The Irish Times view on Hiroshima 80 years on: the day everything changed
A blinding flash, an immense shockwave and a blast of intense heat levelled much of the city within seconds. It is estimated that between 70,000 and 80,000 people died instantly. Tens of thousands more were burned, crushed, or irradiated. Buildings within a two-kilometre radius were either incinerated or flattened. In the days, weeks and months that followed, the death toll continued to climb as radiation sickness set in. By the end of 1945, more than 140,000 were dead.
Hiroshima was a moment that changed the trajectory of the modern world. It revealed, in the most brutal way possible, the terrifying power of nuclear weapons. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. Less than a week after that, Japan surrendered, bringing the second World War to an end.
The shadow cast by those bombings has never lifted. In the eight decades since, the spectre of nuclear annihilation has remained with us, sometimes pushed to the background, other times terrifyingly near. The Cold War saw the United States and the Soviet Union build vast nuclear arsenals, capable of destroying the planet many times over. The Cuban missile crisis of 1962 brought the world to the brink.
READ MORE
The end of the Cold War offered some hope. Tensions eased and warheads were gradually dismantled. But the danger never truly receded. Nine nations now possess nuclear weapons, and others appear determined to join them. Iran's ambitions have drawn global attention and military strikes by Israel and the US. North Korea continues to test its capabilities. And in the early stages of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Vladimir Putin made direct threats of nuclear escalation.
Flashpoints persist, from the Persian Gulf to the India-Pakistan border. Recent suggestions by Polish politicians that their country should seek its own nuclear arsenal are just one more reminder that the old consensus on deterrence is fraying, with American security guarantees now in serious doubt.
Eighty years on from Hiroshima, the world finds itself on the threshold of a new nuclear era: more multi-polar, less predictable, and almost certainly more dangerous. The lessons of 1945 may not have been forgotten, but they have certainly not been fully heeded. What happened to Hiroshima must remain more than a historical event. It is a warning, one that still demands urgent attention and constant vigilance.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘It knocked my self-belief': Adi Roche reflects on ‘shockingly dirty' presidential campaign
Former presidential candidate Adi Roche has said those running for the Áras 'need to be strong', citing her experience in a 'shockingly dirty campaign' which she said continues to haunt her. Ms Roche, who is founder and chief executive of Chernobyl Children International , ran as a Labour Party candidate in the 1997 presidential election. However, her bid was derailed by a 'politically motivated' smear campaign, she later said. Speaking to The Irish Times on Wednesday at a commemoration event of the Hiroshima bombing , Ms Roche said she is still 'haunted' by some of what happened during that time. 'It often penetrates my dreams because it knocked my confidence and my self-belief,' said the 70-year-old. READ MORE Ms Roche said prospective candidates 'need to think very carefully' before going forward. 'I had always felt, naively, that it was above and beyond the political arena, that it was a statesman's role of diplomacy, and what I learned was that it actually was the most political position of all. 'When the gloves were off, it was a shockingly dirty campaign, so I would say to anyone considering going forward, to really check with yourself how resilient you are and can be,' she said. Describing it as a 'smear campaign,' it emerged during the campaign that Ms Roche's brother, Dónal de Róiste , was dismissed from the Defence Forces in 1969. He was never officially told the reason for his forced retirement, nor did he receive a court martial, though it was suggested to him that his dismissal was because of his alleged association with republican militants. A review of his case completed in 2022 found that Mr de Róiste's departure was made 'on foot of a fundamentally flawed and unfair process and was not in accordance with the law'. He subsequently received an apology from then minister for defence Simon Coveney. [ Ex-Army lieutenant Dónal de Róiste: 'I can walk with my head high' Opens in new window ] While Fianna Fáil-backed candidate Mary McAleese went on to win the election, Ms Roche finished fourth out of five candidates. She subsequently disappeared back into her humanitarian work, she said, which helped at the time. However, it was the State apology to her brother that 'meant the world to us'. 'It restored my brother's good name and that of our family, and how dreadfully it had been used against me in my campaign,' she said. She ruled out another potential run for Áras an Uachtaráin, saying she is 'too busy' in her humanitarian work, 'between the war in Ukraine, Chernobyl and also Gaza ... there's too much going on.' Ms Roche said the next president will have a hard act to follow. 'Michael D Higgins is such a champion for the rights of our nation, for the rights of our people, and against injustice. He always has his finger on the pulse of every issue,' she said, and hopes the next president will be one of a 'similar moral compass'. Fianna Fáil and the presidency Meanwhile, asked if Fianna Fáil has approached or had meetings with any potential candidates, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said the party 'will make its decision closer the end of the month and we will take soundings over the month'. He said the party had not approached businessman and former dancer Michael Flatley. Labour backs Connolly, and Flatley jumps the shark Listen | 50:26 Speaking at a Daniel O'Connell commemoration event in Caherdaniel, Co Kerry, Mr Martin said: 'I believe the presidency doesn't necessarily belong to any one party. I believe it belongs to the people of Ireland and it's important that the person who is elected who can bring honour, and distinction to that office ... Fianna Fáil certainly will be making a contribution to that debate.' Asked about his thoughts on MMA fighter Conor McGregor's petition to change the Constitution so people can run without needing the support of four local authorities or 20 Oireachtas members, Mr Martin said, 'we will continue to adhere to the Constitution'. 'I'm not sure he [McGregor] has asked anybody – what happened in previous presidential elections. People went to county councils, some got nominations from the requisite number of county councils, so the Constitution creates a pathway there for people to secure a nomination through that route.'
