Last council meeting held at historic Nottinghamshire County Hall
County Hall has been at the heart of Nottinghamshire politics for decades and serves as a major landmark by the banks of the River Trent.On Thursday, however, it hosted the final full council meeting before the County Council relocates to new offices - called Oak House - near Hucknall.The Conservative-run authority said its historic base had become too expensive to run, and would need upwards of £50m of investment in order to bring it up to modern environmental standards.It is not yet known what will become of County Hall in the future, but the council said the building would be "preserved".
It has previously been suggested it could be converted into homes, restaurants, and bars, but the council's leader recently said that ongoing plans to reorganise local government meant it could be needed for council purposes again in the future.
The end of an era?
The council first started planning for what would become County Hall in the 1930s, having previously been based at the Shire Hall in Nottingham.Work started on site in 1938, but construction was halted after the outbreak of World War Two, and the building was still incomplete when some council staff eventually moved there in 1946.The original designs were significantly altered after the war due to financial restraints and labour shortages.Most notably, a huge bell tower which would have been three times taller than County Hall itself was scrapped.Several concrete annexes were added in the 1960s and 70s, one of which was demolished in 2016, with the others due to follow suit in the coming months.
Over the years the building has hosted royal visits and countless civic ceremonies.In 2022, a major fire caused by a faulty light fitting caused extensive damage to the first-floor corridor where the council's executive members work.Repair work cost more than £1.8million, with the cost met by insurance.In 2023, parts of the building were used for the filming of BBC series Sherwood.As the seat of local government for the county, however, it has regularly been the setting for real-world political drama, and Thursday's meeting was no different.
The annual budget-setting saw clashes over a 4.84% increase to council tax, with several councillors trading insults, prompting calls from the chairman to moderate language.The Conservatives argued they have limited the impact on bills by not putting them up by the maximum allowed, and said they have balanced affordability with the demand for services.Leader of the Ashfield Independents, Jason Zadrozny, called the tax rise "insulting" and accused the Conservatives of "picking the pockets" of residents.Labour, meanwhile, proposed an amendment to the budget which would have involved spending more on flood defences and children's services, paid for by selling Oak House.Labour group leader Kate Foale said the new headquarters was "unfit for purpose" and had become a "vanity project".The amendment was defeated, with Conservatives arguing Oak House will save money in the long term through reduced operating costs.The budget - and tax rise - was ultimately confirmed.
The first full council meeting at the new base is scheduled for March 20.Further details on the reorganisation of local councils are expected in the coming weeks, with various options being discussed behind the scenes.The future of County Hall now appears to be at least loosely linked to those discussions.Thursday marked the end of decades of full council meetings taking place under its iconic green roof...at least for now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
Mel Stride: We will never do a deal with Reform
Sir Mel Stride has vowed the Tories will never make a pact with Reform as he attacked the party's 'fantasy economics'. The shadow chancellor said Nigel Farage's party would put the economy on 'the road to ruin' and said: 'I don't want to be a populist that runs around saying we can do this, that and everything else for you without any plan behind it. I just think that's recklessness.' Sir Mel also attacked Rachel Reeves's 'huge borrowing splurge' to fund spending plans until the next election, but warned that Reform's pledges were even more 'dangerous'. While some influential Tories have called for the parties to work more closely together, Sir Mel said the Conservatives would never strike a deal under his watch. 'I don't want to get involved with a party that peddles fantasy economics,' he told The Telegraph. 'Why would I want to do that? I want to be with a party that is going to be four-square behind fiscal responsibility and manage our economy in a way that doesn't imperil the livelihoods of people up and down our country.' His comments come as the Conservatives seek to fight back against Reform, which has surged past the party in the polls to take the position of Labour's de facto main opposition. Many observers believe the Tories are still paying the price of Liz Truss's mini-Budget of unfunded tax cuts, which triggered the market chaos that led to her downfall. The Conservatives' polling numbers collapsed in the wake of the crisis and have never recovered. Sir Mel has chosen to disavow the policies of Ms Truss as the Conservatives seek to rebuild. He also warned that a Reform victory may lead to a sequel. Reform's central election pledge is to raise the amount people can earn before they start paying tax to £20,000. