logo
What Merz wants from Trump showdown meeting

What Merz wants from Trump showdown meeting

Yahooa day ago

New German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is making a high-stakes trip to meet US President Donald Trump - his first time in Washington DC as the leader of the European Union's largest economy.
Tariffs, defence spending and the war in Ukraine will be high on the agenda when Merz meets Donald Trump on Thursday at the White House.
There's also speculation that Trump's team - which repeatedly has weighed in on Germany's domestic politics - could subject him to an Oval Office "ambush".
It would not be the first time.
Both South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky found themselves in awkward, tense or even fiery exchanges as the world's cameras rolled, capturing every moment. Those moments have turned once cosy, diplomatic moments in the Oval Office into potentially fraught, tight-rope walks for visiting leaders.
Ahead of the visit, Berlin expressed confidence that the German side is ready. "I think he's well prepared for this meeting," Friedrich Merz's spokesman told reporters this week.
Merz - from the centre-right CDU party - is not just prepared, but on friendly terms with the US President, according to German media.
The pair are even said to have exchanged text messages and be on a first name basis, Germany's ARD news outlet has reported.
It's always important to not talk for too long," Merz recently opined on German TV. "But to keep it short and also let him talk."
Merz's forthright, "shoot-from-the-hip" style of politics could add an interesting dimension to the meeting. His remarks can be surprising and make headlines - a stark contrast to those of his more cautious predecessors, Olaf Scholz and Angela Merkel.
Though a traditional supporter of transatlantic relations, Merz raised eyebrows in February by declaring the current US administration is "indifferent to the fate of Europe".
So far, the White House has been uncharacteristically quiet about Merz's visit.
It was only briefly mentioned by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt in a gaggle with reporters on Monday, and not at all during briefings at the White House and State Department on Tuesday.
Sources familiar with the visit suggested several topics that could dominate the conversation.
Of these, tariffs would be among the most pressing, particularly after Trump doubled import taxes on steel and aluminium this week, prompting warnings of EU countermeasures.
The US President also repeatedly expressed dismay with the speed of tariff negotiations with the EU. In May, he threatened to levy a 50% tariff on European goods, saying that it was "time that we play the game the way I know how to play the game".
Trump later backtracked and delayed the tariffs until 9 July, a move that his US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer characterised as having a "fire lit" under the EU.
Germany is the EU's largest exporter to the US, leaving the country's businesses are extremely agitated about any trade obstacles.
Merz, a 69-year-old reputed millionaire with a corporate background, may feel confident about going toe-to-toe with Trump, who often hails himself as the consummate "dealmaker".
Whether the Chancellor will be able to smooth the path for EU negotiators, however, remains to be seen.
Constanze Stelzenmüller, an expert on German-US relations at the Brookings Institute, believes Merz's ability to push the negotiations along is limited, given that the EU as an institution has taken the lead on those talks.
"Whatever Merz says is mood music, rather than being able to say that XYZ will happen, even if major nation states aren't without influence on the European Commission," she explained. "He has to tread a delicate line."
When it comes to Ukraine, Merz is vocal in his support of Kyiv and in his criticism of Moscow - recently warning that the fighting could drag on, despite repeated talk of a ceasefire from the White House.
Justin Logan, director of defence and foreign policy studies at the Washington DC-based Cato Institute, told the BBC he believes Ukraine will present a "dilemma" for the German side in the meeting.
"They'll make a real effort to sell what frankly are the same arguments that have so far failed to persuade the White House," he said.
Merz also has called for stiffer EU sanctions on Vladimir Putin and Russia - something Trump has so far not committed to, even as some lawmakers from within his own party have escalated calls to do so.
Earlier this week, Leavitt said only that Trump has "kept this as a tool in his toolbox if necessary".
"The strange thing for me is, that we haven't heard President Trump say yet, is that Europe has lots of cards it can play on its own," Mr Logan said, pointing to $228bn in frozen Russian assets held primarily in Belgium.
"That's money that's just sitting there," he said.
From the White House's point of view, the issue of Ukraine's defence is also inextricably linked to Trump's demands that NATO allies raise defence spending to 5% of their GDP.
Germany's is 2% - well short of Trump's target, although German officials have signalled a willingness to move in that direction.
"I don't think they've done enough," Mr Logan added. "And I suspect they can't do enough. The White House has to know that 5% is not a goal that any of the major European countries are going to reach."
"The question then becomes: What's next?"
Among the potential pitfalls the German delegation faces are the deep disdain that some members of Trump's cabinet - particularly Vice President JD Vance - have for the so-called "firewall" that keeps Germany's Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party out of power.
"If you're running in fear of your own voters, there is nothing American can do for you," Vance told the Munich Security Conference in February.
Vance also broke diplomatic norms by meeting the AfD's leader, Alice Weidel, ahead of Germany's snap election that saw the party storm into second place.
Since then, AfD has been classified as extremist by Germany's domestic intelligence service - although the public designation was paused pending a legal challenge.
If confronted, Merz is unlikely to concede, having previously called on the US government to "stay out" of Berlin's domestic politics.
While she believes a "Zelensky-style" Oval Office is unlikely, Stelzenmüller said a "worst case scenario" would be something more akin to the visit of Irish Prime Minister Micheál to the White House - an occasion promptly followed by a visit from his political foe, former UFC fighter Conor McGregor.
Subsequent contact with the AfD or Alice Weidel, she added, would be seen as a provocation by Germany.
"That would be DEFCON 1 for the bilateral," she said.
Russia may attack Nato in next four years, German defence chief warns
German chancellor promises to help Ukraine produce long-range weapons
Germany decides to leave history in the past and prepare for war