RTÉ News
8 hours ago
- RTÉ News
US pharma firms will be 'damaged' by tariffs
Taoiseach Micheál Martin said President Donald Trump should keep in mind that US pharmaceutical firms based in Ireland will be "damaged and undermined" if he goes through with his latest sectoral tariffs threats. Mr Trump said the 15% baseline agreed in the EU-US tariff deal last month would only apply to the pharmaceutical sector for "one year, one-and-a-half years maximum". The US President also said "it's [the pharmaceutical tariff] going to go to 150%, and then it's going to go to 250% because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country," before specifically referencing companies based in China and Ireland. It follows the European Commission's spokesperson on trade Olof Gill insisting that the 15% rate is an "insurance policy". His comment comes amid a section 232 investigation into tariffs on pharmaceutical that is under way taking place in the US. The probe could result in Mr Trump, rather than the US Congress, attempting to unilaterally increase pharmaceutical tariffs above the 15% rate. He alluded to before his deal with the EU by telling reporters the pharmaceutical sector is "special". However, responding to Mr Trump's suggestion that pharmaceutical tariffs could surge far above the agreed 15% rate in the future, Mr Martin said this should not be the case. He added that Mr Trump should keep in mind that US pharmaceutical firms based in Ireland will be "damaged and undermined" if any tariff increases occur. "I've had some more recent conversations in light of the negotiations between the EU and US. "There are certain realities applying here, and the overall point I would make is that tariffs are not good for the world economy, they're not good for people, workers or consumers. "And in the context of pharmaceutical companies, the US has gained increasing share of European pharmaceutical market and indeed of Asian markets because of their presence in the markets. "The companies are global powers now, really globally strong companies, because of their presence in Europe, Ireland being one of the countries that they're present in," Mr Martin said. He added: "Ireland has added value and strength to those companies, and I would say to the [US] President he needs to factor that into the equation. "Those companies will be damaged and undermined if such policies were to bear fruit. "But we understand, and I've been in touch with the president of the commission last week and Commissioner Šefčovič, that the 15% is what's being negotiated, has been negotiated, between the US and EU." The presence of multi-national companies and international pharmaceutical firms in Ireland is a key component of the current Irish economy, directly impacting on thousands of jobs across the country.
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Trump hails additional $100bn Apple investment in US
US President Donald Trump will announce an additional $100 million investment by tech giant Apple in its US manufacturing network, White House officials said on Wednesday. It comes as Apple tries to avoid US tariffs on imports that will impact the cost of iPhones and other products in the US. The announcement will be seen by the Trump administration as a big victory is his crusade to restore domestic manufacturing. But the scale of the investment will raise concerns in Irish Government circles about what it might mean for the company's commitment to its Irish manufacturing base, which employs more than 6,000 staff. The US president is hoping his threat of tariffs on imports will pressure companies to increase manufacturing inside the US, the stated aim of his America First agenda. READ MORE 'President Trump's America First economic agenda has secured trillions of dollars in investments that support American jobs and bolster American businesses,' White House spokeswoman Taylor Rogers said in a statement. 'Today's announcement with Apple is another win for our manufacturing industry that will simultaneously help reshore the production of critical components to protect America's economic and national security,' he said. In February, Apple said it planned to hire an additional 20,000 staff in the US over the next four years, as part of a $500 billion investment in the country during Trump's second term in office, a figure that is now expected to increase to $600 billion. The company made similar, smaller pledges during the Biden administration and Trump's first term, though it has not yet followed through on some of those promises. While Apple supports more than 450,000 jobs with thousands of suppliers and partners across 50 states, the president has been concerned at the company's plan to expand its manufacturing footprint in India. In May, Trump threatened Apple and other phone manufacturers with a 25% tariff on products made outside the United States. Bloomberg Intelligence analysts Anurag Rana and Andrew Girard said the latest Apple pledge of investment may 'soften the White House's ire' over Apple's heavy reliance on India for iPhone assembly. 'We anticipate Apple will focus on higher-end products, artificial intelligence labs and semiconductor engineering in the US, rather than mass-produced lower-end phones and accessories.' Mr Trump's announcement, which was reported earlier by Bloomberg, will include the creation of what the White House is calling the 'American Manufacturing Programme', which will focus on bringing more of Apple's supply chain and advanced manufacturing to the United States. The US president is hoping his threat of tariffs on imports will pressure companies to increase manufacturing inside the US, the stated aim of his America First agenda. The Apple announcement comes on the day that Mr Trump signed an executive order imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports from India which, he said, was due to New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil. The order said the 25 per cent levies would be added to existing duties imposed on Indian imports in a move that will raise tensions with prime minister Narendra Modi's government. India has failed to reach a trade deal with Washington and was already facing 25 per cent tariffs on its exports to the US before Mr Trump's announcement. A 15 per cent tariff on most EU exports to the US is scheduled to come into force on Thursday. Both the European Commission and the While House had confirmed previously that the 15 per cent rate would include pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. However, comments by the US president on Tuesday when he warned of tariffs on pharmaceuticals of up to 250 per cent over coming years, naming Ireland as a target alongside China, will cause concern in Dublin. – Additional reporting Bloomberg, New York Times, Financial Times limited
