logo
Russia says it has downed hundreds of Ukrainian drones

Russia says it has downed hundreds of Ukrainian drones

West Australian21-05-2025

Russian authorities say their air defences have shot down more than 260 Ukrainian drones including some approaching Moscow, and the capital's airports were briefly shut down to ensure the safety of flights.
There were no reports of casualties.
As Russia, Ukraine, the United States and European powers discuss ways to end the more than three-year-old conflict in Ukraine, fighting has intensified on some parts of the front and drone warfare has continued.
It was very likely that Russia and Ukraine will hold technical-level talks next week, possibly at the Vatican, Finnish President Alexander Stubb told public broadcaster Yle on Wednesday.
In a series of announcements, Russia's Defence Ministry said on Telegram that at least 262 Ukrainian drones were intercepted or destroyed on Wednesday.
Most were over Russia's western regions bordering Ukraine and central Russia.
But some approached the Moscow region where 21 million people live.
The three major airports in the region halted flights then resumed operations.
Ukrainian drones disrupted air traffic in Moscow throughout Wednesday, Mayor Sergei Sobyanin said on Telegram.
Due to the danger in the air, the aviation authority Rosaviatsiya had to repeatedly stop take-offs and landings at Moscow's airports.
Russia's largest airport, Sheremetyevo, as well as Domodedovo and Zhukovsky airports were particularly affected.
Ukraine's military said its drones hit the Bolkhovsky Semiconductor Devices Plant, a supplier in the Oryol region to Russian fighter jet and missile makers.
The war in Ukraine, which has killed hundreds of thousands of people, has become a crucible of drone innovation as both sides send the unmanned vehicles far behind the front lines.
Russia and Ukraine have sought to buy and develop new drones, deploy them innovatively and devise new methods to disable and destroy them, from farmers' shotguns to electronic jamming.
Russia's Defence Ministry said its forces were advancing at key points along the front and pro-Russian war bloggers said Russia had pierced the Ukrainian lines between Pokrovsk and Kostiantynivka in the Donetsk region of eastern Ukraine.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said in his nightly video address the heaviest frontline battles were around Pokrovsk and made no reference to any Russian advances.
Zelenskiy said Ukrainian forces remained active in two Russian regions along the border - Kursk and Belgorod.
Reuters could not independently verify battlefield accounts from either side.
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday visited the Kursk region for the first time since the Kremlin said Russian forces ejected Ukrainian troops from the area last month.
Putin sent tens of thousands of soldiers into Ukraine in February 2022 and Russia now controls just under one fifth of the country.
with DPA

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge orders US to release pro-Palestine protester
Judge orders US to release pro-Palestine protester

The Advertiser

time3 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Judge orders US to release pro-Palestine protester

