Views sought over Black Country elective healthcare services
Patients are being asked to help shape health services as the NHS explores ideas to boost planned care through the creation of surgical hubs.Setting up centres of excellence for planned surgery would improve outcomes and help reduce waiting times across hospitals, a partnership of some West Midlands trusts said.The partnership, which involves the Dudley Group, Sandwell and West Birmingham, Walsall and Royal Wolverhampton NHS trusts, said it was working to manage rising demand for services and "improve access and patient experience".Patients are being encouraged to share their views on elective care by way of a survey that is open until 27 July.
One concept is for the Dudley and Sandwell and West Birmingham trusts to bring together some of their surgical services at a Sandwell Health Campus to carry out routine procedures "for general surgery, orthopaedics and gynaecology".Other ideas being explored include developing new specialist services so fewer patients need to travel outside the Black Country for treatment.Elective care lead for the Black Country Diane Wake said timely, "high-quality care is so important to our communities".She added "we want to give them the opportunity to reshape elective care to make it work better for patients and staff alike". Ms Wake said: "I encourage everyone to take a few minutes to share their views - your voice will help us build a stronger, more responsive health system for the future."Patients who are waiting for surgery, have recent experience of elective care or simply want to help shape a better future for local health services are encouraged to complete the survey, which can be accessed here.
Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
UK ‘behind curve' on assisted dying among progressive nations, says Kim Leadbeater
The UK is 'behind the curve' on assisted dying among progressive nations, the bill's sponsor Kim Leadbeater has said on the eve of one of the most consequential votes for social change in England and Wales. The Labour MP told the Guardian that the circumstances may never be right again to pass such a bill, which would legalise assisted dying in England and Wales for those terminally ill with less than six months to live, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel of experts. Her intervention came amid more warnings about the safeguards in the bill, including from the Royal College of Psychiatrists and disability activists – who will protest outside parliament on Friday at the final vote in the Commons. Opponents believe the bill will not sufficiently protect those with mental illness or disability or from coercion by abusers. On Thursday, another leading Labour MP, Dan Carden, told the Guardian he would vote against the bill and the Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, urged her MPs to oppose it. Keir Starmer has reiterated his own support for the bill – but on Thursday night there was no firm commitment from No 10 that the prime minister would be present to vote. 'We are behind the curve,' Leadbeater told the Guardian. 'We've got the law going through the Isle of Man. We've got Jersey. We've got France. We've got various American states, Colorado recently. 'Other countries are looking at us and saying, goodness me, why are you not doing what is essentially the right thing to do? And if we don't do it now, we could be looking at another 10 years. We cannot put families through another 10 years of that.' The MP for Spen Valley said circumstances may never allow such a change for another generation – given the numbers of progressive MPs in the parliament. 'This is surely everything modern parliamentarians should believe in: big societal change for the people that need it,' she said. 'Now is the time.' Should the bill pass, Leadbeater said it would be accessible to those with a terminal illness by the end of the parliament – with a four-year implementation period. 'I will certainly be putting pressure on to commence sooner than that if it can be done safely and effectively,' she said 'But ultimately it's about it being safe rather than rushing it through.' At least 19 MPs have publicly said they will switch sides from either abstaining or backing the bill to voting against. Since the bill was last voted on, there has been a major change to the legislation – the removal of a high court judge to sign off each case, replaced by a panel of experts including a psychiatrist, a social worker and senior lawyer. Proponents of the bill claimed they were confident it will pass again on Friday, having previously passed with a majority of 55. But further high-profile switchers or even significant interventions in the chamber on Friday could be critical and those who oppose the bill said they believe there was still significant traffic in their direction. Campaigners on both sides said that MPs would be going to extraordinary lengths to make the vote – returning from hospital bedsides and long-haul trips. Carden, who leads the Blue Labour group of MPs, told the Guardian he would vote against, having previously abstained. 