Teal candidate Nicolette Boele blames volunteer for antisemitic posts asking voters to donate 'shekels' for 'amazing bargains' in fundraising drive
A Teal candidate in one of New South Wales' biggest Jewish seats has blamed a volunteer for antisemitic posts made under her name.
Nicolette Boele's posts were found to be so concerning, they were featured in a report on antisemitism by Australia's peak Jewish representative body.
Sky News can reveal the resurfaced posts were published during the last election and included in a 2023 report on antisemitism by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ).
Ms Boele is the independent candidate for the seat of Bradfield in north Sydney, the electorate with the second largest Jewish population in the state after Wentworth.
In a Facebook post on October 4, 2022, Ms Boele wrote:
'It has been encouragingly suggested today that #TeamNic are demonstrating considerable 'chutzpah' in planning to open Australia's first Shadow Representative Electorate Office right here in #Bradfield… we really could use some more shekels to maintain our chutzpah…some absolutely amazing bargains on offer!'
In a tweet published on the same day, she wrote:
'We really could use some more sheckles (sic) to maintain our chutzpah, so please consider bidding in our Spring Auctions. There's (sic) still some amazing bargains on offer!'
Both posts, which appear to have since been deleted, linked to an online auction platform.
The ECAJ report noted the posts used 'Hebrew/Jewish terms (chutzpah, shekels) in calling for donations, offering bargains, and thus using and reinforcing the stereotype of Jews and money."
In a statement to Sky News, Ms Boele said the posts were written by a volunteer no longer working on her campaign.
'A volunteer wrote a disgraceful, antisemitic Facebook post on my page in 2022,' Ms Boele said.
'I took responsibility for the post and apologized for it.
'Wherever antisemitism appears, political leaders have a responsibility to call it out.
'The volunteer who wrote the post is not volunteering or working on my campaign.
'I will always call out antisemitism.
'The rise in antisemitism in recent years, including incidents in my electorate, is a stain on our nation and we must all do whatever we can to stamp it out.'
Sky News has also obtained a survey Ms Boele completed for ECAJ last week, in which she rejects the idea of a judicial inquiry into antisemitism at universities, proposed by Jewish Liberal MP and shadow assistant minister for foreign affairs Julian Leeser.
Ms Boele is asked in the survey if she would advocate for the next government to conduct a judicial inquiry into antisemitism at Australian universities, including an investigation into whether there has been foreign funding of student protests.
She replies that while she does believe foreign funding should be investigated, she has 'concerns that a judicial inquiry would increase social division and lead to more protests that make campuses even more unsafe for Jewish Australians'.
Ms Boele says in the survey she would advocate the next government make it a condition of receiving Federal funding each university bans encampments, but is against tying funding to banning the disruption of lectures and tutorials by protesters and preventing external organisations or individuals from orchestrating protest activities on campus.
"We have to balance (the) right to peaceful protest with the right to be free from discrimination,' she answered in response to questions on the letter two points."
Ms Boele confirms she would not lobby the next government to demand literary and cultural festival boards have a balance of political representation as a condition of receiving federal grants.
She was also hesitant on whether federal grants come with a condition the recipient does not promote racism.
'(I'm) open to it but don't want the measure to be so broad as to risk undue government interference with cultural institutions,' Ms Boele says.
Both Ms Boele and her Liberal rival Gisele Kapterian are due to front the Bradfield Election Forum being hosted by ECAJ and the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies on Tuesday night to answer questions from Jewish voters.
Bradfield has been held by the Liberals for 75 years, but became a key Teal target following the abolishment of the neighboring seat of North Sydney, held by fellow independent Kylea Tink, and the retirement of sitting MP Paul Fletcher.
In the last election, Ms Boele scored 21 per cent of the primary vote and a 12.3 per cent swing away from the Liberals on a two-party preferred basis.
