
Iran's IRGC is already at war with Britain
For years, Britain and its allies have appeased Iran's regime – ignoring its calls for a second Holocaust while it built the nuclear weapons, missiles and terrorist armies with which it hoped to achieve it.
While our politicians call impotently for 'de-escalation' and shuffle outdated aircraft around the globe, their greatest failure is not overseas. It is here at home.
For all of the fulmination about the need for 'regional stability' thousands of miles away, nobody seems to be doing anything about the IRGC agents operating freely on our soil.
The IRGC is radicalising young people in the UK. IRGC figures have addressed British students at our prestigious universities, denying the Holocaust and inciting hatred: 'The real Holocaust took place in Iran. The one the Jews claim is a lie.' Students were told that 'the battlefront is the university', that they were 'soft-war officers' and 'holy warriors' in a coming apocalyptic war to end 'the era of the Jews'.
This is not empty rhetoric. Just last month, Security Minister Dan Jarvis told Parliament that police and MI5 have responded to 20 Iran-linked plots since 2022. These include assassination and abduction attempts. The IRGC is behind them.
Founded in 1979, the IRGC functions as a second military that answers directly to the fundamentalist mullahs who rule Iran. Believed to have well over a quarter of a million personnel, it has a mandate to spread terror at home and abroad. It propped up Assad in Syria, provided the weapons that the Houthis fire at Royal Navy ships and Israeli cities, and built up the genocidal death cults of Hezbollah and Hamas. The IRGC not only trains, arms and supports this axis of terror but has also brutally crushed four major civilian uprisings in Iran since 2009. It works day and night to foment anti-Semitism and sow bloodshed across the region.
In Britain, eight IRGC officials have been exposed as having addressed students under the banner of the Islamic Students Association. They spread hatred, promote violence against Jews, and call for martyrdom.
These are just the cases that we know about. Just like the thwarted IRGC plots that the authorities understandably say very little about, there are doubtless countless other cases of our universities and even schools being used as recruiting grounds – in recent days an exposé has claimed that adorers of the Iranian regime have set up a summer camp in Britain.
Taken together, it is clear to anybody paying attention that there is a domestic danger in Britain that should command the urgent attention of our politicians. As Sir Richard Dearlove, a former head of MI6 recently said of proscribing the IRGC under the Terrorism Act, 'I just don't get why we haven't done so.' He added: 'It is the agency through which Iran has conducted what I would call 'arm's length warfare'... It should have been identified as a terrorist organisation a long time ago.'
We at Campaign Against Antisemitism – along with many others – have long called for a ban on the IRGC. Our polling shows that 93 per cent of British Jews – who are increasingly concerned about their security in the UK – agree.
Events in the Middle East heighten the urgency. The IRGC is already known to have mapped the Jewish community in the UK, with the former Security Minister Tom Tugendhat telling Parliament two years ago: 'Between 2020 and 2022, Iran tried to collect intelligence on UK-based Israeli and Jewish individuals. We believe this information was a preparation for future lethal operations.'
Unless the IRGC is proscribed, our security services can only swoop when they have evidence that a plot is being prepared – as they did just last month, arresting Iranian nationals in Swindon, London, Stockport and Rochdale. But proscription would enable our protectors to arrest IRGC operatives immediately, just for being IRGC operatives.
Some believe that there may be a legislative complication in proscribing an entity that is a state agency, but that is no excuse for inaction. Indeed the Government's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation has proposed legal changes to address this.
Besides, if Iran's regime collapses, the IRGC may continue as a rogue terror army without state status. The threat will remain – or grow worse.
Two governments have failed to act. This one still can. Both the Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary promised before the last election to ban the IRGC.
They must now honour that promise.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Israel says Iran fired cluster bomb-bearing missile
June 19 (Reuters) - Iran fired at least one missile at Israel that scattered small bombs with the aim of increasing civilian casualties, the Israeli military said on Thursday, the first reported use of cluster munitions in the seven-day-old war. Israeli military officials provided no further details. Israeli news reports quoted the Israeli military as saying the missile's warhead split open at an altitude of about 4 miles (7 km) and released around 20 submunitions in a radius of around 5 miles (8 km) over central Israel. One of the small munitions struck a home in the central Israeli town of Azor, causing some damage, Times of Israel military correspondent Emanuel Fabian reported. There were no reports of casualties from the bomb. Cluster bombs are controversial because they indiscriminately scatter submunitions, some of which can fail to explode and kill or injure long after a conflict ends. The Israeli military released a graphic as a public warning of the dangers of unexploded ordnance. 'The terror regime seeks to harm civilians and even used weapons with wide dispersal in order to maximize the scope of the damage,' Israel's military spokesperson, Brigadier General Effie Defrin, told a briefing. Iran's mission to the United Nations and Israel's embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to requests for comment. "They are egregious weapons with their wide-area destruction, especially if used in a civilian populated area and could add to the unexploded ordnance left over from conflicts," said Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association advocacy group. Noting that Iranian missiles can be imprecise, he said that Tehran should know that cluster munitions "are going to hit civilian targets rather than military targets." Iran and Israel declined to join a 2008 international ban on the production, stockpiling, transfer and use of cluster bombs that has been signed by 111 countries and 12 other entities. After extensive debate, the U.S. in 2023 supplied Ukraine with cluster munitions for use against Russian occupation forces. Kyiv says Russian troops also have fired them. The three countries declined to join the Convention Against Cluster Munitions.


