An eerie tale about our impending doom, plus the best novels of June
by An Yu
Twelve years prior to the beginning of Sunbirth – the third novel by the Beijing-born writer An Yu, after her acclaimed Ghost Music and Braised Pork – the sun had begun to fade away. But Five Poems Lake, the town in which the novel is set, 'had been in decay long before'. The locals have lived through the star's slow evanescence largely as before, albeit under slightly chillier circumstances.
Sunbirth follows an unnamed pharmacist as she reckons with this precarious world. She has her regular customers: 'the Su girl', notable for a leg injury she acquired in childhood; the pregnant Miss Pan; and Driver Hua, a delivery man. He's infatuated with Miss Pan, the father of whose unborn child is unknown. After visiting her in hospital, our narrator walks home and finds an intoxicated Driver Hua waiting outside. He exposes himself – and then, out of nowhere, 'a bright light pushed itself out of his open mouth'. He is, it seems, one of the 'Beacons', a group of people 'with beams bursting' from their faces, who roam the streets shining as the real thing gradually dims.
In response to this slow, and then very sudden, undoing of the world, the narrator's sister returns to live with her. Their concern isn't with the disappearing sun, nor are they particularly alarmed by the transformed humans, who now wander among the inhabitants of Five Poems Lake in a manner itchily suggestive of the Covid pandemic. Instead, they take the opportunity to dig up their dead father's ashes – and learn that he was interred with a photograph of a Beacon. Yet he died when they were young, long before the creatures were first spotted: the photograph's existence is, therefore, the central mystery of the plot.
Think of Sunbirth as a quiet apocalypse novel. The sun disappearing, slice by slice, is an enchanting conceit: the story takes on a sort of innocence, its flatness reminiscent of a child's drawing. This is evident in the tone, too, which is often startlingly naive. Earlier in the story, when Miss Pan jumps from her hospital window, the narrator asks: 'How much had Miss Pan's world failed her, if death was the only way for her to communicate how she really felt?' Yu relies heavily on this sort of rhetorical question. Or else characters shout at each other in sudden outbursts: a conversation is muted until it isn't, 'exploding without any warning' or 'erupting uncontrollably'.
The end of the world is clearly en vogue. Sunbirth arrives shortly after another apocalypse novel, Elisa Levi's well-regarded That's All I Know, and the Levi is just one of many. Like That's All I Know, Sunbirth feels a little like a short story, distended – an enigmatic one, attempting mythical proportions. The characters operate as ciphers, and would lend themselves well to something briefer: policemen are moral arbiters; fathers and sisters are uneasy caretakers. We accept these archetypes as representative, but for prophecy to become plot, there needs to be detail, and Sunbirth struggles to give its story much substance.
Instead, we circle around the same questions for some 300 pages. Remarkably, the apocalypse becomes tiresome. Towards the end of the novel, the narrator muses that 'we used everything to distract ourselves from what was really happening'. Perhaps this explains the stasis. Yu has structured Sunbirth so that in the chapter immediately after the Beacon photograph is found, its existence is explained in flashback. And so, while the world is ending, for the reader there isn't much of a revelation.
It's possible that the most successful apocalypse novel is a self-destructive one: it mimics the lack of forward motion in its world, and therefore stalls, falling in on itself. But while the structure may be logical, it doesn't make for good reading.
In the final scene, the Beacons begin climbing on top of each other, creating a single, human-shaped body of light. It's one of Yu's more memorable images, and one that promises action. Instead, the figure slumps and falls into the lake. Perhaps it's a symbol of how we slide into disaster. Perhaps it's just a shrug. SD
Sunbirth is published by Harvill and Secker at £18.99. To order your copy for £16.99, call 0330 173 0523 or visit Telegraph Books
by Xenobe Purvis
One heat-addled summer in an Oxfordshire village at the start of the 18th century, a 10ft silvery creature is caught in the nearby Thames. 'A miracle,' pronounces one villager. 'Unnatural,' says another: 'Fetch the priest!' Only the ferryman demurs. 'Just a sturgeon,' he declares. The fish is sent to the pub, cooked and shared. The villagers, fears assuaged, are jubilant.
This minor event appears near the beginning of the young writer Xenobe Purvis's debut novel, The Hounding. Its placing is deliberate: the book is inspired by a real-life incident in 1701, in which a doctor reported treating five girls from an Oxfordshire village who'd been 'seized with frequent barking in the manner of dogs'. For the reader, it's not hard to imagine how such behaviour might be received by villagers for whom an unusually large fish is confused with deep evil. Throw in the threat of ailing crops; a patriarchal community for whom masculinity is tightly bound up in drinking, badger baiting and casual violence; and the reflexive social instinct to objectify unconventional women as something 'other', and you have a story that feels directly sprung from our collective cultural consciousness.
Purvis, who was selected to be part of the prestigious London Library Emerging Writers programme, writes in spring-water clear and often disarmingly lovely prose. She presents the village like something out of a picture book: there's the alehouse; the landlady, Temperance Shirly; a vicar who wears a patch to cover a hole in his head, following a shooting accident. Robin Wildgoose, a gentle farmhand, comes 'walking through the crisping cow parsley' like a character from a folk song. Even the Mansfield sisters feel semi-mythical: there are five of them and they live with their near-blind grandfather following the deaths of their parents. They like to keep themselves to themselves, and most of the villagers regard them as merely a little strange.
And yet to the drink-sotted ferryman Pete Darling, the girls remind him of his weakness. Pete is a God-fearing loner, who often prefers to sleep outside after a heavy night at the pub, and who is privately terrified at the prospect of his forthcoming marriage to a respectable village girl. He hates the way the Mansfield girls look at him, the sinful way they make him feel, their otherworldly eeriness. Mostly he hates their faces 'like five drifts of snow. Five fallen moons.'
