logo
Pennsylvania senator asked child ‘pornography' question during civics competition

Pennsylvania senator asked child ‘pornography' question during civics competition

Yahoo18-04-2025
SCHUYLKILL HAVEN, Pa. (WHTM) — A Pennsylvania State Senator is apologizing after posing a pornography question to a sixth grade girl during a civics competition.
On Wednesday, a local National Civics Bee competition was held at Penn State Schuylkill in Schuylkill Haven, giving students in grades 6-8 a chance to 'flex their civics knowledge for a chance to win recognition and cash prizes.'
According to the Schuylkill Chamber of Commerce website, these student competitors came to discuss a variety of essay topics.
Rapper Azealia Banks says she regrets Trump vote
However, one student's topic of Book Banning drew a bit of controversy, not because of her topic, but because of a question asked by one of the participating judges, who happens to be a State Senator.
According to a Facebook post by the mother of the girl whose essay was about book banning, State Sen. David Argall (R-Carbon/Luzerne/Schuylkill) asked the sixth grader if it was 'appropriate to give pornographic magazines to kindergarteners.'
The mother says her daughter asked what the senator meant, seemingly because the young girl did not know what pornography was.
Argall, the mother says, then responded by telling the young girl that pornography was 'naked pictures of people.'
'This discussion has no place at the Civics Bee,' the mother shared online. 'I am further appalled and furious that I now have to explain pornography to my fourth grader who was there to cheer on her sister.'
Facebook sending out $40 payments to users over 'Like button' issue
In response to the incident, Argall told abc27 news the following:
During last night's local round of the National Civics Bee, I posed a question as a volunteer judge to a participant that was not age-appropriate for this setting. I apologize to the young lady, her family, and all the participants who worked hard to get to this point, with excellent presentations by the students who submitted entries on book bans and many other important subjects.
I was attempting to ask if some books and magazines are not appropriate for some age groups, a subject which has received considerable attention in the general assembly in recent years. In hindsight, my obvious mistake was in citing an example that was itself not appropriate for this age group, a mistake which I will not make again.
State Senator Argall
The next round of the Civics Bee will be held in Harrisburg.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Outrage erupts over Proud Boys recruiting billboard near Clinton County school
Outrage erupts over Proud Boys recruiting billboard near Clinton County school

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Outrage erupts over Proud Boys recruiting billboard near Clinton County school

Social-media outrage over a Proud Boys billboard placed near a Breese high school erupted over the weekend and resulted in dozens of phone calls to public officials and a statement from Gov. JB Pritzker's office. Christine Sohnrey, 60, of New Baden, was among those who posted photos of the billboard on Facebook. 'Yes, that Proud Boys,' she wrote. 'The violent extremist hate group tied to January 6th. And now their garbage is staring our kids in the face every single day on their way to school. 'This is not just a sign. It's an attempt to normalize hate. To recruit. To intimidate. To tell our children that violence and white supremacy are welcome in our community. Well, they're not. Not here. Not ever.' Sohnrey and others are expected to attend a Clinton County Board meeting on Monday night to voice opposition to the billboard. The Proud Boys is a far-right, neo-fascist militant organization that has been associated with political violence, including the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Federal prosecutors secured seditious-conspiracy convictions against top Proud Boys leaders, including former Chairman Enrique Tarrio, who received a 22-year sentence. President Donald Trump pardoned Tarrio and others when he returned to office in January for a second term. The Southern Poverty Law Center identifies the Proud Boys as a 'hate group,' and the Anti-Defamation League describes the organization as 'extremist.' Canada designated it 'terrorist entity' in 2021. The billboard went up in Clinton County late last week, according to County Board Chairman Brad Knolhoff. It's along old U.S. 50, just outside of Breese, near Central Community High School. 'Faith, family, freedom, brotherhood,' the billboard reads. A laurel wreath, which symbolizes victory, is shown with the terms 'stand back' and 'stand by' from Trump's controversial comments about the Proud Boys during a 2020 presidential debate. The billboard encourages people to join the organization and lists a phone number with a 618 area code and website address. A call to the number on Monday indicated that the voicemail was full. Gov. JB Pritzker's office denounced the billboard's placement, saying it has no place in Illinois. 'A few wasted advertising dollars will not change the fact that there are millions of Americans who, regardless of political affiliation, know them as an extreme fringe organization that does not reflect who the people of Illinois are,' spokesman Alex Gough wrote in a statement. The Proud Boys didn't immediately respond to an interview request submitted through the organization's website on Monday. Knolhoff said the county is willing to listen to area residents, but officials can't require the billboard to be taken down because of the First Amendment right to free speech. 'I don't like anything that comes (into our county) that sows division, whether it's from the far right or the far left,' he said. 'Anything that is meant to be controversial, I'm not a fan of it. 'But I'm not the person who decides what gets to be stated and what doesn't. That's not my job. I can personally dislike something, but I have no authority to restrict someone's speech, and people should be glad that I don't have that authority.' Knolhoff said he has received about 20 calls of concern about the billboard, including one from as far away as Seattle, Washington. Dustin Foutch, school superintendent for Central District 71, also received calls, including one from a New Jersey woman. Foutch said only a couple of students had mentioned the billboard, but he sent a statement to district parents to keep them informed. 'At Central, we love our students and EVERY child is treated with the respect and dignity they deserve,' he wrote. 'We believe that all students have the right to attend a school where they can be themselves and feel safe, and we work extremely hard to make that possible. 'Our hope is that this billboard will give parents, and our community at-large, the opportunity to discuss what values we stand for, and we are optimistic that the advertisement will not be used to sow hate and division. 'Clinton County is known as a place where we take care of our neighbors, and it is that virtue that makes this an awesome place to live and work.' Breese Mayor Kevin Timmermann emphasized that the billboard is on county land, though his city is closest to it. He said legal counsel has cautioned officials to 'watch what we are saying about it.' 'For me personally, I am very opposed to this,' Timmermann said. 'I am totally opposed to it. I am concerned about it, yes. But right now I have no authority over that sign.' The Proud Boys billboard originally was paired with a sign advertising St. Joseph's Hospital in Breese. On Monday afternoon, a worker moved the billboard to the other side of the stand so it was facing the opposite direction. He declined comment.