She rebranded herself the 'Shadow Representative for Bradfield', even cutting the ribbon for her new 'shadow' electorate office alongside her backer, Climate 200 founder Simon Holmes à Court.
The revelation of the antisemitic posts are the latest scandal to beset Ms Boele.
The independent candidate was earlier this month banned from her local hairdresser Envy Room Salon in Gordon after making a sexualised joke to a teenage hairdressing apprentice.
Ms Boele told the 19-year-old her hair wash was 'amazing and I didn't even have sex with you'.
The candidate apologised, saying it was 'a poor attempt at humour… Everyone deserves to feel respected in their workplace and I'll do better".
It has also emerged the candidate's campaign accepted donations from a funds management company founder who invested heavily in fossil fuel businesses.
The managing director at Samuel Terry Asset Management, Fred Woollard, was listed on Ms Boele's website under donors whose gifts had totaled more than $1,500 during the 2024-25 financial year.
Mr Woollard told the Daily Telegraph while his firm invested in assets including oil and gas companies, 'in my private life I like to encourage climate change action'.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Advertiser
6 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
Muslim preacher defends 'dehumanising' sermons on Jews
An Islamist preacher's speeches that allegedly painted Jewish people as "vile and treacherous" were not racist but formed part of a robust discussion, his lawyer has argued. Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad has been accused of racial discrimination after a series of fiery sermons from November 2023, which have racked up thousands of views online. In one of his speeches, he appears to blame the roots of "the enmity that we see today" on "none other than the Jews ... because their forefathers had shown the same enmity to the Prophet (Mohammed)." Mr Haddad is being sued by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot, who are seeking the removal of the allegedly racist speeches. They also want Mr Haddad to be barred from making similar comments again. Mr Wertheim told the Federal Court on Tuesday the speeches used "overtly dehumanising" language. "Making derogatory generalisations, calling Jews a vile and treacherous people, calling them rats and cowards ... are things which I think would be experienced by most Jews as dehumanising," he said. His barrister Peter Braham SC told the court the speeches drew on a large range of offensive tropes and were designed to threaten, humiliate and denigrate all Jewish people. The court was told Mr Haddad, who is also known as Abu Ousayd, addressed a camera and engaged with media coverage of his commentary. But his barrister Andrew Boe argued the preacher's speeches were intended for a private Muslim audience of 40 people and he was not responsible for publishing them online. He said it was unlikely any Jewish people would have come across the speeches if they had not received coverage by media organisations. "It would be analogous to a person of a prudish sensitivity seeking out pornography on the web and then complaining about being offended by it," Mr Boe said. Mr Haddad denies breaching anti-discrimination laws and claims he was delivering historical and religious lectures on historical events from the Koran and the war in Gaza. The speeches occurred in the context of a vigorous political debate characterised by an intensity of feeling on both sides and set against the background of a long religious history, Mr Boe said. He advocated for the preservation of free speech and argued the boundaries of debate couldn't be set so narrow as to exclude views which were not polite, bland or balanced. Mr Wertheim said being exposed to challenging ideas in robust conversations did not insult him "as long as they don't cross the boundary into vilification". His lawyer told the court that the Jewish community lived with "a communal memory of past persecution and which remains conscious of threats to its safety by reason of race". The hearing continues. Lifeline 13 11 14 beyondblue 1300 22 4636 An Islamist preacher's speeches that allegedly painted Jewish people as "vile and treacherous" were not racist but formed part of a robust discussion, his lawyer has argued. Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad has been accused of racial discrimination after a series of fiery sermons from November 2023, which have racked up thousands of views online. In one of his speeches, he appears to blame the roots of "the enmity that we see today" on "none other than the Jews ... because their forefathers had shown the same enmity to the Prophet (Mohammed)." Mr Haddad is being sued by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot, who are seeking the removal of the allegedly racist speeches. They also want Mr Haddad to be barred from making similar comments again. Mr Wertheim told the Federal Court on Tuesday the speeches used "overtly dehumanising" language. "Making derogatory generalisations, calling Jews a vile and treacherous people, calling them rats and cowards ... are things which I think would be experienced by most Jews as dehumanising," he said. His barrister Peter Braham SC told the court the speeches drew on a large range of offensive tropes and were designed to threaten, humiliate and denigrate all Jewish people. The court was told Mr Haddad, who is also known as Abu Ousayd, addressed a camera and engaged with media coverage of his commentary. But his barrister Andrew Boe argued the preacher's speeches were intended for a private Muslim audience of 40 people and he was not responsible for publishing them online. He said it was unlikely any Jewish people would have come across the speeches if they had not received coverage by media organisations. "It would be analogous to a person of a prudish sensitivity seeking out pornography on the web and then complaining about being offended by it," Mr Boe said. Mr Haddad denies breaching anti-discrimination laws and claims he was delivering historical and religious lectures on historical events from the Koran and the war in Gaza. The speeches occurred in the context of a vigorous political debate characterised by an intensity of feeling on both sides and set against the background of a long religious history, Mr Boe said. He advocated for the preservation of free speech and argued the boundaries of debate couldn't be set so narrow as to exclude views which were not polite, bland or balanced. Mr Wertheim said being exposed to challenging ideas in robust conversations did not insult him "as long as they don't cross the boundary into vilification". His lawyer told the court that the Jewish community lived with "a communal memory of past persecution and which remains conscious of threats to its safety by reason of race". The hearing continues. Lifeline 13 11 14 beyondblue 1300 22 4636 An Islamist preacher's speeches that allegedly painted Jewish people as "vile and treacherous" were not racist but formed part of a robust discussion, his lawyer has argued. Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad has been accused of racial discrimination after a series of fiery sermons from November 2023, which have racked up thousands of views online. In one of his speeches, he appears to blame the roots of "the enmity that we see today" on "none other than the Jews ... because their forefathers had shown the same enmity to the Prophet (Mohammed)." Mr Haddad is being sued by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot, who are seeking the removal of the allegedly racist speeches. They also want Mr Haddad to be barred from making similar comments again. Mr Wertheim told the Federal Court on Tuesday the speeches used "overtly dehumanising" language. "Making derogatory generalisations, calling Jews a vile and treacherous people, calling them rats and cowards ... are things which I think would be experienced by most Jews as dehumanising," he said. His barrister Peter Braham SC told the court the speeches drew on a large range of offensive tropes and were designed to threaten, humiliate and denigrate all Jewish people. The court was told Mr Haddad, who is also known as Abu Ousayd, addressed a camera and engaged with media coverage of his commentary. But his barrister Andrew Boe argued the preacher's speeches were intended for a private Muslim audience of 40 people and he was not responsible for publishing them online. He said it was unlikely any Jewish people would have come across the speeches if they had not received coverage by media organisations. "It would be analogous to a person of a prudish sensitivity seeking out pornography on the web and then complaining about being offended by it," Mr Boe said. Mr Haddad denies breaching anti-discrimination laws and claims he was delivering historical and religious lectures on historical events from the Koran and the war in Gaza. The speeches occurred in the context of a vigorous political debate characterised by an intensity of feeling on both sides and set against the background of a long religious history, Mr Boe said. He advocated for the preservation of free speech and argued the boundaries of debate couldn't be set so narrow as to exclude views which were not polite, bland or balanced. Mr Wertheim said being exposed to challenging ideas in robust conversations did not insult him "as long as they don't cross the boundary into vilification". His lawyer told the court that the Jewish community lived with "a communal memory of past persecution and which remains conscious of threats to its safety by reason of race". The hearing continues. Lifeline 13 11 14 beyondblue 1300 22 4636 An Islamist preacher's speeches that allegedly painted