'Legalising assisted suicide will normalise the choice of death over life, care, respect and love,' the MP for Liverpool Walton said. 'I draw on my own family experience, caring for my dad who died from lung cancer three years ago. 'I genuinely fear the legislation will take us in the wrong direction. The values of family, social bonds, responsibilities, time and community will be diminished, with isolation, atomisation and individualism winning again.' Those who have switched from previously supporting the bill to voting against include the Conservative former minister George Freeman, the Lib Dem work and pensions spokesperson, Steve Darling, and Labour MPs Karl Turner, Kanishka Narayan and Jonathan Hinder. But there have been some who have moved to vote in favour, including the Ipswich Labour MP Jack Abbott, who voted against in November but switched to support having been on the bill's scrutiny committee, saying he was now convinced the safeguards were robust. A YouGov poll on the eve of the vote found support for assisted dying has robust support among the UK public – 75% believe that assisted dying should in principle be legal in some form in the UK, compared to 14% opposed. But there are significant divisions across different sections of society. In polling for the Muslim Council of Britain, British Muslims were overwhelmingly likely to oppose the bill. The poll found 70% of respondents said that if their local MP were to vote for the assisted suicide bill, it would make them less likely to vote for them at the next election. Badenoch urged Conservative MPs to vote against the bill, though it remains a free vote. 'I'm somebody who has been previously supportive of assisted suicide,' she said. 'This bill is a bad bill. It is not going to deliver. It has not been done properly. 'This is not how we should put through legislation like this. I don't believe that the NHS and other services are ready to carry out assisted suicide, so I'll be voting no, and I hope as many Conservative MPs as possible will be supporting me in that.' The Royal College of Psychiatrists issued another warning ahead of the vote, saying there were 'too many unanswered questions about the safeguarding of people with mental illness'. Should the bill pass on Friday, it will then go to the House of Lords. However, it is not expected peers will block its progress once the Commons has passed the bill, though it may be amended. The Labour peer Luciana Berger urged MPs to vote against the bill if they were unsure about safeguards, rather than assume further changes would be made in the Lords. 'Elected MPs should be clear that as it is a [private members bill], amendments are likely to be limited,' she posted on X. 'MPs must be satisfied that the Bill in front of them on Friday is fit for purpose.' The Labour peer Charlie Falconer is likely to take charge of the bill in the House of Lords. Falconer had submitted his own bill to the Lords prior to Leadbeater's – though he withdrew it when her bill was put to the Commons. Proponents of the bill hope it would receive royal assent by October, but there will be a four-year implementation period to allow the NHS, Department of Health and Social Care and the Ministry of Justice to develop procedures and guidance. It is – as yet – unclear if the procedure would be available on the NHS or free at the point of use.
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Public Health Wales issues update on infection outbreak linked to Welsh attraction
Public Health Wales issues update on infection outbreak linked to Welsh attraction A total of 89 confirmed cases were linked to the outbreak at a farm in the Vale of Glamorgan The farm in the Vale (Image: Marlborough Grange Farm ) An infection outbreak associated with a farm shop, which saw a total of 89 confirmed cases in Vale of Glamorgan, has been officially declared over. Public Health Wales confirmed that the cryptosporidium outbreak associated with Cowbridge Farm Shop at Marlborough Grange Farm in Crossways near Cowbridge has now come to an end. The NHS body said a total of 89 confirmed cases were linked to the outbreak, but there had been no new cases identified since the last outbreak control team (OCT) meeting, which was was held on Wednesday, May 28. Following their final meeting on Wednesday, June 18, the outbreak was considered closed. Stay informed on the latest health news by signing up to our newsletter here . According to NHS Wales, cryptosporidium is a parasite that causes an infection called cryptosporidiosis. It can affect people and farm animals. Cryptosporidium is found in lakes, streams and rivers, untreated drinking water and sometimes in swimming pools. Public Health Wales said that although the outbreak has ended they are still encouraging people to practice good hygiene, such as thorough handwashing with soap and water, especially after contact with animals or the natural environment. Article continues below The main symptoms of cryptosporidium