Could Putin attack Britain by blocking the SUN? Fears hostile actors might deploy 'weather weapons' as ministers order probe into 'risks'
There are fears hostile actors such as Russia could make use of solar engineering technology to reflect light away from the earth and back into space.
The concept - using techniques such as deploying aerosols into the atmosphere to reflect light back into space - has been mooted as a way of limiting global warming.
However, experts say that comes with major risks - and concerns have been raised within government that it could be abused by 'an independent or third-party actor'.
Net Zero minister Kerry McCarthy wrote in a letter: 'The UK is a longstanding leader on climate action and an active international collaborator in scientific research.
'The Government recognises the need to understand the risks and impacts of [solar radiation modification] approaches that could be deployed by an independent or third-party actor.'
In the letter seen by The Telegraph, she added: 'Robust scientific evidence is essential for informing responsible and inclusive governance.'
Aria - the government's advanced research and invention agency - has allocated £50million in funding for outdoor field trials, which include brightening clouds to reflect sunshine
Matt Ince, associate director at Dragonfly Intelligence, said Vladimir Putin's Russia was 'increasingly expanding its use of hybrid warfare activities'.
He cautioned geoengineering may be seen as a desirable option due to its 'relative affordability' and the 'feasibility of conducting it' and added some sort of intentionally orchestrated environmental disaster' is an 'avenue that Russia may pursue'.
Such tactics could 'create chaos and a sense of discord, and force countries to become more inward focussed'.
It comes as more than 560 academics have signed an open letter calling for an 'international non-use agreement' on solar geoenginering.
The letter states that without the limits the resulting geopolitics could be 'frightening and inequitable'.
Aria - the government's advanced research and invention agency - has allocated £50million in funding for outdoor field trials, which include brightening clouds to reflect sunshine.
However, the government is not proposing to deploy it for 'climate cooling'.
An Aria spokesman said: 'In line with the Government's position on SRM deployment, Aria is not funding deployment, and does not support, the deployment of any climate cooling approaches.'
The agency aims to 'unlock scientific and technological breakthroughs that benefit everyone'.
'We empower scientists and engineers to pursue research that is too speculative, too hard, or too interdisciplinary to pursue elsewhere,' it says on its website.
The research agency was originally the brainchild of Dominic Cummings, Boris Johnson's former chief aide, and was set up in 2021 by ex-Tory business secretary Kwasi Kwarteng.
The body, based in London, has been given a staggering £800million budget – of taxpayers' cash – to go towards 'high-risk, high-reward' scientific research.
A Government spokesman said: 'The government is not in favour of using solar radiation modification, but we support cautious, controlled research aimed at improving our understanding of its risks and impacts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reeves' new homes levy slammed as a ‘tax on ordinary Londoners' that will hit families hardest
Rachel Reeves ' plans for a new property tax on homes worth over £500,000 have been slammed as a 'tax on ordinary Londoners' that will hit families hardest. The chancellor is reportedly considering a shake-up that will see homeowners taxed on the sale of properties over the £500,000 threshold, with buyers then forced to pay a yearly tax on their value. It would replace the current stamp duty regime for first homes, which sees buyers pay a tax on the value of properties over £125,000, or £300,000 for first-time buyers. But Simon Gerrard, an estate agent who has long campaigned to reform stamp duty, warned it would amount to a 'London tax'. Speaking to The Independent, Mr Gerrard, chairman of Martyn Gerrard Estate Agents, said: 'Rightmove's latest figures for August show that the average price of a property in London is now £666,983. Upping taxes for properties over £500K is not making the wealthy pay their fair share, it's a tax on ordinary Londoners. 'It's already nearly impossible for normal people to start a family in London as it is. This London tax will only make it harder.' He said the threshold for the potential tax change should be significantly higher than £500,000 in London, or Labour would fail in its mission to support working people. He also warned that the potential tax change could distort the property market for homes worth around £500,000. Mr Gerrard warned: 'You're going to see a ceiling at the £500,000 threshold for that band of the market, as people avoid falling under the regime, and then a significant jump in values with nothing in between. 'Prices above £500,000 will skyrocket as sellers account for the losses caused by the tax that used to be paid by the buyer.' Currently, stamp duty is paid by those buying homes over £125,000, or £300,000 for first-time buyers. A first-time buyer purchasing a £500,000 home to live in would pay £10,000 of stamp duty under the current rules. If adopted, the new levy would be paid by owner-occupiers when they sell a home worth more than £500,000. The amount would be based on the property's value, with the rate set centrally and collected by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). It would not replace stamp duty on second homes. Then, anyone having purchased a home worth more than £500,000 would pay an annual tax on the property under the proposals. It is believed the plans are aimed at targeting the financial gains made by property owners due to the huge increase in house prices. But critics warned it could push up asking prices for properties above the £500,000 threshold, with sellers looking to offset the payment of the tax. Ministers have already been briefed on the proposals, which could be rolled out during this parliament, The Guardian reports. Under one option, a national property levy would replace stamp duty on owner-occupied homes. In the longer term, a second stage could see a local property tax replace council tax, a move designed to repair the finances of struggling local authorities. No final decisions have been made, and Treasury sources stressed that while a national levy could be implemented in the coming years, reform of council tax would take longer and would probably depend on Labour winning a second term. The review reflects growing pressure on the chancellor to introduce more wealth-based taxes. Labour's deputy leader, Angela Rayner, has already urged Ms Reeves to consider measures that target property wealth, and Ms Reeves is under pressure to raise revenue without breaking Labour's pledge not to increase taxes on working people. The average house price in the UK was £272,664 in July, according to Nationwide. Current stamp duty receipts from primary residences vary significantly depending on the housing market, raising £11.6bn last year. Treasury officials believe a national property tax would be a more stable source of income and would eventually raise a similar amount. Unlike stamp duty, which currently applies to around 60 per cent of home sales and is paid by buyers, the new levy would affect only about a fifth of transactions. The proposals are informed by a 48-page report published last year by the centre-right think tank Onward. Written by Dr Tim Leunig, a former government adviser who helped devise the furlough scheme during the Covid pandemic, it set out a dual national and local 'proportional property tax' based on property values. Dr Leunig wrote: 'These proposals would make it easier and cheaper to move house, for a better job, or to be near family, as well as being fairer. It should not be the case that a terrace house in Burnley pays more than a mansion in Kensington – and it wouldn't be under these proposals.' A Treasury spokesman said: 'The best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy – which is our focus. Changes to tax and spend policy are not the only ways of doing this, as seen with our planning reforms, which are expected to grow the economy by £6.8bn and cut borrowing by £3.4bn 'We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last Autumn's Budget, we protected working people's payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of Income Tax, employee National Insurance, or VAT.'
