logo
Primary election 2025: What you need to know about voting by mail in Berks

Primary election 2025: What you need to know about voting by mail in Berks

Yahoo23-04-2025
Voting is about to begin in Berks County.
Election officials said the first batch of about 16,000 mail ballots are being sent to voters who requested them and should begin arriving in mailboxes this week.
Voters can decide to cast their ballot by mail or they can go to the polls on May 20. They will help select their parties' nominees for seats on the state appellate courts, local judicial positions, municipal boards and councils, school boards and some county row offices.
Here's what you need to know about voting by mail.
How can I request a mail ballot?
Voters can apply online by visiting VotesPA.com, apply in person at the county elections office or contact the county elections office directly at 610-478-6490 to request a paper application.
You will need to apply with a valid Pennsylvania identification card or supply the last four digits of your Social Security number.
What is the deadline to apply for a mailed ballot?
The deadline is May 13 — seven days before the primary. But election officials ask that voters request a ballot as soon as possible.
How do I vote with a mail ballot?
1. Carefully open the ballot package when you receive it in the mail.
2. Make sure there is a secrecy envelope included because a mailed ballot not in a secrecy envelope, also known as a naked ballot, will not be counted.
3. Fill out the ballot immediately.
4. Place your ballot in the secrecy envelope, then put the secrecy envelope into the official envelope. Be sure to sign and date the declaration or your ballot will not count.
5. You can mail ballots to the county election office in the services center, deliver them in person to the office or place them in one of the three drop boxes available in Berks County.
Will there be drop boxes for ballots?
Three drop boxes are available in Berks.
One box is in the lobby of the Berks County Services Center at 633 Court St. in Reading; one is in the lobby of the Berks County South Campus at 400 E. Wyomissing Ave. in Mohnton; and another is inside the Reading Regional Airport terminal at 24 Liberator Way in Bern Township.
The drop boxes will be open the following days and hours beginning May 5:
• Monday through Friday: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
• Saturday, May 17: 8 a.m. to 1 p.m.
• Sunday, May 18: noon to 4 p.m.
• Monday, May 19: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
• Election Day, May 20: 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.
All three drop boxes are secured by deputies from the sheriff's department and are monitored by security cameras. Workers in the election services department collect the ballots at the end of each day and seal them when the centers are closed.
Voters who choose to drop off their ballots are not allowed to drop off ballots belonging to anyone else — a practice Democrats call community collection and Republicans deem ballot harvesting. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled the practice is illegal.
What if I don't get my mail ballot?
No problem. You can go to your assigned polling place and vote in-person by filling out a provisional ballot if you have not received your mail ballot.
What if I signed up for a mail ballot but want to vote at the polls?
If you misplaced your mail ballot or have decided to cast your ballot at the polls, you still have an opportunity to vote.
Go to your assigned polling place. If you have the mail ballot, you will need to surrender the ballot and its envelopes to the judge of elections to be voided in order to vote on the voting machines. If you misplaced the mail ballot, you will need to tell the judge of elections and they will give you a provisional ballot to fill out.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Speaker Johnson vows to stop California's redistricting push — but ignores Texas doing the same
Speaker Johnson vows to stop California's redistricting push — but ignores Texas doing the same

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Speaker Johnson vows to stop California's redistricting push — but ignores Texas doing the same