infection include: Watery diarrhoea Stomach pains or cramps Nausea or vomiting Mild fever Loss of appetite Weight loss According to Public Health Wales, the symptoms usually start between two and 10 days after exposure and can last for up to two weeks. To help reduce the risk of infection, people visiting farms are reminded to follow the NHS' body's hygiene precautions, which are: Avoid close contact with animals – including holding, cuddling or kissing animals – this significantly increases the risk of illness. Always wash your hands thoroughly with soap and warm water after touching animals, footwear, clothing, bikes, scooters, prams etc. before eating or drinking. Alcohol based hand gels do not provide sufficient cleaning. The physical action of washing with soap and water is the most reliable way to remove the parasite from the skin. Supervise children closely to ensure they wash their hands properly and to avoid close contact, especially cuddling or kissing the animals. Do not eat or drink while touching animals or walking around the farm. Remove and clean footwear and wash hands after leaving the farm. Pregnant women should take particular care to avoid contact with newborn lambs during lambing season. Susan Mably, consultant in health protection at Public Health Wales, said: "We would like to thank everyone affected by this outbreak for their understanding and cooperation. Article continues below "We are particularly grateful to our colleagues from Shared Regulatory Services, Vale of Glamorgan Council, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board and the Animal and Plant Health Agency for their expertise and partnership throughout this investigation."
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Government urged to help save Hinckley hospital frontage
A council leader has written to the health secretary in a bid to preserve the historic frontage of a Hinckley NHS Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Integrated Care Board plans to demolish the Victorian frontage of Hinckley and District Hospital, in Mount Road, as part of its proposal to build a new £10.5m day case May, Stuart Bray, leader of Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council, expressed his "deep disappointment" but the board said it was unable to retain it due to clinical requirements of the Bray has asked Wes Streeting to extend the funding deadline to enable time to find a design solution with the board. The new medical facility is designed to deliver services including gynaecology, urology and plastic surgery and will be linked to the new community diagnostic centre at the site. In his letter to the health secretary, Bray said he "warmly" welcomed government investment for improved NHS facilities in the town following decades of campaigning, However he also highlighted that the hospital building's facade was part of the town's heritage and the demolition was causing concerns said he had met with the project team, who informed him any delay or changes to the proposed design would result in the funding being withdrawn."They tell me that your department has set a hard deadline of next spring for spending of the budget on this project," he said."I am therefore writing to ask you to consider asking your officials to work with myself, planning and conservation officers and the local community to look again at the design."At the very least I would ask for a commitment to ensure that the funding for the scheme is safeguarded to enable local discussions to proceed."Bray added he would be happy to discuss the matter with Streeting and invited him to visit Hinckley. 'Benefits outweigh loss' A planning application to demolish the entire hospital was submitted to the borough council in May.A spokesperson for the board said: "The option of retaining the Victorian frontage of the hospital unfortunately would have meant that the business care objectives and clinical requirements for the development of the new facilities would not be met. "The proposed materials do include reclaimed bricks from the current building and we consider that the heritage impact of the scheme will be outweighed by the benefits to the public."Hinckley and Bosworth MP Dr Luke Evans supported the plans, adding the current building was "no longer fit for purpose"."To ignore the realities facing us and request a delay at such a late stage in the process, after the NHS has put time and money into creating these plans, risks our community losing this funding and access to vital local healthcare services altogether," he response to Bray's letter, the Department of Health said: "We are pleased to be providing more than £7m for a day case unit in Hinckley which will greatly benefit patients and the community."The funding is due to be spent this financial year with delivery scheduled by February 2026."Any requests for further funding or to change or delay the scope of the project, would have to be made through the appropriate channels for consideration.A public consultation on the development ended on 13 June.
