Florida must end Medicaid delays for schizophrenia treatment
I've also seen the impact of this condition in my personal life — my son has schizophrenia. As an advocate and a mother, I find it disturbing how often access to the most effective treatment is delayed because Florida's Medicaid program forces patients to fail on alternative medications through a policy known as step therapy.
Step therapy is a method of mental health treatment that requires a patient to try a series of treatments, typically starting with the least expensive and least invasive options, before moving on to more intensive treatments if necessary. The approach is commonly used in insurance-covered mental health treatments.
This trial-and-error process can require patients to try up to three different medications, taking months.
For someone living with schizophrenia, that kind of delay can mean the difference between stability and crisis.
Schizophrenia is not a condition where 'trial and error' works well. Delayed treatment or ineffective medications can lead to hospitalization, incarceration or even homelessness. Every day without the right treatment increases the risk of irreversible harm.
Yet Florida's current policies ignore clinical judgment and prioritize potential cost savings over patient safety.
During the last legislative session, Senate Bill 264, which would have ended step therapy protocols, died in committee.
Fortunately, Florida's Medicaid Pharmaceutical & Therapeutics Committee has an opportunity to update these rules during its virtual meeting on June 27.
The committee is responsible for developing and implementing a Medicaid preferred drug list, as mandated by the Florida Legislature in 2000.
This update is urgently needed. In my case, it's personal. I've worked directly with individuals living with serious mental illness, and I've also walked this journey with my son. I see how step therapy frustrates providers trying to do what's best for their patients.
Psychiatrists are forced to prescribe medications they know won't work — or that have already failed a patient — just to meet step therapy requirements. Even new and innovative treatments with fewer side effects are often out of reach due to this outdated policy.
I hope the committee will consider the harmful impact these requirements have on Floridians and make the decision to put patients first by removing step therapy for medications that treat schizophrenia.
If Florida's leaders are serious about addressing mental health in our state, this is a crucial step. With better access to the right treatments, we'll see fewer hospitalizations, better health outcomes—and cost savings for the state.
Florida must give people living with schizophrenia a fighting chance, starting by ensuring they get the care they need, when they need it.
Marilyn Ricci is a family advocate, a member of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) in Palm Beach and a former president of NAMI's national organization. Those interested can watch the virtual meeting here starting at 8:30 a.m. Friday
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
9 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Why AI therapy might be inevitable (and that's not necessarily bad)
Artificial intelligence therapy is here. For now, it still probably strikes most people as a little weird to talk to a chatbot about your most private fears or let an algorithm offer comfort when you're in pain. But strangeness fades quickly in the face of convenience and affordability. One reason that AI therapy might be attractive is a service-sector phenomenon called 'cost disease.' Cost disease is shorthand for a dynamic first described by economist William Baumol. Some industries, like manufacturing, can achieve dramatic gains in productivity over time. The same number of workers can make more widgets faster and cheaper thanks to automation, technology and process improvement. But in labor-intensive fields like health care, education or the performing arts, productivity growth is limited. Mental health care is squarely in this category. Most treatments require a trained person to spend time with a patient. Over time, wages in the broader economy rise with productivity gains elsewhere, so therapists' salaries rise, too. But without corresponding efficiency gains, the cost of providing therapy goes up. HIcks: AI won't steal your job. It will make human tasks more valuable. That's the cost disease: the gap between what it costs to provide the service and what you get for those costs keeps widening. That's why simply 'expanding access' to traditional therapy in a cost-challenged fiscal environment cannot work by itself. AI therapy, at least in theory, sidesteps this dynamic. A chatbot or AI-driven tool can be replicated infinitely at a near-zero marginal cost, making it dramatically cheaper to provide support at scale. That doesn't mean it's a replacement for human care, but it does explain why, in a cost-diseased world, the idea has such appeal. Our beliefs about what therapy is will shape how we see and use AI. Here are four different lenses: No single model is right, but each suggests different possibilities and limits for AI therapy. If you see therapy as either a path to self-optimization or a way to manage symptoms, AI could fit neatly into that role. It is available 24/7, infinitely patient, low-cost and able to monitor progress, reinforce skills, and provide guidance between human-led sessions. But if you see therapy as deep healing or social connection, AI is at best an adjunct. It can mimic empathy, but it cannot share the lived mutuality of a human relationship. Jay Chaudhary: Indiana prides itself on work. What happens when AI takes our jobs? | Opinion The reality of cost disease means we will keep feeling pressure to find cheaper options for care. In Indiana, rapidly rising Medicaid costs have led state officials to explicitly float using technology, including AI, to help bridge the state's mental health gap. We should encourage such exploration while also remembering that cost isn't the only variable that matters. The unsatisfying truth is that we will need to let AI therapy play out instead of making snap judgments, like Illinois' preemptive ban. AI therapy may turn out to be a breakthrough, a disappointment, or something in between. As we are deciding if and where it fits into the broader mental health space, we should be honest about the trade-offs, and about which mental models we're using when we call something 'therapy.'
