Heather Humphreys confirms she will not run in presidential election
Since her announcement that she was to leave politics, Ms Humphrey's name has been considered as a potential Fine Gael candidate for the upcoming Presidential election.
Ms Humphries said after much consideration, she has decided she would not run.
'I have made my decision, and I have to say, I have been quite humbled by the number of people who have approached me and said that I should run for the presidency,' Ms Humphreys said.
'I have given it a lot of consideration and a lot of thought, and while it is very flattering and a great honour to be considered for the highest office in the land, I have decided that I will not be running for the presidency,' she added.
Spending more time with family and friends was again the reason for her decision not to enter the race.
'I said at that time I wanted to spend more time with the family, and that my time in public life was over, and that doesn't mean I'm not committed to public service, but I made that decision then, and it is the same,' Ms Humphreys said.
Speaking on the Joe Finnegan Show on Northern Sound Ms Humphreys said she gave a bid for the Áras 'very, very serious consideration'.
'I said at the time, if I was younger, I wouldn't be leaving politics, and the same applies to the presidency. I want to do other things in life, because I have been working.
'People probably don't realise this, between the bank and the credit union and politics, I have worked full time for 47 years,' she said.
Committing to the presidency was a significant decision and Ms Humphreys said she would only have considered it if she was willing to give it 100pc.
'I just feel that it's a job for somebody else this time,' Ms Humphreys said.
The former minister said she would support any Fine Gael candidate selected, but did name check Mairead McGuinness.
'If she decided to put her name forward, she'd have my support. I've known her for many, many years. I've canvassed with her. She's been a brilliant MEP, a fantastic European Commissioner, and she has been a great ambassador for Ireland,' Ms Humphreys said.
'So I know her well, and as I say, she'd have my support,' she added.
Ms Humhreys said she did not discuss her decision with Tanaiste and leader of Fine Gael, Simon Harris.
'I didn't discuss it with anybody. This was my own decision. I discussed it with my family, and so many people have said it to me, and I felt that it was time now to let people know what my decision was,' she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Extra.ie
7 minutes ago
- Extra.ie
Heather Humphreys secures Fine Gael nomination for presidency
Heather Humphreys has secured the Fine Gael nomination for President after securing enough support within the parliamentary party. Such is the level of support that Fine Gael MEP Sean Kelly cannot secure enough signatures to force a contest. The two hopefuls had announced their intention to seek Fine Gael's nomination after initial hopeful Mairead McGuinness withdrew, citing health concerns. Heather Humphreys. Pic: Sasko Lazarov/ Speaking on RTE's Morning Ireland, Mr Kelly had said he was 'enthusiastic' about the prospect of running for president. Mr Kelly said: 'I'll certainly seek the Fine Gael nomination. 'Unfortunately, Mairead McGuinness had to withdraw, and there's a process now over which we can seek nominations over the next five days. 'So I would be looking for the nomination and after that, and if I'm nominated, I would be greatly honoured to represent the party and stand for election for president.' Ms Humphreys, who held multiple cabinet positions, told the Joe Finnegan Show on Northern Sound radio: 'I have decided to go for it, and I will be seeking the Fine Gael nomination to be a candidate for the president of Ireland.' Sean Kelly. Pic: Piaras Ó Mídheach/Sportsfile Ms Humphreys said she had previously ruled herself out because she was supporting Ms McGuinness, adding: 'I wasn't going to stand against her and that's being straight about it – but as we know everything has changed.' Ms Humphreys has now secured the Fine Gael nomination and will undoubtedly be a strong contender in the election itself. Nutriband entrepreneur Gareth Sheridan, mixed martial arts fighter Conor McGregor, and Riverdance star Michael Flatley are among other hopefuls seeking a nomination. A presidential election is expected towards the end of October, as it must take place in the 60 days before the term of Michael D Higgins ends on November 11. To be eligible to run, a candidate must be an Irish citizen who is 35 or older. They must be nominated either by at least 20 members of the Oireachtas or by at least four local authorities. Former or retiring presidents can nominate themselves.