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Urgent warning to close ‘loophole' within online age checks
England's children 's commissioner, Dame Rachel de Souza, has urged the government to prevent children from using virtual private networks (VPNs) to bypass age verification on pornography websites. Her new report reveals a rise in children accessing online pornography, with 70 per cent of respondents having seen it before age 18, up from 64 per cent two years ago. The report highlights that 59 per cent of children and young people encountered pornography online accidentally, suggesting harmful content is pushed by algorithms rather than sought out. VPNs allow users to mask their location, enabling them to circumvent age checks introduced by the Online Safety Act on adult content platforms. While the government states VPNs are legal for adults and will not be banned, it warns platforms that promote workarounds for children will face severe penalties and fines.
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Woman who was sexually assaulted by passenger on flight to London is refused compensation - despite her attacker being jailed for six years
A woman who was sexually assaulted as she slept on an airplane has been denied compensation from a government scheme - because the plane she flew on was registered abroad. The woman, who cannot be identified for legal reasons but is being referred to by her lawyers as Kelly, was attacked on a Qatar Airways flight from Doha to Gatwick last September. Her attacker, Momade Jussab, was detained on landing and charged with one count of sexual assault by penetration and two counts of sexual assault, for which he was found guilty after a trial and jailed for six and a half years in May. However, Kelly's bid for compensation from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme (CICS) - a taxpayer-funded redress initiative for victims of crime - that would have helped pay for therapy after the attack was turned down. The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, which administers the scheme on behalf of the Ministry of Justice, said the attack did not take place in a 'relevant place' - namely, on British territory. Current rules dictate that aircraft are only deemed 'relevant places' if they are registered in Britain - but the jet bore a Qatari registration. Kelly's lawyers are calling for justice secretary Shabana Mahmood to update the rules so they are in line with current legislation on aircraft offences. The Civil Aviation Act was only changed 30 years ago to allow offences committed on foreign planes to be tried in British courts. But the rules on the compensation scheme have not caught up. Have you been denied CICS compensation? Email: Kelly, who is in her 20s, from London, said: 'I do not understand why I, and other victims like me, have been excluded from the CIC Scheme. 'I was attacked on a flight en route to the UK, I am a UK citizen, and this crime was investigated and prosecuted by British authorities. 'I should be entitled to compensation, and being excluded from the scheme is unfair and illogical. 'I am still suffering with the effects of the attack and want to move forward with my life.' She told BBC News that she had awoken on the flight in the darkened cabin coming back from a trip to Africa to find Jussab, 66, putting his hand down her trousers. He had covered them both with a blanket to hide what he was doing from other passengers. 'I said to him, "What are you doing?" I said, "Stop",' she said. 'He said, "No, please". And I had to force his hand out of my trousers and that just made me get up straight away. 'I left my phone, I left my bag, I left my passport, I left everything. I left my shoes and ran into the toilet, left the door open (and) told the flight attendant.' She was moved elsewhere in the cabin - but remained terrified she would encounter Jussab again. But he was arrested on landing, and jailed for six and a half years at Lewes Crown Court in May as part of an extended sentence - meaning he must serve at least two thirds before he will be eligible for parole. However, Kelly remains traumatised by the incident, and had hoped to use the award from the CICS to seek professional counselling from a therapist. She added: 'I understand that he's been sentenced and he's done what he's done and he's paying the price for that. But what about me? I can't afford certain therapy. 'I just want to be compensated for what I've been through. I want professional help and I want to be heard.' Law firm Leigh Day, which is representing Kelly, has written to Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, urging her to close what it believes is a gap in the law. The letter points out that, had Kelly been on a UK-registered plane, she would be eligible for compensation. Its solicitor Claire Powell said: 'Our client suffered an horrific sexual attack on a UK-bound flight. 'She was refused compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation scheme simply because it was a foreign flight and the rules have not been amended in line with the updates to the Civil Aviation Act. 'It is a gap that needs closing urgently and we trust the Justice Secretary will agree, particularly in light of this Government's commitment to addressing violence against women and girls.' The CICS makes payments of between £1,000 and £250,000 for both physical and mental injuries resulting from crimes affecting either an individual or their loved one, with a maximum payout across multiple claims of £500,000. Its rules are approved by Parliament, meaning any potential changes to the scheme must be given the nod by MPs. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'Our thoughts remain with this victim, and we remain resolute in our mission to halve violence against women and girls in a decade. 'The rules that the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority follows, and the values of payments for injuries, are set by Parliament. Other routes are available for victims to receive support.'