It's no discredit to Purvis that her novel prompts thoughts of both The Crucible and The Virgin Suicides. The Hounding is also about the conflation of fear, suspicion and desire in a small, claustrophobic community; it also follows a group of girls who are bound together by inscrutable intimacy and who, as a result, are inscribed in the eyes of others with a mysterious power. But Purvis keeps the historical period vague and only alludes to it fleetingly – there's a reference to a father who fought in the Civil War; another to the dawning age of science. The village is clearly trapped between Puritan superstition, oppressive poverty and encroaching modernity, but that's left to the reader to discern. Mainly Purvis's novel exists suspended in time, a reading experience more akin to a lucid dream.
At the same time, the novel proceeds very much as you might expect. One night, young Robin – who, like Pete, privately feels himself to be different to most of the village men – hears barking down a lane where two Mansfield girls were recently walking. Later, Pete says he heard something similar, and starts the rumour connecting the two, which soon spreads 'like mould in the alehouse's dark corners'. Piles of animals are later found mauled to death in the parched fields; the river reduces in the heat to a dirty trickle; both are believed to somehow be the fault of the sisters. Even Thomas Mildmay, a farmhand who has fallen for the eldest Mansfield sister Anne, believes he sees her face briefly change shape.
Purvis writes with impressive emotional specificity, widening our understanding of this tiny traditional community through the alternating perspectives of Thomas, Pete, Robin, Temperance and the Mansfields' grandfather, Joseph. The slippery ability of rumour to acquire the solidity of truth may be a familiar theme, but Purvis is very good at showing the way in which a baseless idea can become a lightning rod for more general feelings of collective unease. As each character contributes to the growing conviction that the girls are indeed transforming into dogs, it's not the credibility of their belief that's at stake but the more diffuse insecurities behind why they and others might wish to believe it is true.
Eventually the story arrives at an event hinted at in the prologue, though it's also there throughout in the 'stifling air, the rankling heat'. Purvis loves a bit of foreshadowing, yet she also relies heavily on stock tropes – abnormal weather; a stealthy accumulation of incidental violence – to achieve it. More problematically, The Hounding feels bloodless. All the elements are there in their right place, but they lack any kind of weight and the novel confirms expectations instead of unsettling them. Still, Purvis is an exquisitely accomplished wordsmith. I'm greedy to learn what she writes next. CA
The Hounding is published by Hutchinson Heinemann at £16.99. To order your copy for £14.99, call 0330 173 5030 or visit Telegraph Books
by Hal Ebbott
Hal Ebbott's mostly very impressive first novel begins with a kind of two-page overture. At an American university, a 'needful', rather anxious student called Amos spots a boy whose 'brown eyes accept the campus like something owned' and who takes a 'violent bite' out of an apple. The boy introduces himself as Emerson and the two discover they're going to be roommates.
From there, we fast forward three decades to the present day, when Amos (now a psychiatrist) is driving his wife Claire and their 16-year-old daughter for a weekend at Emerson's second home in upstate New York. Before setting off, Amos had been to the dentist, where he'd replied to the question of whether he flosses by shaking his head and saying, 'Better you know the real me' – a remark that he then rather anxiously analyses at some length: 'It was an odd joke, he allowed. Was it funny? Yes, sort of, not terribly, but enough. Funny enough for a dentist's office certainly…'
By the time they get to the house and meet Emerson (now a lawyer), together with his wife and 16-year-old daughter, we already know the primary source of Amos's continuing anxiety: that unlike both his entitled life-long pal and Claire – to whom Emerson introduced him – he grew up amid poverty and spectacular parental neglect.
Over dinner, the big news is that a few hours before, Emerson had run over a woman who'd tried to commit a vengeful suicide by jumping out in front of his car which, being the same model and colour, she'd mistaken for that of her perfidious teacher-boyfriend. 'How are you feeling?' asks Amos solicitously. 'Shaken obviously,' says Emerson. 'I mean just imagine, finding out that you drive the same car as a teacher?'
So, is this an example of Emerson being funny? Weirdly charming? Performatively outrageous? Unfeeling to the point of sociopathic? Or is he just trying to hide or deflect his sense of shock? The answer, as it so often is in the pages that follow, is all of the above. That's because, if Among Friends were to have a motto, it would be something Emerson says earlier at dinner: 'Paradoxes all round.'
As it soon turns out, Amos's remorseless scrutinising of every remark and deed is shared by both the other characters and Ebbott himself. All have the habit of 'parsing' (a word that recurs throughout the novel) whatever anybody says or does to tease out the many possible meanings. But all, too, generally reach the same conclusion: that, however contradictory, those meanings co-exist.
This reluctance to let anything go unexamined might sound either endlessly fascinating or slightly wearying. True to form, though, it paradoxically proves to be both. Taken as a whole, the book perhaps overdoes everybody's scrupulous anatomising. Yet each individual example is so unfailingly sharp that you can understand Ebbott's unwillingness to drop any of them.
Meanwhile, the same paradoxical approach applies to the wider themes of long-term friendship and long-term marriage, where the ability of the people involved to flit regularly between resentment, admiration, love, hatred, exasperation, tenderness and cynicism will, I fear, be familiar to most readers. But if this is making you think Ebbott forsakes narrative momentum in favour of chin-stroking meditation, that would be badly misleading. Instead, this apparent dichotomy is yet another question not of either/or, but of both/and.
During the weekend, Emerson commits an act of violence that, although it comes only halfway through the book, I'd better not spoil – but which darkens the action considerably. Suddenly there's something much bigger to parse than merely an off-colour joke or some small incident from the past. And, as the properly page-turning repercussions continue, it's not just the action that darkens, but the whole social setting.
Up until then the agreeable middle-class life the two families enjoy had seemed, at worst, a bit complacent. Now it's revealed to be far more ruthless than that, with any unwelcome truths seen as a threat to be resisted whatever the damage caused. There's also the striking notion that these people are haunted by the future at least as much as by the past – which in this case means they're constantly aware of the dire financial and social consequences of taking a principled stance.
Another word that recurs often in the novel is 'flailing', as it becomes increasingly evident that the calm and clear-eyed analysis the characters pride themselves on is essentially delusional, their real emotions far more unruly than they'd ever acknowledge. And it's here that they and their creator diverge, since anything less flailing than Among Friends itself is difficult to imagine. At times, in fact, Ebbott has everything under such total control that there's not much for the reader to do; every nuance so thoroughly elucidated as to make the narrative feel almost predigested.