Meta faces backlash over ‘sensual' chatbot conversations with children
Meta faces backlash over ‘sensual' chatbot conversations with children

The Hill

time4 hours ago

  • The Hill

Meta faces backlash over ‘sensual' chatbot conversations with children

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are seizing on new revelations about 'sensual' chatbot conversations Meta deemed acceptable for children, dragging the tech giant and its checkered past on children's safety back into the spotlight. Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has long faced scrutiny over the impact of its social media platforms on children. As the company has expanded into artificial intelligence (AI) alongside the rest of the tech industry, it is grappling with both familiar and new, distinct problems. In an internal policy document obtained by Reuters, Meta featured examples of acceptable conversations between its AI chatbot and children, suggesting they could engage in 'conversations that are romantic or sensual' and describe them 'in terms that evidence their attractiveness' — examples Meta said were erroneous and have since been removed. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) slammed the tech giant Thursday, suggesting the revelations were 'grounds for an immediate congressional investigation.' He followed up with a letter to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Friday, saying the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism was opening a probe into the company's generative AI products. 'It's unacceptable that these policies were advanced in the first place,' Hawley wrote. 'Meta must immediately preserve all relevant records and produce responsive documents so Congress can investigate these troubling practices.' Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), who has long championed the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), pointed to the revelations as underscoring the need for such legislation. A spokesperson said the senator supports an investigation into the company. 'When it comes to protecting precious children online, Meta has failed miserably by every possible measure,' she said in a statement. 'Even worse, the company has turned a blind eye to the devastating consequences of how its platforms are designed. This report reaffirms why we need to pass the Kids Online Safety Act.' Democrats have also joined the backlash, with Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) questioning how the chatbot guidance was approved. 'META Chat Bots that basically hit on kids – f— that,' he wrote on X. 'This is disgusting and evil. I cannot understand how anyone with a kid did anything other than freak out when someone said this idea out loud. My head is exploding knowing that multiple people approved this.' Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) suggested the incident shows Meta is a company 'morally and ethically off the rails.' 'It seems clear that Mark Zuckerberg rushed an unsafe chatbot to a mass market just to keep up with the competition, consequences for its users be damned,' he said. 'I've long said that Section 230 does not protect generative AI bots like this, which are entirely created by the company, not users,' the senator continued. 'Meta and Zuckerberg should be held fully responsible for any harm these bots cause.' Wyden's concerns underscore a key difference between the problems that Meta has previously encountered as a social media company and the issues that plague recent AI developments. Previous scandals involved content on Facebook and Instagram that was generated by users, clearly giving Meta cover under Section 230 — a portion of the Communications Decency Act that shields companies from liability for user-generated content. Social media has increasingly tested the limits of this law in recent years, as some argue major tech companies should be held responsible for harmful content on their platforms. Meta felt the severity of this backlash in 2021, when Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen leaked a tranche of internal documents. She later testified before Congress, alleging the firm was aware its products were harming children and teens, but still sought to profit off their engagement. In 2024, Zuckerberg was hauled before lawmakers to discuss Meta's child safety policies, alongside the CEOs of TikTok, Discord, Snapchat and X. Following a contentious exchange with Hawley, Zuckerberg turned around in the hearing room to apologize to dozens of parents and activists. 'I'm sorry for everything you have all been through,' he said at the time. 'No one should go through the things that your families have suffered.' However, the emergence of AI tools, like chatbots, has created new challenges for tech companies, as they make decisions about how to train AI models and what limitations to put on chatbot responses. Some, like Wyden, have argued these tools fall outside the protections of Section 230. Parent advocates said the newly reported documents 'confirm our worst fears about AI chatbots and children's safety.' 'When a company's own policies explicitly allow bots to engage children in 'romantic or sensual' conversations, it's not an oversight, it's a system designed to normalize inappropriate interactions with minors,' Shelby Knox, campaign director for tech accountability and online safety at ParentsTogether, said in a statement. 'No child should ever be told by an AI that 'age is just a number' or be encouraged to lie to their parents about adult relationships,' she continued. 'Meta has created a digital grooming ground, and parents deserve answers about how this was allowed to happen.' Meta spokesperson Andy Stone said in a statement Thursday that the company has 'clear policies' that 'prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors.' Additional examples, notes, and annotations on its policies 'reflect teams grappling with different hypothetical scenarios,' he added, underscoring that those in question have been removed. The latest firestorm threatens to derail Zuckerberg's apparent efforts to alter his and Meta's public image to one that is more palatable to conservatives. He validated conservative censorship concerns last year, writing to the House Judiciary Committee that his company had been pressured by Biden officials in 2021 to censor content related to COVID-19 — frustrations he later reiterated during an appearance on Joe Rogan's podcast. Zuckerberg also overhauled Meta's content moderation policies in January, announcing plans to eliminate third-party fact-checking in favor of a community-based program in what he described as an effort to embrace free speech. The move earned praise from President Trump. Like other tech leaders, the Meta chief also courted Trump's favor as he returned to office, meeting with the president-elect at Mar-a-Lago and scoring a front-row seat to the inauguration.

