South Korea removing loudspeakers on border with North
The nations, still technically at war, had already halted propaganda broadcasts along the demilitarised zone, Seoul's military said in June after the election of President Lee Jae Myung.
It said in June that Pyongyang stopped transmitting bizarre, unsettling noises along the border that had become a major nuisance for South Korean locals, a day after the South's loudspeakers fell silent.
"Starting today, the military has begun removing the loudspeakers," Lee Kyung-ho, spokesman of the South's defence ministry, told reporters on Monday.
"It is a practical measure aimed at helping ease tensions with the North, provided that such actions do not compromise the military's state of readiness."
All loudspeakers set up along the border will be dismantled by the end of the week, he added.
He did not disclose the number to be removed, but a Yonhap news agency report -- which the defence ministry declined to verify -- said it was about 20.
Handout photos released by the ministry show soldiers wearing body armour unloading sets of speakers as part of the process.
Newly elected President Lee ordered the military to stop the broadcasts in a bid to "restore trust".
Relations between the two Koreas had been at one of their lowest points in years, with Seoul taking a hard line towards Pyongyang, which has drawn ever closer to Moscow in the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
-Overture-
Last year, the two Koreas were in a tit-for-tat propaganda war, as the North sent thousands of trash-filled balloons southwards, saying they were retaliation for propaganda balloons launched by South Korean activists.
In response, South's then-president Yoon Suk Yeol ordered to turn on border loudspeaker broadcasts -- including K-pop tunes and international news.
Shortly afterwards, North Korea started transmitting strange sounds along the frontier, unsettling South Korean residents.
Lee has taken a different approach in dealing with the North since his June election, including requesting civic groups to stop sending anti-North propaganda leaflets.
"We have strongly urged civic groups to halt leaflet activities in order to foster peace and ensure the safety of residents in border areas," Koo Byung-sam, spokesman of the Unification Ministry, said at a press briefing on Monday.
Lee has said he would seek talks with the North without preconditions, following a deep freeze under his predecessor.
Despite his diplomatic overtures, the North has rejected pursuing dialogue with its neighbour.
"If the ROK... expected that it could reverse all the results it had made with a few sentimental words, nothing is more serious miscalculation than it," Kim Yo Jong, sister of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, said last week using the South's official name.
The two countries technically remain at war because the 1950-53 Korean War ended in an armistice, not a peace treaty.
kjk/fox
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Nagasaki commemorates 80th anniversary of atomic bomb drop as mayor urges against nuclear weapons
A minute of silence was observed today in Nagasaki, precisely at the time of the atomic bomb explosion which was dropped by an American bomber on the Japanese city eighty years ago, while the restored bell tower of the city's church rang — for the first time since then. On 9 August 1945, at 11:02, just three days after Hiroshima, Nagasaki was struck by the horror of a nuclear attack. Some 74,000 people lost their lives in the city, a major port in the south-western part of the archipelago, adding to the 140,000 deaths of Hiroshima. 'Eighty years have passed, and who would have imagined the world would come to this? Stop armed conflicts immediately!' urged Shiro Suzuki, mayor of the martyred city, during the ceremony attended by representatives from over a hundred nations. 'Conflicts are escalating across various regions due to the vicious cycle of strife and division. A crisis capable of threatening the very survival of humanity itself — such as nuclear war — looms over all who inhabit this planet,' he added, shortly after the heavy rain which had fallen throughout the morning eased, just before the minute's silence was observed. International participation — a record turnout — was notably marked by the presence of Russia, which had not attended the anniversary since its military invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Israel, whose ambassador was excluded last year in protest at the conflict in Gaza — prompting a boycott by other G7 ambassadors — was present this time. That explosion feels as though it happened 'in ancient times, but for those who lived through it, it is as fresh as yesterday. We must keep alive the memory of these real events,' said Atsuko Higuchi, a 50-year-old Nagasaki resident, at the Peace Park. A symbol of this memorial is the cathedral bell, destroyed by the atomic bomb: it was restored in the spring by American Christians and placed beside the existing bell before ringing once more on the anniversary, for the first time in eighty years. The striking red-brick Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception stands atop a hill. Rebuilt in 1959, the building was almost obliterated when the bomb exploded just a few hundred metres away. Related Hundreds protest nuclear weapons at Hiroshima ceremony Hiroshima remembers victims on 80th anniversary of atomic bombing Only one of the two bells was recovered from the ruins. For the church's priest, Kenichi Yamamura, the restoration 'demonstrates the grandeur of the human spirit' and is 'proof that those belonging to one side of a conflict that struck another may one day seek to make amends.' The aim is not 'to forget the wounds of the past, but to acknowledge them and work to heal, to rebuild, and thereby labour together for peace,' Mr Yamamura told the French Press Agency. The priest wished to send a message to a world shaken by multiple armed conflicts and caught up in a frantic arms race. 