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump and Musk fell out because Trump just doesn't get principled people
Trump and Musk fell out because Trump just doesn't get principled people

The Hill

time34 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump and Musk fell out because Trump just doesn't get principled people

There are limitations to President Trump's transactional view of the world. This is evident in his growing tension with Elon Musk, which risks creating political problems that threaten his agenda. Trump usually gets his way through a mix of flattery, favors and intimidation, but Musk is less inclined than most to respond to these techniques. Musk holds a lot of cards. His Tesla factories employ tens of thousands of American workers. His SpaceX rockets underpin our national aspirations in space. He is also the wealthiest person on the planet, and his wealth facilitates a natural tendency to speak out when his principles are challenged. That was illustrated in late 2023 when he invited advertisers to stay off his social media platform. It is possible to disagree with everything Musk does and still concede that the man is principled. This is why our less principled President is struggling to understand Musk's hostility to the tax and spending bill, the oddly named One Big Beautiful Bill Act, so named after an utterance by Trump. Musk carried out his work at the Department of Government Efficiency without humanity and with childish antics. But if his methods were wrong, his beliefs were real. His opposition to a spending bill that negates his work by increasing federal debt by more than $2 trillion is rooted in deeply held principles. His life would be easier and his businesses more secure if he had stayed quiet and joined other Republicans in supporting a bill they know leads our nation one step closer to fiscal ruin. Musk is different. He was willing to alienate himself from liberal consumers by taking up his position at DOGE and supporting Trump, but equally willing to alienate himself from MAGA consumers by opposing the Trump tax bill on principle. This type of principled stand is difficult for someone like Trump to understand, and I believe he is being honest when he says he can't understand Musk's opposition to the bill. In Trump's eyes, he offered Musk a favorable transaction: Publicly support my policies, and I will maintain your access and influence. Musk refused the deal because staying quiet meant violating his principles. This is foreign to Trump, who values public appearance and profit over principles. Musk isn't the only person President Trump is struggling to understand. Chinese president Xi Jinping is equally principled and believes what he says about the 21st century belonging to China. Xi is committed to erasing the last vestiges of China's subordination to the West. He is telling the truth when he discusses the belief that China should play a central role in the world and dominate Asia. The Chinese president is committed to taking control of Taiwan because its de facto independence represents a contemporary manifestation of an earlier and weaker time in Chinese history. American power can deter Xi from invading, but there is no deal imaginable that will cause him to change his mind about the inevitability of seizing Taiwan. Xi holds the principle too deeply to let it go, and here again Trump struggles to understand. Xi cannot capitulate to American demands on either trade or Taiwan without resurrecting in his own mind the idea of a weak and subordinate China. This is one important reason among several why he hasn't acquiesced to American demands on trade and seems to be preparing for a prolonged standoff — something that probably wasn't part of Trump's initial plan. Xi's principles make it difficult for our transactional president to understand the man and predict his actions. Russian President Vladimir Putin is another example of someone Trump fundamentally fails to understand. Putin acts immorally but is still more principled than he is transactional. Trump's offer to reintegrate Russia into the world economy and deepen American economic ties with Russian companies might have worked to end the war in Ukraine if Putin were as transactional as Trump. Our president offered Putin an objectively good deal — an escape from relative isolation and a chance to increase Russia's national wealth and the personal wealth of its president and closest collaborators. But Putin is being honest when he says Ukraine should be part of Russia. He has so far been unwilling to accept Trump's generous offers because they don't comport with his principled belief. Like Xi, Putin refuses to accept even the appearance of Russian subordination to the West. His principled stand means Trump's transactional offers are unlikely to succeed. American interests are better served by forcing Putin's hand — by weaking Russia's economy and hurting it militarily by supporting Ukraine's resistance. Trump cannot easily see this because he doesn't understand how the Russian president sees the world. Putin is not primarily transactional — he pursues his principles until sufficient counterforce is applied. This is a different way of engaging with the world than Trump's dealmaking. It requires an American approach to Russia that Trump has so far failed to understand and embrace. Trump believes everyone has a price and will eventually make a deal. He has been successful because he has often been proven right in this. Consider, for example, the Republicans in Congress who sacrificed their principles to safeguard their reelections by supporting a fiscally irresponsible bill. Their actions once again affirmed Trump's instinct that everyone has a price. But not everyone is so transactional as that. Men like Musk, Xi and Putin see the world through a principled lens. As good as he is at dominating transactional people, Trump struggles to understand and then anticipate and control the actions of people who are primarily guided by principle. This has political consequences for Trump himself and geopolitical consequences for our nation. Until Trump better understands the motivations of principled people, our country will continue offering deals to people who are entirely uninterested. Trump is also risking his legacy and agenda by antagonizes potential critics like Musk by miscalculating their reactions when his actions violate their principles. One of Trump's most redeeming qualities is his honest desire for peace, but his transactional approach to America's adversaries will never create the stability he seeks. Just as he should have anticipated Musk's opposition to the spending bill, he should have anticipated Xi's intransigence on trade and Putin's desire to continue his war. The understanding that some people act on principle is a blind spot for our transactional president, and this makes it difficult for him to understand the principled parts of the world.

