Indiana National Guard hopes active duty, tuition help bill can staunch enlistment losses
Indiana's National Guard has 'never been more ready,' per Adjutant General Larry Muennich.
Citizen-soldiers have deployed during recent storms, to the U.S.-Mexico border and to the Middle East. But the guard has also struggled.
The force recorded a whopping 38% decline in enlistments from 2019 to 2023, Muennich told a Senate panel on Tuesday. And 77% of Hoosier youth aren't qualified for service, whether because of education levels, medical standards, criminal history or other reasons.
'While there are signs of a modest recovery this year, our ability to attract the next generation of talent remains a significant challenge,' Muennich said. 'This bill will help address our challenges.'
The Indiana Army and Air National Guard's volunteer force is about 12,000 strong, according to Muennich. Members have dual roles: both Indiana's governor and the U.S. president can call them into active duty for emergency help.
House Bill 1111 would add soldiers on state active duty to the definition of a state employee for death benefit and worker's compensation laws.
It would increase the payout cap on reasonable funeral expenses to $20,000 from $8,800 and delete detailed, guard-specific processes for injury claims. A fiscal analysis said those claims are already paid from worker's compensation funds, so the simplifications wouldn't add costs.
Additionally, the legislation would let the adjutant general procure health insurance for members ordered to state active duty. Current law only lets the officeholder provide allowances to cover insurance premiums, according to the fiscal analysis.
'This bill helps protect soldiers and airmen who are often in harm's way during state active duty,' Muennich told lawmakers.
Other provisions would benefit student-soldiers.
High-schooler Leonardo Martinez wanted to be the first from his immigrant family to serve his new country — and chose Indiana's National Guard for its educational perks.
The 18-year-old, who called himself a 'proud' member of the guard, told lawmakers that his friends were more reluctant to join. He said members may struggle to balance guard service and officer training with school and work — and to afford to do it all.
'I feel like this would help us reach those Hoosiers,' Martinez said.
Guard members who are 21st Century Scholars would win in House Bill 1111. That state program covers tuition to Indiana colleges for foster children and low-income Hoosiers who meet academic requirements. Lawmakers recently allowed the program to auto-enroll eligible students, but before that, they had to sign up as middle-schoolers.
Under the proposal, scholars would be able to use guard grants to pay up to $5,000 for room and board, plus other approved expenses, for two years. That could increase or shift expenditures by $250,000 in the first year and $500,000 annually, at full utilization, according to the fiscal analysis.
Martinez said that's a 'great' idea.
But he asked lawmakers to consider expanding the provision further. He said he was unaware of the 21st Century program as a middle-schooler. His mother, meanwhile, didn't understand how to navigate the website and application process because of a 'language barrier.'
The legislation also would let members apply for guard tuition supplement scholarships and use the awards on credentialing programs, apprenticeships and more for 'in demand occupations' determined by the adjutant general and Department of Workforce Development. The fiscal analysis said that could increase or shift scholarship expenditures by up to $400,000 annually.
