I continue to use Google Home and its speakers, but I hate everything about it
I don't think I'm alone in this contradictory state. Every week I run across a Reddit thread of frustrated users reporting new bugs and issues, or voicing their impatience at the state of Google's smart home. And I nod in agreement, again and again, because I am them. They are me. We're all in this unhealthy relationship with Google's smart home platform together. And we can't escape.
Why are you still using Google Home in 2025?
0 votes
I've invested too much time/money into it.
NaN %
The bugs and glitches don't bother me that much.
NaN %
My experience has been seamless and bug-free.
NaN %
Other (let us know in the comments).
NaN %
What annoys me about my Google smart speakers, every day
C. Scott Brown / Android Authority
If I had a penny for every time my Google speakers and hubs… plain out refused to hear me,
misunderstood what I said,
decided this is not my own voice,
forgot that they can control a specific device,
forgot that they can execute a certain command on a device,
forgot my entire routine and the keyword that triggers it,
decided to tell me a long story instead of giving a short answer,
told me they're executing a command and then failed to do it,
took forever to do something,
or answered on the furthest speaker away despite me being literally in front of another one,
… well, then I'd be a millionnaire.
Not a day goes by without my Nest speaker, hub, or Pixel tablet failing at some point. It's so frequent that I'm desensitized to it now; I try again and insist as if it's normal for tech to fail this frequently before getting it right. Or, if I'm in a hurry, I grab my phone to tap a button, manually, bypassing the entire raison d'être of a smart speaker.
My Google smart speakers are useless, on average, about half the time I try to use them.
'Hey Google, I'm cooking,' is a routine I use every day to trigger all three air purifiers in my home and set them to the highest fan speed. Google understands me one time out of three when I say those simple words. My husband is luckier; Google gets him about four out of five times. So I've resorted to asking my husband to tell Google to start the routine because I'm tired of hearing nothing but silence. On the other hand, 'Set a chicken timer' sets a normal timer for my husband, but does the whole chicken animation when I ask for it, which irritates my husband. He wants the animation and sounds, too.
For several weeks, 'Set a 20-minute timer' would open the French 20minutes news website. Anytime my husband says, 'Nothing,' the speakers answer him with the Wikipedia page of the Nothing phone company. When I play music on the ground floor, which is supposed to include both my Nest Hub and my Samsung Soundbar, the music is out of sync half the time; the other half, Google says it'll play music on my speaker group and then tells me 'Something went wrong, try again later.'
Talking to this so-called smart speaker feels dumber than chatting with the snail chilling on my wet porch now. The one thing it excels at is telling me and my husband the weather, and even then, it switches to Fahrenheit every few weeks even though we've repeatedly set it and told it and insisted to get it in Celsius.
'Something went wrong, try again later,' is the soundtrack of my life.
When a timer goes off in one room and I'm in another, I have to shout and hope the other speaker hears me: 'Stop' doesn't do anything on the speaker near me; it might even confuse Google because 'Nothing is playing right now.' How can it not understand that I'm stopping the timer in the other room baffles me.
Plus, because I use Gemini on my phone, multiple calendar support has been kaput for me for several months now. I can have the busiest day with work and family engagements, but my Nest Audio will tell me my calendar is free because none of these are on my personal account.
And don't get me started on how atrociously limited the Pixel Tablet is in a multi-user house. It only supports one voice — mine — so my husband can never ask it for his events, his shopping list, his music, or his reminders. We've relegated it to my office so he doesn't throw it out the window after the millionth, 'I'm sorry, I can't do that yet.'
I've tried enrolling in Google Home previews and leaving them, updating my speakers and resetting them, improving my router and home connection, as well as every other trick in the book to no avail. My Google smart speakers are useless, on average, about half the time I try to use them.
The Google Home app got better, but is still very frustrating
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
It's been 18 months since I wrote an article praising the Google Home app, saying it's on the right path. Sadly, not much has changed since, and even though I love the ubiquitous smart home panel, there's so much that annoys me every day about this app.
The biggest example for me is how the Google Home app becomes less useful the more devices you have. Scrolling endlessly through large similar icons becomes a waste of time, and I'm tired of having my rooms sorted alphabetically without any custom sorting. I don't want to see the bathroom lights before the bedroom or living room. I don't want to see my motion sensors take up a large tile like every other light or thermostat either, so why can't I hide them? I've set up my Favorites to create a semblance of a custom panel, but even then, why can't I make smaller tiles for the devices I use less often?
