logo
Exercise boosts cancer recovery and slashes risk of death or relapse by a third, major study finds

Exercise boosts cancer recovery and slashes risk of death or relapse by a third, major study finds

The Sun2 days ago

EXERCISE is 'better than a drug' at stopping cancer coming back, a landmark trial suggests.
Top doctors say recovering patients should be prescribed personal trainers to boost survival.
1
A Cancer Research UK study showed it could slash bowel cancer patients' risk of death or relapse.
Following an exercise programme after treatment reduced their risk of dying within eight years by 37 per cent.
And it reduced the chance of a patient's cancer growing back within five years by 28 per cent.
Physical activity also appeared to cut the risk for breast and prostate cancers, the two most common types.
'Drugs are approved for less'
Dr Julie Gralow, president of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, said: 'This is the same magnitude of benefit as many drugs.
'Drugs get approved for less than that and they're expensive and toxic, so I would say it's better than a drug.'
Dr Pamela Kunz, of Yale University in the US, said prescribing it was a 'no-brainer'.
The world-first trial involved 889 people from Canada and Australia who had received surgery and chemotherapy for colon cancer, the most common form of bowel cancer.
It affects around 32,000 people per year in the UK and develops in the large intestine.
Half of the participants were given basic exercise advice and the other half were assigned personal trainers and given tailored exercise programmes for three years.
The plan added the equivalent of three to four hours of walking on top of patients' normal daily activity.
At the end of the 15-year trial, people in the personal trainer group were significantly less likely to have relapsed or died.
Study author Dr Christopher Booth, from Queen's University in Kingston, Canada, said: 'These results are clear: an exercise program that includes a personal trainer will reduce the risk of recurrent or new cancer, make you feel better and help you live longer.
'Most patients chose a walking program and could reach their targets by going for a walk of 45 to 60 minutes three to four times per week.
'The benefit was substantial and in some cases exceeded the benefit of many of our very good medical therapies.
'This sets a new standard of care for colon cancer.'
He said that one life was saved for every 14 patients who enlisted in the exercise programme.
It cost an estimated £2,500 per patient over three years and the Canadian government is now looking at including it in hospital care.
Dr Gralow added: 'If you start exercising after you get through your treatment you absolutely still get the benefits – it's not too late.
'Three decades ago it was still the era of doctors being gentle and saying don't overdo it, but we've reversed that and had a major shift in understanding the importance of physical activity.
'We should be doing all we can to help patients be active.'
How much exercise should you do and when?
There are guidelines issued by the NHS and the Government regarding how much exercise people should do each day.
People should be active daily, and avoid sitting for long periods.
The NHS recommends an adults – those aged 19 to 64 – should aim for 150 minutes of 'moderate intensity activity' a week.
This works out to 21 minutes a day, or 30 minutes five days a week.
Or, they could do 75 minutes of vigorous activity per week, which could be less than 11 minutes per day or 25 minutes three days a week.
Adults should also aim to do strength exercises twice a week, at least.
Examples of moderate-intensity activities include brisk walking, water aerobics, riding a bike, dancing, doubles tennis, pushing a lawn mower, hiking or rollerblading.
Examples of vigorous activities include running, swimming, riding a bike fast or on hills, walking up the stairs, sports, like football, rugby, netball and hockey, skipping, aerobics, gymnastics or martial arts.
Things like lifting heavy weights, sprinting up hills, spin classes or circuit training are considered very vigorous.
What time should you exercise?
Getting exercise into your day, no matter what time is a good idea.
But you may want to be more selective depending on your goal.
A 2023 US study on 5,285 middle-aged adults showed exercising between 7 and 9 am was the best time if you're looking to lose weight.
Researchers found that early-bird gym goers had a lower body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference than those working out later.
A 2022 study led by Prof Paul J Arciero, Skidmore College, New York, found that the optimal time of day to get your kit on might differ according to your gender.
Prof Arciero said women wanting to lose fat around their belly and hips would do better to hit the gym in the morning, but those seeking to gain upper body strength or simply improve their mood might see more results from evening exercise.
The results were the opposite for men.
If you struggle to get to sleep, it's been found that exercise in the morning may help, but exercise in the evening may help you to stay asleep.
Exercise, generally, can improve sleep quality.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Northern Powergrid fixes Isle of Axholme electrical fault
Northern Powergrid fixes Isle of Axholme electrical fault

BBC News

time33 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Northern Powergrid fixes Isle of Axholme electrical fault

Northern Powergrid says its engineers have fixed a fault in Northern Lincolnshire, as some residents claim the frequent outages reminded them of 1970s-style power living in the Isle of Axholme have told the BBC that the outages, which had been going on since December, often lasted for hours and heavily disrupted their Cawkwell, who lives in the village of Althorpe, described the situation as "ridiculous", adding that it left residents needing to "get the candles out".A Northern Powergrid spokesperson blamed the problem on overgrown trees. "Engineers were mobilised to investigate, repairs have taken place, and we can confirm this is now complete," they added. In April, a foodbank in Haxey said it was "deeply frustrated" after power cuts ruined their stocks of chilled living in the area said their lives had become a nightmare and, at some points in the last month, thousands of people saw their supplies cut off on a daily Wootten, who has lived in West Butterwick for 34 years, said she had resorted to keeping camping lanterns around her added: "They've been happening regularly since Christmas and often in the middle of the night. The last two months have been the worst."We're paying a lot of money for something but we're not getting the service. They (Northern Powergrid) say they have fixed it but I'm just waiting for the next cut."Some residents said they had been offered a £30 payment from Northern Powergrid for the inconvenience Kennedy said she had "lost count" of how many power cuts her household had experienced and was sceptical about the cause of the added: "We've been told birds and vegetation are to blame but that's difficult to believe. Are they really different here compared to anywhere else?" Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.