'We must not respond to violence with violence, but rather show through the way we live and pray just how irrational it is to take another's life,' he added. An American university professor, whose grandfather had been involved in the Manhattan Project — the development of the first nuclear weapons used in the Second World War — led the restoration project for the bell. James Nolan, a sociology professor in Massachusetts, raised approximately €107,200 from American Catholics for the endeavour. At the unveiling of the restored bell in spring, 'there were people who literally wept,' recalled Mr Nolan. Many American Catholics he met were unaware of the painful history of Nagasaki's Christians. Converted to Christianity in the 16th century by European missionaries, they endured persecution by the Japanese shoguns; practising and spreading their faith in secret for over 250 years. This story was recounted in the novel Silence by Japanese Catholic author Shūsaku Endō — adapted for the big screen by Martin Scorsese in 2016. 'We are talking about centuries of martyrdom, torture, illegality, mockery and persecution because of their faith,' Mr Nolan emphasised, referring to the Japanese Catholics. American Catholics were inspired by 'their willingness to forgive and rebuild, and their devotion to prayer,' he added. The atomic bombings dealt the final blow to the Japanese empire, which surrendered on 15 August 1945, bringing the Second World War to a close. Yet historians continue to debate whether and to what extent these bombings hastened the end of the war and saved lives, given the suffering endured by the hibakusha — the survivors — who, among other hardships, faced lifelong discrimination and were at a very high risk of developing certain types of cancer.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
The New Nuclear Generation
It was a sweltering day last August when Valentina Urtan, a 30-year-old from Ukraine, sat in an auditorium in Nagasaki, Japan, listening to a survivor of the atomic bomb. The man flipped through black-and-white photographs from eight decades ago showing wrecked buildings and charred bodies. Some 70,000 people died from a single bomb, dropped by the United States on Aug. 9, 1945. The photographs felt familiar to Ms. Urtan. They reminded her of cities in Ukraine that had been leveled by Russian warplanes and missiles. She wanted to get out of her chair, she said, and show images of that destruction to the people around her. The proof was right on her phone, in photos of her home region, Borodyanka, and alerts of air raids that had been flashing across its screen all morning. These were reminders of a war in which President Vladimir Putin of Russia has repeatedly used the threat of a nuclear strike to try to cow the West. 'It's not the past for me,' Ms. Urtan wanted to tell them. 'It's actually happening right now.' Today, nuclear war is mostly thought to be the stuff of history books: gruesome, uncomfortable and firmly in the past. But as nations' nuclear stockpiles expand and the risk of a strike rises, a generation of young people like Ms. Urtan is waking up to the threat. In the halls of New England prep schools, students are gathering to re-energize the antinuclear movement. Medical students are learning to use their knowledge to educate the public about the growing danger. Young Japanese activists are questioning their lawmakers' commitment to global disarmament, and the descendants of nuclear test survivors in places including the Marshall Islands and Kazakhstan are fighting for recognition — and to make sure testing never happens again. And if not them, who? The adults who were children at the dawn of the atomic era are nearing the end of their lives, and there are now fewer than 100,000 officially recognized hibakusha, as Japanese A-bomb survivors are known, alive today. Last fall, when the grass-roots survivor movement Nihon Hidankyo won the Nobel Peace Prize for its struggle against the bomb, the hibakusha made a plea: When we are gone, they said, the next generation must carry on their fight. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
The Contradiction at the Heart of Trump's Trade Deals