The Trump administration cannot use US foreign policy interests to justify its detention of Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, a judge has ruled but stopped short of ordering Khalil's immediate release. US District Judge Michael Farbiarz in Newark, New Jersey, said his ruling would not take effect until Friday to give the administration the chance to appeal. Farbiarz wrote that the administration was violating Khalil's right to free speech by detaining and trying to deport him under a little-used provision of US immigration law granting the US secretary of state the power to seek the deportation of any non-citizen whose presence in the country is deemed adverse to US foreign policy interests. "The Petitioner's career and reputation are being damaged and his speech is being chilled," Farbiarz wrote. "This adds up to irreparable harm." The judge also barred the administration from deporting Khalil on the grounds that his presence was allegedly adverse to US foreign policy. "This is the news we've been waiting over three months for," Khalil's wife, Dr Noor Abdalla, said on Wednesday. "Mahmoud must be released immediately and safely returned home to New York to be with me and our newborn baby, Deen." Neither the State Department nor the Justice Department, which represents the administration in court, immediately responded to requests for comment. Khalil was arrested on March 8 after the State Department revoked his green card. He has since been held in immigration detention in Louisiana. Khalil was the first known foreign student to be arrested as part of Republican President Donald Trump's bid to deport foreign students who took part in pro-Palestinian protests that swept US college campuses after Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel and Israel's subsequent military assault. The Hamas attack killed 1195 people, according to Israeli tallies, and Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza health ministry. The Trump administration cannot use US foreign policy interests to justify its detention of Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, a judge has ruled but stopped short of ordering Khalil's immediate release. US District Judge Michael Farbiarz in Newark, New Jersey, said his ruling would not take effect until Friday to give the administration the chance to appeal. Farbiarz wrote that the administration was violating Khalil's right to free speech by detaining and trying to deport him under a little-used provision of US immigration law granting the US secretary of state the power to seek the deportation of any non-citizen whose presence in the country is deemed adverse to US foreign policy interests. "The Petitioner's career and reputation are being damaged and his speech is being chilled," Farbiarz wrote. "This adds up to irreparable harm." The judge also barred the administration from deporting Khalil on the grounds that his presence was allegedly adverse to US foreign policy. "This is the news we've been waiting over three months for," Khalil's wife, Dr Noor Abdalla, said on Wednesday. "Mahmoud must be released immediately and safely returned home to New York to be with me and our newborn baby, Deen." Neither the State Department nor the Justice Department, which represents the administration in court, immediately responded to requests for comment. Khalil was arrested on March 8 after the State Department revoked his green card. He has since been held in immigration detention in Louisiana. Khalil was the first known foreign student to be arrested as part of Republican President Donald Trump's bid to deport foreign students who took part in pro-Palestinian protests that swept US college campuses after Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel and Israel's subsequent military assault. The Hamas attack killed 1195 people, according to Israeli tallies, and Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza health ministry. The Trump administration cannot use US foreign policy interests to justify its detention of Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, a judge has ruled but stopped short of ordering Khalil's immediate release. US District Judge Michael Farbiarz in Newark, New Jersey, said his ruling would not take effect until Friday to give the administration the chance to appeal. Farbiarz wrote that the administration was violating Khalil's right to free speech by detaining and trying to deport him under a little-used provision of US immigration law granting the US secretary of state the power to seek the deportation of any non-citizen whose presence in the country is deemed adverse to US foreign policy interests. "The Petitioner's career and reputation are being damaged and his speech is being chilled," Farbiarz wrote. "This adds up to irreparable harm." The judge also barred the administration from deporting Khalil on the grounds that his presence was allegedly adverse to US foreign policy. "This is the news we've been waiting over three months for," Khalil's wife, Dr Noor Abdalla, said on Wednesday. "Mahmoud must be released immediately and safely returned home to New York to be with me and our newborn baby, Deen." Neither the State Department nor the Justice Department, which represents the administration in court, immediately responded to requests for comment. Khalil was arrested on March 8 after the State Department revoked his green card. He has since been held in immigration detention in Louisiana. Khalil was the first known foreign student to be arrested as part of Republican President Donald Trump's bid to deport foreign students who took part in pro-Palestinian protests that swept US college campuses after Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel and Israel's subsequent military assault. The Hamas attack killed 1195 people, according to Israeli tallies, and Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza health ministry. The Trump administration cannot use US foreign policy interests to justify its detention of Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, a judge has ruled but stopped short of ordering Khalil's immediate release. US District Judge Michael Farbiarz in Newark, New Jersey, said his ruling would not take effect until Friday to give the administration the chance to appeal. Farbiarz wrote that the administration was violating Khalil's right to free speech by detaining and trying to deport him under a little-used provision of US immigration law granting the US secretary of state the power to seek the deportation of any non-citizen whose presence in the country is deemed adverse to US foreign policy interests. "The Petitioner's career and reputation are being damaged and his speech is being chilled," Farbiarz wrote. "This adds up to irreparable harm." The judge also barred the administration from deporting Khalil on the grounds that his presence was allegedly adverse to US foreign policy. "This is the news we've been waiting over three months for," Khalil's wife, Dr Noor Abdalla, said on Wednesday. "Mahmoud must be released immediately and safely returned home to New York to be with me and our newborn baby, Deen." Neither the State Department nor the Justice Department, which represents the administration in court, immediately responded to requests for comment. Khalil was arrested on March 8 after the State Department revoked his green card. He has since been held in immigration detention in Louisiana. Khalil was the first known foreign student to be arrested as part of Republican President Donald Trump's bid to deport foreign students who took part in pro-Palestinian protests that swept US college campuses after Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel and Israel's subsequent military assault. The Hamas attack killed 1195 people, according to Israeli tallies, and Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza health ministry.

