer concrete details on what concessions the Russians may have offered in terms of territory, but added 'that discussion is going to specifically be detailed on Monday, when President Zelenskyy arrives with his delegation and some of the other European leaders,' Witkoff said. 'And, hopefully, we can cut through and make some decisions right then and there on that.' Russia illegally annexed the Ukrainian territory Crimea in 2014, and three years after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia controls the majority of the Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions. The Trump administration said the Russians may support Ukraine signing a future security deal with the U.S. and European allies—but even with the security guarantees, convincing the Ukrainians to cede territory could prove difficult for the Trump administration. Zelenskyy has consistently rejected peace offers that include territorial exchanges in the past, and reiterated this sentiment in a statement posted on social media Sunday, shortly after meeting with European leaders in Brussels. 'There is clear support for Ukraine's independence and sovereignty,' the Ukrainian president said. 'Everyone agrees that borders must not be changed by force.' What Is Article 5? The Trump administration says that Russian negotiators indicated they would agree to allow Ukraine to sign a future security agreement with the U.S. and European allies—one that would offer similar protections like those outlined in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, the document that forms the basis of NATO. Article 5 guarantees that if one NATO member is attacked, it is considered an attack on all member states, and all member states are compelled to take necessary action to 'restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.' Witkoff told Tapper the administration got the Russians to agree to allow the U.S. and European nations to 'effectively offer Article 5-like language to cover a security guarantee.' However, he was adamant that this would not amount to Ukraine actually joining NATO—something he said the Russians still viewed as a 'red flag.' The special envoy did not elaborate on the details of the guarantee. European leaders are trying to avoid a repeat of the tense press public meeting Zelenskyy held with Trump and Vice President JD Vance in February, Reuters and other outlets reported Sunday. However, Secretary of State Marco Rubio rejected this notion while speaking to CBS News' Margaret Brennan on Sunday morning. 'We've been working with these people for weeks,' Rubio said. 'They're coming here tomorrow because they chose to come here tomorrow. We invited them to come.' Rubio said the Trump administration was focused on hammering out a peace deal. 'Look, our goal here is not to stage some production for the world to say, oh how dramatic he walked out,' he said. 'Our goal here is to have a peace agreement to end this war.'

Trump approval rating takes another hit in latest poll
Trump approval rating takes another hit in latest poll

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump approval rating takes another hit in latest poll

President Donald Trump's approval rating slipped again in the latest Pew Research Center poll released Thursday. The Pew Research Center poll found that Trump's approval rating has dropped three percentage points over the past two months and is down nine points since shortly after he took office. The poll ultimately found that Trump had a 38% approval rating among all Americans, which is down from the 47% approval rating in January. The poll found Trump's approval rating also dropped among those who voted for him since taking office earlier this year. Trump's approval rating among his own supporters fell from 95% recorded earlier this year to 85% in the latest poll. The Pew Research Center found that an overwhelming majority of those who identify as strong Republicans still approve of how he is handling his job as president. About 93% approve of his job performance, slightly down from the 96% who said the same shortly after he took office. The research center highlighted a significant change in approval among certain Republican-leaning groups. The research center noted that there has been 'substantial erosion in his approval over this period among those who identify as Republicans but not strongly, as well as among independents who lean toward the GOP.' 'About six-in-ten of those in these groups approve of Trump's performance today, down from roughly three-quarters at the start of his second term,' the research center wrote in its press release. The Pew Research Center also found that public assessments of Trump's personality traits have also fallen off since 2024. More from the research center: Fewer now say he cares about the needs of ordinary people (37% today, 42% last summer), is a good role model (29% now, 34% then) or is mentally sharp (48% now, 53% then). Trump is widely described as standing up for what he believes in: 68% say this today, identical to the share who said this last summer. The poll was conducted among 3,554 adults from Aug. 4 to 10, 2025. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 1.8 percentage points. Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to

Democrat Senator said Alaska summit was ‘great day' for Russia: Putin was ‘absolved of his crimes in front of the world'
Democrat Senator said Alaska summit was ‘great day' for Russia: Putin was ‘absolved of his crimes in front of the world'

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrat Senator said Alaska summit was ‘great day' for Russia: Putin was ‘absolved of his crimes in front of the world'