The panel advanced the bill on a unanimous, 7-0 vote. It next heads to the Senate floor.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
35 minutes ago
- New York Times
Where D.C. Crime Is Bad, Residents Question Trump's Motives
In the Congress Heights neighborhood in the southeast corner of Washington, D.C., where there have been several murders and more than a dozen robberies so far this year, residents have greeted President Trump's promise of liberation from crime with a mix of skepticism, suspicion and outright derision. It's not that they don't believe crime is a problem in the nation's capital. They know it is. They just don't believe the president cares — at least not about them. If he did, they asked, why are residents hearing of federal agents roving the whiter areas of 16th Street Northwest but less so in their largely Black neighborhood? Why are National Guard members posing with tourists at the Washington Monument? 'If Trump is genuinely concerned about safety of D.C. residents, I would see National Guard in my neighborhood,' said Karen Lake, 62, a lawyer who has lived in Congress Heights since 2017, in the far eastern corner of the diamond-shaped district. 'I'm not seeing it, and I don't expect to see it. I don't think Trump is bringing in the National Guard to protect Black babies in Southeast.' Mr. Trump might have found a more sympathetic audience in the distant Southeastern quadrant of the city, far away from the National Mall, the White House, or the restaurants and clubs of 16th Street and 14th Street, where a young employee of the Department of Government Efficiency recently was beaten in an assault that raised the city's criminal profile to presidential level. In neighborhoods such as Congress Heights and Washington Highlands, where the District of Columbia abuts Prince Georges County, Md., the city's Black working class struggles with the twin challenges that have diminished the ranks of what was once, when Washington still had a majority Black population, affectionately called Chocolate City. There's crime, for sure, but also gentrification driving Black residents into suburban Maryland and Virginia. In Ward 8, where Congress Heights is found, there have been 38 homicides this year, according to data from the District of Columbia government. That's almost 10 times as many as Ward 2, where the National Mall is located. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Leaders of Katrina recovery reflect on hurricane, plan for future readiness
NEW ORLEANS (WGNO) — From government leaders to military leaders, each brought memories of the days following Katrina. Benny Rousselle was the Plaquemines Parish president. 'It's depressing for me to reminisce about it. As I went through my notes for tonight's event, I started looking and reading all of the notes that I wrote in my notepad, and I got a little depressed,' Rousselle said. Gulf dead zone over 4,700 square miles They say that being able to see New Orleans thrive 20 years later is something they'll never take for granted. Gen. Russel Honore, retired Army, brought a sense of security to residents, as he lead National Guard troops into the city. 'My dream while I was working Katrina, was that there would be another Super Bowl; that they would have Mardi Gras. I looked at it from the proudest perspective because this city is resilient going back 300 years,' Honore said. While the event was to honor these leaders, some of them, like Walt Leger, who was with the Louisiana Recovery Authority, said honor is not the right word. 'There was nothing to honor us about. We just all did what we had to do at the time. I'm happy that I had the opportunity to be one of the people to do it, but there's nothing to be honored about. It was almost like going to war,' Leger said. While remembering the past is important, they said it is just as important to prepare for the future and make sure something like Katrina doesn't happen again. '80% of the region evacuated. It's the 20% that didn't evacuate. How do we not leave 20% behind next time? Through cooperative community organizations,' Honore Posts Hot Saturday with afternoon storms ICE officers, impersonators accused of abusing women More than 30K wireless power banks recalled over fire, explosion risk Border Report Live: Coast Guard joins border mission from air, land and sea 3 babies have died of congenital syphilis in New York: What is it? Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
San Francisco Chronicle
6 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's aggressive push to take over DC policing may be a template for an approach in other cities
WASHINGTON (AP) — The left sees President Donald Trump's attempted takeover of Washington law enforcement as part of a multifront march to autocracy — 'vindictive authoritarian rule,' as one activist put it — and as an extraordinary thing to do in rather ordinary times on the streets of the capital. To the right, it's a bold move to fracture the crust of Democratic urban bureaucracy and make D.C. a better place to live. Where that debate settles — if it ever does — may determine whether Washington, a symbol for America in all its granite glory, history, achievement, inequality and dysfunction, becomes a model under the imprint of Trump for how cities are policed, cleaned up and run, or ruined. Under the name of his Making D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force, Trump put some 800 National Guard troops on Washington streets this past week, declaring at the outset, 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals.' Grunge was also on his mind. 'If our capital is dirty, our whole country is dirty, and they don't respect us.' He then upped the stakes by declaring federal control of the district's police department and naming an emergency chief. That set off alarms and prompted local officials to sue to stop the effort. 