Support for third-party cameras is still abysmal, too. I have two TP-Link cameras that are compatible with Google Home, but they don't show their live feed in the app or on the home panel of my Google TV Streamer. Why? Because Google still chooses a few partner companies to elevate to a status similar to the Nest Cams, while the others are left in nowhere land.
And then, there are the routines. In an ideal world, I'd be able to set those up so I rarely, if ever, speak to Google Assistant, letting my home react to certain conditions and situations by itself without any voice commands. In reality, I've been able to create a few routines, but not nearly as many as I would've liked. For instance, Home and Away routines are restricted to light controls only. Why can't I turn off my TV or change the thermostat's mode when I leave home? Why can I not turn on the A/C when I get back home? I don't know.
My air purifier supports all these modes
But not in custom routines
So I work around that by writing voice commands
Custom routines are a bit more powerful, but still lack so many options. For example, I can control my air purifier's mode and fan speed in the Google Home app, but when I build a routine, I can only turn it on or off. Additionally, I can see several air quality metrics from my Sensibo Elements in the Google Home app, but I can't create a routine that turns on the air purifier each time the TVOC or CO2 levels are high; that data just doesn't appear in the 'if' part of the routine creation. The only way to bypass these is to use the code editor, and even then, the results have been hit-or-miss for me. And to make my Pixel Tablet play music when I turn on my office light, I had to type the command instead of using the visual picker because, for some unknown reason, you can't create a routine that plays music on the Pixel Tablet (on other speakers, yes).
When all of these controls and parameters are available in the Google Home app, why do they not show up in the routine creation menu? I couldn't tell you.
Why do I keep torturing myself then?
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
Ah, the million-dollar question.
To be honest, I don't really know or have an answer. I have a series of theories and thoughts about why I stick with Google's excruciating smart home platform, and I think the reality is somewhere in the middle.
There's the sunk cost fallacy where I just can't walk away from something I've invested so much money and time in. There's the evil you know versus the evil you don't; I keep testing the Alexa app on my devices to see if it's any better and realize it has a different and equally frustrating set of issues, too. There's the hope that with Gemini, things will get better. There's the fact that I write on Android Authority, I own Pixel phones and watches and Google TVs, and so does my husband, and Google Home is the only platform that makes sense for us. There's the casting capability and its compatibility with my Samsung soundbar. And there's the simple photo album feature that I cherish more than anything on my Pixel Tablet and Nest Hub and that I wouldn't give up for anything else.
Between the sunk cost fallacy, reticence to change, and the evil I know, there are many reasons why I stick with Google Home.
There's also the fact that when things work, they work. And I'm an optimist who hopes they'll work the same way next time, too.
I've bought and started using a Home Assistant Yellow to try to extricate myself from Google's ecosystem. That has been a long, painful, and frustrating journey, too. I love that I'm in control of my new Home Assistant setup, but I hate having to babysit every aspect of it. What I gained in control over my smart home, I lost in troubleshooting, setup, and ease of use. There's no ideal smart home platform out there, and as I said earlier… the evil I know.