But, at the risk of being patronising, maybe that's the result of being a first novel. Ebbott is obviously a writer of lavish talents in all the old-school virtues of sentence-writing, paragraph-building, dialogue, characterisation, plot and pacing. Now all he needs is to trust the reader a little more. JW
Among Friends is published by Picador at £18.99. To order your copy for £16.99, call 0330 173 0523 or visit Telegraph Books
by Gurnaik Johal
According to Hindu scripture, the Saraswati was one of the great rivers of ancient India. In this ambitious debut, named for that river, by the British Indian writer Gurnaik Johal, a young man of similar heritage from Wolverhampton travels to his ancestral village in the Punjab following his grandmother's death. On his last visit, as a child, the well on her farm had been dry for decades. But now Satnam finds water in it. Could, as the villagers claim, this be the return of the Saraswati?
The politicians who get wind of it certainly think so. If Satnam will just sign over the land, they tell him, he could be part of an 'era-defining project' to resurrect the river and 'return our country back to its former greatness'. Satnam, who's unemployed, going through a breakup and looking for a sense of purpose, cannot sign fast enough, and is soon committing acts of thuggery to encourage other landowners to do the same.
We're made to wait to find out what happens to him, as the novel then cuts to the Chagos Islands and the story of a pest exterminator; indeed, each of Saraswati's seven long sections concern a different main character. But we continue to hear about the Saraswati, the Narendra Modi-esque prime minister who's elected on the promise of resurrecting it, and the rising tensions between India and Pakistan over the project's contravention of a water treaty.
Saraswati is a sobering parable: we corrupt what is miraculous. Yet Johal never loses sight of his characters. In one section, a Canadian eco-saboteur keeps watch for her comrades as they sabotage a lumber mill. She has heard that their next target is where her mother works and phones her, casually suggesting she take some time off. But she can't say what for. It's a brilliantly charged scene.
Johal's other characters include an asexual Kenyan academic, a Bollywood stuntman, a 15-year-old Pakistani influencer and a nameless female journalist: all very different, all well realised. Then, there's Sejal, a 16-year-old girl when we first meet her in 1878, 'destined to live the life of her mother, who had lived the life of her mother'. She elopes to the Punjab with a man called Jugaad, but still ends up living the narrow, destitute life she's hoped to escape.
It seems an incongruous tale to be telling, until we realise it's the same tale – that our seven present-day characters are all Sejal's descendants. The connection forms a beautiful counterpoint with the Saraswati storyline. There, like the proverbial flap of a butterfly's wings, a small thing escalates into something terrible; here, the reverse happens – that is, from someone seemingly insignificant comes an amazingly various diaspora. But then almost everything in Saraswati works beautifully. Johal has written a major novel, and at his very first attempt. GC
Saraswati is published by Serpent's Tail at £16.99. To order your copy, call 0330 173 0523 or visit Telegraph Books
by Francesca Maria Benvenuto
On Nisida, an island off the coast of Naples and site of a notorious juvenile prison, one inmate called Zeno – a 15-year-old who has been detained for shooting and killing another boy – is given a simple task by his Italian teacher, Ms Martina: write down what you're thinking, and you'll get furlough for Christmas.
Zeno duly complies. And so through a run of sprawling entries that make up Francesca Maria Benvenuto's engrossing debut novel, So People Know It's Me, we learn about Zeno's life both before prison and inside it. There's his impoverished upbringing, which forced his mother to resort to sex work; descriptions of friends he's made on the inside, among them a guard called Franco; his girlfriend, Natalina; and the story of his slow capture by a world of criminal drug gangs that has led him to where he is now.
Almost instantly, we see that Benvenuto is presenting us with that most tempting of literary archetypes: the loveable rogue, who despite having committed some of the most awful acts imaginable, still wins our sympathy through charm, and – in the case of a young criminal such as Zeno – the glimpses of innocence he occasionally betrays. We see this, and we prepare ourselves not to be taken in by it. Only here, through the unusual twists and turns of Benvenuto's narrative, the trick of the archetype works on us all the same.Compelling though this is, So People Know It's Me has an equally strong sales pitch: Benvenuto is an accomplished criminal lawyer who has defended minors in court. Her book draws from the experiences of her mother who – just like Ms Martina – worked as a teacher on Nisida, home to a very real prison for young people.
And yet Benvenuto avoids wielding that authority too heavily. She never bashes over our heads the very legitimate moral problems of housing minors in a prison complex as on Nisida; rather, intimate experience affords her an empathy that feels real without being sentimental. Zeno is under no illusions that what he has done is wrong – but that does not make him less human or beyond hope. With time, his simple writing exercise becomes a project of self-realisation; near the end of the novel, Zeno begins to envision a life for himself beyond prison, perhaps even as a writer.
As befits her setting near Naples, Benvenuto's original prose blends Italian with Neapolitan. Inevitably, the translator Elizabeth Harris has replaced this interplay between two languages with just one: but the more diminished English, with Zeno's voice peppered with vague colloquialisms, feels as though it belongs everywhere and nowhere at once ('she don't got no problems'). And where Harris has let the occasional Neapolitan word or phrase stand on its own – strunz, scornacchiato, 'nnammurata – we're only reminded of a layer of meaning that has been lost. This dualism is important, though: in particular, I'm left wondering where Benvenuto might have originally slipped into Neapolitan to distinguish between other dualities, such as between social classes or children and adults. (That isn't to criticise Harris's work, however. Another translator might have cast the Neapolitan in another mutually intelligible dialect – imagine a back and forth between English and Scots – but the specificities of Italy would still be lost.)
