Koru Racing Wins Fastest Car At STEM Racing Australia National Finals
Koru Racings performance at the STEM Racing Australia National Finals caught the attention of teachers, judges, and event organisers, and Koru Racing has been offered the opportunity to be the first team to represent New Zealand at the STEM Racing …
New Zealand's Koru Racing made a bold debut at the STEM Racing Australia National Finals, outperforming experienced Australian teams setting the fastest lap in the competition.
STEM Racing (formerly F1 in Schools) is a global engineering competition where students design, manufacture, and race miniature F1 cars. Made from balsa wood and 3D printed components, the cars are powered by CO2 gas canisters and race down a 20m track. The competition – officially supported by Formula 1 – has over 1.2 million students competing annually, and incorporates high-level engineering, manufacturing, sponsorship, and teamwork.
The team first competed in the NZ school competition at Saint Kentigern College. Koru Racing won this event, having the fastest car, best trade display, and portfolios. Because of their performance, Koru Racing was offered to compete at the 2025 STEM Racing Australia National Finals. On the first day, the team set a lap time which would remain unbeaten throughout the rest of the competition – even outperforming top Australian teams which have had podium placement at the 2024 World Finals in Saudi Arabia. Koru Racing won a trophy for the fastest car – a fantastic achievement given they had significantly less financial resources, industry support, and sponsorship, compared to their more experienced Australian counterparts, who have been competing since 2003.
Koru Racing's performance at the STEM Racing Australia National Finals caught the attention of teachers, judges, and event organisers, and Koru Racing has been offered the opportunity to be the first team to represent New Zealand at the STEM Racing Singapore World Finals set for September. Attending the World Finals would allow Koru Racing to showcase their ability against 65 teams from other countries, put New Zealand innovation on the map, and provide exposure to sponsors supporting the initiative. As well as this, the team can network with experienced professionals across a range of industries, and bring home valuable knowledge and experience to mentor other kiwi teams.
To compete and represent New Zealand at this level, Koru Racing need sponsorship. If you're interested in supporting Koru Racing personally, please visit the Koru Racing Givealittle: https://givealittle.co.nz/cause/koru-racing
If you're interested in supporting Koru Racing as a business, please email reilly@koruracing.nz for more information.
Reilly Turner (Team Principle and Graphic Designer):
'Australia has competed in STEM Racing for 22 years now with ongoing sponsorship and development, so for a New Zealand team to have the fastest car is really exciting.'
'It was a great experience, and we're really proud to bring the fastest car trophy to New Zealand.'
Lucas Alward (Design Engineer):
' It's quite an encouraging accomplishment, to be able to say that our little team from New Zealand went on to create the fastest car raced at Australia. I think it all comes down to research, testing, and development, and a process of continual refinement.'
'I'm very proud of what we've managed to achieve so far. We've shown the world that us Kiwis are serious competition, and we can prove ourselves on the international stage.'
Aydan Hawken (Manufacturing Engineer):
'I believe our success is a testament to the countless hours our team have put in. Seeing that performance on the track makes it all worth it.'
'It's really a huge honour to win the fastest car award and bring it back to New Zealand . We really hope we made everyone back home proud.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Techday NZ
12 hours ago
- Techday NZ
Australasian firms face tougher cyber cover rules than global peers
Australian and New Zealand businesses are being subjected to stricter cyber insurance requirements compared to their global peers, according to the 2025 Cyber Insurance Report from Arctic Wolf. The report, based on research involving 400 professionals from cyber insurance broker and carrier companies worldwide, identifies that organisations in Australia and New Zealand must satisfy higher security standards to qualify for coverage. The average business in these markets must now have a minimum of six security controls in place, whereas the global average is five. The findings suggest the more rigorous scrutiny is a result of the elevated risk profile in the region, where businesses are 9% more likely to experience a 'significant' cyberattack compared to the global average. This has prompted insurers to tighten eligibility criteria in an effort to protect themselves from mounting risks. Insurers have reported a growing expectation that cyber insurance premiums will rise, with 72% of global respondents anticipating increased rates in the coming year. This follows an intensification of the threat landscape globally, driven chiefly by the adoption of artificial intelligence systems, large language models, and mounting data privacy concerns, all of which are contributing to more sophisticated attacks. Regional requirements For businesses located in Australia and New Zealand, the report notes email security (87%) and identity and access management (84%) as the two most commonly required solutions for cyber insurance eligibility. These requirements sit considerably above the survey's global averages, with email security at 66% and identity and access management at 53% worldwide. Despite the prominence of these foundational controls, the survey highlights that advanced protections – such as round-the-clock Security Operations Centres (SOC) and managed detection and response solutions – are viewed as the most impactful measures for enhancing security postures. Common claims and causes Globally, ransomware remains the most frequent type of incident prompting claims, with 18% of insurance professionals reporting that their clients were affected in the last 12 months. Data breaches, theft of funds, and phishing incidents follow in frequency. Artificial intelligence is cited among leading contributors to changing the nature of cyber threats. The research shows that increased adoption of AI and LLMs (large language models) are raising the complexity of attacks, posing new challenges for businesses and insurers alike. Insurance gap and hesitancy The survey also identifies that, despite the rising frequency of attacks, only 12% of policyholders have submitted claims in the last year. A notable finding is that a quarter of incident claims were rejected due to policy gaps, highlighting that many policies contain exclusions that are not fully understood by businesses until after incidents occur. Steve Hunter, Director of Engineering, ANZ at Arctic Wolf said: "In one of the world's most targeted cyber markets, businesses in Australia and New Zealand face insurance scrutiny like never before. Six security controls are now the entry ticket for coverage in ANZ, higher than the global average. High-profile attacks and the heightened risk of regulatory action, as seen in the Optus case, is raising the stakes for insurers and forcing local organisations to prioritise security operations as a critical business function. Insurance is no longer a financial safety net – it's a test of cyber readiness and business resilience." The report finds that with these evolving conditions, both insurers and policyholders in Australia and New Zealand are having to adapt to an environment where robust cyber defences are not just advised, but required, for coverage eligibility. The full impact of these changes is expected to continue unfolding as both regulatory expectations and threat actors' capabilities evolve.