I feel that that's where most of us, Google Home survivors, are nowadays. We don't see the grass being greener anywhere else, so we might as well stick with the patchy blot we have here in the hopes that it'll get better. Soon™.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gwyneth Paltrow is Astronomer's ‘temporary spokesperson' in new video
There's a lot of buzz around Astronomer, the data infrastructure company that skyrocketed into public attention after its executives - now former executives - gave us the viral Coldplay 'kiss cam' moment. With all this recent popularity, the business brought on some extra help, hiring a 'temporary spokesperson' with experience in Coldplay internet fame: Gwyneth Paltrow. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. 'I've been hired on a very temporary basis to speak on behalf of the 300+ employees at Astronomer,' the actress said in the minute-long video posted to social media Friday. 'Astronomer has gotten a lot of questions over the last few days, and they wanted me to answer the most common ones.' The Goop chief executive happens to be the ex-wife of Coldplay lead singer Chris Martin and co-author of the original 'break-the-internet' breakup statement when the pair announced their 'conscious uncoupling' in 2014. If you're searching for answers to the company's real frequently-asked questions, you won't find them in the tongue-in-cheek clip. The questions 'OMG! What the actual f' and 'How is your social media team holding' get comically cut off by Paltrow as she explained the much less juicy details of Astronomer's business. 'We've been thrilled so many people have a newfound interest in data workflow automation,' Paltrow said. Astronomer's chief executive Andy Byron and human resources chief Kristin Cabot both resigned after they were filmed cuddling at a Coldplay concert in Boston earlier this month. They appeared on the arena video board in a 'kiss cam' segment before looking uncomfortable, with Cabot turning around and Byron ducking out of sight as Martin quipped from the stage that the two might be having an affair. Mark Borkowski, a British public relations and crisis consultant, described using Paltrow to front a video parodying the incident as 'utter genius' that shows the company has a sense of humor. 'It's a savvy use of media to create a viral moment,' he told The Washington Post in a phone interview Saturday. 'In a way you're laughing with everybody else.' Astronomer choosing Paltrow will not go unnoticed, Borkowski said. 'Astronomer is a meme now. Owning the ridiculous nature of how it became a meme is far better than apologizing for it.' A representative for Paltrow didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. As for how he advises clients caught in such situations, Borkowski said acting in a dignified way and 'using as few words as possible' is always the best approach. Paltrow's cameo is reminiscent of the scared Peloton wife discourse from 2019. After actress Monica Ruiz's worry-stricken expression in a Peloton holiday commercial became the butt of internet jokes, she laughed it off, later using her horrified face for an Aviation Gin ad. 'We will now be returning to what we do best: delivering game-changing results for our customers,' Paltrow closed out the ad. 'Thank you for your interest in Astronomer.' - - - Tatum Hunter contributed to this report. Related Content Hulk Hogan was a well-known Trump supporter. Their ties go back 40 years. Mendelson reaches deal with Commanders on RFK site amid growing pressure Amy Sherald cancels major Smithsonian show over 'censorship' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rivian vs. Lucid: 1 Reason Jim Cramer Likes One Stock Over the Other
Key Points Lucid closed a deal with Uber to power its robotaxi division. Wall Street veteran Jim Cramer is doubting the deal's long-term potential. Rivian may be a better buy due to a deal with VW. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID) soared in value following the announcement of its partnership with Uber Technologies. According to the deal's terms, Uber will invest $300 million in the electric vehicle (EV) maker. Uber also committed to purchase 20,000 vehicles from Lucid to kick-start its robotaxi division. Wall Street veteran Jim Cramer recently weighted in on the deal, and his take was surprising to many. He compared Lucid's deal with Uber to a partnership Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ: RIVN), another EV stock, made earlier this year. If you're invested in either Lucid or Rivian, you'll want to give Cramer's comments some consideration. How big is the Uber and Lucid partnership in reality? The details of Lucid's partnership with Uber are fairly straightforward. The latter says it is expecting to launch a robotaxi service later next year in a major U.S. city. To power this launch, Uber plans to order 20,000 Lucid Gravity SUVs over the next six years. According to a press release, the vehicles will be owned and operated by Uber or its third-party fleet partners and made available to riders exclusively via the Uber platform. To help Lucid scale up enough to produce this many vehicles, Uber also agreed to invest $300 million into the business. Around the same time, Lucid announced a 1-for-10 reverse stock split, but it's not clear how connected these two events are. While all of this looks promising on paper, there are two obvious problems. First, Uber's robotaxi division remains in its infancy. Whether it can actually grow big enough to acquire 20,000 Lucid vehicles remains a huge open question. Second, $300 million won't do much to keep Lucid financially viable over the next six years. While it ended 2024 with more than $6 billion in liquidity, the company also posted a net loss of $2.7 billion, roughly the same net loss it posted in 2023. A $300 million cash infusion is helpful, but it will hardly cure its ongoing financial challenges. Jim Cramer thinks Rivian's deal with Volkswagen is superior When Jim Cramer was asked about Lucid's partnership with Uber last week, he called the deal a "dalliance." In other words, he views it more as a short-term arrangement than a bona fide long-term partnership. "I think that you need a commitment, like the Volkswagen commitment to Rivian is extraordinary," Cramer said. "That's an open-ended check from one of the biggest car companies." He is referring to a joint venture between Volkswagen and Rivian that was announced in November 2024. The German automaker will receive crucial access to Rivian's software operating platform and technological back end. In exchange, Rivian receives up to $5.8 billion in funding. It's not hard to see the difference in commitments here. Uber is investing just $300 million into Lucid, with the promise of buying vehicles over the next six years. Rivian, meanwhile, is receiving up to $5.8 billion in funding by the end of 2027, starting with an immediate $1 billion convertible note. To be clear, Lucid's deal with Uber is still very exciting. ARK Investment CEO Cathie Wood eventually sees the robotaxi market being worth up to $10 trillion by 2030. But Rivian's deal with Volkswagen gives more credence to Rivian's tech stack and differentiation. If you're excited about the Uber-Lucid tie-up, be sure to dive into Rivian's and Volkswagen's partnership, as Cramer correctly points out. Should you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group right now? Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends Volkswagen Ag. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Rivian vs. Lucid: 1 Reason Jim Cramer Likes One Stock Over the Other was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should You Buy XRP (Ripple) While It's Under $5?