But perhaps this musing is all too hypothetical, and in any case, the unavoidable compromises of translation aren't enough to detract from Benvenuto's strength as a storyteller. Her messaging is similarly deft: everybody is simultaneously the product of structural problems and also not, as Zeno proves. Good people can arise even from difficult circumstances and vice versa. That's a philosophy that survives change and iteration – and is always worth retelling. DMA
So People Know It's Me is published by Pushkin. To order your copy, call 0330 173 0523 or visit Telegraph Books

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
13 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
‘Queer Lens' is the provocative photography show only the Getty would be brave enough to stage
'Queer Lens: A History of Photography' is a sprawling survey of more than 270 works from the last two centuries that looks at the ways cameras transformed the expression of gender and sexuality. Scores of artists as well-known as Berenice Abbott, Anthony Friedkin, Robert Mapplethorpe, Man Ray and Edmund Teske hang with more than a dozen unknowns. The Getty Museum's groundbreaking Pride Month show is provocative and important, and the timing packs a wallop. The exhibition has been in the works for years (since 2020), but coincidentally, it opens during a state of national emergency. The ACLU is tracking 597 anti-LGBTQ+ bills in state legislatures across the U.S., including six in California. (Texas leads the hate-pack, with 88.) Most won't pass. All, however, mean to intimidate just by being introduced. The show conjures an oppressive frame of social reference again and again. Often it is subtle. Take the simple black-and-white photo booth snapshot in which a kissing couple of twentysomething young men was memorialized around 1953 by Canadian-born American artist Joseph John Bertrund Belanger. Their mouths smashed together, one man looks with a heavy-lidded gaze at the other, his eyes shut but his open hand raised, fingers brushing his beloved's throat. Tight framing in the contained privacy of a photo booth underlines an image of passionate intimacy. However, imagine if they were to step outside the curtain and into Vancouver's Playland Amusement Park, where the picture was made, for the very same kiss. They would face possible arrest and imprisonment for 'gross indecency' under the country's antigay criminal code. (That law wasn't lifted until 1969.) Belanger was a World War II veteran who fought with ordinary distinction against a fascist German regime rampaging across Europe — one that launched its reign of terror with the 1933 burning of a homosexual's library on a Berlin public square. In 1944, the fellow pilot with whom Belanger had a private wartime romance was killed in combat. This modest postwar photograph resounds because it pictures the photo booth as a closet. Was that the artist's intention in making it? We don't know, but the result is compelling because it is at once profoundly personal, which is obvious from the deep kiss, while extremely exotic, since queer images like this are rarely seen, never mind celebrated. That bracing fusion recurs in gallery after gallery. The vivifying dichotomy is even announced in advance. Climb the stairs in front of the museum, its risers smartly painted as a cheerful rainbow flag that visually sets the art museum atop a queer pedestal, and you'll encounter the inviting billboard for 'Queer Lens.' Reproduced is a publicity image by Frederick Spalding, a self-taught British portrait photographer. Fanny and Stella, middle-class lovelies in hoop skirts, engage in a warm embrace. The couple, otherwise known as Thomas Ernest Boulton and Frederick William Park, appeared on the London stage — and often out and about in public — in snazzy women's attire. The photograph dates from about 1870. Today, when drag queens and trans people, especially women, are innocent targets of hysterical conservative attacks as some new liberal phenomenon signaling imminent social collapse, a 155-year-old photograph casts a witty and jaundiced eye on the stubbornness of irrational anti-queer hate. Good on the Getty for not mincing visual words. Getty curator Paul Martineau has organized 'Queer Lens' in nine chronological sections. (His catalog, compiled with historian Ryan Linkof, is very good.) Each one is pegged to social conditions around LGBTQ+ life, principally in the United States and Europe. 'The Pansy Craze,' for example, takes note of pre-Prohibition-era underground clubs, often gay, where drag and other performers gained local fame, in addition to bohemian European establishments, some with a vibrant public face. Show business is prominent in Baron Adolph de Meyer's atmospheric portraits of entertainer (and later spy) Josephine Baker and Carl Van Vechten's Bessie Smith, empress of the blues, resplendent behind a huge, feathered fan. Buoyant members of a Harlem social club of drag kings and queens posed for James Van Der Zee, while Brassaï cast his quietly voyeuristic eye on a relaxed and tender lesbian couple enjoying a Paris nightclub. Artist and designer Cecil Beaton performed a coy fashion magazine pose in full drag, his slender form crowned by an enormous picture hat that transforms him into something approaching a human flower, photographed by the duo David James Scott and Edgar Wilkinson. Such portraits create a surprisingly revealing context for Surrealist Man Ray's 'Rrose Sélavy,' the famous photographs of Dada artist Marcel Duchamp in drag, bundled up in a cloche hat and fur-collared coat, eyeliner carefully smudged and lip gloss crisp. Two straight male artists are scrambling establishment gender, but here it's less a singular statement than part of a larger cultural phenomenon. Art and science are analytical tools in some photographs, especially those of nudes. (The show includes considerable nudity, mostly male.) Two images from about 1860 are early textbook cases. In one, photography pioneer Félix Nadar pictured an intersex person from the neck down. Careful cropping maintains privacy for clinical study. In the other, Gaudenzio Marconi helped to launch what would become a standard trope over a century's time for using an artistic pedigree to legitimize homoerotic images. With a flesh-and-blood male model, his picture replicates the famous, much-admired Hellenistic marble sculpture known as the 'Barberini Faun,' a muscled god with splayed legs, dredged up during the Renaissance from a moat below Rome's Castel Sant'Angelo. Strict gender separation common to early 19th century social structures underwent unexpected transformation after the binaries of heterosexual and homosexual were invented in 1869. Karl Maria Kertbeny, an apparently closeted Hungarian journalist, who was living in Berlin, coined the two terms barely a generation after the camera's 1839 invention. The show's first image is even earlier. A small cut paper silhouette from 1810 shows Sylvia Drake and Charity Bryant gazing into each other's eyes, their profiles framed in entwined strands of their hair. The artist is unknown. But silhouettes like this are evoked by the phrase 'the art of fixing a shadow,' which is how William Henry Fox Talbot described his earthshaking invention of the negative-positive process that made photographs possible. The lesbian silhouette's inclusion reminds that same-sex love predates cameras and the modern era, while implying