Judge orders US to release pro-Palestine protester
Judge orders US to release pro-Palestine protester

Perth Now

time5 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Judge orders US to release pro-Palestine protester

The Trump administration cannot use US foreign policy interests to justify its detention of Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, a judge has ruled but stopped short of ordering Khalil's immediate release. US District Judge Michael Farbiarz in Newark, New Jersey, said his ruling would not take effect until Friday to give the administration the chance to appeal. Farbiarz wrote that the administration was violating Khalil's right to free speech by detaining and trying to deport him under a little-used provision of US immigration law granting the US secretary of state the power to seek the deportation of any non-citizen whose presence in the country is deemed adverse to US foreign policy interests. "The Petitioner's career and reputation are being damaged and his speech is being chilled," Farbiarz wrote. "This adds up to irreparable harm." The judge also barred the administration from deporting Khalil on the grounds that his presence was allegedly adverse to US foreign policy. "This is the news we've been waiting over three months for," Khalil's wife, Dr Noor Abdalla, said on Wednesday. "Mahmoud must be released immediately and safely returned home to New York to be with me and our newborn baby, Deen." Neither the State Department nor the Justice Department, which represents the administration in court, immediately responded to requests for comment. Khalil was arrested on March 8 after the State Department revoked his green card. He has since been held in immigration detention in Louisiana. Khalil was the first known foreign student to be arrested as part of Republican President Donald Trump's bid to deport foreign students who took part in pro-Palestinian protests that swept US college campuses after Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel and Israel's subsequent military assault. The Hamas attack killed 1195 people, according to Israeli tallies, and Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, according to the Gaza health ministry.

Informal talks of EU security deal under way with Canberra
Informal talks of EU security deal under way with Canberra

The Advertiser

time10 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Informal talks of EU security deal under way with Canberra

