Nextracker achieves 10 GW Solar Tracker milestone in India
Hyderabad, May 28 (UNI) Nextracker, a global leader in advanced solar energy solutions, on Wednesday announced that it has surpassed 10 gigawatts (GW) of solar tracker deployments in India—a major milestone reinforcing its market leadership and the country's accelerating solar adoption.
Nextracker is expanding its footprint with a new 80,000 sq. ft. office and research and development (R&D) facility in Hyderabad, reinforcing its long-term commitment serving customers throughout the region and India's clean energy future, the company said in a release here..
With 1.8 GW of projects added in the last quarter alone, Nextracker's India portfolio now totals over 10 GW, underscoring strong momentum in solar adoption.
Recent project wins include a 305 MW project with ReNew in Anantapur (Andhra Pradesh), along with 1.5 GW of projects through partnerships with key EPCs (engineering, procurement, and construction companies) across the country—highlighting Nextracker's expanding presence in India's high-growth solar regions.
Speaking on the partnership with Nextracker for the Anantapur project, Sanjay Varghese, Group President – Solar Projects & Manufacturing, ReNew, said, 'As we continue to expand our footprint in renewable energy, such collaborations help in driving project efficiency and contributing to the sector's broader goals.'
To further strengthen its presence in the world's third-largest solar power market, Nextracker inaugurated its largest office outside the United States. The new Hyderabad hub integrates R&D, testing, and workforce development under one roof, featuring a 13-acre Center for Solar Excellence (CFSE) cutting-edge R&D and testing laboratory. Supported by a USD $1 million investment, the CFSE is dedicated to advancing local solar technology and training in India..
Building on its existing workforce of over 400 employees in India, Nextracker is accelerating its hiring efforts across engineering, manufacturing, and customer support. The Hyderabad facility will also focus on skill development initiatives to nurture local expertise in advanced solar technology and project execution.
Under the 'Make in India' initiative, 95 percent of Nextracker's tracker components used in India are manufactured domestically. This localization supports supply chain resilience, energy security, and technology localization, enabling Indian solar developers to access industry-leading, climate-resilient solutions tailored to the country's unique energy landscape and conditions.
Rajeev Kashyap, Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Nextracker (Middle East, Africa, and India) said, 'With 10 GW of projects commissioned or under delivery, we are equipping developers with best-in-class technology optimized for the country's diverse needs, while investing in local talent, infrastructure, and innovation to meet the country's renewable energy goals.'
'Nextracker's investment in advanced manufacturing is not only a significant milestone for the company, but also an important moment for India's broader renewable energy ecosystem,' said Subrahmanyam Pulipaka, CEO, National Solar Energy Federation of India (NSEFI).
'At NSEFI, we believe India's next phase of solar growth will be driven by innovation, resilience, and self-reliance,' Pulipaka added.
UNI KNR GNK
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
4 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Chennai-based Lalithaa Jewellery Mart files DRHP for Rs 1,700 crore IPO to fuel southern expansion
Lalithaa Jewellery Mart, a Chennai-headquartered jewellery retailer offering gold, silver, and diamond jewellery designed for southern Indian markets, has filed its Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP) with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to raise Rs 1,700 crore through an initial public offering (IPO). ADVERTISEMENT The proposed Rs 1,700 crore IPO comprises a fresh issue of up to Rs 1,200 crore and an offer-for-sale (OFS) of Rs 500 crore by promoter M. Kiran Kumar Jain. The company also plans a reservation for eligible employees with a bidding discount and may undertake a pre-IPO placement of up to 20% of the fresh issue size, which would proportionally reduce the fresh issue. Proceeds from the fresh issue will be primarily deployed towards capital expenditure for setting up new stores in India, amounting to Rs 1,014.50 crore, with the balance allocated for general corporate purposes, the company said in its filing. The issue will follow the book-building process, allocating no more than 50% of the net offer to qualified institutional buyers (QIBs), and reserving at least 15% and 35% for non-institutional investors and retail individual investors, respectively. The company proposes to list its shares on the National Stock Exchange of India and BSE Ltd. Founded in 1985, Lalithaa Jewellery Mart opened its first store in Chennai's T. Nagar, a hub for silk and jewellery retail. The company operates 56 stores across southern India's Tier I, II, and III cities, including 22 in Andhra Pradesh, 20 in Tamil Nadu, seven in Karnataka, six in Telangana, and one in Puducherry, spanning a total operational area of 6,09,408 sq. ft. As of December 31, 2024, 47 of these stores each cover more than 5,000 sq. ft. According to a CRISIL report cited in the DRHP, Lalithaa Jewellery Mart recorded the highest operating revenue per store among key organised jewellery players in India between fiscal years 2022 and 2024. It is also ranked the second fastest growing regional jewellery player based on operating revenue growth during the same period, posting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 43.62%. ADVERTISEMENT The company's jewellery schemes, 'Dhana Vandhanam' and 'Free-yo-Flexi,' have attracted repeat customers, with 420,261 active enrolments as of December 31, 2024. Lalithaa Jewellery Mart runs two manufacturing units in Tamil Nadu, one at Thirumudivakkam, Chennai, and another at Maraimalai, Kanchipuram, the latter through its wholly owned subsidiary Asita Manufacturing Private Limited. From December 2024, operations commenced at the Thirumudivakkam facility. The company employs a total of 563 Karigars across both manufacturing units. ADVERTISEMENT