BBC News
39 minutes ago
- BBC News
Government pledges £900m for sports events & facilities
The government has pledged to spend £900m on major sporting events and grassroots facilities across the UK as part of a "transformational" than £0.5bn of the money will be used to support the delivery of "a pipeline of major international events", including Euro 2028, which will be hosted in the UK and 2026 European Athletics Championships in Birmingham and the Grand Departs of the men's and women's Tour de France cycling races in 2027 will also those events had already received government backing, along with a proposed UK bid to host the women's football World Cup in 2035, which the Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) is continuing to work on with the home nations football the government is yet to decide whether to support London's bid to host the 2029 World Athletics Championships, with more than 100 of Britain's most renowned athletes urging Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to do so earlier this Secretary Lisa Nandy said: "Sport tells our national story in a way few other things can – uniting communities, inspiring millions, and showcasing our nation on the global stage."This major backing for world-class events will drive economic growth across the country. Coupled with strong investment into grassroots sport, we're creating a complete pathway to allow the next generation of sporting heroes to train and take part in sport in communities across the UK. " In March, the former chair of funding agency UK Sport Dame Katherine Grainger told BBC Sport that it was "frustrating" that Britain was not staging more major events over the next decade, warning of "a big gap". Her successor Nick Webborn said: "We welcome the government's ongoing commitment to hosting the Tour de France, Tour de France Femmes and Euro 2028…and support their commitment to secure the pipeline of big events beyond 2028 to ensure we can continue to reach, inspire and unite people in every corner of the country."Britain is hosting the women's rugby union World Cup in England this year, along with the 2026 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow, but the government is not believed to be backing any bids for golf's Ryder Cup or Solheim part of the funding commitment, the DCMS says that a minimum of £400m will also be invested over the next four years into new and upgraded grassroots sports facilities "that promote health, wellbeing and community cohesion".On Thursday the government announced plans for a new School Sport Partnerships and Enrichment Framework for schools to ensure all young people have equal access to high-quality sport and extracurricular Oliver, chief executive of the Youth Sport Trust, said: "We are grateful to the government for listening and responding so comprehensively to our sector's united call for a reimagined approach to PE and school sport. This will be an amazing boost to those who work so tirelessly, often against the odds, in PE and school sport."Children's activity levels have been too low for too long. We welcome the government seeking to harness the vast potential of play and sport to change this."


Sky News
41 minutes ago
- Sky News
Whitehall officials tried to convince Lord Gove to cover up grooming scandal, he tells Sky News
Whitehall officials tried to convince Lord Michael Gove to go to court to cover up details of a report into the grooming scandal in 2011, he has said, confirming Sky News reporting earlier this week. Speaking to Sky's Politics Hub With Sophy Ridge, the former senior cabinet minister said it is "undoubtedly the case that more should have been done" to prevent the abuse of young girls in Britain, admitting that it weighs on him. The allegations of an attempted cover-up were first made to Sky News by former Downing Street adviser Dominic Cummings in an interview with Sky News, and the claims were substantiated by other sources as well. Mr Cummings was working for Lord Gove, who was then education secretary. Lord Gove explained that in 2011, he learned that the late Times journalist Andrew Norfolk, who he described as "a heroic reporter who did more than anyone to initially uncover this scandal", was seeking to publish details of a report from Rotherham Council about the abuse and grooming of young girls. He said: "Rotherham Council wanted to stop that happening. They wanted to go to court to prevent him publishing some details, and we in the Department for Education were asked by the council, 'would we join in, would we be a party to that court action to stop it?' "And I had to look at the case, advised by Dominic [Cummings] and by others, and there were some within the department, some officials who said, 'be cautious, don't allow this to be published, there may be risks for relatives of the victims concerned." 1:56 Rotherham Council also argued that publication may pose "risks" to the process of "improving in the way in which it handles" grooming cases, he continued. The judicial review wanted by officials would have asked a judge to decide about the lawfulness of The Times' publication plans and the consequences that would flow from this information entering the public domain. But Lord Gove said: "My view at the time, advised by Dominic and by others within the department, was that it was definitely better for it to be published." "So we said to Rotherham, we will join the case, but we're joining it on the side of the Times and Andrew Norfolk because we believe in transparency." 1:11 'Tough questions' for Whitehall Lord Gove went on to say that a national inquiry could see some "tough questions" asked of the Home Office about its culture and its interactions with the police. But those questions will also be posed to two departments he led - the Department for Local Government and the Department of Education, and he said: "I think it's right that there should be, because the nature and scale of what the victims have endured means that there's an obligation on all of us who've been in any form of elected office to be honest and unsparing in looking at what went on." He said he "certainly didn't have the knowledge at my command that we now do about the widespread nature of this activity". 'Not nearly enough' progress made Sophy Ridge put to Lord Gove that despite commissioning a report on what was happening to girls in care, and not seeking to block the publication of Andrew Norfolk's reporting, he still failed to make change. He replied: "Yes, so it is undoubtedly the case that more should have been done." He admitted that it "absolutely" weighs on him, and that "not nearly enough" progress was made on the protection of vulnerable girls. "With the benefit of hindsight, I do wish that I had been more vehement in trying to persuade people to take appropriate action," he said. 1:36 Local government 'sought to deny scale' of scandal The now Spectator editor went on to say that there was "pushback, particularly but not exclusively, from those in local government" to subsequent questions about cultural background, and he said "local councillors and others sought to deny the scale of what was happening and particularly, sought to deny questioning about the identity and the background of the perpetrators". He continued: "I think the right thing to do is for everyone to acknowledge that sometimes there were people who were acting from noble motives, who did not want to increase ethnic and racial anxieties, who did not to fan far-right flames, and thought that it was better to step away from the really grim reality of what was going on. "I can understand that. But ultimately, that didn't serve anyone. It did not serve the victims."