Incredible details of ‘world's most lethal weapon' emerge…Trump's F47 fighter jet boasts huge range & ‘double X' stealth
The chief of the US airforce dropped bombshell new stats about the F-47 - designed to destroy anything China can fly.
6
6
6
General David Allvin posted a new graphic showing off America's "next generation of air dominance".
He revealed that the incoming F-47 - named after Trump, the 47th president - will be operational in the period 2025-2029.
There are two keys stats that mark out the F-47 as the most advanced US jet ever.
First is the stealth rating; the next gen fighter is the first to be stamped with "Stealth++" - meaning it will be the most covert yet.
And the combat radius was revealed to be at least 1000 nautical miles - much further than the next-highest figure of 690nm from the F-15E(X)E.
The general defined the top speed as Mach 2+, which means it will fly at more than twice the speed of sound.
We also learned that at least 185 of the F-47s are on order - matching the size of the F-22 fleet.
General Alvin vowed that, with the next generation of airborne gadgets, the US air force would "continue to be the world's best example of speed, agility and lethality".
He added: "Modernization means fielding a collection of assets that provide unique dilemmas for adversaries - matching capabilities to threats - while keeping us on the right side of the cost curve."
The spanking-new jet was first announced back in March by Trump, alongside Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth in the Oval Office.
US military stages biggest EVER 'elephant walk' with supersonic jets, helicopters & drones in show of force to China
At its launched, another key feature was flaunted.
Embracing the development of new warfare technology, the F-47 will be accompanied by its own drone swarm.
Program coordinators plan to use sophisticated robotic wingmen designed by Anduril Industries and General Atomics in the drones, according to Axios.
Trump didn't confirm how much the project would cost, but a source close to the Next Generation Air Dominance pegged it at upwards of $20billion.
A huge cash wad has been set aside to fund the programme and ensure America's air defences remain dominant.
6
6
Two months ago, Trump hailed these jets as 'the most advanced, most capable, most lethal aircraft ever built'.
He added: "The F-47 is equipped with state-of-the-art stealth technologies, virtually unseeable and unprecedented power," and called the title a "beautiful name".
"There's never been anything like it," he concluded.
It's no wonder Trump approves of the name - as it comes from his own position as 47th president.
However, he insisted that it was not his own work, but devised by his generals.
The contract for the deadly new military aircraft was awarded to the struggling American company Boeing - replacing Lockheed Martin's F-22 Raptor.
This marked a major improvement in the company's fortune.
Boeing will eventually receive hundreds of billions of dollars in orders over the contract's multi-decade lifetime.
List of fighter jets used by the Air Force
THE US Air Force uses four different F-series fighter jets.
Here is an inside look at the top-tier weapons.
F-15 Eagle - This is an extremely maneuverable fighter built to operate in all weather conditions. According to the Air Force, the Eagle can, "penetrate enemy defense and outperform and outright any current enemy aircraft."
F-16 Fighting Falcon - This craft is more compact and can have several roles in the Air Force. It's quick and excels in air-to-air combat. The Falcon, "provides a relatively low-cost, high-performance weapon system for the United States and allied nations."
F-22 Raptor - The Raptor is the pinnacle of US air combat excellence. This model takes a more operational role in the skies with stealth capabilities that are ideal for recon missions. The jet assists multiple military branches and "cannot be matched by any known or projected fighter aircraft."
F-35A Lightning II - This model is an upgraded version of the Air Force's aging fleet of F-16 Fighting Falcons and A-10 Thunderbolt II's. The jets, "bring with it an enhanced capability to survive in the advanced threat environment in which it was designed to operate."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Newsmax and Dominion settle for $67m in defamation suit over US election lies
The conservative outlet Newsmax has agreed to pay $67m to Dominion Voting Systems to settle a defamation lawsuit over lies about voting in the 2020 election. The settlement came as the case was headed to trial. Earlier this year, Delaware superior court judge Eric Davis ruled that Newsmax had defamed the voting technology company by broadcasting false claims about its equipment after the 2020 election. A jury would have considered whether Newsmax was liable for damages. Dominion had sued the outlet for $1.6bn. After the 2020 election, lies about the security of Dominion voting machines, which are widely used in the US, became central to Donald Trump's false claim that the election was stolen from him. Allies and other rightwing personalities made baseless claims that votes had been flipped and that the equipment was not secure. 'We are pleased to have settled this matter,' Dominion said in a statement to CNN. In a lengthy statement of its own, Newsmax was defiant, saying it chose to settle not because it was admitting wrongdoing, but because it believed Davis wouldn't give the company a fair trial. 'Newsmax believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020,' the company said. 'We stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism.' Newsmax will be paying the settlement in three instalments until January 2027. Dominion obtained a $787.5m defamation settlement from Fox in 2023 on the eve of a defamation trial in Delaware. Ahead of the settlement, Dominion lawyers obtained internal communications from Fox hosts and personalities that showed they knew many of the outlandish claims the outlets hosts and guests were broadcasting about the election were not true. Newsmax agreed to pay $40m to settle a defamation case against Smartmatic, another voting equipment company, last year. One America News, another far-right outlet, also settled a defamation case with Smartmatic last year. Fox is now defending itself in a pending defamation suit against Smartmatic.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Orders down: DC area restaurants feeling the squeeze as Trump's police takeover decreases foot traffic
