logo
F-22 Raptor: The 5th-Gen Fighter Jet That US Won't Sell

F-22 Raptor: The 5th-Gen Fighter Jet That US Won't Sell

News183 days ago

Last Updated:
The US-built F-22 Raptor, developed by Lockheed Martin and Boeing, is a top fifth-generation fighter jet with stealth, supercruise, and unmatched agility
In an era where warfare is increasingly defined by speed, stealth, and supremacy in the skies, fifth-generation fighter jets have become the ultimate symbols of military might. As nations race to outpace one another in aerospace technology, the United States, China, and Russia lead the charge, each wielding their own cutting-edge aircraft. But among them, one machine continues to soar above the rest, the US-built F-22 Raptor.
Developed jointly by Lockheed Martin and Boeing, the F-22 Raptor was first tested in 1997 and officially inducted into the US Air Force by 2005. With a minuscule radar cross-section, the F-22 is nearly invisible to enemy radar systems, allowing it to infiltrate hostile airspace undetected.
Powered by twin Pratt & Whitney F119-PW-100 engines generating a combined 70,000 pounds of thrust, the jet is capable of 'supercruise", sustained supersonic flight without the use of fuel-guzzling afterburners. It cruises at speeds exceeding Mach 1.5 (approximately 1,850 km/h) and can climb to altitudes over 50,000 feet.
Its agility in the air is unmatched, thanks to thrust vectoring technology that allows the jet to pivot and roll with astonishing precision. In dogfights, this maneuverability makes it nearly impossible to pin down.
Equipped with the AN/APG-77 radar, the jet can detect and track enemies at long range. With sensor fusion technology, it delivers a 360-degree battlefield view to its pilot, offering a critical edge in complex air combat situations.
Weapons-wise, the Raptor carries a lethal mix. It can house six AIM-120 AMRAAM air-to-air missiles, two AIM-9 Sidewinders, a 1,000-pound GBU-32 JDAM smart bomb, and a 20mm M61A2 Vulcan cannon with 480 rounds, making it equally deadly against both airborne and ground threats.
The F-22 was designed for air superiority. It's faster, topping Mach 2.25 (nearly 2,700 km/h), and more agile due to its advanced thrust vectoring. The F-35, on the other hand, is a versatile, multi-role combat aircraft tailored for a broader range of missions: air-to-ground strikes, electronic warfare, and intelligence gathering.
It comes in three variants for the Air Force (F-35A), Marines (F-35B for vertical landing), and Navy (F-35C for carrier operations). Though slower and less nimble, the F-35's strength lies in its adaptability and digital warfare capabilities, including its AN/APG-81 radar and Electro-Optical Targeting System.
Despite its staggering capabilities, the F-22 remains exclusive to the United States. In 1998, Congress enacted a strict ban on its export, citing the need to safeguard its highly classified stealth and avionics systems. The fear? That this top-tier technology might fall into adversarial hands.
Indeed, those fears weren't unfounded. In 2016, China was caught attempting to steal design blueprints of the F-22, F-35, and C-130 transport aircraft. Since then, Washington has doubled down on keeping the Raptor within American borders.
Allies such as Japan, Israel, and Australia have repeatedly expressed interest in acquiring the F-22. In one case, Lockheed Martin even proposed a hybrid model combining features of the F-22 and F-35 for Japan. But concerns over cost and export laws killed the deal. Instead, the US has promoted the more widely available – and export-friendly – F-35, which shares some DNA with the Raptor but lacks its specialised air dominance pedigree.
India recently greenlit its own 5th-gen Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) programme. While promising, it remains years away from operational deployment. For now, India, like many others, watches from the sidelines as the trio of aerial superpowers – the US, China, and Russia – unfold their futuristic wings.
Watch India Pakistan Breaking News on CNN-News18. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
First Published:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bye bye Gemini? Samsung may soon have Perplexity AI on its phone, its browser, everywhere
Bye bye Gemini? Samsung may soon have Perplexity AI on its phone, its browser, everywhere

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

Bye bye Gemini? Samsung may soon have Perplexity AI on its phone, its browser, everywhere