Musk suggests creating a new political party as feud with Trump continues to rage
Musk suggests creating a new political party as feud with Trump continues to rage

New York Post

time36 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Musk suggests creating a new political party as feud with Trump continues to rage

Elon Musk floated the idea of a new political party as his rapidly escalating feud with President Trump reached a tipping point — with more than 80% of the millions who voted wanting change. The world's richest man posted a poll on X asking followers whether they supported the idea of a party to take on the Republicans and Democrats. 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' the poll asked. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters as Elon Musk looks on in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025. AP Well over 4.7 million votes had been cast as of early Friday — with more than 80% agreeing a new party was needed. The poll was posted soon after Musk and Trump's once-close relationship imploded late Thursday when the men started hurling blistering attacks at each other. Musk also encouraged Republicans torn over who to back to side with him. 'Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years,' he wrote in one tweet. The verbal punches erupted after Trump criticized Musk in the Oval Office on Thursday, telling reporters he was 'very disappointed' in the Tesla founder for denouncing his sweeping tax-cut and spending bill. Elon Musk shared the poll to his X followers on June 5, 2025. @elonmusk/X Trump quickly posted on Truth Social that Musk had been 'wearing thin,' that he had 'asked him to leave' his administration and that the tech titan had 'gone CRAZY.' Trump then threatened that he could save taxpayer money by canceling government contracts and subsidies for Musk's companies. Musk, for his part, fired back by expressing support for impeaching Trump and even accused the administration of withholding documents related to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein because the president would be mentioned. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk post on X.

Dollar poised for weekly loss, hurt by economic weakness and trade limbo
Dollar poised for weekly loss, hurt by economic weakness and trade limbo

CNBC

time37 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Dollar poised for weekly loss, hurt by economic weakness and trade limbo

The dollar was headed for a weekly loss on Friday, undermined by signs of fragility in the U.S. economy and little progress on trade negotiations between Washington and its partners, ahead of a critical jobs report. The U.S. nonfarm payrolls report expected later on will draw greater scrutiny after a slew of weaker-than-expected economic data this week underscored that President Donald Trump's tariffs were taking a toll on the economy. Currencies were mostly rangebound in early European hours as traders steered clear of large bets ahead of the data release. The euro was taking a breather after hitting a 1-1/2-month top on Thursday following hawkish remarks from the European Central Bank. It last bought roughly $1.1422, down just 0.2% on the day. Traders have pushed back expectations on the timing of the next rate cut, but continue to anticipate a 25 basis point reduction by year-end. Deutsche Bank's Mark Wall said he still expects 50 basis points worth of ECB rate cuts, adding "it is still too early to judge the impact of trade war, and the path of the trade war is in any case still inherently unpredictable." Reflecting a struggling economy, data showed that German exports and industrial output fell more than expected in April and data on euro zone retail sales is expected later in the day. Sterling dipped 0.2% at around $1.3546 having scaled a more than three-year peak in the previous session, and was set to rise about 0.6% for the week. The yen fell 0.18% to 143.90 per dollar. Most currencies had surged against the dollar late on Thursday, helped by news that Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke on a call for more than an hour, before paring some of their gains. Against a basket of currencies, the dollar edged up to 98.9, and was headed for a weekly loss of 0.5%. Analysts said Friday's U.S. jobs data would likely be the next catalyst for currencies. Economists polled by Reuters forecast the U.S. economy created 130,000 new jobs in May versus 177,000 in April. Job growth likely slowed considerably in May as businesses struggled with headwinds from tariff uncertainty, but probably not enough for a cautious Federal Reserve to resume cutting interest rates anytime soon, analysts said. "Within all the noise... the softness that we've seen in the data this week has probably been more responsible for rejuvenating the bearish U.S. dollar narrative than anything else that's gone on," said Ray Attrill, head of FX research at National Australia Bank. "We've always taken the view that once it becomes clear that the U.S. economy is no longer exceptional, and that the policy actions that we've seen to date, together with the relative tightness of Fed policy, will start to show through particularly in a weakening labor market. Hence the importance of tonight's numbers." Adding to headwinds for the dollar, investors remain worried about U.S. trade negotiations and the lack of progress in hashing out deals ahead of an early July deadline. The highly anticipated call between Trump and Xi also provided little clarity and the spotlight on it was quickly stolen by a public fallout between Trump and Elon Musk.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store