House Speaker Mike Johnson says he plans to derail California's proposed congressional map after Governor Gavin Newsom unveiled a proposal to redraw the state's electoral boundaries. Newsom and California Democrats proposed new congressional lines on Friday in an attempt to eliminate potential gains in Texas, where Republicans backed by Donald Trump launched a nationwide redistricting battle with nakedly partisan ambitions ahead of midterm elections in 2026. Johnson accused Democrats of an 'illegal power grab.' 'Gavin Newsom should spend less time trampling his state's laws for a blatant power grab, and more time working to change the disastrous, far-left policies that are destroying California,' Johnson wrote Monday. 'Newsom obviously wants to launch a presidential campaign on the backs of disenfranchised California voters, but it will not work.' But unlike California, Texas lawmakers in the state legislature only need to vote on the maps before they are signed into law by Governor Gregg Abbott. Newsom, meanwhile, must hold a special election this fall so voters can decide whether to suspend the state's independent redistricting commission until the end of the decade to advance the new map. Johnson's statement followed the return of a group of Texas Democrats who left the state to break quorum in the state House, leaving Republicans without enough members present to vote on legislation during a special 30-day legislative session that was requested by Abbott. Dozens of Texas Democrats declared victory on Monday after staying out of the state for more than two weeks, blocking Republicans' Trump-led gerrymandering campaign. But redistricting is on the agenda for a second special session. Texas Republicans are expected to quickly take up — and pass — a new congressional map that would create five more districts likely to elect Republican candidates, which would give the GOP 30 of the state's 38 seats in Congress. In a statement on Monday, the Texas House Democratic Caucus said that members returned 'to launch the next phase' in the redistricting battle. Democrats' return to the state will allow them to create the 'legal record necessary to defeat this racist map in court, take our message to communities across the state and country, and inspire legislators across the country how to fight these undemocratic redistricting schemes in their own statehouses,' Texas House of Representatives Minority Leader Gene Wu said in a statement. GOP lawmakers were explicit that the new map was designed to improve 'political performance,' an act of political or partisan gerrymandering — in which a controlling party carves out maps to 'pack' likely opponents into a few districts, or 'cracks' them across multiple districts, thereby diluting their voting power. Critics accused Republicans of gerrymandering a map on racial lines, effectively letting Republicans choose their voters rather than the other way around. While out of the state, Abbott and state Attorney General Ken Paxton and GOP members of Congress put pressure on law enforcement to haul absent lawmakers back to the state capital in Austin. 'We killed the corrupt special session, withstood unprecedented surveillance and intimidation, and rallied Democrats nationwide to join this existential fight for fair representation — reshaping the entire 2026 landscape,' Wu said. California and Texas, the nation's two most populous states, remain at the forefront of the brewing redistricting war, as Trump pushes Republicans to redraw electoral lines for control of the House of Representatives to avoid a repeat of 2018 midterm elections — when Democrats regained control of Congress and impeached him twice. Democrats — who accused Republicans of illegally diluting the voting strength of Black and Latino voters — are planning to retaliate, triggering a race to reshape the electoral map by the time Americans cast their ballots in 2026. Newsom has stressed that bypassing the state's redistricting commission would be temporary, and that the state would only redraw its congressional boundaries if Texas shot first. At a rally in Los Angeles last week, Newsom said Trump is 'trying to rig the system' and, 'as a consequence, we need to disabuse ourselves of the way things have been done.' 'We have got to recognize the cards that have been dealt,' Newsom said. 'And we have got to meet fire with fire.' Johnson called Newsom's plans a 'slap in the face to Californians who overwhelmingly support' the state's redistricting commission. 'Unlike other states, California must shred its own Constitution to succeed in its desperate gambit to 'end the Trump presidency.' Voters in California and across the nation see through this partisan stunt,' he said. Johnson said his office and the National Republican Congressional Committee will 'use every measure and resource possible' to take on California. The Republicans' congressional campaign arm criticized Newsom's move, accusing the governor of 'shredding California's Constitution and disenfranchising voters to prop up his Presidential ambitions.' 'The NRCC is prepared to fight this illegal power grab in the courts and at the ballot box to stop Newsom in his tracks,' chairman Richard Hudson said last week.

Bill Barr deposition kicks off House GOP's Epstein probe
Bill Barr deposition kicks off House GOP's Epstein probe

The Hill

time16 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Bill Barr deposition kicks off House GOP's Epstein probe