Techday NZ
12 hours ago
- Techday NZ
Ethereum leads July surge as altcoins & stablecoins shine
The cryptocurrency market recorded a significant surge in July, with a 13.3% rise in total market capitalisation as reported by Binance Australia. This growth was attributed to improved macroeconomic conditions, increased risk appetite, and a rise in institutional demand. The period also saw regulatory developments and increased adoption of digital assets by corporate treasuries, which contributed to Bitcoin reaching several new all-time highs and boosting confidence in altcoins and stablecoins. Altcoin momentum During July, there was a notable shift in market dynamics as altcoin dominance increased by nearly 10%, now making up 39.2% of the market. In contrast, Bitcoin's market dominance fell by 5.2% to 60.6%, dropping below 60% for the first time since January. Ethereum was a leading driver of this change, with its own market share climbing over 25% to reach 11.8%. Other prominent altcoins, such as XRP and BNB, also posted considerable gains, bolstered by ecosystem developments and new partnerships. "Investors are no longer just focused on Bitcoin as a singular hedge. We're seeing them explore the broader market, driven by improved macroeconomic conditions, rising consumer confidence, and increased regulatory clarity globally. "Adoption narratives around tokenization and stablecoin infrastructure have also helped strengthen broader sentiment - particularly benefiting Ethereum and related DeFi assets, which rely heavily on stablecoin liquidity." This statement was made by James Quinn-Kumar, Director of Community Engagement for Binance Australia and New Zealand, who noted the maturation of the crypto asset class and rising mainstream adoption. Institutional demand for Ethereum Corporate adoption of Ethereum reached record levels in July, with 24 new firms adding the asset to their balance sheets. This resulted in a 127.7% increase in institutional holdings of Ethereum, now surpassing 2.7 million ETH. Concurrently, Ethereum's price gained 50% in the month, and the asset led altcoin inflows, with spot ETH ETFs registering a 19-day streak of positive net inflows. "The extraordinary corporate adoption of Ethereum in July signals a fundamental shift in how institutions view digital assets," Mr Quinn-Kumar said. "Companies are now moving beyond a 'store of value' mindset and are actively leveraging Ethereum's unique utility." Market participants increasingly favoured direct exposure to Ethereum's features - such as staking yield and a deflationary monetary model - over more passive vehicles like ETFs, which further supported its performance during the period. "Demand, liquidity, and strong price action has seen Ethereum emerge as one of the month's best performing large-cap assets. However, with Ethereum historically exhibiting higher volatility than Bitcoin, and the space still maturing, the long-term durability and scale of these corporate ETH strategies remain to be seen," Mr Quinn-Kumar said. Australian trading trends The Australian crypto community mirrored global patterns throughout July. Binance Australia data showed that, for the first time, Ethereum surpassed Bitcoin by number of traders on the platform. The five most-traded digital currencies on Binance Australia remained led by ETH, followed by BTC, XRP, Solana, and BNB. A new entrant in the top ten was HBAR, which climbed nine spots following a 55% increase in price. This shift suggests traders are branching out beyond Bitcoin to seek fresh opportunities in other blockchain ecosystems. Stablecoins and regulation In July, stablecoins were given a boost by major regulatory developments in the United States. The passing of the GENIUS Act created a federal-level framework for fully reserved, anti-money laundering compliant stablecoins, mandating that they be backed one-to-one by cash or short-term Treasury securities. The new law prompted increased institutional adoption and led to higher activity from major global banks and payments companies, including pilot projects from JPMorgan and Citi and an expansion of stablecoin support from Visa. On-chain stablecoin transfer volumes stayed near record highs, continuing to surpass those of Visa since late last year. "Stablecoins have a growing dominance as a mainstream payment infrastructure," Mr Quinn-Kumar said. "The passage of the GENIUS Act is a monumental step for the cryptocurrency industry, providing much-needed regulatory clarity that supports the continued growth of digital assets within the broader financial ecosystem. This law unlocks a new, more efficient, and more transparent financial infrastructure and a clear trajectory to mainstream adoption. "Looking ahead, the pace of capital rotation into crypto will depend on broader macroeconomic and liquidity conditions, alongside continued regulatory support. One thing is certain, the demand from both retail and institutional investors is undeniable."