that things were about to change. And change they have, for good and ill. These days, the Getty is probably the only major art museum in America that could open an exhibition like 'Queer Lens.' Others wouldn't dare. Some smaller institutions would, like the young Chicago exhibition space Wrightwood 659, where the large international loan exhibition 'The First Homosexuals: The Birth of a New Identity, 1869-1939' is currently on view. (Curator Jonathan D. Katz, a respected scholar, has said that four out of five of his requests to museums and private collectors for loans to the show were denied, and no American museum would accept the show for a tour, even when offered for free.) Meanwhile across town, the mainstream Art Institute of Chicago is about to unveil 'Gustave Caillebotte: Painting His World,' a traveling exhibition virtually identical to the one already seen in Paris and Los Angeles, where it was notably titled 'Gustave Caillebotte: Painting Men.' The show explores the late-19th century artist's homosocial themes, distinctive for Impressionism, whose common human subjects were typically women and girls. A spokesperson at the Art Institute of Chicago says the name change, made long before the show's Paris debut, is simply meant to reflect 'Caillebotte's full lived experience and daily life.' Maybe, but all three prior Caillebotte retrospectives at American museums since 1976 have already done that. In the current repressive climate, the explanation is frankly unconvincing. The Getty has the prestige and immense financial resources to ignore thuggish political attacks on queer people — and on the arts — which now gush from various statehouses and, most dangerously, Washington's halls of government. An absurd, now notorious New York Times front-page story in 2016 claiming presidential candidate Donald J. Trump would be 'the most gay-friendly Republican nominee for president ever' has been disproved by what is widely considered to be the most vicious such administration in American history. It surpasses even the 1980s Reagan Administration, recalled in '$3 Bill,' a companion Getty Research Institute show also on view. A furious 1987 Donald Moffett poster, dedicated to Gay Men's Health Crisis Director Diego Lopez, juxtaposes the AIDS-indifferent Hollywood president, smirking vapidly above the phrase, 'He kills me,' next to a screaming orange bullseye. '$3 Bill' is a rather jumbled amalgam of minor artworks, documents (books, fliers, pamphlets, magazines, etc.) and ephemera assembled by GRI curator Pietro Rigolo, meant to compile evidence of contemporary queer lives. Its most affecting moments reference the AIDS epidemic's abject cruelty. Powerful forces of oppression are of course still at play. The day after 'Queer Lens' opened, the Supreme Court ruled that individual states may ban healthcare for minors based on the identity of the patient asking for it: cisgender, yes; transgender, no — parents and doctors be damned. The blatantly bigoted decision will someday be overturned, but not without inflicting enormous pain in the interim. A few features of 'Queer Lens' are surprising. A lone film projection — Andy Warhol's short movie 'Blow Job,' in which an actor's face performs the role of fellatio recipient — seems out of place, when many other queer films could as easily be included. In fact, like Marconi using the classical Barberini faun sculpture as a high-art pretense to legitimize ogling male nudity in a photograph, Warhol used ink and acrylic paint as 'makeup' to legitimize the mass media photographs he appropriated for paintings. Since almost all of Warhol's classic 1960s silkscreen works are best described as photographs in painting drag, including one would have been splendid. Omissions are inevitable. (The show makes no claim to being encyclopedic.) Luis Medina, who chronicled Chicago's queer scene in the 1970s, and Jeff Burton, who photographed the almost surreal margins of the huge 1990s pornography industry in the suburban San Fernando Valley, are especially missed. Through no fault of its own, 'Queer Lens' peters out a bit at the end, when the final section declares 'The Future is Queer' in 18 works from the last decade. (Happily, two-thirds are from Getty's own collection.) The world got along for thousands of years without the enforced binaries of heterosexual and homosexual, and in recent decades the fences erected around that century-old split have been coming down. The simultaneous 21st century digital revolution is dramatically changing the contextual terms of the image game, as surely as the analog camera did after 1839. Given that a digital camera is now in most every pocket, queer photography's bracing fusion of the personal and the exotic is pretty threadbare, since exoticism no longer applies to being queer in American life. It simply is what it is. We can be grateful for the shift. And we can also be grateful pictures will continue to shape and affirm queer existence, as pictures always have the capacity to do.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
An eerie tale about our impending doom, plus the best novels of June
by An Yu Twelve years prior to the beginning of Sunbirth – the third novel by the Beijing-born writer An Yu, after her acclaimed Ghost Music and Braised Pork – the sun had begun to fade away. But Five Poems Lake, the town in which the novel is set, 'had been in decay long before'. The locals have lived through the star's slow evanescence largely as before, albeit under slightly chillier circumstances. Sunbirth follows an unnamed pharmacist as she reckons with this precarious world. She has her regular customers: 'the Su girl', notable for a leg injury she acquired in childhood; the pregnant Miss Pan; and Driver Hua, a delivery man. He's infatuated with Miss Pan, the father of whose unborn child is unknown. After visiting her in hospital, our narrator walks home and finds an intoxicated Driver Hua waiting outside. He exposes himself – and then, out of nowhere, 'a bright light pushed itself out of his open mouth'. He is, it seems, one of the 'Beacons', a group of people 'with beams bursting' from their faces, who roam the streets shining as the real thing gradually dims. In response to this slow, and then very sudden, undoing of the world, the narrator's sister returns to live with her. Their concern isn't with the disappearing sun, nor are they particularly alarmed by the transformed humans, who now wander among the inhabitants of Five Poems Lake in a manner itchily suggestive of the Covid pandemic. Instead, they take the opportunity to dig up their dead father's ashes – and learn that he was interred with a photograph of a Beacon. Yet he died when they were young, long before the creatures were first spotted: the photograph's existence is, therefore, the central mystery of the plot. Think of Sunbirth as a quiet apocalypse novel. The sun disappearing, slice by slice, is an enchanting conceit: the story takes on a sort of innocence, its flatness reminiscent of a child's drawing. This is evident in the tone, too, which is often startlingly naive. Earlier in the story, when Miss Pan jumps from her hospital window, the narrator asks: 'How much had Miss Pan's world failed her, if death was the only way for her to communicate how she really felt?' Yu relies heavily on this sort of rhetorical question. Or else characters shout at each other in sudden outbursts: a conversation