Former Attorney General Bill Barr answered questions about Jeffrey Epstein in a Monday deposition with the House Oversight Committee that kicked off the panel's probe into matters relating to the late sex offender — an interview that fueled Republican defenses of President Trump while leaving the panel's Democrats hoping to call additional witnesses. Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), the panel's chair who was present for the first hours of the deposition, told reporters that Barr testified that he did not know of any information that would implicate President Trump. 'What Attorney General Barr testified in there was that he never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list,' Comer said. 'He didn't know anything about a client list. He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out.' Asked about reporting from the Wall Street Journal that Attorney General Pam Bondi had told Trump that he was mentioned in the Epstein files, Comer said Barr talked about how 'you go over everyone that you've ever been in communication with, or whatever, that doesn't implicate you, as far as being guilty.' Democrats on the panel who sat in on the deposition, meanwhile, asserted that they were taking the investigation more seriously than the Republicans. 'I think the Democratic side is doing most of the heavy lifting. I don't think we're learning much from the questioning from the House Republicans. It doesn't seem like this is something where they are truly caring about the victims and about trying to get to the bottom of what's happening,' Rep. Suhas Subramanyam (D-Va.) said. 'It seems like they are going through the motions, and they want people to believe that they are digging in,' Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) added about her Republican counterparts. 'But at the end of the day, I don't think that we've learned anything through the Republican questioning that you couldn't find in one of the articles that most likely your outlets have printed.' Comer in response said: 'It's unfortunate the Democrats are trying to, seems to me, politicize this, when you look at the basis of this, horrific crimes against young girls. And of course, the Democrats' goal is to try to dig up some type of dirt on President Trump.' The panel's Epstein investigation was spurred by the furor that followed the Department of Justice and FBI releasing a memo in July saying that it would not release any more information from the so-called 'Epstein files.' The announcement further fueled conspiracy theories that the government is shielding powerful individuals who may have been involved with Epstein's abuse of young women and underage girls. Barr is one of 10 high-profile former federal officials who the Oversight panel subpoenaed as it looks into the Epstein matter, pursuant to a Republican-led motion that came as Democrats on the panel also successfully moved to subpoena the Justice Department for the 'full, unredacted Epstein files.' Deposition dates are also set for former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton — who, like president Trump, had socialized with Epstein — and other former attorneys general and FBI directors going back to the first prosecution of Epstein in 2008. Barr was attorney general in President Trump's first term when Epstein was arrested on federal charges of sex trafficking minors in 2019, and when died in his prison cell later that year in what federal authorities have repeatedly said was a suicide. He was also attorney general when Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend and associate, was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges in 2020. Maxwell was later convicted and is currently in prison. Crockett said that the questioning led her to want to seek more information from investigators in the Southern District of New York and from former Labor Secretary Alex Acosta, who was the prosecutor who handled Epstein's much-criticized plea deal in 2008 and was not one of the former officials subpoenaed pursuant to the Republican-led motion in July. Comer indicated he was open to calling more witnesses when asked about the possibility of bringing in Acosta. 'We'll bring in everyone what we think can add information to the investigation. This is a serious investigation, this is a sincere investigation. I hope this will be a bipartisan investigation,' Comer said. The next deadline in the panel's investigation is Tuesday, the date by which it directed the Department of Justice to deliver all documents and communications relating to its Epstein investigation. Comer indicated that the Tuesday deadline could be pushed back. 'We're having really good conversations. You have to understand how many, you can imagine, how many documents there are,' Comer said. 'I think we'll receive the documents very soon,' Comer added, saying 'we're working together in a good faith effort.' Crockett said that if the DOJ does not comply with the deadline, Democratic leadership will talk about how to respond. 'I fully anticipate that they should at least try to substantially convey the vast majority of the request,' Crockett said. 'Because that is one of the things that the court will look at, if we have to go so far as to try to seek enforcement on this, is whether or not there was substantial compliance.' The Oversight panel has also subpoenaed Maxwell, but Comer has agreed to delay deposing her until after the Supreme Court considers her petition to overturn her conviction for sex trafficking. The Justice Department, meanwhile, has made new efforts to reveal previously unseen information — despite the president himself dismissing the Epstein saga as a 'hoax.' Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche sat down with Maxwell to try to get new information. The DOJ also made motions to unseal grand jury testimony transcripts from the Epstein case and from Maxwell's case, but both were denied.

Texas House signals it will ‘move quickly' on redistricting with Democrats back
Texas House signals it will ‘move quickly' on redistricting with Democrats back

The Hill

time16 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Texas House signals it will ‘move quickly' on redistricting with Democrats back

The Texas House signaled it would move quickly on redistricting and other legislative matters after reaching a quorum on Monday afternoon following the return of Democrats who had fled the state in protest against GOP efforts to push through a new congressional map. 'No one here needs a reminder that the last few weeks have been contentious, but from this point forward, the rules of engagement are clear: Debate is welcome, but personal attacks and name calling will not be tolerated,' Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows (R) told his colleagues. 'Let me also be clear about where we go from here,' he added. 'We are done waiting. We have a quorum. Now is the time for action. We'll move quickly, and the schedule [will] be demanding until our work is complete.' Texas House Democrats returned to the state after boycotting an initial special session called by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R). Republicans had moved to quickly pass a new GOP-friendly House map that aims to give Republicans five pick-up opportunities ahead of 2026. Democrats had signaled they would return to the state after two conditions were met: Texas lawmakers adjourning their first special session on Friday and California Democrats' introducing their own House map that looks to offset expected gains from Texas' new House map. Both of those things happened last week. 'When Republicans tried to silence minority voters through racist gerrymandering, Texas House Democrats answered the call,' the Texas House Democrats said in a post on X ahead of the Monday session. 'After rallying Americans to join this existential battle for democracy, we're returning to Texas on our terms — ready to build the legal record needed to defeat these unconstitutional maps in court. The fight continues,' they added. Monday's session lasted just under half an hour, with a number of bills being read and referred to different committees, including legislation around the proposed GOP House map. The congressional lines need to passed by each chamber's respective redistricting committee before the map can be teed up for floor votes in the House and Senate. Once passed in the state legislature, they will head to Abbott's desk for his signature. Burrows said that the House would next meet on Wednesday, with lawmakers who did not thwart the chamber's quorum being allowed to freely leave. Burrows said House Democrats would only be allowed to leave 'after agreeing to be released into the custody of a designated DPS officer appointment under the rules of the House' who would ensure their return on Wednesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store