Techday NZ
15 hours ago
- Techday NZ
Ready on paper, not in practice: The incident response gap in Australian organisations
Most Australian organisations believe they are ready to face a cyber crisis, with 97% reporting they have incident response plans in place. This is an encouraging statistic at first, but when the same organisations are asked about the practical details and real-life effects of those plans, a different (and more chaotic) story emerges. 76% of Australian organisations experienced at least one high-impact cyber incident that stopped their critical business functions in the past year. This type of disruption could severely impact business continuity, leading to extended downtime and financial consequences that may escalate into the millions. To make matters worse, nearly 40% of organisations suffered multiple major incidents in the past year. It begs the question, why arenʼt organisations' cyber response plans driving stronger business resilience? The truth is, security teams often build their plans around assumptions rather than real-world threats and trends. That gap becomes painfully obvious during an actual incident, when organisations realise they aren't adequately prepared to respond. Recent findings of a Semperis study titled The State of Enterprise Cyber Crisis Readiness revealed a strong disconnect between organisations' perceived readiness to respond to a cyber crisis and their actual performance. The study also showed that cyber incident response plans are being implemented and regularly tested, but not broadly. In a real-world crisis, too many teams are still operating in silos. With the global cost of cybercrime estimated to reach as much as 10.5 trillion dollars in 2025, Australian organisations must invest in their cyber resilience now. Simply hiring more people isnʼt the answer. To drive resilience, organisations need to fix gaps in cross-team communication and coordination, but this is not always a simple task. The key challenges in launching an effective cyber response In the survey, Australian organisations were asked if any key factors were blocking their ability to launch an effective cyber response. Only 10% said they didn't face any roadblocks, revealing a common sense of frustration among respondents. Communication gaps topped the list of roadblocks, and for good reason. Consider a scenario where an organisation has suffered a ransomware or other severe attack, which has disrupted its email and messaging systems, rendering them unusable. Without a dedicated communication tool that sits outside the affected email and messaging server, teams often struggle to communicate effectively. Out-of-date response plans Organisations were also stymied by outdated or one-size-fits-all response plans. Often, companies in crisis find that their playbooks donʼt reflect the way their business actually operates. Unless incident response plans are tailored to the organisationʼs specific industry and business needs, the results can be chaotic. For example, a generic plan might drive people through an unrealistic escalation path that they canʼt actually implement because it doesnʼt match their technology, staffing, or budget capabilities. Unclear roles and responsibilities Having unclear roles and responsibilities can further add to the chaos. To stop breaches from threatening crucial systems and services - and even causing denial of cyber insurance claims - incident response actions must be followed in a specific order by specific people, sometimes including those outside of IT and cybersecurity. However, many companies struggle with this during a crisis. Three ways to improve your cyber response plan A cyber crisis response plan must be executable at a moment's notice, whatever the threat. That is where practice comes in. 1. Tailor the plan to your organisation's specific needs To ensure that your playbooks are tailored to the specific cyber challenges of your industry and organisation, you need to determine: Your risk tolerance: What is an acceptable level of cyber risk your organisation can withstand, quantified in terms of potential impacts, such as downtime or financial loss? The risk tolerance of a retail store will be very different to a hospital. Identify your most critical assets and Tier 0 resources: What are your crown jewels that, if compromised, could lead to a complete takeover or severe disruption of your operations? Dedicate roles to carry out specific actions in a specific order - not just for IT operations and cybersecurity leadership, but also for other critical business unit leaders, and even Board stakeholders. 2. Practise, practice, practice! A robust, integrated, and well-practiced cyber crisis response plan is paramount for cyber and business resilience. After all, the faster you can respond and recover, the less severe the financial impact of a cyberattack will be. Organisations can increase their agility by conducting tabletop exercises that simulate attacks. By practicing incident response regularly and introducing a range of new scenarios of varying complexity, organisations can train for the real thing, which can often be unpredictable. Security teams can continually adapt their response plans based on the lessons learned during these exercises, and any new emerging cyber threats. 3. Implement dedicated out-of-band communication tools In the event of a cyber-attack, an organisation's primary communication systems including email servers and collaboration tools may be compromised or unreliable. That's why having a secure, out-of-band communication channel that can be activated during a crisis is not optional, but essential. The takeaway: Cyber criminals donʼt wait for organisations to be ready - they strike when they least expect it. Having a thorough, well-tested incident response plan is the best way to improve operational resilience at a time during times of need.