Irish Examiner
7 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
The cards are stacked against Ukraine — and against Europe
The most revealing moment in US president Donald Trump's White House meeting with European leaders came during a 'hot mic' moment when Trump was overheard discussing his relationship with Russian president Vladimir Putin. 'I think he [Putin] wants to make a deal for me, you understand that? As crazy as it sounds,' he whispered to French president Emmanuel Macron. The idea that Putin is beholden to Trump, that some sense of personal magnetism or obligation to the American president is pushing him towards a deal that will end the conflict in Ukraine is indeed crazy. Putin has earned his reputation as a cold and vicious thug, solely interested in his own goals and unmoved by sentiment. Yet Trump has often spoken of his admiration for Putin. The latter has repeatedly broken Trump's red lines on Ukraine, refusing to agree to a preliminary ceasefire before talks, and even escalating Russia's military offensive in the immediate aftermath of calls with the US president. Trump has threatened to impose more sanctions, but ultimately always backed down. Last week in Alaska, Trump described his relationship with Putin as 'fantastic'. Picture: AP /Julia Demaree Nikhinson Last week in Alaska, Trump described his relationship with Putin as "fantastic", even though he had threatened to impose sanctions if Putin did not offer concessions as a starting point to ending the war in Ukraine — none were forthcoming. The bromance is decidedly lopsided. Trump also has an outsized view of Russia's strength, telling journalists that only his intervention had prevented the Russian military from achieving victory in Ukraine. This overlooks Ukrainian successes in pushing back the Russian offensive in 2022 and the more than one million casualties, killed and wounded, inflicted on the Russian military since the start of the war. Russia, with an ageing population, a rusting and hydrocarbons-dependent economy, is not the Soviet Union of the Cold War. Despite his failed meeting with North Korea's president Kim Jong Un in Hanoi during his first term and the backlash following his fawning over Putin in Helsinki in 2018 when he accepted Putin's word over that of the FBI regarding interference in US elections, Trump still believes he can get a quick summit win on Ukraine. The search for moments of "great television" — as Trump's described his upbraiding of Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy during their meeting in February — is an important motivation. The vicious ambush of Zelenskky by both Trump and vice-president JD Vance in the Oval Office in February was shocking but it should not have been unexpected. Picture: AP /Mstyslav Chernov The problem for Europe and Ukraine is that there is a serious risk a trilateral summit between Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy will descend into a two versus one pile-on. Trump's hostility towards Ukraine's president stretches back to his failed attempts to get the Ukrainian government to implicate the Biden family in a corruption scandal during Trump's first term in office. The vicious ambush of Zelenskky by both Trump and vice-president JD Vance in the Oval Office in February was shocking but it should not have been unexpected. On Monday, European leaders took their turns to praise Trump in Washington DC. This is viewed as a necessary tribute to keep the United States engaged on Ukraine's side of the war, supplying vital intelligence, communications and air defence systems. Europe can ramp up a lot of military assistance to Ukraine, but there are capability gaps that European militaries cannot hope to fill for some years yet. Paying homage to a capricious president may work in the short-term but if, as now seems likely, Trump turns on Zelenskyy and demands that he cede the remaining parts of the Donbas region controlled by Ukraine in the interests of "peace", then the inability of Europe to prevent such a stitch-up will call these tactics of obeisance into question. Allowing Washington, or Beijing, to believe Europe can be belittled, and then ignored with little consequence — whether on trade or Ukraine — could seriously backfire. Trump officials, like his envoy Steve Witkoff, say such concessions are a necessary precondition before putting in place "robust security guarantees" that will ensure a durable peace. Prior to the invasions of 2014 and 2022, Ukraine already had such assurances under the Budapest Memorandum of 1994; Russia as a signatory guaranteed Ukraine's independence and committed to never use military force against Kyiv. Ukraine, for its part, gave up all nuclear weapons systems which had previously been stationed in the country during the Cold War. It is still unclear what new guarantees the Trump administration believes would be sufficient to deter future Russian aggression. It is difficult to envisage a diplomatic breakthrough in the coming weeks. Putin's participation in talks are likely a gambit, a means for Moscow to try to shift blame to Ukraine as a spoiler of peace. Witkoff has shown his ineptitude and bias in recent months; he was unable to name the five Ukrainian regions — Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea — annexed or partly occupied by Russia. Witkoff also previously called Ukraine 'a false country'. Before any security guarantees are discussed, top of Trump's agenda will be transfers of land to satisfy Putin. President Zelenskyy cannot give up land which Russia does not occupy — even if he will be pressed to do so by Trump. Given the documented accounts of the mass abduction of children, rape, torture and murder in territories seized by the Russian military to date, the abandonment of more than 250,000 Ukrainians (more than the population of Cork City) living in unoccupied Donetsk to Russian control would be an unimaginable cruelty. Ukraine is struggling to get enough troops to the frontline. An angry Trump cajoling and then threatening Zelenskyy to give Putin what he cannot, will further demoralise Ukrainians — or so Putin hopes — at a time when Russia has gained considerable territory during its summer offensive in Donetsk. Trump has form, having presided over a disastrous deal with the Taliban in 2020, the Doha Agreement, that excluded the then Afghan government, and helped spur the Taliban to victory the following year. The best hope may be that Trump, notoriously inattentive, will simply move on and leave diplomacy on the Ukraine war to others. Dr Edward Burke is a lecturer in war studies at University College Dublin
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump offers assurances that US troops will not be sent to help defend Ukraine
President Donald Trump has offered his assurances that US troops would not be sent to help defend Ukraine against Russia after seeming to leave open the possibility the day before. Mr Trump also said in a morning TV interview that Ukraine's hopes of joining Nato and regaining the Crimean Peninsula from Russia are 'impossible'. The Republican president, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders held hours of talks at the White House on Monday aimed at bringing an end to Russia's war against Ukraine. The White House meeting (Alex Brandon/AP) While answering questions from journalists, Mr Trump did not rule out sending US troops to participate in a European-led effort to defend Ukraine as part of security guarantees sought by Mr Zelensky. Mr Trump said after his meeting in Alaska last week with Vladimir Putin that the Russian leader was open to the idea of security guarantees for Ukraine. But asked on Fox News Channel's Fox & Friends what assurances he could provide going forward and beyond his term that American troops would not be part of defending Ukraine's border, Mr Trump said: 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president.' Mr Trump would have no control over the US military after his terms ends in January 2029. The president also said in the interview that he is optimistic that a deal can be reached to end the Russian invasion, but he underscored that Ukraine will have to set aside its hope of getting back Crimea, which was seized by Russian forces in 2014, and its long-held aspirations of joining the Nato military alliance. 'Both of those things are impossible,' Mr Trump said. Mr Putin, as part of any potential deal to pull his forces out of Ukraine, is looking for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, as well as recognition of Crimea as Russian territory.