As the dust — perhaps — starts to settle after four frenetic months of trade negotiations, the biggest win for America might be a potential windfall of investment from overseas. In an effort to avoid even higher tariffs, Japan, the European Union and South Korea loosely pledged to directly invest a total of $1.5 trillion in the United States, equivalent to what the government spent on Social Security benefits last year. We don't know exactly when the money will arrive, or if some of it simply replaces investments that might have happened anyway. Even with a healthy haircut, the pledges sound impressive, and could be greater than the new global direct investment in the United States over the past six years. Well before President Trump's deal-making, what's officially known as foreign direct investment has played an increasingly important role in America's economy. Today it accounts for about one in 10 American jobs and more than 16 percent of all U.S. manufacturing jobs. It brings technology and expertise (think Arizona semiconductor facilities courtesy of Taiwan) and supports American innovation, accounting for nearly 16 percent of U.S. corporate research and development. (Yes, the United States benefits from technology and knowledge transfers, just like other countries.) And in contrast to fickle stock and bond flows, this capital is sticky; most projects involve multiyear investments that provide a consistent boost to local economies. The need for foreign cash is only going to become more urgent, since U.S. budget deficits will likely limit how much money Washington has to invest. But there's a problem for the administration. An influx of foreign investment will worsen the trade deficit, which is the opposite of Mr. Trump's stated goal. America should nonetheless take that deal. When other countries want to buy U.S. land or buildings or invest in an American business, they need dollars. Selling foreign currencies to buy dollars pushes up the U.S. currency's value. A stronger dollar, in turn, weighs on exports by making them more expensive overseas. All else being equal, that leads to a wider trade deficit. This is a basic economic reality: A country's current account, which includes trade in goods and services, must balance its capital account — the flow of capital across borders, such as financial assets as well as direct investments. A current account deficit necessitates a capital account surplus. Thus, if you want the benefit of foreign investment, you effectively need to accept trade deficits. This is among the reasons it's wrongheaded to focus simply on America's bilateral trade relationships, as the White House seems to, to measure success or failure. The United States attracts hundreds of billions in new foreign investment every year, thanks to its enormous consumer market, a deep, highly skilled labor pool, an innovative culture and an economic growth rate that often dwarfs that of its overseas peers. The advantages are clear. Americans who benefit directly (through jobs created by foreign investment) and indirectly (via returns on their retirement accounts) have more money to spend, some of which goes to imports and contributes to trade deficits. This is the environment the United States has operated in for decades. Germany's BMW first produced vehicles in South Carolina in 1994 with a $600 million investment and 500 jobs. Since then, BMW has put some $14 billion into its South Carolina operations and now employs over 11,000 workers. The state hosts more than 1,100 operations of foreign-affiliated firms. These firms pay American workers and support U.S. G.D.P. American policymakers want to build on this success, especially when it comes to strategic industries that would bolster national security and create manufacturing jobs by returning to the United States. How to achieve these goals isn't obvious — there will always be trade-offs. The Biden administration tried to address this with a focus on carrots in the form of government incentives. It targeted strategically important foreign firms, such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, that would support U.S. national security while creating domestic jobs. Mr. Trump has also offered carrots, including tax breaks, less red tape and a plan to fast-track investment from approved companies. But his administration paired those carrots with sticks: higher tariff rates unless countries provided attractive deals for the United States. Countries have responded by opening up their markets to American products and pledging to put more than a trillion dollars to work in the United States. But these wins could prove difficult to sustain if this administration keeps alienating its allies. Consider Canada, the third-largest source of inbound foreign direct investment to the United States last year. An EY survey of dozens of Canadian chief executives released in June showed that 14 percent had stopped planned investments and 58 percent had delayed investments (domestically and abroad) in response to recent developments in geopolitical and trade policy. Britain, another historically important investment partner for the United States, seems to be having similar doubts. A Deloitte survey released in early July found only net 2 percent of chief financial officers at major British firms saw the United States as an attractive place to invest, down from net 59 percent in late 2024. (Instead they became notably more optimistic about investing at home.) This administration wants a manufacturing renaissance. Achieving that goal will be a lot more likely with robust foreign investment. And for that, the United States needs to keep its overseas friends and accept that smaller trade deficits may not be the optimal policy priority. Rebecca Patterson is an economist and a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations who has held senior positions at JPMorgan Chase and Bridgewater Associates. The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We'd like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here's our email: letters@ Follow the New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Bluesky, WhatsApp and Threads.
