‘I'd do it again', says Grant Shapps over secret Afghan scheme
The senior Tory politician, who was defence secretary when the injunction was first put in place, said the move to keep data breach a secret was 'entirely justified' to protect the lives of thousands of Afghans.
He made his first public comments on the data debacle after it emerged that the leak had also included the details of more than 100 Britons, including spies and members of the special forces.
Sir Grant said he would 'walk over hot coals to protect those guys' and the super-injunction was needed in order to keep people safe.
It was revealed earlier this week when the super-injunction was lifted that a dataset containing the personal information of 25,000 Afghans who had applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) had been released 'in error' in February 2022 by a defence official.
The Tory government became aware of the leak in August 2023 and Sir Ben Wallace, the then defence secretary, made the decision to apply for an injunction.
Sir Grant took over as defence secretary on August 31 2023 and the High Court granted a super-injunction at the start of September.
The government established a covert relocation scheme to bring the affected Afghan soldiers and their family members to the UK, amid fears they could be targeted by the Taliban, at a cost of £7billion.
Around 4,500 people have been brought to the UK or are in transit so far under the secret route.
'Would walk over hot coals to protect those guys'
Sir Grant defended the decision to use a super-injunction to keep the breach and the relocation scheme a secret.
He told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme on Friday morning: 'I would just make this point, that there are things that the state just has to do secretly otherwise you would get to the point where people would say 'well why aren't you releasing the nuclear codes?'
'You simply can't release everything and this was one of those times where, faced with a decision of protecting lives, both Brits and Afghanis, I would do the same thing all over again.
'I would walk over hot coals to protect those guys.'
The use of a super-injunction by the government to keep something so significant a secret has prompted major questions about transparency after Parliament was kept in the dark.
Sir Grant said he was 'surprised' that the super-injunction was kept in place for so long.
He also said he would support the initial defence assessment of the data leak which formed the basis of the super-injunction being handed over to the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament for scrutiny.
Asked the question about sharing the document with the committee, Sir Grant said: 'I will say two things. First of all, yes I would. And secondly this injunction, the super-injunction, was in place for longer than I was defence secretary, so it has been in place a lot longer under the current government than it was under us.
'I am surprised it has lasted quite so long. My expectation was, as the risks start to lessen over time and people are removed from the theatre, from Afghanistan, and measures are taken to protect the Brits on the list, that it would carry on quite so long.
'I'd thought that it was probably going to come to an end last summer or the autumn perhaps at maximum.
'So I am surprised it has taken quite so long and it is absolutely right that those committees are able to look into it properly.'
Sir Grant said he believed the public understood that 'there are times where you simply have to act in the most maximalist way in order to stop people from being murdered and executed and that is quite simply what properly happened in this case'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tasers to be issued to staff in male prisons in government crack down on violence
Tasers are set to be issued to some staff in male prisons as the government attempts to crack down on 'unacceptable' record levels of violence. Specialist officers from the Operational Response and Resilience Unit based in Kidlington, Oxfordshire, and Doncaster, South Yorkshire, will be the first to become equipped with electric stun guns when the pilot launches on Monday. as she attended the base in Kidlington last week. The trial in England and Wales will run until enough data has been collected to determine if Tasers should be more widely used, according to the Ministry of Justice – but Ms Mahmood said she hoped to have updates in the autumn. The launch comes after rates of assaults on prison staff reached record levels last year, rising by 13 per cent in the 12 months up to December 2024, according to government data. There were also 10,496 assaults on staff in the 12 months to September 2024 – a 23 per cent increase from the previous 12 months and a new peak. Unions welcomed the new trial, but called on the government to address the roots of violence in jail. Last week, officers demonstrated how they would use Tasers on violent inmates in scenarios where there is a significant threat to safety – such as hostage situations or riots. Speaking to reporters at the Kidlington base, Ms Mahmood said: 'I inherited a situation with completely unacceptable levels of violence. I'm not willing to tolerate that. I'm determined to do everything I can to keep prison staff safe. 'They have been asking for Tasers to be allowed to be used in our prison estate for years and years and years, and I'm very pleased to have been able to greenlight this trial.' In April this year, Manchester Arena plotter Hashem Abedi targeted prison staff at HMP Frankland with boiling oil and homemade weapons in a planned ambush. Four prison officers were injured at the jail in Brasside, County Durham, with three taken to hospital. 