The company also operates one of India's largest jewellery stores in Vijayawada, with a carpet area of 1,00,000 sq. ft., alongside large-format stores in Somajiguda (98,210 sq. ft.) and Vishakhapatnam (65,000 sq. ft.), making them among the largest jewellery retail outlets in the country, according to Lalithaa Jewellery Mart reported a 26.07% increase in restated consolidated revenue from Rs 13,316.80 crore in fiscal 2023 to Rs 16,788.05 crore in fiscal 2024, driven by the rise in store count from 47 to 53, higher gold rates, and increased gold sales. For the nine months ended December 31, 2024, the company posted revenue of Rs 12,594.67 crore and profit after tax of Rs 262.33 crore. ADVERTISEMENT The Indian gems and jewellery retail industry was valued at Rs 6.49 trillion in fiscal 2024 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 13–14% to reach Rs 12–12.2 trillion by fiscal 2029. South India remains the largest jewellery-consuming region, accounting for 38–43% of the country's overall jewellery Rathi Advisors and Equirus Capital are the book-running lead managers for the issue, while MUFG Intime India serves as registrar. ADVERTISEMENT Also read | IPO calendar: 4 new issues, 1 listing lined up in a busy mid-June week (Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
How did things get from bad to worse between Donald Trump and Elon Musk? A step-by-step guide
A no-holds-barred and very public blow-up between the world's richest man and the president of the United States has had social media agog in recent days, with each making serious accusations against the other. And while tech billionaire Elon Musk appears to have cooled the spat somewhat – deleting some of his more incendiary social media posts about Donald Trump – the president still appears to be in no mood to make up, warning Musk of 'very serious consequences' if he backs Democrats at the mid-term elections in 2026. Tensions erupted over Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' (OBBB). The OBBB proposes extensive tax cuts which could add roughly USD 3 trillion (AUD 4.62 trillion) to the US national debt. After stepping down from his role as advisor to Trump, Musk criticised the OBBB as 'disgusting abomination' that would 'burden America [sic] citizens with crushing unsustainable debt'. Trump returned fire, suggesting 'Elon was 'wearing thin', I asked him to leave […] and he just went CRAZY!'. In a dramatic escalation, Musk responded by calling for Trump's impeachment. Musk also tweeted allegations that Trump was implicated in the Epstein files related to child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. He has since deleted those tweets. Why has the much-hyped 'bromance' between Musk and Trump suddenly ended? And what was the basis of their alliance in the first place? Like many billionaires, Musk had previously been hesitant to get involved in frontline politics. He says he voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Joe Biden in 2020, but claimed in 2021 'I would prefer to stay out of politics'. In early 2024, Musk was still claiming to be politically non-aligned, suggesting he would not donate to either presidential campaign. This apparent neutrality ended following the attempted assassination of Trump at a July 2024 campaign rally, with Musk immediately endorsing Trump. In reality, Musk's conversion to the MAGA movement long predated the assassination attempt. Musk's hyperactive Twitter/X account shows a steady radicalisation. Across 2020-2024, Musk engaged with accounts sharing MAGA and far-right conspiracy theories. These include the antisemitic Great Replacement Theory, and the related South African white genocide conspiracy. Musk's posts also show the obsession with opposing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies characteristic of the MAGA movement. After endorsing Trump, Musk spent USD 288 million (AUD 444 million) supporting Trump's election and appeared at campaign events around the country. Musk's support for Trump was both ideological and pragmatic. From tax cuts to immigration restrictions to opposing DEI, there were clearly many ideological commonalities between Musk and Trump. There were also clear practical benefits for both men. Trump gained the financial backing of the world's wealthiest man. Musk gained not only unparalleled access to the US president, but also a role leading the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Early reporting on the second Trump presidency noted the omnipresence of Musk, who at one point moved into Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort to be close to the president. However, observers were sceptical about the potential effectiveness of DOGE, and Musk's claim it would save the government USD 2 trillion (AUD 3.02 trillion). In the early months of the Trump administration, Musk cut government programmes and employees at a remarkable rate. The USAID programme was particularly hard hit, as were the Department of Education and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. As the spending cuts picked up pace, Musk began to attract more controversy. Critics questioned the apparent power wielded by the unelected billionaire. Musk's ties to the far right were also in the spotlight after he appeared to perform two 'Roman salutes', which many observers believed to be a Nazi salute. Musk's apparent rampage through government did not last long. As Trump's executive appointees assumed control of their departments, Musk and DOGE experienced increasing resistance. After a series of fractious cabinet meetings, Trump reportedly reduced the power of DOGE in March. Political attention was also clearly affecting Musk's businesses. The negative publicity has significantly damaged the Tesla brand, leading to declining sales around the world and repeated falls in Telsa's share price. On May 1, Musk announced he would be leaving DOGE, claiming the department had saved the government USD 180 billion (AUD 277 billion) in spending. This number is likely an exaggeration, but still falls well short of his original target. Musk has learned a harsh lesson in politics – that the complexities of government resist simple reform and cannot be easily rolled back in the way a CEO might slim down a company. For