European ministers warn Israel's Gaza City plan would cause mass civilian deaths
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's security cabinet on Friday greenlighted plans for a major operation to seize Gaza City, triggering a wave of domestic and international criticism.
In a joint statement, the foreign ministers of the eight nations said the decision 'will only aggravate the humanitarian crisis and further endanger the lives of the remaining hostages.'
They estimated the operation could lead to an 'unacceptably high number of fatalities and the forced displacement of nearly one million Palestinian civilians,' according to a copy of the statement released by Spain's foreign ministry.
They also warned that the planned offensive and occupation of Gaza City would be 'a major obstacle to implementing the two-state solution, the only path towards a comprehensive, just and lasting peace.'
Besides Spain, the statement was signed by the foreign ministers of Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, Norway, Portugal and Slovenia.
Foreign powers, including some of Israel's allies, have been pushing for a negotiated ceasefire to secure the hostages' return and help alleviate a humanitarian crisis in the strip.
Despite the backlash and rumors of dissent from Israeli military top brass, Netanyahu has remained defiant over the decision to seize Gaza City.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leaders
25 minutes ago
- Leaders
Israel's Netanyahu 'Has Lost the Plot,': New Zealand's PM
New Zealand's Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said on Wednesday that Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had 'lost the plot,' according to Reuters. Luxon's remarks come at a crucial time as New Zealand weighs up whether to recognize a Palestinian state. He said Netanyahu had gone way too far and the lack of humanitarian assistance, the forceful displacement of people as well as the annexation of Gaza were utterly appalling. 'I think he has lost the plot,' 'What we are seeing overnight, the attack on Gaza City, is utterly, utterly unacceptable,' he added. Earlier this week, New Zealand was considering the step of recognizing the State of Palestine amid the unthinkable humanitarian conditions in Gaza. On Monday, Australia, New Zealand's close ally, joined Canada, the UK and France in unveiling their intentions to take such a step at a UN conference in September. 'The Netanyahu Government is extinguishing the prospect of a two-state solution by rapidly expanding illegal settlements, threatening annexation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and explicitly opposing any Palestinian state,' Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said. He also noted that a two-state solution is the only pathway to a secure and prosperous future that respects the aspirations of Israelis and Palestinians alike. This decisive move increases isolation on the United States that has been defending and supporting Israel's escalating military campaign since its beginning in 2023. 'Australia is further compelled by the Netanyahu Government's disregard of the international community's calls, and its failure to comply with its legal and ethical obligations in Gaza,' Albanese added. Gaza War Currently, Israel is facing regional and international pressure to put an end to its war in the Palestinian enclave and allow the delivery of more aid. At the same time, the Israeli government has been facing harsh criticism from countries, nations, and individuals who considered the war as a genocide or ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. Since the beginning of Hamas-Israel War, the Israeli strikes have killed more than 61,499 Palestinians and wounded over 152,800, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Dozens of Gazans including children have lost their souls due to malnutrition throughout the war that caused unthinkable humanitarian conditions. Related Topics: Al Jazeera Holds Vigil for Journalists Killed in Gaza Airstrike Watch: British Influencer Describes Gaza War as 'Holocaust' Arab Ministers Hold Israel Fully Accountable for Gaza Genocide Short link : Post Views: 7
Leaders
25 minutes ago
- Leaders
'If I Were a Palestinian, I Would Fight against Israel,': Shabak's Former Director
Ami Ayalon, a former Director of the Israeli Security Agency, also known as the Shin Bet or Shabak, said that if he were a Palestinian, he would fight against Israel, during an interview. In a video that went viral on social media, Ayalon said that if he were a Palestinian he would do everything in order to achieve his liberty. When asked about his opinion about the two far-right Israeli cabinet ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, Ayalon described them as 'terrorists and Jewish Messianic.' 'Are you calling the Minister of National security and the Minister of Finance of Israel 'terrorists'? the interviewer asked 'Of course,' Ayalon replied. @resistance4ever #stop_the_starvation #stop_the_genocide #free_palestine🇵🇸 #free_gaza ♬ original sound – You Nes Decisive Steps against Israeli Ministers Several European countries have recently criticized both ministers and even imposed travel bans on them in a response to their indictment of violence against Palestinians. In June, Slovenia declared both Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich persona non grata, according to Reuters. The Slovenian government has accused both ministers of making 'genocidal statements' and inciting violence against Palestinians. 'Today, the government adopted one of the first national measures, which is to declare two Israeli ministers… unwanted in the Republic of Slovenia,' Slovenian Foreign Minister Tanja Fajon told a news conference. Slovenia's government issued a statement saying both Ben-Gvir and Smotrich 'publicly advocate the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, the forced evictions of Palestinians, and call for violence against the civilian Palestinian population'. Moreover, the Dutch government imposed travel bans on both ministers in July. The government has accused both Ben-Gvir and This international pressure on Israel comes at a crucial time as violence against Palestinians in the West Bank is growing with increasing number of killings and attacks by settlers and security forces. At the same time, the starvation crisis in Gaza is worsening with dozens of Gazans including children dying due to malnutrition throughout the 22 months of war, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. Related Topics: Jewish Woman Condemns Israel After Zionist-Funded 'Birth Right' Trip 'You are Hated,': American Journalist Sends Direct Message to Israelis Australia Criticized Over Continued Export of Weapons Parts to Israel Short link : Post Views: 26
Arab News
33 minutes ago
- Arab News
How can we understand Hezbollah's intransigence over its weapons?