is muted until it isn't, 'exploding without any warning' or 'erupting uncontrollably'. The end of the world is clearly en vogue. Sunbirth arrives shortly after another apocalypse novel, Elisa Levi's well-regarded That's All I Know, and the Levi is just one of many. Like That's All I Know, Sunbirth feels a little like a short story, distended – an enigmatic one, attempting mythical proportions. The characters operate as ciphers, and would lend themselves well to something briefer: policemen are moral arbiters; fathers and sisters are uneasy caretakers. We accept these archetypes as representative, but for prophecy to become plot, there needs to be detail, and Sunbirth struggles to give its story much substance. Instead, we circle around the same questions for some 300 pages. Remarkably, the apocalypse becomes tiresome. Towards the end of the novel, the narrator muses that 'we used everything to distract ourselves from what was really happening'. Perhaps this explains the stasis. Yu has structured Sunbirth so that in the chapter immediately after the Beacon photograph is found, its existence is explained in flashback. And so, while the world is ending, for the reader there isn't much of a revelation. It's possible that the most successful apocalypse novel is a self-destructive one: it mimics the lack of forward motion in its world, and therefore stalls, falling in on itself. But while the structure may be logical, it doesn't make for good reading. In the final scene, the Beacons begin climbing on top of each other, creating a single, human-shaped body of light. It's one of Yu's more memorable images, and one that promises action. Instead, the figure slumps and falls into the lake. Perhaps it's a symbol of how we slide into disaster. Perhaps it's just a shrug. SD Sunbirth is published by Harvill and Secker at £18.99. To order your copy for £16.99, call 0330 173 0523 or visit Telegraph Books by Xenobe Purvis One heat-addled summer in an Oxfordshire village at the start of the 18th century, a 10ft silvery creature is caught in the nearby Thames. 'A miracle,' pronounces one villager. 'Unnatural,' says another: 'Fetch the priest!' Only the ferryman demurs. 'Just a sturgeon,' he declares. The fish is sent to the pub, cooked and shared. The villagers, fears assuaged, are jubilant. This minor event appears near the beginning of the young writer Xenobe Purvis's debut novel, The Hounding. Its placing is deliberate: the book is inspired by a real-life incident in 1701, in which a doctor reported treating five girls from an Oxfordshire village who'd been 'seized with frequent barking in the manner of dogs'. For the reader, it's not hard to imagine how such behaviour might be received by villagers for whom an unusually large fish is confused with deep evil. Throw in the threat of ailing crops; a patriarchal community for whom masculinity is tightly bound up in drinking, badger baiting and casual violence; and the reflexive social instinct to objectify unconventional women as something 'other', and you have a story that feels directly sprung from our collective cultural consciousness. Purvis, who was selected to be part of the prestigious London Library Emerging Writers programme, writes in spring-water clear and often disarmingly lovely prose. She presents the village like something out of a picture book: there's the alehouse; the landlady, Temperance Shirly; a vicar who wears a patch to cover a hole in his head, following a shooting accident. Robin Wildgoose, a gentle farmhand, comes 'walking through the crisping cow parsley' like a character from a folk song. Even the Mansfield sisters feel semi-mythical: there are five of them and they live with their near-blind grandfather following the deaths of their parents. They like to keep themselves to themselves, and most of the villagers regard them as merely a little strange. And yet to the drink-sotted ferryman Pete Darling, the girls remind him of his weakness. Pete is a God-fearing loner, who often prefers to sleep outside after a heavy night at the pub, and who is privately terrified at the prospect of his forthcoming marriage to a respectable village girl. He hates the way the Mansfield girls look at him, the sinful way they make him feel, their otherworldly eeriness. Mostly he hates their faces 'like five drifts of snow. Five fallen moons.' It's no discredit to Purvis that her novel prompts thoughts of both The Crucible and The Virgin Suicides. The Hounding is also about the conflation of fear, suspicion and desire in a small, claustrophobic community; it also follows a group of girls who are bound together by inscrutable intimacy and who, as a result, are inscribed in the eyes of others with a mysterious power. But Purvis keeps the historical period vague and only alludes to it fleetingly – there's a reference to a father who fought in the Civil War; another to the dawning age of science. The village is clearly trapped between Puritan superstition, oppressive poverty and encroaching modernity, but that's left to the reader to discern. Mainly Purvis's novel exists suspended in time, a reading experience more akin to a lucid dream. At the same time, the novel proceeds very much as you might expect. One night, young Robin – who, like Pete, privately feels himself to be different to most of the village men – hears barking down a lane where two Mansfield girls were recently walking. Later, Pete says he heard something similar, and starts the rumour connecting the two, which soon spreads 'like mould in the alehouse's dark corners'. Piles of animals are later found mauled to death in the parched fields; the river reduces in the heat to a dirty trickle; both are believed to somehow be the fault of the sisters. Even Thomas Mildmay, a farmhand who has fallen for the eldest Mansfield sister Anne, believes he sees her face briefly change shape. Purvis writes with impressive emotional specificity, widening our understanding of this tiny traditional community through the alternating perspectives of Thomas, Pete, Robin, Temperance and the Mansfields' grandfather, Joseph. The slippery ability of rumour to acquire the solidity of truth may be a familiar theme, but Purvis is very good at showing the way in which a baseless idea can become a lightning rod for more general feelings of collective unease. As each character contributes to the growing conviction that the girls are indeed transforming into dogs, it's not the credibility of their belief that's at stake but the more diffuse insecurities behind why they and others might wish to believe it is true. Eventually the story arrives at an event hinted at in the prologue, though it's also there throughout in the 'stifling air, the rankling heat'. Purvis loves a bit of foreshadowing, yet she also relies heavily on stock tropes – abnormal weather; a stealthy accumulation of incidental violence – to achieve it. More problematically, The Hounding feels bloodless. All the elements are there in their right place, but they lack any kind of weight and the novel confirms expectations instead of unsettling them. Still, Purvis is an exquisitely accomplished wordsmith. I'm greedy to learn what she writes next. CA The Hounding is published by Hutchinson Heinemann at £16.99. To order your copy for £14.99, call 0330 173 5030 or visit Telegraph Books by Hal Ebbott Hal Ebbott's mostly very impressive first novel begins with a kind of two-page overture. At an American