'I have never seen a single government action that would cause a greater threat to law and order than this dangerous directive,' Police Chief Pamela Smith said. On Friday, the Trump administration partially retreated from its effort to seize control of the Metropolitan Police Department when a judge, skeptical that the president had the authority to do what he tried to do, urged both sides to reach a compromise, which they did — at least for now. Trump's Justice Department agreed to leave Smith in control, while still intending to instruct her department on law enforcement practices. In a new memo, Attorney General Pam Bondi directed the force to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. In this heavily Democratic city, local officials and many citizens did not like the National Guard deployment. At the same time, they acknowledged the Republican president had the right to order it because of the federal government's unique powers in the district. But Trump's attempt to seize formal control of the police department, for the first time since D.C. gained a partial measure of autonomy in the Home Rule Act of 1973, was their red line. When the feds stepped in For sure, there have been times when the U.S. military has been deployed to American streets, but almost always in the face of a riot or a calamitous event like the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Trump's use of force was born of an emergency that he saw and city officials — and many others — did not. A stranger to nuance, Trump has used the language of emergency to justify much of what he's done: his deportations of foreigners, his tariffs, his short-term deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles, and now his aggressive intervention into Washington policing. Washington does have crime and endemic homelessness, like every city in the country. But there was nothing like an urban fire that the masses thought needed to be quelled. Violent crime is down, as it is in many U.S. cities. Washington is also a city about which most Americans feel ownership — or at least that they have a stake. More than 25 million of them visited in 2024, a record year, plus over 2 million people from abroad. It's where middle schoolers on field trips get to see what they learn about in class — and perhaps to dance to pop tunes with the man with the music player so often in front of the White House. Washington is part federal theme park, with its historic buildings and museums, and part downtown, where restaurants and lobbyists outnumber any corporate presence. Neighborhoods range from the places where Jeff Bezos set a record for a home purchase price to destitute streets in economically depressed areas that are also magnets for drugs and crime. In 1968, the capital was a city on fire with riots. Twenty years later, a murder spree and crack epidemic fed the sense of a place out of control. But over the last 30 years, the city's population and its collective wealth have swelled. A cooked-up emergency? Against that backdrop, Philadelphia's top prosecutor, District Attorney Larry Krasner, a Democrat, assailed Trump's moves in Washington. 'You're talking about an emergency, really?' Krasner said, as if speaking with the president. 'Or is it that you're talking about an emergency because you want to pretend everything is an emergency so that you can roll tanks?" In Washington, a coalition of activists called Not Above the Law denounced what they saw as just the latest step by Trump to seize levers of power he has no business grasping. 'The onslaught of lawlessness and autocratic activities has escalated,' said Lisa Gilbert, co-chair of the group and co-president of Public Citizen. 'The last two weeks should have crystallized for all Americans that Donald Trump will not stop until democracy is replaced by vindictive authoritarian rule.' Fifty miles northeast, in the nearest major city, Baltimore's Democratic mayor criticized what he saw as Trump's effort to distract the public from economic pain and 'America's falling standing in the world.' 'Every mayor and police chief in America works with our local federal agents to do great work — to go after gun traffickers, to go after violent organizations,' Brandon Scott said. 'How is taking them off of that job, sending them out to just patrol the street, making our country safer?' But the leader of the D.C. Police Union, Gregg Pemberton, endorsed Trump's intervention — while saying it should not become permanent. 'We stand with the president in recognizing that Washington, D.C., cannot continue on this trajectory,' Pemberton said. From his vantage point, 'Crime is out of control, and our officers are stretched beyond their limits.' The Home Rule Act lets a president invoke certain emergency powers over the police department for 30 days, after which Congress must decide whether to extend the period. Trump's attempt to use that provision stirred interest among some Republicans in Congress in giving him an even freer hand. Among them, Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee drafted a resolution that would eliminate the time limit on federal control. This, he told Fox News Digital, would 'give the president all the time and authority he needs to crush lawlessness, restore order, and reclaim our capital once and for all.' Which raises a question that Trump has robustly hinted at and others are wondering, too: If there is success in the district — at least, success in the president's eyes — what might that mean for other American cities he thinks need to be fixed? Where does — where could — the federal government go next?