Trump, his manoeuvring of Musk appears to be another smart political move. As the public face of DOGE, Musk bore the negative rap for early government cuts and chaos. Having used his money and reputation, Trump dispensed with Musk as he has with so many advisers and appointees before. Musk departed his role in a muted White House ceremony, where Trump thanked him for his service and presented him with a ceremonial 'golden key' to the White House. However, behind the public show of civility, tension was brewing over Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill. Trump and Musk had originally claimed the USD 2 trillion (AUD 3.02 trillion) in DOGE savings could be used to fund a substantial tax cut. With the efficiency savings not eventuating, Musk worried the OBBB would significantly increase US public debt. Unable to convince Trump or other Republican legislators, Musk took to X, launching a 'Kill the Bill' campaign that ultimately led to his incendiary showdown with Trump. For his part, Trump has belittled Musk, suggesting Musk only opposed the OBBB because it cut subsidies for electric vehicles. Though the subsidy cuts will affect Tesla, Musk has previously supported eliminating subsidies. Musk's anger at the OBBB is more likely driven by the realisation he has been played by Trump. Trump has used and discarded many other powerful figures in his chaotic political career. Musk has more power than most, and might be able to strike back at Trump. Yet, with his public reputation and brands already tarnished, Musk would be ill-advised to pick further fights with Trump and his adoring MAGA movement. Accordingly, Musk has indicated over the weekend he is open to a détente. Tesla investors will no doubt be relieved if Musk makes good on his pledge to step back from politics and return to his businesses. More concerning are the prospects for democracy. With wealth and power continuing to concentrate in a handful of billionaires, voters appear reduced to the role of viewers forced to watch the reality TV drama unfold. Though Trump appears to have won this round of billionaire battle royale, whatever happens next, democracy is the real loser.
Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
China's rare earth export curbs are India's wake-up call
The US-China trade war has opened a fresh front, now impacting Indian industry in a big way. China's curbs on exports of rare earth magnets—processed from rare earth elements (REEs)—have disrupted supply chains, particularly in the country's automobile sector. The development also underscores why India must urgently reduce its dependence on China by ramping up domestic exploration and refining of its own rare earth reserves. In April, Beijing imposed export restrictions on seven REEs in retaliation for US tariff hikes. Importers were forced to navigate a complex licensing system, triggering delays and shortages worldwide. Indian firms have faced stiffer restrictions than many others, Mint reported last week. China dominates the global rare earths industry, mining 46% of REEs and refining 74% as of 2024, according to the International Energy Agency. These 17 metals are essential for everything from electric vehicles and fighter jets to smartphones and MRI scanners. Given the high costs of extraction, China has built a commanding lead in the sector over decades. India, despite having the world's third-largest rare earth reserves—estimated at 6.9 million metric tonnes—mines only a small portion. The country has remained heavily import-dependent, with China as the primary supplier. India's position This isn't the first time China has used REEs as a geopolitical lever. In 2010, it briefly cut off exports to Japan during a territorial standoff. The latest curbs serve as a timely reminder for India to move faster in securing its access to these critical materials. Some steps have been taken. Under the National Critical Mineral Mission (NCMM), launched in January 2025 with a ₹16,300 crore outlay over seven years, REEs have been identified as one of 30 critical minerals. Their production and import have been made a national priority. In March, for the first time, the REE sector was opened to private investment. A Reuters report noted that the government plans to introduce fiscal incentives for domestic production in response to the current disruption. But more must be done. A 2020 Exim Bank working paper identified key gaps. Chief among them is India's limited refining and processing capacity, which has long hamstrung efforts to tap domestic reserves. Greater investment in R&D is also needed to develop alternatives for critical minerals, the report said. India must also look outward—by enabling joint mining ventures and helping Indian firms acquire assets abroad. This strategy has been adopted by countries like the US and Japan. As the global push to reduce Chinese dominance in the sector gathers pace, India could emerge as a viable alternative supplier—though the transition will take time. China's own dominance took nearly two decades to build after it began prioritizing REE development in the 1980s. What next? Demand for rare earths is set to soar as the global economy pivots toward decarbonization and electrification. According to the IEA's Critical Minerals Outlook 2025, demand stood at 91 kilotonnes in 2024 and could nearly double to 178 kilotonnes by 2050. Clean energy will be the main driver, with REE demand from this segment expected to rise from 20% today to over 33% by 2050. 'Growing demand for permanent magnets, particularly from EVs and wind power, boosts the need for magnet rare earths," the IEA report noted. Read this | EV industry, government struggle to find alternatives as China throttles rare earth magnet supply While demand is set to rise sharply, the biggest vulnerability remains China's dominance—and its willingness to weaponize supply chains. Australia is expected to emerge as a key supplier over the next decade. Meanwhile, India and Central Asian nations—including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan—have expressed interest in joint exploration of rare earths and other critical minerals. Such efforts may not yield immediate results, but could gradually chip away at China's grip over the global supply.