Samsung could soon shake up its artificial intelligence (AI) strategy, with talks underway to make Perplexity AI a major part of its smartphone ecosystem. According to a Bloomberg report, Samsung is in advanced discussions with US-based startup Perplexity AI to not only preload its assistant on future devices but also to invest significantly in the the deal goes through, Samsung may integrate Perplexity's AI tools into several core areas, including its browser, the Bixby virtual assistant, and possibly even its operating system. The company is reportedly aiming to roll out the changes as early as this year, with a broader launch expected with the Galaxy S26 series in 2026. Notably, as per the report, these plans are still in flux and could evolve before any official announcement is partnership would represent a major shift in Samsung's AI approach. So far, the company has leaned heavily on Google's Gemini to power many of its AI features through the Galaxy AI suite. But a collaboration with Perplexity would allow Samsung to diversify and reduce its dependence on Google. For Perplexity, on the other hand, the deal would mark its largest mobile tie-up yet. The startup has already partnered with Motorola and offers its AI assistant in the Razr 60 and Razr 60 Ultra. Talks between Samsung and Perplexity reportedly began earlier this year, and recent meetings in South Korea have reportedly brought the two sides closer to finalising the deal. Alongside the potential software integrations, Samsung is also expected to be one of the lead investors in Perplexity's next funding round. Its investment division, Samsung NEXT, had already backed the startup in Apple has also shown interest in Perplexity's capabilities. In testimony during the ongoing antitrust case against Google, Apple's services head Eddy Cue said the iPhone maker had been 'impressed' by Perplexity and had started discussions to explore using its search tools as an alternative to Google or ChatGPT in Siri. What effect a Samsung-Perplexity alliance might have on those talks remains to be scale of the possible Samsung partnership goes beyond just putting another AI assistant on its phones. Bloomberg reports that the companies have discussed developing a new AI-powered operating system and an app that would act as a hub for different AI agents, including Perplexity becomes the default assistant on Samsung devices, questions naturally arise about the future of Google's Gemini on Galaxy phones. While it's unlikely Gemini will be completely removed, it may become a secondary option. This would be a major change, considering Samsung's close partnership with Google to power Galaxy AI features. Interestingly, the news comes just as Google is working to integrate Gemini AI into iPhones, possibly as a Siri enhancement.

Regulators realising fintechs are here to stay: QED's Nigel Morris
Regulators realising fintechs are here to stay: QED's Nigel Morris

Time of India

time5 hours ago

  • Time of India

Regulators realising fintechs are here to stay: QED's Nigel Morris

Fintechs are no longer scrappy outsiders. They're scaling faster than traditional players and increasingly, regulators are recognising them as a permanent fixture in the financial services industry, QED Investors' cofounder Nigel Morris told us. In an exclusive interview during his annual visit to India, Morris said fintechs are beginning to dominate categories such as earned wage access, money transfers, and neobanking. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Fintechs are no longer scrappy outsiders in the financial world; they are scaling faster than traditional players, dominating high-growth segments and increasingly being recognised by regulators as a permanent feature in the financial services industry, according to QED Investors cofounder Nigel Morris 'Regulators are now internalising that fintech is here to stay,' Morris told ET in an exclusive interaction during his annual India visit. Fintechs have a role to play in the future of how financial services are delivered, he visit comes at a time when India's fintech sector is navigating tighter regulatory oversight, particularly around unsecured lending and digital compliance. He sees this not as a setback, but as a necessary phase. 'It's a natural course laying the groundwork for the next wave of innovation.'Referring to the recently released QED–BCG Global Fintech Report, Morris said, fintechs are not only growing faster than incumbents, they're starting to dominate key categories. 'Earned wage access (allowing employees to access a part of their wages before the payday) is a great example—Refyne in India operates in a space where there isn't a single incumbent,' he said. 'In money transfers, it used to be Western Union, now it's Wise and Remitly. For buy now, pay later, Klarna and Affirm are dominating, not banks. In neo-banking, look at Nubank, Monzo and Chime. What we're seeing is that incumbents, either by default or by design, are simply not playing in these spaces.'It would be 'very interesting' to see how India's landscape evolves, whether the legacy players step up or continue to lag behind, he said. 'Their (banks') skills might not be as relevant; they've got other things on their mind.'A key trend QED is tracking is how artificial intelligence is reshaping financial services from underwriting to product delivery. 'Fintechs are adopting AI at a much faster rate than incumbents. That's not surprising,' said Morris. 'They're more digital, more tech-centric and faster in how they move.'This tech-led agility, he said, is giving fintechs an edge in product innovation, risk assessment and consumer engagement, while legacy institutions are still weighed down by infrastructure and regulatory US-based fund plans to deploy $250–300 million in early- and growth-stage startups across India and the Asia-Pacific region. Armed with a $925 million fund raised in 2023, QED is eyeing investments across Indonesia, Singapore, Japan and other APAC the past five years, the fintech-focused VC firm has invested roughly $220 million in Asia. Its India portfolio includes early bets in neo-banking platform Jupiter, credit card sourcing platform OneCard, financial infrastructure startup Upswing and Efficient Capital Labs, which offers financing solutions for SaaS companies. In December 2024, QED led a $25 million funding round in OneCard While India's fintech sector has faced increasing regulatory scrutiny, especially around NBFCs (non-banking financial companies) and unsecured lending, Morris doesn't see this as a deterrent. 'The regulators stepped in with a cautionary stance—rightly so,' he said. 'They said we have to really think about AML, KYC and about a little bit more scrutiny to make sure that the banks that partner with the fintechs are living up to the responsibilities that they have. From there, move to a new equilibrium… I think that's a natural cycle.'QED Asia head Sandeep Patil, who oversees India investments, echoed the view. 'I'm not turning a blind eye to what's happened. Yes, regulations have slowed lending and caused short-term pain. But we're far more optimistic about the long term,' he reset in the fintech market has affected funding in the sector. Cred is in talks to raise fresh funds at an around $4 billion valuation—down from $6.4 billion in 2021, as reported by ET on April 14 . QED portfolio firm Klarna of Sweden dropped from $46 billion to $6.7 billion before recovering to a targeted $15 billion ahead of IPO . Stripe went from $95 billion to $50 billion before a tender offer lifted its valuation to $91.5 billion.'The rise and fall played out over just two and a half years,' Morris said. 'But in the last year, things have been relatively stable.'He noted that public fintechs traded at 4–5x revenue pre-Covid, surged to 20x during the digital wave, and are now returning to more rational however, continues to buck that trend. 'India benefits from a roaring wind at its back, strong GDP growth and a different economic cycle compared to the US, UK, or Latin America,' he bullish on India, QED remains measured on certain sub-sectors like neo-banking.'Many haven't demonstrated meaningful product engagement or cross-sell success,' said Patil. 'They either don't have a wide enough product suite, or they haven't had enough traction on the core banking product. Then you're just another account inside someone's app—and the story doesn't go anywhere.'Still, Morris believes that the good fintechs will earn regulatory trust and potentially, banking licences. 'In the long run, I believe some of them will end up with licences at different speeds in different markets,' he said. 'But there's still room for strong partnerships between good fintechs and good banks. That's the opportunity.'Morris has long pushed back against the hypergrowth-at-all-costs mindset that defined much of the past decade's startup boom. 'I've always railed against the model of blitzscaling in financial services—the idea that you acquire a load of customers, lose money on every one of them, and figure out the model later. I've never believed in that,' he said. 'We are incredibly meticulous and focused on unit economics.'In the Indian context, that model faces even more pressure. 'The cost to acquire it is really low. But the ARPU (average revenue per user) is equally low,' he said. 'So, we're playing a different economic game. In the end, how those two net off is critical. You're dealing with a much larger customer base with thinner economics per user. The bet is on how big they can get, who they can partner with, and what else they can sell and at what rate.'