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has estimated this could cost up to £80bn, although Reform has insisted its plans would be fully funded by sweeping cuts to Whitehall departments and said it would not cut taxes until it had slashed spending first. However, raising the tax threshold is just one of several costly promises made by Mr Farage's party. Reform has also pledged to cut corporation tax and abolish the two-child benefit cap that restricts payments to families with three or more children. Sir Mel said: '[They're] promising everybody everything they want to hear, without any credible plan as to how they're going to pay for any of this. Certainly, if Reform were in No 10 now, I think the economy would be in a very dangerous position.' While he now spends much of his time in attack mode, Sir Mel offers up little of substance when it comes to policies of his own. He says Britain is failing the young and suggests the Government should do more to crack down on Mickey Mouse degrees that do little to increase people's job prospects. But just as he suggests universities may have a role in sharing the financial burden of dead-end degrees, he stops himself to insist the proposal is just 'blue-sky thinking in an interview'. This caution has allowed Reform to steal the limelight with its eye-catching proposals as the Tories struggle to get their mojo back. Sir Mel, who almost lost his Central Devon seat at the last election, admits his party 'lost connection entirely with the British electorate and we have to win that back – and that will take time'. For now, he believes the best way to do that is by highlighting the flaws in Reform's policy platform. 'What we've got to do is be out there making the case that people need to think long and hard about whether the numbers add up, because if they don't, that is the road to ruin,' Sir Mel says. 'Right now, Reform is ahead in the polls [and] they are out there saying they will take everybody out of tax up to £20,000 at a cost of £50bn to £80bn – about a third of what we spend on the NHS every year, with its 1.3m employees. Really? How are they going to fund that?' The Conservatives' slump in the polls had to put pressure on Kemi Badenoch but Sir Mel said she was 'absolutely' the right person to lead the party. This is Sir Mel's 11th interview of the day and he's only halfway through his commitments. Stationed in the shadow cabinet room in Westminster, he's armed with two copies of the cornflower blue spending review book, one of which is covered in scribbled notes that include a reminder to talk about GDP figures out that morning to attack lines such as 'summer of speculation, fear of what will come'. Sir Mel, a self-confessed history buff, suggests the Tories would be prepared to take the tough decisions to slash the size of the state if they got back into power. The man who led a series of sweeping reforms to the benefits system insists 'we need to get a grip on welfare' as he opened the door to a conversation about the NHS. While qualifying that the health service is an 'absolutely vital part of what we are as a civilised society', he signals there will be choices to come 'around what the health service does'. Sir Mel says: 'What is possible at different points in time changes. For example, the idea of my grandparents going to hospital, getting both hips replaced and leaping around like a mountain goat within weeks would have been entirely fancy. We have drugs today that can do things that we didn't have the drugs to do in the past. So it will be an evolving terrain. 'But my fundamental point is that if you run a health service that is not productive, that is consuming ever larger levels of resources and is not really producing in the way that it can, then you're not serving the British people properly.' While he is reluctant to talk specific policies, he suggests one of his priorities is to address tax traps that can leave people facing punishing tax rates for every extra hour worked, including the so-called 60pc trap where people who earn above £100,000 gradually have their personal allowance withdrawn. 'There are definitely aspects of the complications within the tax system that slow economic activity,' he says. 'The personal allowance gets withdrawn above a certain level of income and that leads to high marginal tax rates. 'The interaction with the benefit system can produce similar effects to the withdrawal of child benefit where you can actually reach marginal tax rates of 70pc or more. So there are all sorts of things that we need to think very deeply about within our tax system.' Young people are also firmly on his mind, with Sir Mel frequently citing the fact that the average Tory voter is 63. He wants to change that. 'We have to have a big, bold, credible offer that shows younger people that they can have the opportunities that I had as a young man. The education that will lead to higher-paying jobs so they can get on the housing ladder.' He has put forward a proposal for a 'Headstart' scheme under which a person in their first job would see their first £5,000 of National Insurance paid not to HMRC but into a personal savings pot which they could use as a down-payment for a house. Before he can be drawn on detail, he steps back again, saying the proposal is 'just one idea we're discussing'. 'We will have the answers through time,' he insists. 'I'm not the Chancellor, I'm not in the Treasury.' Judging by the polls, he will have to work hard to change that.