A daring prison escape, crypto boom, huge Powerball jackpot: Catch up on the day's stories
A daring prison escape, crypto boom, huge Powerball jackpot: Catch up on the day's stories

CNN

time14 hours ago

  • CNN

A daring prison escape, crypto boom, huge Powerball jackpot: Catch up on the day's stories

5 ThingsFacebookTweetLink Follow 👋 Welcome to 5 Things PM! Now's a good time to pick up some Powerball tickets. The jackpot for Monday night's drawing just passed $600 million — the biggest so far this year. No one has won since the end of May. Here's what else you might have missed during your busy day. Grant Hardin, a one-time police chief, evaded authorities for more than 10 days in the rocky terrain and dense vegetation of rural northwest Arkansas. His prison escape plan, hatched over several months, included Sharpie markers and a handmade badge. Americans started their back-to-school shopping earlier this year, worried that tariffs would raise prices. Families looking for deals on sneakers and laptops are finding them in a less traditional place — and at a fraction of the cost of major retailers. This summer has been one to remember for cryptocurrency. A growing number of enthusiastic investors are embracing it — spurred in large part by White House support and sweeping legislative changes in Washington. The once-thriving Roman city of Pompeii resembles an eerie time capsule, seemingly unoccupied since a catastrophic volcanic eruption in AD 79 buried everything under a blanket of ash. But new findings reveal a little-known postscript. Do people cancel plans with you at the last minute, flake out for no good reason or just go MIA? It could be because you're a bad friend. GET '5 THINGS' IN YOUR INBOX If your day doesn't start until you're up to speed on the latest headlines, then let us introduce you to your new favorite morning fix. Sign up here for the '5 Things' newsletter. 🌀 Eye of the storm: Hurricane hunters with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration flew through Erin after it rapidly intensified into a rare Category 5. It's expected to continue fluctuating in intensity. Trump meets with Zelensky and other European leaders at the White House Hamas says it has agreed to new ceasefire proposal as mediators push to renew talks Texas Democrats return to the state as GOP pushes ahead with redistricting 👰‍♀️ Wedding wear: A designer is making edgy baby doll dresses for a new generation of women who just want 'something you can move in.' It could become the next go-to look for unconventional brides. 📺 MSNBC is getting a new name as part of its split from NBC News. What will it be called?A. VersantB. MS NOWC. News NowD. MS Next⬇️ Scroll down for the answer. 👋 We'll see you tomorrow.🧠 Quiz answer: B. The channel will become MS NOW, which stands for My Source for News, Opinion and the World.📧 Check out all of CNN's newsletters. Today's edition of 5 Things PM was edited and produced by CNN's Kimberly Richardson and Sarah Hutter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store