Fox News
12 hours ago
- Fox News
Judge orders RFK Jr's HHS to stop sharing Medicaid data with immigration officials
Print Close By Landon Mion Published August 15, 2025 A federal judge ordered the Department of Health and Human Services to stop providing access to Medicaid enrollees' personal data, including their home addresses, to immigration officials. District Judge Vince Chhabria, an Obama appointee, granted a preliminary injunction blocking the Department of Homeland Security from using Medicaid data obtained from 20 states that filed a lawsuit to stop the data sharing. The order, handed down Tuesday, blocks HHS from sharing data on Medicaid enrollees in these states with Immigration and Customs Enforcement for the purpose of targeting migrants for deportation. "Using CMS data for immigration enforcement threatens to significantly disrupt the operation of Medicaid—a program that Congress has deemed critical for the provision of health coverage to the nation's most vulnerable residents," Chhabria wrote. CALIFORNIA SUES TRUMP ADMIN AGAIN, THIS TIME OVER MEDICAID DATA TRANSFER TO DHS The judge wrote that while there is nothing "categorically unlawful" about DHS collecting data from other agencies for immigration enforcement purposes, ICE has had a policy against using Medicaid data for that reason for 12 years. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has also long maintained a policy of using patients' personal information only to run its healthcare programs. "Given these policies, and given that the various players in the Medicaid system have relied on them, it was incumbent upon the agencies to carry out a reasoned decision-making process before changing them," Chhabria wrote, adding: "The record in this case strongly suggests that no such process occurred." Chhabria said the preliminary injunction will remain in effect until HHS provides "reasoned decision-making" for its new policy of sharing data with immigration officials or until litigation concludes. The disclosure of Medicaid data is part of the Trump administration's broader effort to give DHS more data to help locate migrants and carry out the president's mass deportation plan. In May, a federal judge refused to block the Internal Revenue Service from sharing immigrants' tax data with ICE officials. BIDEN-APPOINTED JUDGE HALTS TRUMP HHS OVERHAUL AFTER DEMOCRAT-LED LAWSUIT "The Trump Administration's move to use Medicaid data for immigration enforcement upended longstanding policy protections without notice or consideration for the consequences," California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a statement. "As the President continues to overstep his authority in his inhumane anti-immigrant crusade, this is a clear reminder that he remains bound by the law." HHS first provided the personal information of millions of Medicaid enrollees in June, prompting a lawsuit from the 20 states to block the new policy. In July, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services entered into a new agreement that allowed DHS to have daily access to the personal data of the country's 79 million Medicaid enrollees, including their Social Security numbers and home address. Neither agreement was announced publicly. HHS has insisted that its agreement with DHS is legal. Medicaid officials had attempted to block the data transfer, but they were overruled by top advisers to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Immigrants – both legal and illegal – are not authorized to enroll in the Medicaid program, which offers nearly free coverage for health services. However, under federal law, all states must offer emergency Medicaid, a temporary coverage that only covers lifesaving services in emergency rooms to anyone, including people who are not U.S. citizens. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP "Protecting people's private health information is vitally important," Washington state Attorney General Nick Brown said in a statement. "And everyone should be able to seek medical care without fear of what the federal government may do with that information." The sharing of Medicaid enrollees' personal data could cause concern among people seeking emergency medical help for themselves or their children, immigration advocates have warned. The Associated Press contributed to this report. Print Close URL
Los Angeles Times
18 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge orders RFK Jr.'s health department to stop sharing Medicaid data with deportation officials
WASHINGTON — A federal judge ordered the nation's health department to stop giving deportation officials access to the personal information — including home addresses — of all 79 million Medicaid enrollees. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services first handed over the personal data on millions of Medicaid enrollees in a handful of states in June. After an Associated Press report identified the new policy, 20 states filed a lawsuit to stop its implementation. In July, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services entered into a new agreement that gave the Department of Homeland Security daily access to view the personal data — including Social Security numbers and home address — of all the nation's 79 million Medicaid enrollees. Neither agreement was announced publicly. The extraordinary disclosure of such personal health data to deportation officials in the Trump administration's far-reaching immigration crackdown immediately prompted the lawsuit over privacy concerns. The Medicaid data sharing is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to provide DHS with more data on migrants. In May, for example, a federal judge refused to block the Internal Revenue Service from sharing immigrants' tax data with Immigration and Customs Enforcement to help agents locate and detain people living without legal status in the U.S. The order, issued by federal Judge Vince Chhabria in California, temporarily halts the health department from sharing personal data of enrollees in those 20 states, which include California, Arizona, Washington and New York. 'Using CMS data for immigration enforcement threatens to significantly disrupt the operation of Medicaid—a program that Congress has deemed critical for the provision of health coverage to the nation's most vulnerable residents,' Chhabria wrote in his decision, issued on Tuesday. Chhabria, an appointee of President Barack Obama, said that the order will remain in effect until the health department outlines 'reasoned decisionmaking' for its new policy of sharing data with deportation officials. A spokesperson for the federal health department declined to directly answer whether the agency would stop sharing its data with DHS. HHS has maintained that its agreement with DHS is legal. Immigrants who are not living in the U.S. legally, as well as some lawfully present immigrants, are not allowed to enroll in the Medicaid program that provides nearly free coverage for health services. But federal law requires all states to offer emergency Medicaid, a temporary coverage that pays only for lifesaving services in emergency rooms to anyone, including non-U.S. citizens. Medicaid is a jointly funded program between states and the federal government. Immigration advocates have said the disclosure of personal data could cause alarm among people seeking emergency medical help for themselves or their children. Other efforts to crack down on illegal immigration have made schools, churches, courthouses and other everyday places feel perilous to immigrants and even U.S. citizens who fear getting caught up in a raid. 'Protecting people's private health information is vitally important,' Washington state's Attorney General Nick Brown said in a statement. 'And everyone should be able to seek medical care without fear of what the federal government may do with that information.' Seitz and Kindy write for the Associated Press.