The fate of Hezbollah's arms is no longer a domestic dispute between advocates of sovereignty and supporters of the 'resistance.' Since the 2023-2024 war with Israel, this question has been distilling into an existential crisis facing the party. The slogan raised by the leader of Hezbollah's parliamentary bloc, Mohammed Raad — 'we will die before surrendering the weapons' — reflects his awareness that his camp has no other option but to cling to what remains of its arsenal. Abandoning its arms would break Hezbollah's political and ideological foundations. These actions are not mere reflections of political intransigence. Given its rigid ideology and uncompromising idealism, and because Iran's regional project is in its DNA, Hezbollah is not an agile actor with the capacity to fundamentally change in nature. Moreover, it has built its power around the notion that weapons are an identity, not merely a means to an end. In truth, the Lebanese have never associated Hezbollah with a domestic political or economic project. Its engagement in public affairs has always revolved around the 'resistance' and the imperatives of regional conflicts. Thus, surrendering its arms would entail redefining the party from scratch and sacrificing its raison d'etre. Operating within these restrictive parameters, Hezbollah has dragged its feet. Its bets verge on wishful thinking: that the Lebanese state will remain too weak to follow through on its commitment to disarm the party; that a new episode of regional chaos will destabilize Syria's emerging political authorities; and that the high-level assurances it has received from Tehran's top brass regarding its survival and armament will materialize. Hezbollah has built its power around the notion that weapons are an identity, not merely a means to an end. Nadim Koteich That is, Hezbollah is betting that it will get lucky — or even await miracles. The fate of these matters is totally beyond Hezbollah's control and external factors (that are consistently going against it) will determine how things play out. After years of collapse, Lebanon's state institutions are steadily, albeit slowly, consolidating and enhancing their credibility in the eyes of a broadening segment of the population. This trajectory undermines the slander and vilification of the state that Hezbollah has long used to challenge the state's legitimacy and justify its own existence. As for its wager on vacuums emerging in Syria that will grant it more room for maneuver, current developments point in the opposite direction. The political and military situation in Syria suggests that the weight of open-ended geopolitical conflicts and regional actors is declining, consolidating the new regime in Damascus. Even Iranian support, which constituted the cornerstone of Hezbollah's existence for decades, is increasingly constrained. Tehran is grappling with a severe economic crisis amid volatile shifts in the internal balance of power between the different wings of the regime. Iran is preparing for a new phase, all while trying to put the military and security apparatus (that was battered by deep Israeli strikes during the 12-day war in June) back together. These considerations have compelled Iran to prioritize its military and financial needs over coming to the aid of its allies, foremost among them Hezbollah. All this means the party is fighting for its very survival. However, while turning to politics has offered armed movements elsewhere in the world a lifeline, allowing them to maintain some influence, material conditions have left Hezbollah hostage to its weapons. The group has never pursued a genuine domestic cause that could underpin a shift toward politics. Nadim Koteich The Irish Republican Army, despite being deeply rooted in the conflict with Britain, pursued a clear, localized national cause: unifying Ireland and defending the rights of nationalist Catholics. That is why it managed to survive the shift from armed struggle to a political course that culminated in the 1998 Good Friday Agreement, which left Sinn Fein in a strong position politically. Colombia's Revolutionary Armed Forces, known as FARC, despite becoming involved in the drug trade and losing some of its legitimacy as result, was nonetheless pursuing a domestic agenda to a social and economic struggle in Colombia. FARC thereby managed to conclude a peace agreement that, despite only being partially implemented, granted it a political foothold. Hezbollah, in contrast, has never pursued a genuine domestic cause that could underpin a shift toward politics. Even its claims of defending Lebanon's sovereignty and confronting occupation were never presented as ultimate, final objectives. These goals were presented as a means to further its regional ambitions. Its ideological link to its axis, as well as its intrinsic role in the regional power struggle, make any fundamental change to its nature nearly impossible. To give up its arms would not be to adjust its strategy; it would be to abandon the reason for its existence. Thus, the party appears bound to keep behaving this way. It will continue to vie to maintain its weapons and transnational function. Even after being put out of action, it will continue to wait for gradual decline. Its intransigence could, in turn, perpetuate the decay of Lebanon's state institutions. If it does so, the country would go from being a political battleground to being home to a failed state, with the Lebanese people paying the price many times over. • Nadim Koteich is the general manager of Sky News Arabia. X: @NadimKoteich