Chatting at wheel ‘worse than using phone'
Chatting at wheel ‘worse than using phone'

Telegraph

time36 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Chatting at wheel ‘worse than using phone'

Talking to passengers and daydreaming behind the wheel are bigger causes of driving mistakes that may lead to an accident than using a mobile phone, a survey suggests. The RAC, which commissioned the poll, warned that distractions can have 'catastrophic consequences'. More than three in five (63 per cent) of the 2,691 UK drivers surveyed said they had made mistakes behind the wheel because they were distracted. Of this group, the most common self-reported causes of distraction were talking to other passengers (43 per cent) and thinking about topics unrelated to driving (37 per cent). When respondents were asked what they thought were the most distracting things a driver could do, the most common responses were talking on a phone (46 per cent) and applying make-up or shaving (42 per cent). Among those who admitted to making distraction mistakes, just 8 per cent said talking on the phone was the cause, while 2 per cent of drivers blamed shaving or applying make-up. Mistakes included missing a junction, exceeding the speed limit, ending up in the wrong lane or nearly crashing into another road user. Yet almost a quarter (23 per cent) of under-25s said they had been distracted by making phone calls, even though doing so with a handheld device while driving is illegal. More than half (55 per cent) of this age group admitted to breaking the law by doing this. Public wrong about hazard causes Overall, the difference between what drivers believe is distracting and what actually caused a mistake to be made suggests that the public may be wrong about the causes of road safety hazards. Rod Dennis, the RAC road safety spokesman, said: 'Talking to passengers or daydreaming are so common that they aren't perceived by drivers to be big distractions, but our research has revealed they are in fact responsible for most of the errors drivers admit to. 'Although your eyes are on the road, it's easy for your mind to wander behind the wheel, especially on long journeys. 'Distractions can have catastrophic consequences for both drivers themselves and other road users, especially in extreme instances like failing to stop at a junction or at a red light or crossing. 'Driving is still a very mentally demanding task, especially as we need to be able to react to what's in front in a split-second, so it's important we do everything we can to stay alert and minimise distractions.' Almost one in five (18 per cent) of younger motorists aged 17 to 24 said they had become distracted after eating or drinking while driving. Similarly, just over one in 10 of the same age group said vaping or smoking behind the wheel had led to them taking their minds off the road. Interacting with modern touchscreen systems to control functions such as heating, radio and navigation aids also lead to drivers making mistakes, with 26 per cent of the full survey sample saying this happened to them. Safety over convenience Separate Department for Transport (DfT) figures show 940 people were killed or seriously injured in crashes on Britain's roads in 2023 where a driver was found to be distracted by something within their vehicle. Campaigners have long sought to crack down on the use of mobile phones while driving because of their potential to distract motorists from the road ahead. Yet the message of safety over convenience has yet to fully sink in. Earlier this year, rapper Stormzy was banned from driving for nine months after an undercover police officer caught him using a phone behind the wheel of a Rolls-Royce in west London. Manchester City player Erling Haaland was reportedly caught scrolling on his phone while stopped in traffic last September. Doing so behind the wheel still counts as using a handheld device while driving, even when the vehicle is stationary. Similarly, rail minister Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill was reported to police after he was caught doing the same thing in April while behind the wheel of his vintage Routemaster bus, which he was driving during a charity event.

Is Ozempic fueling a new era of body image pressure? Join The Independent Debate
Is Ozempic fueling a new era of body image pressure? Join The Independent Debate

The Independent

time39 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Is Ozempic fueling a new era of body image pressure? Join The Independent Debate

Originally developed for type 2 diabetes, drugs like Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro are now being widely used for weight loss, with demand skyrocketing. Touted as a game-changer by some and a cause for concern by others, GLP-1 receptor agonists work by suppressing appetite. The UK government is backing a five-year trial in Greater Manchester, offering weight-loss jabs to up to 3,000 unemployed people with obesity, in a bid to improve job prospects and reduce strain on the NHS. Health Secretary Wes Streeting defended the move, insisting it's part of a broader preventative health strategy. 'There's a lot of evidence already that these jabs, combined with changes to diet and exercise, can help people reduce their weight but also prevent cardiovascular disease and diabetes, which is game-changing,' he said. But as demand rises, so do questions. Streeting also cautioned against creating a "dependency culture" and experts have warned of potential side effects, including nausea, fatigue, and digestive issues, while long-term effects remain uncertain. Concerns have also been raised about overuse, off-label prescribing, and people turning to unregulated online sources to get the injections without proper medical guidance. There's also a cultural shift to consider: Are we medicalising body image issues? Are we heading toward a future where weight loss is expected to come in a syringe rather than through lasting lifestyle change? Now we want to hear from you: as Ozempic becomes more mainstream, is it a breakthrough treatment, or are we rushing in too fast without understanding the consequences? Are weight-loss jabs simply fueling a new era of body image pressure? All you have to do is sign up and register your details – then you can take part in the debate. You can also sign up by clicking 'log in' on the top right-hand corner of the screen.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store