The Independent
20 hours ago
- The Independent
Tories ‘got it wrong' when they backed 2045 net zero target, Findlay says
Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay insisted his party is the only one 'telling the truth' on net zero – as he announced the Conservatives in Scotland would scrap the target of reaching this goal by 2045. Tory MSPs had voted for legislation in 2019 which commits Scotland to achieving net zero by that date. But Mr Findlay now says they had been 'wrong' to do so. His comments came as a new policy paper published by the party said reaching this target would result in 'unaffordable costs for struggling families across Scotland and put at risk our oil and gas industry and farmers' businesses'. UK Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has already said the UK target of reaching net zero by 2050 – five years later than the Scottish date – is 'impossible'. While Scottish Tories had previously backed the 2045 date, Mr Findlay told the PA news agency: 'I think yes, we did get it wrong'. When Conservative MSPs at Holyrood supported the 2045 date, he said they had done so 'so on the basis of what was known in those moments'. But he added: 'The situation has become clearer, it is evident to everybody watching this, to everybody in the Scottish Parliament, if they were being honest. 'Both Labour, the SNP and the rest of them would admit that the 2045 target isn't just unaffordable it's unachievable – that's the reality. 'So we're telling the truth to the Scottish public.' Mr Findlay continued: 'We want to reach net zero fairly and quickly. We understand the climate crisis emergency but we cannot harm our own economy and force householders who are already struggling to pay the bills with yet more great costs. 'Whether it be ripping out their gas boilers and putting in costly heat pumps, or forcing them to get rid of their cars and buying very expensive electric alternatives. 'This has got to be about the balance between ensuring we reach net zero properly and speedily, but recognising that it cannot come at a crippling cost to those people out there who are having to pay for it.' Asked later by journalists if his party was pandering to climate sceptics, Mr Findlay said they were 'absolutely not', adding the Tories were the only party 'telling the truth' on the issue. His comments came as the Scottish Conservatives promised to give every household in Scotland a £100 discount on their energy bills – with this to be funded from money accrued from the ScotWind auction, where areas of the seabed were leased for offshore wind power projects. The paper also said the Tories would make pylons 'an option of last resort for energy infrastructure projects' – with the party promising legislation to give people 'greater decision-making authority over local infrastructure projects' by abolishing the Scottish Government's existing energy consents union. Speaking about the changes as he addressed the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh, Mr Findlay said: 'We would scrap the SNP's 2045 net zero target. It is unaffordable and unachievable.' He added that instead of spending money on 'SNP eco-projects', the Tories would 'use it to protect oil and gas workers' livelihoods'. Mr Findlay continued: 'We would take £100 off every household energy bill in Scotland from the proceeds of leasing our waters to wind farms. 'We will also give residents new legal powers to oppose mega-pylons.'