Restaurant reservations in Washington, D.C., were down nearly 25 percent, on average, this past week after President Donald Trump announced the federal government would largely take control of the nation's capital to reduce crime. Seated reservations declined 16 percent on August 11, the day Trump announced he would deploy approximately 800 National Guard members and directed local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration law enforcement officials, according to data collected by OpenTable. The pattern continued in the days after, with reservations down 27 percent on August 12, 31 percent on August 13, 29 percent on August 14, and 25 percent on August 15, compared to the same time last year. D.C. had the most significant decline in reservations compared to any U.S. state, including nearby Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware. Over the weekend, seated reservations were down 20 percent on August 16 and 21 percent on August 17 – indicating that the heavy presence of National Guard members, FBI agents, Drug Enforcement Administration agents, ICE agents, and officials from the Bureau of Tobacco, Alcohol, and Explosives appears to have reduced foot traffic. The decline in reservations coincides with D.C.'s Restuarant Week in which some restaurants offer a three-course prix fixe menu, allowing people to try expensive or exclusive restaurants at a discounted rate. But with a heavy presence of federal law enforcement conducting immigration raids, dismantling homeless encampments, and arresting individuals, it's unclear if residents will be inclined to step downtown and try new restaurants. That may be heightened if more National Guard troops are deployed to D.C. and carry weapons, displaying an intimidating image of power and control in D.C. Recent reports indicate that troops are anticipating an order from the Defense Department to carry weapons. No formal order has been given yet. But more National Guard troops can be expected with West Virginia, South Carolina, and Ohio delivering anywhere from 150 to 400 troops to the nation's capital. Trump's stated reason for the increased federal law enforcement presence is to curtail crime in D.C., which he has characterized as out of control and violent. However, statistics indicate violent crime has dramatically declined in the city since it hit two-decade-high in 2023. Despite various reports indicating the D.C. crime rate is down, Trump has continued to push his narrative claiming, on Monday, that the city gave 'fake crime numbers in order to create a false illusion of safety.' There is no evidence at this time that the Metropolitan Police Department in D.C. gave 'fake' numbers. But the president continued to assert that his decision to declare a crime emergency in D.C. has made it 'the safest' city. Attorney General Pam Bondi said that there have been more than 400 arrests since last week when federal law enforcement descended upon the city, 'People are flocking to D.C. again, and soon, the beautification will begin!' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Monday.
The Independent
16 minutes ago
- The Independent
Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital ads violated Big Tech's free speech, judges say
Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital advertising violated the Constitution, a federal appeals court says, because blocking Big Tech from telling customers about the tax violates the companies' right to free speech. Supporters say Maryland needed to overhaul its tax methods in response to significant changes in how businesses advertise. The tax focuses on large companies that make money advertising on the internet such as Meta, Google and Amazon, who say they're being unfairly targeted. The ongoing legal fight is being watched by other states that are considering taxes for online ads. Maryland estimated the tax could raise about $250 million a year to help pay for a sweeping K-12 education measure. Maryland's law says the companies must not only pay the tax, but avoid telling customers how it affects pricing, with no line items, surcharges or fees, said the appeals court Friday in siding with trade associations fighting the tax. Judge Julius Richardson cited the Colonial-era Stamp Act, which helped spark the Revolutionary War, and wrote that 'criticizing the government — for taxes or anything else — is important discourse in a democratic society.' The plaintiffs contended Maryland lawmakers were trying to insulate themselves from criticism and political accountability by forbidding companies from explaining the tax to their customers. 'A state cannot duck criticism by silencing those affected by its tax,' the judge wrote. The unanimous ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reverses a decision by U.S. District Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby and sends the case back to her with instructions to consider an appropriate remedy in light of the panel's decision. Trade groups praised the decision. 'Maryland tried to prevent criticism of its tax scheme, and the Fourth Circuit recognized that tactic for what it was: censorship,' said Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, said in a statement. The law imposes a tax based on global annual gross revenues for companies that make more than $100 million globally. Under the law, the tax rate is 2.5% for businesses making more than $100 million in global gross annual revenue; 5% for companies making $1 billion or more; 7.5% for companies making $5 billion or more and 10% for companies making $15 billion or more. The law has been challenged in multiple legal venues, including Maryland Tax Court, where the case is ongoing. The Maryland General Assembly, which is controlled by Democrats, overrode a veto of the legislation in 2021 by then-Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican.