From Rs 6 lakh to Rs 18 lakh to Rs 0 salary: Techie shares journey from getting dream US job to becoming jobless, all in a month
From Rs 6 lakh to Rs 18 lakh to Rs 0 salary: Techie shares journey from getting dream US job to becoming jobless, all in a month

Time of India

time8 hours ago

  • Time of India

From Rs 6 lakh to Rs 18 lakh to Rs 0 salary: Techie shares journey from getting dream US job to becoming jobless, all in a month

In the fast-paced tech world, a young Indian full-stack developer 's story has gripped r/developersIndia, serving as both inspiration and warning. The anonymous Redditor shared a rollercoaster journey: in just one month, his salary soared from Rs 6 LPA to a promised Rs 18 LPA, only to plummet to Zero when his dream job vanished. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now What started as a dream leap into a US-based job ended has ended with a grueling job hunt. With 1.6 years of experience at an Indian startup, the developer honed skills in MERN stack, DevOps, and even Machine Learning. His big break came with a contract offer from a U.S. startup, tripling his pay. Excited, he resigned, served his notice, and prepared for the leap. But days before starting, a curt email cited 'internal restructuring' and a sudden change in business needs as the reason for revoking the offer. A new name in the company's Slack channel hinted at other motives. All in all, the dream of US job just vanished in thin air, The startup offered 15 days' pay as a gesture, but it was cold comfort. Now unemployed, the developer faces the grueling job hunt once more, his story a stark reminder of the tech industry's unpredictability. Check full text of techie's Reddit post I was a full-stack dev at an Indian startup, grinding at 6 LPA. Learned a ton, and after a lot of effort, landed a contract offer from a very early-stage US-based startup that looked like a dream – promising around 18 LPA. Everything seemed set. I put in my papers at my old job, went through all the onboarding formalities with the new US startup, and served my notice period. But just as I was ready to officially start, they hit me with the news: due to sudden internal restructuring and unforeseen changes in their needs (which I very much suspect translates to they found some other candidate as I could see a new person join their slack before I was hit with the mail but again I'm not entirely sure), they had to revoke my offer. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They did offer to pay for 15 days as a gesture, which I appreciate, but it doesn't change the fact that I'm now unexpectedly unemployed. Trying to apply like a freak and getting literally no callbacks and it's been a tough pill to swallow, going from that high to this low so quickly. I have 1.6 years of experience, primarily as a full-stack developer (skills include MERN, DevOps so I can plan to deploy and monitor, worked on building MCP servers & clients, A2A workflow because of personal interest recently even though I don't know the fundamentals of Machine Learning lol but would love to learn anyways). The next company I join will be my third, and so far, my entire career has been with startups. While the learning is immense, the uncertainty has been real. I'm now considering having some stability, a place where I can contribute and grow for at least 2-3 years. That doesn't mean I'll stop grinding or upskilling; I'm always eager to learn and push myself, but a bit more predictability would be welcome. If anyone has any leads, referrals, or just some advice on navigating this, I'd be incredibly grateful. Thanks for reading.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store