university, a 'needful', rather anxious student called Amos spots a boy whose 'brown eyes accept the campus like something owned' and who takes a 'violent bite' out of an apple. The boy introduces himself as Emerson and the two discover they're going to be roommates. From there, we fast forward three decades to the present day, when Amos (now a psychiatrist) is driving his wife Claire and their 16-year-old daughter for a weekend at Emerson's second home in upstate New York. Before setting off, Amos had been to the dentist, where he'd replied to the question of whether he flosses by shaking his head and saying, 'Better you know the real me' – a remark that he then rather anxiously analyses at some length: 'It was an odd joke, he allowed. Was it funny? Yes, sort of, not terribly, but enough. Funny enough for a dentist's office certainly…' By the time they get to the house and meet Emerson (now a lawyer), together with his wife and 16-year-old daughter, we already know the primary source of Amos's continuing anxiety: that unlike both his entitled life-long pal and Claire – to whom Emerson introduced him – he grew up amid poverty and spectacular parental neglect. Over dinner, the big news is that a few hours before, Emerson had run over a woman who'd tried to commit a vengeful suicide by jumping out in front of his car which, being the same model and colour, she'd mistaken for that of her perfidious teacher-boyfriend. 'How are you feeling?' asks Amos solicitously. 'Shaken obviously,' says Emerson. 'I mean just imagine, finding out that you drive the same car as a teacher?' So, is this an example of Emerson being funny? Weirdly charming? Performatively outrageous? Unfeeling to the point of sociopathic? Or is he just trying to hide or deflect his sense of shock? The answer, as it so often is in the pages that follow, is all of the above. That's because, if Among Friends were to have a motto, it would be something Emerson says earlier at dinner: 'Paradoxes all round.' As it soon turns out, Amos's remorseless scrutinising of every remark and deed is shared by both the other characters and Ebbott himself. All have the habit of 'parsing' (a word that recurs throughout the novel) whatever anybody says or does to tease out the many possible meanings. But all, too, generally reach the same conclusion: that, however contradictory, those meanings co-exist. This reluctance to let anything go unexamined might sound either endlessly fascinating or slightly wearying. True to form, though, it paradoxically proves to be both. Taken as a whole, the book perhaps overdoes everybody's scrupulous anatomising. Yet each individual example is so unfailingly sharp that you can understand Ebbott's unwillingness to drop any of them. Meanwhile, the same paradoxical approach applies to the wider themes of long-term friendship and long-term marriage, where the ability of the people involved to flit regularly between resentment, admiration, love, hatred, exasperation, tenderness and cynicism will, I fear, be familiar to most readers. But if this is making you think Ebbott forsakes narrative momentum in favour of chin-stroking meditation, that would be badly misleading. Instead, this apparent dichotomy is yet another question not of either/or, but of both/and. During the weekend, Emerson commits an act of violence that, although it comes only halfway through the book, I'd better not spoil – but which darkens the action considerably. Suddenly there's something much bigger to parse than merely an off-colour joke or some small incident from the past. And, as the properly page-turning repercussions continue, it's not just the action that darkens, but the whole social setting. Up until then the agreeable middle-class life the two families enjoy had seemed, at worst, a bit complacent. Now it's revealed to be far more ruthless than that, with any unwelcome truths seen as a threat to be resisted whatever the damage caused. There's also the striking notion that these people are haunted by the future at least as much as by the past – which in this case means they're constantly aware of the dire financial and social consequences of taking a principled stance. Another word that recurs often in the novel is 'flailing', as it becomes increasingly evident that the calm and clear-eyed analysis the characters pride themselves on is essentially delusional, their real emotions far more unruly than they'd ever acknowledge. And it's here that they and their creator diverge, since anything less flailing than Among Friends itself is difficult to imagine. At times, in fact, Ebbott has everything under such total control that there's not much for the reader to do; every nuance so thoroughly elucidated as to make the narrative feel almost predigested. But, at the risk of being patronising, maybe that's the result of being a first novel. Ebbott is obviously a writer of lavish talents in all the old-school virtues of sentence-writing, paragraph-building, dialogue, characterisation, plot and pacing. Now all he needs is to trust the reader a little more. JW Among Friends is published by Picador at £18.99. To order your copy for £16.99, call 0330 173 0523 or visit Telegraph Books by Gurnaik Johal According to Hindu scripture, the Saraswati was one of the great rivers of ancient India. In this ambitious debut, named for that river, by the British Indian writer Gurnaik Johal, a young man of similar heritage from Wolverhampton travels to his ancestral village in the Punjab following his grandmother's death. On his last visit, as a child, the well on her farm had been dry for decades. But now Satnam finds water in it. Could, as the villagers claim, this be the return of the Saraswati? The politicians who get wind of it certainly think so. If Satnam will just sign over the land, they tell him, he could be part of an 'era-defining project' to resurrect the river and 'return our country back to its former greatness'. Satnam, who's unemployed, going through a breakup and looking for a sense of purpose, cannot sign fast enough, and is soon committing acts of thuggery to encourage other landowners to do the same. We're made to wait to find out what happens to him, as the novel then cuts to the Chagos Islands and the story of a pest exterminator; indeed, each of Saraswati's seven long sections concern a different main character. But we continue to hear about the Saraswati, the Narendra Modi-esque prime minister who's elected on the promise of resurrecting it, and the rising tensions between India and Pakistan over the project's contravention of a water treaty. Saraswati is a sobering parable: we corrupt what is miraculous. Yet Johal never loses sight of his characters. In one section, a Canadian eco-saboteur keeps watch for her comrades as they sabotage a lumber mill. She has heard that their next target is where her mother works and phones her, casually suggesting she take some time off. But she can't say what for. It's a brilliantly charged scene. Johal's other characters include an asexual Kenyan academic, a Bollywood stuntman, a 15-year-old Pakistani influencer and a nameless female journalist: all very different, all well realised. Then, there's Sejal, a 16-year-old girl when we first meet her in 1878, 'destined to live the life of her mother, who had lived the life of her mother'. She elopes to the Punjab with a man called Jugaad, but still ends up living the narrow, destitute life she's hoped to escape. It