'The incident of Frankland has really forced the pace on further roll-out of these measures,' Ms Mahmood said. Southport killer Axel Rudakubana also allegedly attacked a prison officer at HMP Belmarsh in May by pouring boiling water over them. Union bosses called for officers to be given stab vests and protective equipment, with Ms Mahmood announcing in June that officers would be told to wear body armour at close supervision centres, separation centres and segregation units in the highest categories of prisons in England and Wales. The trial will use the Taser 7 model, which generates 50,000 volts when fired, with the voltage dropping to 1,500 volts on contact with the skin to incapacitate the target. The T7 model is also a two-shot weapon, enabling officers to shoot a second time in the event they miss their target the first time. The Tasers will be worn by officers on their tactical vest in a secure holster, making the weapon visible to inmates as a deterrent, officers told Ms Mahmood last week. They added that the device also collects data – such as how long it was discharged for – which will contribute to the trial. Officers already have access to batons and Pava spray, a synthetic form of pepper spray, in men's prisons in the public sector. The Ministry of Justice announced in April Pava spray is due to be made available 'in limited circumstances' to a select number of specialist staff at the three public sector young offender institutions – including YOI Werrington, Wetherby and Feltham A. The Taser trial is part of a £40 million package announced last month to boost security across the prison estate, including £10 million specifically for anti-drone measures such as new netting and reinforced windows, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) said on Monday. 'Officers will be subject to robust accountability measures, each deployment of a taser will be reviewed,' a spokesperson for the MoJ added. A spokesperson for the Prison Officers' Association (POA) said: 'The POA will always support any initiative that will help protect our members. 'However, as welcome as this initiative is we need to address the reasons why prison officers need Tasers in the first place. 'Violence in our prisons is out of control and apathetic prison managers would rather put the prison regime before the safety of their staff. 'We urgently need action to address overcrowding, understaffing, drugs and the other root causes of prison violence.'
The National
12 minutes ago
- The National
John Swinney and Donald Trump to meet in Aberdeen
JOHN Swinney will use his meeting with Donald Trump to push for stronger US pressure on Israel and to seek trade concessions for key Scottish exports. Swinney is expected to urge the US president to back an immediate and lasting ceasefire in Gaza and increase humanitarian aid access during a meeting on Tuesday. The First Minister is also reported to have accepted an invitation to have dinner with the president on Monday night. Swinney is expected to make the case that the 'blunt human reality' of starvation in the enclave requires urgent international action. READ MORE: John Swinney to discuss 'horrific' Gaza humanitarian crisis with Donald Trump 'There must be an intensification of pressure on Israel,' Swinney said in a BBC interview. 'President Trump is ideally positioned – perhaps uniquely positioned – to ensure safe passage for humanitarian aid and push for a durable ceasefire. The people of Gaza face absolutely unbearable conditions.' Swinney will also press Trump to exclude Scotch whisky from the current 10% US tariff on UK exports. He argued the 'uniqueness' of Scottish whisky production merits special exemption. 'It can only be produced in Scotland. It's not a product that can be produced in any other part of the world," Swinney said. 'So there's a uniqueness about that, which I think means there is a case for it to be taken out of the tariffs arrangement that is now in place. 'Obviously the trade deal with the United States provides a degree of stability for economic connections with the United States, but the application of tariffs is increasing the costs for the Scotch whisky industry. 'So one of my objectives will be to make the case to President Trump that Scotch whiskey should be exempted from those tariffs. 'It's a product that is uniquely produced in Scotland, and it's a product that is much welcomed and supported within the United States. 'And I think there's a really good case for exempting Scotch whisky, and this is an opportunity that I have to put that case to President Trump on behalf of the Scotch whisky industry, which is a significant part of the Scottish economy.' Swinney said the tariffs are currently costing the industry around £4 million each week, describing them as a 'significant burden'. He added that reaching a deal would support economic growth and development in Scotland. 'Obviously, I'll be using every opportunity I have to try to put that across to President Trump," he continued. His interventions come as Prime Minister Keir Starmer meets Trump for broader discussions on the Middle East, the war in Ukraine, and the future of UK-US trade. While a recent UK-US Economic Prosperity Deal eased some barriers, tariffs on British steel remain unresolved. Industry leaders had feared a hike to 50%, but the current 25% rate still poses challenges, particularly with no new agreement following a July 9 deadline set by the Trump administration. READ MORE: Donald Trump to meet John Swinney and Keir Starmer for Gaza talks Downing Street said both governments are working "at pace" to provide long-term certainty for UK industry and deliver tangible benefits to workers on both sides of the Atlantic. Trump is also expected to discuss the war in Ukraine with Starmer, including coordinated efforts to pressure Vladimir Putin to end the invasion. After their meetings in Ayrshire, the pair will travel to Aberdeen for a private engagement. Trump struck a trade deal between the US and EU during his meeting with Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at Turnberry on Sunday. The agreement introduces a 15% tariff on most EU goods entering the US – down from a previously threatened 30% – and includes significant energy commitments.