A key senator on the Foreign Relations committee called Donald Trump's Alaska summit with Vladimir Putin a 'disaster' Sunday and blamed the U.S. president for legitimizing his Russian opponent in front of the world. 'It was an embarrassment for the United States. It was a failure. Putin got everything he wanted,' said Chris Murphy, the ranking Democratic member of the Foreign Affairs subcommittee on European security cooperation. Murphy told NBC's Meet the Press that Trump was forced to abandon his main commitment — a call for a ceasefire — during the meeting and was similarly unable to convince Putin to drop demands for Ukraine to cede more territory, something the senator from Connecticut said was 'stunning' to see a U.S. president consider. 'He wanted to be absolved of his war crimes in front of the world. He was invited to the United States — war criminals are not normally invited to the United States of America,' Murphy said. Trump 'walked out of that meeting saying, 'I didn't get a ceasefire. I didn't get a peace deal. And I'm not even considering sanctions,'' the senator continued. 'And so Putin walks away with his photo op, with zero commitments made, and zero consequences. What a great day for Russia.' Murphy's comments to NBC come as two top Trump officials who traveled with the president to Alaska for the summit Friday, Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff, did the rounds on separate Sunday morning programs defending the outcome of the president's meeting with Putin. The optics of the meeting are being endlessly scrutinized in the mainstream press, partly due to the few specifics released so far about what the two men discussed. Among those moments been picked apart by analysts included the arrival of the Russian president, which was preceded by U.S. troops, in uniform, rolling out a red carpet on the tarmac. On Sunday, Witkoff told CNN'S State of the Union that the U.S. secured what he claimed was a 'game-changing' development in the discussions: Putin's willingness to consider accepting a U.S. security agreement protecting the future sovereignty of Ukraine's borders. This was the first time negotiators were able to gain ground on the issue, he explained. 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO," he said. Witkoff wouldn't specify whether the security guarantee could lead to what Trump and his followers have long opposed — a promise to directly engage U.S. troops in defense of Ukraine should Russia continue crossing Trump's red lines. Murphy, on Sunday, seemed to imply that such a guarantee would be the bare minimum standard necessary for any peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia. 'That [security guarantee] is an essential element of a peace agreement because any commitment that Vladimir Putin makes to not invade Ukraine again isn't worth the paper that it's written on,' said the senator. 'He's made that commitment many times. So yes, there has to be a guarantee that if Putin were to enter Ukraine after a peace settlement, that there would be some force there, a U.S. force, a U.S.-European force there to defend Ukraine.' He would go on to hammer Trump over reports that Witkoff wouldn't confirm when pressed by CNN's Jake Tapper, which revealed that Trump had signaled his own willingness to accept Russian demands for Ukraine to cede the entire occupied Donbas region as part of a potential agreement. Murphy said that the reported development was 'another sense that Putin is just in charge of these negotiations.' Chris Van Hollen, another Democrat on the Foreign Relations panel, was equally critical of Trump's meeting with the Russian president during an interview with ABC's Martha Raddatz on This Week. Heading into Friday's summit, Trump warned of 'severe consequences' if Russia continued to oppose peace efforts and said that he was working towards an immediate ceasefire. Afterwards, he claimed in a Truth Social post that "It was determined by all [in attendance] that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' Van Hollen called this news a 'setback' for the U.S.'s European allies and Ukraine, while accusing Trump of being 'flattered' by Putin. 'There's no sugarcoating this. Donald Trump, once again, got played by Vladimir Putin. Vladimir Putin got the red carpet treatment on American soil. But we got no ceasefire, no imminent meeting between Putin and Zelensky,' said Van Hollen. Jake Sullivan, national security adviser to the Biden administration, agreed. "President Trump's stated goals were very simple, get an immediate ceasefire, and in the absence of a ceasefire, impose what he called severe consequences," Sullivan said. "Well, the summit has come and gone. There is no ceasefire. There are no consequences.' Trump is now scheduled to meet Monday with European leaders including Finnish president Alexander Stubb, German chancellor Friedrich Merz, French president Emmanuel Macron and the UK's Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. Stubb is known for his personal relationship with Trump, and is poised to be on-hand to quell any disputes between Trump and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky, who will also be in attendance. Zelensky is reported to be wholly opposed to any demand to recognize Russian occupation of the Donbas as legitimate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store