seems an incongruous tale to be telling, until we realise it's the same tale – that our seven present-day characters are all Sejal's descendants. The connection forms a beautiful counterpoint with the Saraswati storyline. There, like the proverbial flap of a butterfly's wings, a small thing escalates into something terrible; here, the reverse happens – that is, from someone seemingly insignificant comes an amazingly various diaspora. But then almost everything in Saraswati works beautifully. Johal has written a major novel, and at his very first attempt. GC Saraswati is published by Serpent's Tail at £16.99. To order your copy, call 0330 173 0523 or visit Telegraph Books by Francesca Maria Benvenuto On Nisida, an island off the coast of Naples and site of a notorious juvenile prison, one inmate called Zeno – a 15-year-old who has been detained for shooting and killing another boy – is given a simple task by his Italian teacher, Ms Martina: write down what you're thinking, and you'll get furlough for Christmas. Zeno duly complies. And so through a run of sprawling entries that make up Francesca Maria Benvenuto's engrossing debut novel, So People Know It's Me, we learn about Zeno's life both before prison and inside it. There's his impoverished upbringing, which forced his mother to resort to sex work; descriptions of friends he's made on the inside, among them a guard called Franco; his girlfriend, Natalina; and the story of his slow capture by a world of criminal drug gangs that has led him to where he is now. Almost instantly, we see that Benvenuto is presenting us with that most tempting of literary archetypes: the loveable rogue, who despite having committed some of the most awful acts imaginable, still wins our sympathy through charm, and – in the case of a young criminal such as Zeno – the glimpses of innocence he occasionally betrays. We see this, and we prepare ourselves not to be taken in by it. Only here, through the unusual twists and turns of Benvenuto's narrative, the trick of the archetype works on us all the though this is, So People Know It's Me has an equally strong sales pitch: Benvenuto is an accomplished criminal lawyer who has defended minors in court. Her book draws from the experiences of her mother who – just like Ms Martina – worked as a teacher on Nisida, home to a very real prison for young people. And yet Benvenuto avoids wielding that authority too heavily. She never bashes over our heads the very legitimate moral problems of housing minors in a prison complex as on Nisida; rather, intimate experience affords her an empathy that feels real without being sentimental. Zeno is under no illusions that what he has done is wrong – but that does not make him less human or beyond hope. With time, his simple writing exercise becomes a project of self-realisation; near the end of the novel, Zeno begins to envision a life for himself beyond prison, perhaps even as a writer. As befits her setting near Naples, Benvenuto's original prose blends Italian with Neapolitan. Inevitably, the translator Elizabeth Harris has replaced this interplay between two languages with just one: but the more diminished English, with Zeno's voice peppered with vague colloquialisms, feels as though it belongs everywhere and nowhere at once ('she don't got no problems'). And where Harris has let the occasional Neapolitan word or phrase stand on its own – strunz, scornacchiato, 'nnammurata – we're only reminded of a layer of meaning that has been lost. This dualism is important, though: in particular, I'm left wondering where Benvenuto might have originally slipped into Neapolitan to distinguish between other dualities, such as between social classes or children and adults. (That isn't to criticise Harris's work, however. Another translator might have cast the Neapolitan in another mutually intelligible dialect – imagine a back and forth between English and Scots – but the specificities of Italy would still be lost.) But perhaps this musing is all too hypothetical, and in any case, the unavoidable compromises of translation aren't enough to detract from Benvenuto's strength as a storyteller. Her messaging is similarly deft: everybody is simultaneously the product of structural problems and also not, as Zeno proves. Good people can arise even from difficult circumstances and vice versa. That's a philosophy that survives change and iteration – and is always worth retelling. DMA So People Know It's Me is published by Pushkin. To order your copy, call 0330 173 0523 or visit Telegraph Books


Miami Herald
16 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Dermot Mulroney files for divorce from Prima Apollinaare after nearly 15 years
Dermot Mulroney is ready to start a new chapter of his life. According to TMZ, the 61-year-old 'My Best Friend's Wedding' actor filed for a 'standard dissolution of marriage' from his wife, Prima Apollinaare, on June 21 in Los Angeles County Superior Court. The couple were married for nearly 15 years and share two kids — Mabel Ray, 17, and Sally June, 15. Court documents obtained by TMZ revealed that the 'Young Guns' actor requested joint physical and legal custody of their two daughters, but asked the court to deny support payments for Apollinaare. Instead, Mulroney is asking the court to grant him spousal support for the two children. People later reported that 'neither side is asking for anything, and no one is denying anything.' The outlet clarified that the estranged couple aren't arguing over the children, aren't concerned about finances, and reportedly used mediators instead of lawyers. 'They are friends and this is amicable and they were advised to file this way,' People reported. According to USA Today, Mulroney failed to disclose the couple's official date of separation, but cited 'irreconcilable differences' as the reason for the divorce. As for the couple's assets, Mulroney has stated that 'all community earnings and accumulation during marriage through the date of separation' will be considered community property, per People. Mulroney and Apollinaare started dating in 2008 — one year after his divorce from Catherine Keener. The couple welcomed their first daughter, Mabel Ray, later that year before welcoming their second daughter, Sally June, in 2009. They tied the knot in December 2010. The divorce comes more than a year after Mulroney and Apollinaare appeared together on Fox's game show 'We Are Family.' Apollinaare, an Italian-born singer-songwriter, sang 'Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow' by the Shirelles before Mulroney, a professional cellist, joined her for a duet of 'Islands in the Stream' by Dolly Parton. After Mulroney's identity was revealed, Apollinaare revealed that they've been together for 19 years. The couple opened up about the experience in a February 2024 interview with Entertainment Weekly. 'They knew Prima's music and put together that we are this sort of secret couple even though we've been together for 20 years. Kind of a stealth Hollywood couple,' Mulroney said of the couple's duet. Apollinaare added that the pair 'like to do karaoke together and we both like music so much.' 'It is great to come out and then turn to your own spouse and sing right into their face. That was unusual. I have to say, really, really fun,' Mulroney continued. In addition to his two daughters with Apollinaare, Mulroney also shares a son Clyde, born in 1997, with Keener.