Australia will push ahead with informal talks for a new security agreement with Europe which could involve future defence industry cooperation and intelligence sharing, the EU's top diplomat has confirmed. Gabriele Visentin, the European Union's ambassador to Australia, said both sides have agreed to informal talks about the prospect of a security pact after the EU floated the idea on the sidelines of Pope Leo XIV's inauguration in May. Mr Visentin said a potential deal would mirror similar agreements between the EU and other countries such as Japan and South Korea, which involve military exercises and other cooperation in areas of mutual interest. "It's not a military alliance. It's a partnership for co-operation on defence issues, including industrial things," the envoy told the National Press Club on Wednesday. "So there is no scope for an understanding in terms of transfer of troops or mutual help and mutual assistance." Prime Minister Anthony Albanese appeared to initially downplay the idea of a security pact with the EU after noting Australia already had similar agreements in place with other European countries, including Germany. Mr Visentin indicated he was optimistic the Albanese government would come around after Defence Minister Richard Marles held a recent meeting with the bloc's High Representative in Singapore. European countries are preparing to spend billions of dollars to rebuild their armies in the wake of reduced support from the US and Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Mr Visentin said a European security pact with Australia would be critical as Russia broadens its ambitions beyond Ukraine and China scales up its military posture in the Indo-Pacific. "I think that there are geopolitical tensions which are aiming at reversing what the international rules-based order is, regardless of the actors. And I think that we have to team up to defend that," he said. In a thinly veiled reference to US President Donald Trump's trade tariffs, Mr Visentin also expressed concerns that rising "isolationism and protectionism" will see an increase in unfair trading practices. Mr Visentin confirmed ongoing disputes over negotiations for a free trade agreement between Australia and the EU were unresolved but encouraged both governments to "team up and defend tree trade." "Nothing has changed in terms of content. The differences are still there. And are still difficult to resolve and to address," he said. "What has changed, of course, is the willingness and the readiness to try to strike a deal. We have seen an incredible change in the geopolitics and in the world of trade." Australia will push ahead with informal talks for a new security agreement with Europe which could involve future defence industry cooperation and intelligence sharing, the EU's top diplomat has confirmed. Gabriele Visentin, the European Union's ambassador to Australia, said both sides have agreed to informal talks about the prospect of a security pact after the EU floated the idea on the sidelines of Pope Leo XIV's inauguration in May. Mr Visentin said a potential deal would mirror similar agreements between the EU and other countries such as Japan and South Korea, which involve military exercises and other cooperation in areas of mutual interest. "It's not a military alliance. It's a partnership for co-operation on defence issues, including industrial things," the envoy told the National Press Club on Wednesday. "So there is no scope for an understanding in terms of transfer of troops or mutual help and mutual assistance." Prime Minister Anthony Albanese appeared to initially downplay the idea of a security pact with the EU after noting Australia already had similar agreements in place with other European countries, including Germany. Mr Visentin indicated he was optimistic the Albanese government would come around after Defence Minister Richard Marles held a recent meeting with the bloc's High Representative in Singapore. European countries are preparing to spend billions of dollars to rebuild their armies in the wake of reduced support from the US and Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Mr Visentin said a European security pact with Australia would be critical as Russia broadens its ambitions beyond Ukraine and China scales up its military posture in the Indo-Pacific. "I think that there are geopolitical tensions which are aiming at reversing what the international rules-based order is, regardless of the actors. And I think that we have to team up to defend that," he said. In a thinly veiled reference to US President Donald Trump's trade tariffs, Mr Visentin also expressed concerns that rising "isolationism and protectionism" will see an increase in unfair trading practices. Mr Visentin confirmed ongoing disputes over negotiations for a free trade agreement between Australia and the EU were unresolved but encouraged both governments to "team up and defend tree trade." "Nothing has changed in terms of content. The differences are still there. And are still difficult to resolve and to address," he said. "What has changed, of course, is the willingness and the readiness to try to strike a deal. We have seen an incredible change in the geopolitics and in the world of trade." Australia will push ahead with informal talks for a new security agreement with Europe which could involve future defence industry cooperation and intelligence sharing, the EU's top diplomat has confirmed. Gabriele Visentin, the European Union's ambassador to Australia, said both sides have agreed to informal talks about the prospect of a security pact after the EU floated the idea on the sidelines of Pope Leo XIV's inauguration in May. Mr Visentin said a potential deal would mirror similar agreements between the EU and other countries such as Japan and South Korea, which involve military exercises and other cooperation in areas of mutual interest. "It's not a military alliance. It's a partnership for co-operation on defence issues, including industrial things," the envoy told the National Press Club on Wednesday. "So there is no scope for an understanding in terms of transfer of troops or mutual help and mutual assistance." Prime Minister Anthony Albanese appeared to initially downplay the idea of a security pact with the EU after noting Australia already had similar agreements in place with other European countries, including Germany. Mr Visentin indicated he was optimistic the Albanese government would come around after Defence Minister Richard Marles held a recent meeting with the bloc's High Representative in Singapore. European countries are preparing to spend billions of dollars to rebuild their armies in the wake of reduced support from the US and Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Mr Visentin said a European security pact with Australia would be critical as Russia broadens its ambitions beyond Ukraine and China scales up its military posture in the Indo-Pacific. "I think that there are geopolitical tensions which are aiming at reversing what the international rules-based order is, regardless of the actors. And I think that we have to team up to defend that," he said. In a thinly veiled reference to US President Donald Trump's trade tariffs, Mr Visentin also expressed concerns that rising "isolationism and protectionism" will see an increase in unfair trading practices. Mr Visentin confirmed ongoing disputes over negotiations for a free trade agreement between Australia and the EU were unresolved but encouraged both governments to "team up and defend tree trade." "Nothing has changed in terms of content. The differences are still there. And are still difficult to resolve and to address," he said. "What has changed, of course, is the willingness and the readiness to try to strike a deal. We have seen an incredible change in the geopolitics and in the world of trade." Australia will push ahead with informal talks for a new security agreement with Europe which could involve future defence industry cooperation and intelligence sharing, the EU's top diplomat has confirmed. Gabriele Visentin, the European Union's ambassador to Australia, said both sides have agreed to informal talks about the prospect of a security pact after the EU floated the idea on the sidelines of Pope Leo XIV's inauguration in May. Mr Visentin said a potential deal would mirror similar agreements between the EU and other countries such as Japan and South Korea, which involve military exercises and other cooperation in areas of mutual interest. "It's not a military alliance. It's a partnership for co-operation on defence issues, including industrial things," the envoy told the National Press Club on Wednesday. "So there is no scope for an understanding in terms of transfer of troops or mutual help and mutual assistance." Prime Minister Anthony Albanese appeared to initially downplay the idea of a security pact with the EU after noting Australia already had similar agreements in place with other European countries, including Germany. Mr Visentin indicated he was optimistic the Albanese government would come around after Defence Minister Richard Marles held a recent meeting with the bloc's High Representative in Singapore. European countries are preparing to spend billions of dollars to rebuild their armies in the wake of reduced support from the US and Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Mr Visentin said a European security pact with Australia would be critical as Russia broadens its ambitions beyond Ukraine and China scales up its military posture in the Indo-Pacific. "I think that there are geopolitical tensions which are aiming at reversing what the international rules-based order is, regardless of the actors. And I think that we have to team up to defend that," he said. In a thinly veiled reference to US President Donald Trump's trade tariffs, Mr Visentin also expressed concerns that rising "isolationism and protectionism" will see an increase in unfair trading practices. Mr Visentin confirmed ongoing disputes over negotiations for a free trade agreement between Australia and the EU were unresolved but encouraged both governments to "team up and defend tree trade." "Nothing has changed in terms of content. The differences are still there. And are still difficult to resolve and to address," he said. "What has changed, of course, is the willingness and the readiness to try to strike a deal. We have seen an incredible change in the geopolitics and in the world of trade."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store