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Recognising Palestine would not reward Hamas, says Cabinet minister
Recognising Palestine would not 'reward' Hamas, a Cabinet minister has said. Last week, Benjamin Netanyahu claimed Emmanuel Macron would 'reward terror' after he announced that France will recognise Palestine within weeks. But on Monday Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, said the Israeli prime minister was wrong and insisted formal Palestinian statehood must form part of a long-term peace process in the region. It comes as Sir Keir Starmer prepares to recall his Cabinet from its summer break for an emergency meeting on the war as the humanitarian situation in Gaza continues to worsen. In an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Mr Reynolds was asked whether he agreed that immediate recognition would act as a reward for Hamas. He said: 'No, I think that is not the right way to characterise it. I think we all recognise that both Israelis and Palestinians require a two-state solution. No matter how difficult that is, that requires a state to exist on both sides. 'This conflict has clearly been going on for a very long period of time. But the scale of the horrific scenes we are seeing, we've surely got to use this as a moment to move forward on a two-state solution and that is how we want to use recognition.' Mr Macron said formally acknowledging Palestine would contribute to a 'just and lasting peace' in the Middle East. Risk of 'another Iranian proxy' But rebuking his decision hours later, Mr Netanyahu said: 'We strongly condemn President Macron's decision to recognise a Palestinian state next to Tel Aviv in the wake of the October 7 massacre. 'Such a move rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became.' The French president's remarks were also condemned by the White House although Donald Trump, his US counterpart, later said that it 'doesn't matter' what Mr Macron has to say. Sir Keir will press Mr Trump on whether more can be done to end the Gaza conflict at a meeting in Scotland on Monday. But his urging for securing a ceasefire raises the risk of a clash with the US president, who is staunchly opposed to recognition on the grounds that Hamas does not want peace. It emerged on Monday that Sir Keir is preparing to recall his Cabinet despite the summer recess to hold emergency talks on war as aid charities and campaigners warn the humanitarian crisis is worse than ever. Sir Keir has to date resisted calls to follow France by immediately recognising Palestine but is facing pressure from Cabinet ministers including Angela Rayner, his deputy, to do so. A third of Labour MPs signed a letter on Friday saying it was time for 'immediate recognition', a policy move that Ms Rayner is understood to '100 per cent' support. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, and Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, are also understood to be in favour of such a move. Bloomberg reported last week that Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, also wants to see Palestine recognised straight away, a view that is said to be shared by Hilary Benn, the Northern Ireland Secretary. Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, said during a broadcast round last week he was 'deeply, deeply offended' by Israel's actions and was 'desperate' to see Palestine fully recognised. Labour infighting costly at the polls Labour has already been punished by Muslim and Left-wing voters at the ballot box over its initial refusal to call for an immediate ceasefire after the Oct 7 attacks. Five independent MPs were elected at the last general election on a pro-Gaza ticket including Jeremy Corbyn, Sir Keir's predecessor who now sits as an independent MP. Mr Corbyn and Zarah Sultana recently announced the launch of a new hard-Left party to fight Labour nationally. The pair have repeatedly accused Israel of committing 'genocide'. It comes after Sir Keir's tone and language towards Israel hardened significantly in recent weeks. The Prime Minister vowed over the weekend that the UK would evacuate children who required emergency medical aid from Gaza as he condemned a 'humanitarian catastrophe'. He has also said the situation in the region is 'untenable' and repeatedly demands Mr Netanyahu commit to an immediate ceasefire, as well as to delivering aid to the region. In a joint statement issued after a phone call on Friday evening, Mr Macron, Friedrich Merz, the German Chancellor, and Sir Keir said the 'appalling scenes in Gaza are unrelenting'. They also appeared to criticise Israel over the 'starvation and denial of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people'.