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Flash Tory donor cashed in on disposable vape boom before ban on sales
The Mirror can reveal shareholders at Sandy Chadha's Supreme firm enjoyed a multi-million pound dividend bonanza just months before the sale of single-use e-cigs was outlawed Grinning as he clutches two bottles, this is the flash Tory donor who cashed in on disposable vapes before a ban. We can reveal how shareholders at Sandy Chadha's firm enjoyed a multi-million pound dividend bonanza just months ago. Supreme, distributor of popular Lost Mary and Elfbar e-cigs, paid out £3.7million in January. It comes as we have unearthed pictures showing the vaping kingpin has flaunted his luxury lifestyle on social media. Another snap pictures Mr Chadha topless, clad in shades, holding his arms outstretched as he revels in the sunshine next to a pool. The Brit, 58 — who once even gave away a £130,000 Bentley in a bet — has helped bankroll the Conservatives. Last week, our probe uncovered how disposable vapes were illegally flogged despite their sale being outlawed this month. The crackdown on the single-use devices was brought in to safeguard kids and the environment. Supreme, which also has its own 88Vape brand, has capitalised on the popularity of e-cigs. Supreme's vaping division revenues jumped 9% to £82.8million in 2023-4. Disposable vapes revenue was 70.7million. Supreme turned a pre-tax profit of £30.1million in 2023-4, up from £14.4million. The firm paid out £1.3million in remuneration to directors in 2023-4. Mr Chadha's total pay packet was £653,056 – including a £325,000 bonus. Pictures posted on Mr Chadha's Facebook page demonstrate he had a taste for luxury years before the vaping market took off. One image showed the businessman on the red carpet, with another picturing him by the sea holding his hair in a model-like pose. Meanwhile, in a further snap he climbed out of the water with his arm outstretched and another showed him lying down on a yacht. Mr Chadha owns in a mansion, with an indoor swimming pool, spa, steam and sauna rooms. He purchased the home in Hale, near Altrincham, Greater Manchester, for £6.8million in October 2017. Mr Chadha's home is in a sought-after area, with the property featuring a roof terrace, study, his and hers ensuites, as well as dressing rooms. In 2022, permission was given by the local council for a side extension to the property for a new dining room, records show. Mr Chadha's Supreme 8 Ltd donated £350,000 to the Tories in 2023, with the company also giving £50,000 in 2022. And in late 2023, Mr Chadha personally donated £50,000 to the Conservatives. According to Action on Smoking and Health (ASH): 'In 2024, 18% of youth aged 11-17 had tried vaping, amounting to 980,000 children…' It added: 'In 2024, 7.2% (390,000 children aged 11-17) currently vaped compared to 5.1% (280,000 children) who currently smoked.' ASH also explained: 'As with adults, the most popular flavours are fruit (adults 47%, children 59%), but children are more likely than adults to choose sweet flavours (16%)...' It concludes: '...although our survey suggests the rapid rise in youth (aged 11-17) vaping since the pandemic has stabilised in 2024, it is not yet clearly declining. And although the vast majority (81%) of children aged 11-17 have never tried vaping, over a third of those who have tried vaping have never smoked. Furthermore, children's awareness of promotion continues to rise. The big increase in the use of disposable products has happened concurrently with higher levels of youth use from 2021 to 2023.' Supreme said: 'Supreme has been at the forefront of seeking to eradicate underage vaping, having proactively introduced plain packaging, reduced hardware colour, age-appropriate product names, and recommendations to retailers that vapes are positioned away from confectionary. Supreme's overriding goal remains to support the widespread use of compliant vape products as a smoking cessation device in line with the UK Government's conclusion that vaping remains the most effective tool to transition smokers away from cigarettes.' And Mr Chadha said: 'Supreme PLC operates a diversified portfolio of fast-moving consumer goods, supplying thousands of UK retailers with essential everyday products ranging from lighting and batteries to personal care, household goods, vitamins, and vaping. All of our products, including those in the vaping category, have been distributed in full compliance with UK regulations. The sale of disposable vapes before the ban was entirely legal and fulfilled strong market demand. Vaping continues to serve as a credible, regulated alternative to traditional smoking…' He added: 'As a listed company, Supreme's dividend policy has been clearly communicated and remains aligned with standard practices in public markets. Our directors' remuneration, shareholder distributions, and business activities are fully disclosed, publicly audited, and operate under the governance of the UK's regulatory frameworks. "Personal images cited in your story were posted... many years before Supreme's involvement in disposable vapes and before the development of the UK vaping market. The same goes for the house, which was bought in 2017. Any attempt to link them retrospectively to more recent regulatory debates, or to dividends or earnings linked to vaping, would be misleading.'