Key Points XRP's value has surged nearly 480% in just 12 months. Deregulation, ETFs, and general crypto enthusiasm are driving the coin's value higher. XRP is priced for perfection, and it's looking increasingly like a speculative gamble. 10 stocks we like better than XRP › Cryptocurrency XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) has gained lots of attention from investors lately, resulting in a 480% increase over the past year. Whenever any type of investment rises that quickly, it's worth evaluating to see if it's worth owning. Unlike some cryptocurrencies, XRP (sometimes called Ripple) has real-world applications through its blockchain, which can act as a bridge currency in foreign transactions, saving both time and money compared to traditional financial transactions. But XRP's rapid value increase calls into question whether the crypto is overvalued right now, and if it's being driven higher simply because of investor sentiment. While XRP isn't necessarily a meme coin, here are three reasons why it may be best not to buy it right now. 1. It's very volatile If you're interested in owning cryptocurrencies, then it's likely that you're OK with some volatility. Any type of investment will have price swings, of course, but cryptocurrencies are more prone to make big movements on little to no news. While XRP isn't unique in its volatility, I think it's significant enough to dissuade some investors from owning it. Consider that back in February, XRP's value fell about 30% in just a five-week period. XRP regained its footing temporarily, but then fell 16% in just one week following the announcement of President Donald Trump's tariffs in early April. Those are just two examples of XRP's tendency toward volatility, both occurring within weeks of each other. Of course, the coin's value has subsequently rallied again, but if you're not used to investment value shifts to this degree and they might cause you undue stress or prompt you to take action without thinking, then it's probably best to stay away. 2. It's fairly speculative It's important to point out that some of the price movements XRP has experienced are tied to concrete reasons. For example, some of XRP's price gains over the past year have come from investors getting excited about crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) focused on XRP and the Trump administration taking a more open approach toward cryptocurrencies. But while crypto ETFs can signal more legitimacy for digital coins and open them up to more investors, there's still a lot of speculating involved. Some analysts have estimated that XRP's price could surge to $25 because of the launch of the ETFs -- only to see the value then fall by 90%. While that's just a prediction, it's a good representation of how speculative the price of XRP can be. What's more, XRP's value jumped more than 70% in the past month after the House of Representatives passed the Genius Act and the Digital Markets Clarity Act in the House, both of which clarify regulations for crypto and stablecoins. While it's good news for the industry, a 70% surge in XRP's price is likely unwarranted. Huge value movements over a short period, whether for stocks or crypto, often signal that investors are pushing up an investment solely based on how they feel. 3. It's already richly valued XRP's massive run lately means this crypto is priced for perfection. Its price already includes optimism around crypto deregulation, the launch of XRP ETFs, real-world usage of its blockchain, and a general optimism that's fueling a surge in crypto prices. In short, XRP is already on a huge run based on a handful of tangible reasons, and any more gains from here are likely purely built on the whims of crypto investors. Unlike stocks, cryptocurrencies don't have cash flow or earnings to judge their value by, and based on XRP's 480% jump over the past year, it looks like the coin's price is now detached from the already speculative metrics used to judge crypto values. Could XRP still go higher? Of course. Many cryptocurrencies have shown that they can continue to climb even without being tied to any concrete metrics. But there's no getting around the fact that buying XRP means you're paying a premium. And with optimism for XRP sky-high, any unmet expectations from the crypto could cause a substantial sell-off. Should you invest $1,000 in XRP right now? Before you buy stock in XRP, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and XRP wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Chris Neiger has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Buy XRP (Ripple) While It's Under $5? was originally published by The Motley Fool