Jewish people as "vile and treacherous" were not racist but formed part of a robust discussion, his lawyer has argued. Sydney-based Al Madina Dawah Centre cleric Wissam Haddad has been accused of racial discrimination after a series of fiery sermons from November 2023, which have racked up thousands of views online. In one of his speeches, he appears to blame the roots of "the enmity that we see today" on "none other than the Jews ... because their forefathers had shown the same enmity to the Prophet (Mohammed)." Mr Haddad is being sued by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot, who are seeking the removal of the allegedly racist speeches. They also want Mr Haddad to be barred from making similar comments again. Mr Wertheim told the Federal Court on Tuesday the speeches used "overtly dehumanising" language. "Making derogatory generalisations, calling Jews a vile and treacherous people, calling them rats and cowards ... are things which I think would be experienced by most Jews as dehumanising," he said. His barrister Peter Braham SC told the court the speeches drew on a large range of offensive tropes and were designed to threaten, humiliate and denigrate all Jewish people. The court was told Mr Haddad, who is also known as Abu Ousayd, addressed a camera and engaged with media coverage of his commentary. But his barrister Andrew Boe argued the preacher's speeches were intended for a private Muslim audience of 40 people and he was not responsible for publishing them online. He said it was unlikely any Jewish people would have come across the speeches if they had not received coverage by media organisations. "It would be analogous to a person of a prudish sensitivity seeking out pornography on the web and then complaining about being offended by it," Mr Boe said. Mr Haddad denies breaching anti-discrimination laws and claims he was delivering historical and religious lectures on historical events from the Koran and the war in Gaza. The speeches occurred in the context of a vigorous political debate characterised by an intensity of feeling on both sides and set against the background of a long religious history, Mr Boe said. He advocated for the preservation of free speech and argued the boundaries of debate couldn't be set so narrow as to exclude views which were not polite, bland or balanced. Mr Wertheim said being exposed to challenging ideas in robust conversations did not insult him "as long as they don't cross the boundary into vilification". His lawyer told the court that the Jewish community lived with "a communal memory of past persecution and which remains conscious of threats to its safety by reason of race". The hearing continues. Lifeline 13 11 14 beyondblue 1300 22 4636


9 News
20 minutes ago
- 9 News
Sydney preacher accused of vilifying Jewish people
Bankstown preacher Wissam Haddad has faced court, accused of vilifying Jewish people in a series of speeches in the wake of the October 7 attacks.

The Age
31 minutes ago
- The Age
ASX extends gains on US-China talk hopes; Monash plummets on IVF bungle
The Australian sharemarket extended its gains in early afternoon, buoyed by hopes constructive talks between the US and China will ease global trade tensions as officials struck a positive tone after the first day of negotiations. The S&P/ASX 200 rose 64.7 points, or 0.8 per cent, to 8580.49 as of 1.11pm AEST. Nine of the 11 industry sectors rose, with banks, consumer and energy stocks leading the gains. CBA hit a fresh record high, while Monash shares plummeted following news of another IVF bungle. The bourse was closed on Monday for the King's Birthday holiday. The Australian dollar strengthened overnight, and was flat at US65.18¢ at 1.13pm AEST. American and Chinese officials met in London on Monday to talk about a range of different disputes that are separating them. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the discussions were 'fruitful' and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent cited a 'good meeting'. 'We are doing well with China. China's not easy,' President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House. 'I'm only getting good reports.' The advisers will meet again on Tuesday at 10am in London, according to a US official, as the two sides look to ease tensions over shipments of technology and rare earth elements. Loading Markets across Asia edged up as traders closely followed the talks between the two economic superpowers. On the ASX, consumer discretionary and financial stocks led the local market higher as investors stepped up their bets for a de-escalation of the global trade war. 'There's this growing optimism again that the negotiations will ultimately reach an agreement,' said Takeru Ogihara, a Tokyo-based executive strategist at Asset Management One. 'If the US and China can come together, it will be a positive development for the global economy.'